|
|
Please Refund the Overdraft Fees, Bank of America
Posted Mon May 7, 2007 12:00 pm, by James D. written to Bank of America
Write a Letter to this Company | Rate this Company
On May 1, 2007 I was charged a total of seven overdraft fees totaling $245.00. These fees where charged for transactions that posted to the account on the same day as a direct deposit from my employer. I called one of your customer service reps on May 2nd and was told that because I had previously been issued a credit I was no longer able to get a complimentary refund for the fees. I asked the customer service rep why I had been granted a refund in the past and they informed me that there was no set policy but they were unable to help me at this time. I told the rep on the phone that in 2006 several similar instances had been refunded and they informed me that the people who did it before where probably reprimanded for not following procedures and they had no idea why they would do such a thing. I asked if it was because they where being nice and the rep agreed. I then asked why this particular rep wouldn't be nice and they said they didn't have to be because it was a bank policy. On March 21, 2007 I was charged $105.00 for a similar event when a deposit was made the same day before the funds where withdrawn and was told by a representative at the Clayton, Missouri brand that she could refund them. This never happened. In the last two months I have been charged a $35 fee seventeen (17) times for fees totaling $595.00. This has caused me a great deal of financial difficulty and has perpetuated a cycle of overdrafts. I have been a Bank of America customer for some time and would like to continue holding an account there. I know that there is a policy in place to charge these fees, but there is also an unknown or undisclosed policy that allows you to refund them as well. I realize that I am asking you for a favor, but as a longtime account holder I feel justified in asking.
I would like you to credit all of the fees incurred in the last 2 months totaling $595 to my account. I feel that once these fees are refunded I will be able to recover financially and will have a better chance of maintaining my account in the future.
James D
Reply
| Log In/Create an account | 66 comments |
|
|
| PlanetFeedback Comments are subject to strict terms and conditions. We reserve the right to deny site membership privileges to any individuals acting inappropriately. |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
by cherbeth Posted Wed November 4, 2009 @ 3:33 PM
|
|
|
I was just charged 5 over draft fees totaling $175 for items that were paid from my account. There was enough money in the account to cover 4 of them. They could have returned the other one (which was the largest) and I would have only been charged one time. Instead I was told that because other customers prefer that the largest amount be paid first in case it is a mortgage or car payment that is what they did with my account. I don't give a rat's arse what other people want. Common sense would have told them to return one item and pay the other 4. I know I was wrong by letting my account go into the negative but I think we can all agree these are hard times. I chatted with a BofA customer service rep who told me they could refund me one charge of $35. Yipee. I'm going to try going to my branch tomorrow to see what they can do but I'm guessing nothing. To top it off their advice was to stop using the account until it is current. Really? Now what great advice. The only thing is how am I going to get it current when I am charged these outrageous fees everyday?
Reply
|
|
 |
|
|
by Bank W. Posted Wed August 12, 2009 @ 3:47 PM
|
|
|
We should all band together and form an organization so when this type of thing happens we take our business else where. Because obviously the government is not on our side they gave bank of america billions in our taxes our money and they turnaround can't refund a overdraft fee. They allow these banks to charge any amount of overdraft fees no limit. So they can actually charge 10 overdraft fees in one day. That is over 350 dollars, they lie deposit before 8 pm post the same day, also on an overdrawn account they give 5 days to deposit the same. You then make the deposit and place a hold on your account without your knowledge and thus more fees.
Reply
|
|
 |
|
|
by Mark B. Posted Wed July 15, 2009 @ 6:43 PM
|
|
|
Bank of America is the the worst bank period...I once told an agent during a heated discussion regarding their very very fine print NSF policies that, "I need another job just to bank here"...but what can you say Banks have to much power and this is the result, honest tax paying citizens are left helpless. But whats unlawful when no law exist? I have a BA in accounting and a BOA representative once told me, when I pointed out there shady NSF policies, that I didn't know how to balance a check book, hah. The moral of the story is you can't trust ANY bank or financial institution to express care or concern for your assets, they're in business to make money by taking yours!!!
Reply
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|
|
by Ines P. Posted Wed June 10, 2009 @ 11:27 AM
|
|
|
James,
I totally understand what you are saying. I was just charged 117.00 to my accuont in over draft fee's because my bank was too slow to put in the amount that was in my account I put more then this amount into my account and for some reason it is not adding up. I am with TCF, and they are not really any better. Personally I think we need to go back to a time were we stuffed money into our matresses because then at least we knew exactly how much we had in our accounts without the delay of systems and beurocratic idiocies.
Reply
|
|
 |
|
|
by Tunisha P. Posted Sun April 26, 2009 @ 5:14 PM
|
|
|
Recently, Bank of America has started new posting practices that cause its customers to incur several overdraft fees for a single transaction and no customer service representative can explain how this new practice is logical. I incurred $105.00 in overdraft fees without any logical explanation. Even after using the new online banking feature which allows one to see what triggered an overdraft fee, it just doesn't make since.
In March, I had an unauthorized transaction post to my account. I called and spoke with a representative who overturned one of the fees associated with this transaction. I also called to dispute the item and a temporary credit was posted to my account until the issue is resolved.
