|
|
Employee's View of Mystery Shoppers at Applebee's
Posted Mon October 20, 2008 12:00 pm, by Monika W. written to Applebee's International, Inc.
Write a Letter to this Company | Rate this Company
To Whom It May Concern,
I am writing this letter to express how I feel about the new "Mystery Shopper" experiences. I am a current employee and I have been told that if I recieve two bad grades from a secret shop I will be terminated.
I love my job. I do not feel that I am unable in any way in doing my job. I do however feel that if Applebees is based on teamwork, and the effort of every employee...then everyone should be held accountable.
I feel that when there are nights and I am alone (last server there) and I have over 6 tables, how am I expected to give awesome service? I have many faces in my postion at one point, like the following: Greeter, seater, server, expo line, and I have no complaints about that. I love the challenge. My own personal challenge is when I am triple sat, the other server has done their checkout, and therefore cannot place any orders. I am in the back prepping each plate, and I come out onto the floor only to see that I have many new tables. On top of this I might encounter a mystery shopper who is counting every minute.
I had an incident last night where I was triple sat. I took every order and I no more than prepare each drink (a total of 11) and the host walks into the kitchen to say that one of the tables is complaining that she has waited too long for her drink. HUH? Am I sure that this is a mystery shop? Of course not. My expressions are merely out of loyalty. I have been loyal to this comapany for some time now. I wish that I could express to each and every guest the importance of my job, but that is not want I am there to do.
I am writing this letter to you, Applebees International, Inc. because I am concerned that all of my hard work and loyalty goes out the window because I am handling many tasks so that the company can save on labor...yet I am risking my job. I do not feel that every factor is looked at when you are at an unfair advantage and the only server on the floor to serve every customer that may walk in. I could easily ask management for help, but they are really busy with paperwork.
I have not yet had a mystery shopper, and I try to give the best I can to everyone that walks in. I help to pay the bills with the company by upselling, and sales amounts, yet I will always have a noose around my neck and I think every factor should be looked out before someone is terminated. I just want to be heard. Thank you
Reply
| Log In/Create an account | 27 comments |
|
|
| PlanetFeedback Comments are subject to strict terms and conditions. We reserve the right to deny site membership privileges to any individuals acting inappropriately. |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
by moose 39 Posted Fri September 9, 2011 @ 2:31 AM
|
|
|
Very true sir.. I just got a mystery shop and I am not sure if I lost my job or not, my managers have to talk to one another to see if i was indeed the only server working and if I indeed did do the best I could under the circumstances. As much as I despise my General Manager I do need my job at this point in my life.. Please pray for me.
Thank uou
Reply
|
|
 |
|
|
|
Try this one:
I was given a written warning by my manager because I received a 20% out of 100% on a secret shop......I received this score because:
1)The only employees we had were the manager, assistant manager, and myself. The manager and assistant manager made plans to go do something together and i had to work by myself.
Did I mention it was Sunday?
2) Our secret shop consisted of several things: the most important were:
-Greeting within 20 seconds of walking in the door
-Starting a dressing room for the customer
-asking the customer if they needed different sizes
-explaining to them the belly pillow
-asking if they need to be fitted for a bra
-putting them on the mailing list.
-explaining to them the return/exchange policy
The only thing I got credit for was the mailing list, and the return/exchange policy because I couldn't move from behind the register for 4 hours I had a sale every few minutes.
So I got in trouble because nobody could bring themselves to come to work, so I couldn't do my job.
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
by Kelshir Posted Wed October 22, 2008 @ 9:13 AM
|
|
|
Mystery Shoppers, the hate of almost every retail/food industry worker.
In many ways I am lucky, mystery shops where I work used to be heavily slanted against the employees, but in the past year they changed the questions so much to help employees.
Mystery shoppers are really good in theory and can be a huge help to a business if done right or if you have a good person doing the mystery shop.
I do not like the idea of terminating someone because of just a few bad mystery shops, especially if you are working the floor alone. It sounds like Applebee's needs to rethink/rework their mystery shop program.
Reply
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|
|
by Final Score: Boys-3, Girls-1 Posted Wed October 22, 2008 @ 8:20 AM
|
|
|
The idea of mystery shoppers is a good one, although very flawed. I also work for a casual dining chain that uses them, HOWEVER, they do not fire anyone for failing the shop. That's a horrible idea.
