|
|
Bank of America Still a Predatory Lender
Posted Thu May 7, 2009 12:00 pm, by Steve S. written to Bank of America
Write a Letter to this Company | Rate this Company
PREDITORY LENDER-LEWIS DID NOT TAKE OBAMA SERIOUS?
My wife and I both have BAC Credit Cards. Mine through Fidelity and hers direct. We use mine for almost all purchases because I get 1.5% back which goes into my Fidelity IRA. Balances are paid off in full each month. We have not used my wife's in over 6 months. Every so often BAC (yes, I recently bought the stock) sends out checks to use for cash advances or to pay off other credit cards. My wife and I both received some about 3-4 weeks ago. Of course we never would use them because I believe there is some sort of "advance fee" to use them, and like I wrote, we pay our balance every month.
Today, my wife receives a letter from BAC stating her credit limit was lowered from $10,000 to $6,500 because "of the way you have historically used your account". No problem there. Balance has never been that high anyway, and we really just keep the account open so my wife can have some credit on her own in case something ever happened to me. And with BAC needed 79 BILLION DOLLARS of Taxpayer money to stay afloat, I certainly can understand them lowering credit limits.
Now, here's the problem. Why didn't BAC lower the credit limits BEFORE sending out the Cash Advance Checks? Had we used them like I'm sure many people have, then we might be over our limit at this time. I know Mr. Lewis and the CEO's of a lot of the larger banks recently had a meeting with President Obama about this type of predatory lending. I suppose Mr. Lewis didn't take Mr. Obama seriously. Maybe BAC will need to become nationalized before they do take Obama serious.
Nothing. I've voiced my concerns. Now I just have to decide if I should keep out accounts and the stock as I'm not sure I wish to associate with this type of company.
Reply
| Log In/Create an account | 10 comments |
|
|
| PlanetFeedback Comments are subject to strict terms and conditions. We reserve the right to deny site membership privileges to any individuals acting inappropriately. |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
by daphany p. Posted Thu June 11, 2009 @ 7:45 AM
|
|
|
I am so sorry this has happened to you. Unfortunately, this bank is so desperate for money that they are willing to screw over their customers.
Way to to go Bank of America.
Reply
|
|
 |
|

|
by Kemp Posted Fri May 8, 2009 @ 9:37 PM
|
|
|
I think I can top your story. Because of non-usage my BOA credit card account was cancelled. Two months later I received the same checks as you did.
Reply
|
|
 |
|

|
by PepperElf Posted Fri May 8, 2009 @ 5:45 PM
|
|
|
O gawd ... no we don't need a nationalized bank. It's bad enough the government is taking over businesses. Considering all of the scandals and political biases and kickbacks in the government, I really don't think they'd know how to manage a single cow, let alone taking over all of the banks and industries. And I'd rather not have them directly in control of my money... never know when one of them might decide to "dip" into our funds because they decide that their pet project deserves it more than we do.
However as for using those checks... it is the individual's responsibility to use those responsibly.
Reply
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|
|
by hussyinterrupted Posted Fri May 8, 2009 @ 12:50 PM
|
|
|
How do you know that if you would have used those checks your credit limit would have been lowered? Like you said yourself, your limit was lowered because you rarely ever use the card. Maybe if you would have used those checks, you wouldn't have qualified to have your limit lowered since you would have been using the account.
Moreso, your card has a zero balance so there was absolutely no risk that the would be "preying" on you by lowering your limit. You don't know the criteria the company used to lower the credit limit so you don't know that they are "preying" on anyone.
There are too many variables in this situation and absolutely no evidence that BOA is infact preying on anyone to accuse them of something like this.
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|

|
by Chris M Posted Fri May 8, 2009 @ 9:47 AM
|
|
|
because I think, so what? Much ado about nothing?
The checks arrived before the credit limit decrease. Who cares. They printed in mass separate from mailings about specific credit line decreases. If you got the checks and used them, you would be fine. If you were at $9,000 balance with a $10,000 credit limit, and they lowered your credit limit to $6,500, they will not charge your an over limit fee. As far as I understand with my cards, you would pay per your terms, and as long as you were paying AND not charging more until you were under your new limit, you would not have any problems at all.
Reply
|
|
 |
|
|
|
Good letter, and I agree with your point re: the checks and then the lowering of the limit.
Signed,
Another American Against Every Penny of the Bailout
Reply
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|

|
by Donno Posted Thu May 7, 2009 @ 8:54 PM
|
|
|
I use my non-BoA card in a very similar manner to how you use yours, and enjoy a nice cash rebate feature.
I never use those checks (there is a fee), I pay my balance every month, and some of my cards I rarely use, same as you. I recently had my first credit limit reduction, on a card I rarely use. Like you, it won't affect me. They say you should use a card at least once every 6 months to keep the bank happy.
Now here's the thing: those cash advance checks come regularly, I'd say every two months and sometimes every month for each card.
Are the checks for an unlimited amount (I have never looked)? If your balance is zero on this rarely used card, you would have to write a very large check to trip the old or new limit, right? My guess is there is likely no connection between the timing of the checks and that reduction. Those darned useless checks just come, and create a disposal security hazard. Worse than junk mail.
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|