I once had a shopper lie and say that I did not suggestively sell her a drink. But she had shown up late to her own "shop" (she was with a friend who got there first), and I had sat down with the friend and gone over the whole drink menu before she got there. That bad mark was amongst other things, that had to do with the hostess, manager, and other employees.
The only thing that would get you fired from one of our shops is if you don't card the shopper. The policy is "Card anyone who looks under 40", and the shoppers they send in are all around 28 or so. Don't card one? Fired on the spot. This has happened to three or four servers since I have been there.
But the points on the shop would never get us fired. I agree, wait times, cook times, the condition of the bathroom (which the employees aren't even allowed to use/mess up), and the actions of other employees should NEVER have an effect on a server's livelihood.
Good letter, Monika, I hope the adjust their mystery shopper policy.
Reply
|
|
 |
|
|
by G D. Posted Wed October 22, 2008 @ 7:20 AM
|
|
|
I work for a company that uses mystery shoppers, and I also work for a mystery shopper company.
I believe that mystery shopper reports shouldn't have a bearing on anything other than the fact, that is how that person saw the company at that time on that day. It is the opinions and views of the shopper, and they can have financial effects on employees. In my store staff can earn a 10% bonus (on top of wages), the manager an additional 1% of sales, one of the criteria is the mystery shopper.
Things happen in life beyond the control of the business.
People call in sick, days, hours, minutes are extremely busier than expected, mistakes happen.
How can I acknowledge someone if they are at the back of a queue within 20 seconds, if it takes longer to serve the x customers infront, with full staffing capabilities.
Mystery shoppers have so much power, paid little, and can have an extreme effect financially and on the morale of a team. They are not vetted on their professional judgement or experience, and who is there to defend you should their report be inaccurate.
The reports should have less relevancy, but that the criticism should not be ignored, in that pro active action is taken to correct these. Disciplinary action is extreme but should be only merited if there is an extreme catalogue of failures in work in general.
The OP is completely correct that the team is essential to all mystery shops, so why should the server suffer the repercussions of a team failure. Good letter highlighting genuine concerns.
Reply
|
|
 |
|

|
by MayDay Posted Tue October 21, 2008 @ 8:39 PM
|
|
|
When I worked in optical the company would pull this mystery shopper on us too. It really doesn't help morale when all the employees get yelled at b/c we didn't greet person within 30 seconds and so on and so forth.
Most of it was petty stuff and who knows if the mystery shopper even remembered who did what. Some of it was out of our control such as the time it took for the glasses to come in. The mystery shopper stuff should end! I don't think it helps the employees at all..it only makes them upset.
Reply
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|
by Marty5223 Posted Tue October 21, 2008 @ 6:05 PM
|
|
|
I think mystery shopper companies are BAD.
The retail company I use to work for would use these shoppers.
We would catch them not telling the truth. You could often tell on slow days the mystry shopper was in our store. They were required to ask a question and when they would go dept to dept you could pick up on them.
They did as you say check to see how long before they are greeted. If you were doing stock work and so forth. If you offer to put it on the company credit card. One day we had just received and alert for a bad check writer. As management we were alerting the sales staff in small groups by going to each dept. This one shopper reported it on her shopping report. Well Duh if she had not been listening in she would not of heard it, and secondly it was something urgent that we were told to communicate by corporate security. Only reason she should of been concerned if she was the person writing bad checks.
More than once over the years we even caught the shopper not telling the truth.
We use to spot the shopper and watch to see what they said and how are staff handled them.
My theory if the store received perfect scores there would be NO NEED for their service.
So find something wrong even if you had to make it up was what the shopper would do.
I am all for real customers letting a company know how their service was...but NEVER for a company paying for untrained spies.
Spies that Lie!
We finally convienced our company after many years to fire the shopping service.
And like you say how fair is it that these people cause people to get fired or have bad reviews.
The phone surveys are ok, but I can see how someone might enter the wrong end of the scale by not paying attention.
Reply
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
|

|
by Elaine W. Posted Tue October 21, 2008 @ 1:11 PM
|
|
|
I agree. Our store has the survey on the bottom of the receipt for people to call in or get on the Net to fill out. We are graded by the score, not by any comments that are left. We have had a couple that even though it states that 5 is the best, 1 is the worst, gave us all ones, but then in the comments section wrote, "I love shopping at the New Albany Meijer!" so you know it was just a goofup. They also don't take into account that people might have called off or you get unexpectedly slammed and that causes delays for even the best workers.
The servers (or in our case the Service area workers) tend to take the blame for alot that is beyond their control. It isn't fair and your job shouldn't be on the line for something like this.
Reply
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|
|
by shewakesupl0nely Posted Tue October 21, 2008 @ 9:29 AM
|
|
|
At our restaurant they have stupid things like that too. It's also a corporate chain restaurant. One guest complained that the coffee should be complimentary and because the waitress charged him he called corporate and she was fired. Even though coffee isn't free and we're told to charge for it.
Reply
|
|
 |
|
|
|
It's really unfortunate when quality programs which could really be used to help a company, team, and individual, devolve into something that is seen as punitive. Here, the OP has been told that 2 bad scores means you get the boot, rather than having the management team say "we have a really great new way of seeing our service the way our customers see it. Won't we get some fantastic learnings about what we can do better?"
You make some excellent points. As a consumer, I can tell you that when a service person takes an extra 10 seconds to make a bit of a connection with me (a smile, a sincere how are you, explaining that it's a bit backed up and that you'll be right with me, etc.), I'm a lot more forgiving when things are a bit slow. Problems happen -- everyone understands that. How we react to problems is how we set the bar of service.
Reply
|
|
 |
|
|
|
that a mystery shopper would be required to grade each aspect of the restaurant and not hold one person accountable for the entire operation.
I suspect your management was merely letting you know that if you specifically are singled out as not performing well on a mystery shop that you get 2 chances and then you are gone. NOT that you are to be the only one on the hook for an overall bad grade.
Mystery shoppers are not like average guests. They are trained to understand that slow drinks may mean the bar is backed up, poorly prepared food indicates an issue in the kitchen. They don't pin everything on the server like some customers do.
I would just continue to give the same good service you have been and not let it bother you. There's no way the restaurant will lose a strong staff member over something beyond their control.
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
Mystery shoppers take much care in how they rate any restaurant or business. They use their judgement on things such as low staff, menu items that are not available, the way the staff treat each other along with other issues that may come up.
You cannot work being so paranoid. Just take care of your customers and make sure you do the best you can in your job. If you can go over and above, do so. Help another staff member if you are able.
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|

|
by Donno Posted Mon October 20, 2008 @ 11:38 PM
|
|
|
I suppose this is possible, but it makes sense this would be done in prime time. To do it when there is only one server on would be a trifle unfair.
Reply
|
|
 |
|
|
|
What an interesting letter! Thank you for writing it. It seems that mystery shopping is to waitressing as standardized testing is to learning!
Reply
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
|
|
by MrsMootz Posted Mon October 20, 2008 @ 7:49 PM
|
|
|
I can see it from a bunch of sides. I was a mystery shopper at one time, in an attempt to be able to stay at home with my daughter and still earn some money.
Mystery shoppers are woefully underpaid, by the way, but that's beside the point.
The mystery shopper is given a set of guidelines to use for grading the shop and the guidelines are set by the companies paying for said shop. The shopper has no idea you are handling all this work, and should be using impartial judgement when putting scores together.
That being said, the store (Applebee's) has the responsibility of putting together a shop that does not penalize individual employees.
I think, used properly, mystery shops can be a great tool to see where a business needs improvement. However, I am a firm believer that mystery shops should NOT be used against employees, unless the employee is doing something egregious like flashing all the customers or being abusive.
Mystery shops should be used in order to fix issues so that better customer service can be provided to their clientele. However, they also need to be willing to see where problems lie and be willing to correct those problems. Using a mystery shop to terminate an otherwise good, stable, hard working employee is just wrong.
Reply
|
|
 |
|

|
by SumnerMan Posted Mon October 20, 2008 @ 6:02 PM
|
|
|
Great letter. I agree with you 100%. These mystery shoppers have no idea what your individual situation is. Like you said, it should be a team work sort of overall score. At Walgreens we have mystery shoppers also but at least they don't single you out by name (unless it's positive). They may single out your department and you know what time they were in the store (so management can pretty much guess who messed up) but at least Walgreens doesn't make these visits a condition of your employment. How freakin' horrible.
Reply
|
|
|
 |
|
|