In April, I was charged the additional unrelated fees because of a $51 pending transaction that I had authorized. I called and spoke with a representative and asked why I was charged fees when the transaction had not even posted yet and I had already transferred the money in from my savings to cover the transaction. She explained that the new policy is that even when funds are on hold they are just as good as gone and fees will be incurred for any pending transactions that exceed the available balance, even if the money is put in after the transaction is made. She explained this is because the money was not available at the time of the authorization. She further stated that she could not overturn any of the transactions because I had already received a courtesy credit. When I told her why I had received the credit, she sympathized and apologized but still stated there was nothing that she could do as it was recorded as a courtesy credit and I should try back after the situation was resolved with the disputes department. I was upset but said okay thank you for letting me know; I was unaware of this new practice and will try back later.
The very next day my check went into my account direct deposit and I was charged yet an additional $35 overdraft fee. I called to find out why and was told that it was because (conveniently for Bank of America) the same $51 transaction was posted after the first two overdraft fees had posted and had taken my account under. (If this sounds complicated and confusing, it's because it is and doesn't make sense even to the representatives)
I was basically charged all of these fees due to deceptive posting practices. If you felt it was logical to charge me overdraft fees because this money was authorized, how do you also feel is it also logical to the post overdraft fees for this transaction and then post the transaction itself and charge me an additional fee? It would be more logical to post the transaction and then the fee. However, I understand that in that case you'd be responsible for any fees associated with your posting an overdraft fee to my account; although, if it had been done in this manner, there would be no fees at all because the money was available to cover the transaction.
It is deceptive and will only earn this a bad reputation. I've been with Bank of America for years and cannot afford to continue taking this type of abuse that is causing me to be financially vulnerable. Please refund the fees associated with this transaction.
Reply
|
|
 |
|
|
by debra c. Posted Fri April 3, 2009 @ 1:00 PM
|
|
|
You advertise that you care, I see the commercials. You advertise on the web "WE WANT TO HELP"!
REALLY! I don't think so! I hope our government does look into the practices on rates and fees banks and credit cards are able to impose on us.
You all make it impossible to get caught up and out of debt. You choose not to work with us! You choose not to assist us when we need it the most.
I don't think any of these individuals said anything about going days, weeks or months leaving accounts overdrawn with no money to cover checks they have written. That is punishable by law, writing bad checks. All of these individuals have placed money in the account to cover their debts/checks. Imposing one fees is all that is necessary to make a statement and a point. Not one for every check/debit, that in my opinion is crazy and just another way to make money for you.
So many people are filing bankruptcies and losing everything. Would you rather have bankruptcies where you collect nothing, or work with us and get your money with minimal fees.
I have a businesss credit card, and am having a rough time right now in business. I finally got a check from a customer and put it in the bank the day other debits and checks hit the bank. That money was supposed to pay my credit card payment to you! I had to call your credit card department and tell them, they had taken my credit card payment in fees the day before. My credit card is not 30 days late, and will stay that way as I have not additional funds to cover it. Your fees will ruin my credit. I have been a 6 year customer and have run into hard times, and you DO NOT CARE!
Thanks for letting me sound off! I too will be moving my banking out of Bank of America, and as I said to them on the phone I now know why everytime I go into the bank someone is in there arguing with a teller or rep! I NOW UNDERSTAND!
To those of you who are not experiencing these difficult times and have posted here it is our fault for those fees. I HOPE YOU DO NOT HAVE TO WALK IN OUR SHOES!
Financially at a loss!
Reply
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|
|
by begbie1 Posted Wed January 21, 2009 @ 1:12 PM
|
|
|
I have also heard that there is a class action law suit against Bank of America over the Overdraft Fees scam? Let me know if anyone else has heard this.
Reply
|
|
 |
|
|
by begbie1 Posted Wed January 21, 2009 @ 1:11 PM
|
|
|
January 2009, I have 15 overdraft fees withing 21 days. I called customer service, no refund was given. I do all my banking online, rarely keep a ledger. A check tried to go through when funds were not available, so a hold was put on the check while transactions were allowed to go through. When funds were available, the check finally went through. I got charged 7 overdraft fees for this one instance. Online banking shows no negative balance during this time. The representative said they were doing me a favor by holding it while still allowing other transactions to go through. And then charging me $245.00. I've never felt so good in my life.
There is a feature that will turn off the 'Bank of America will take care of you if you under, but turn around and stick it in and break it off' policy. I had them do this to my account, because if a check bounces, that's 25.00 and I get a 'Sorry your card was declined' at the gas station vs. BoA takes a chunk of my arse.
Reply
|
|
 |
|
|
by bank of Posted Sun December 7, 2008 @ 10:55 PM
|
|
|
I live on a small ss check , am elderly and my husband recently passed away. We took this account out when boa was equitable trust, and have had the same account for over thirty years. Two weeks ago, I checked my account as usual online, noticed that I had a check cleared in "pending" leaving me a balance of 84 dollars, I transferred 50 dollars from another account, and left the house to go shopping . While out I used my check card for items totalling 142dollars, so when I got home I put in another nine dollars making my balance show as 27 cents. Two days later, that is what the account continued to state, 27 cents, then suddenly on saturday, four days after my shopping trip, I opened the online page and saw three overdraft charges, the first one for 25 and two for 35 each. The check that cleared that morning four days before was charged an overdraft fee, leaving every thing above it to bounce. . No one can convince me that this is fraudulent practice and designed to hurt those less likely to fight back, the very young and the elderly. BOA charges me nine dollars a month, even though I have direct deposit of my ss check. That nine dollars was put in on the SAME DAY, but marked as the next day, it was transferred from another account and should have been immediately available. Since this instance I have deliberately transferred money from one account to another and notice it is PENDING. Why should a boa account transferring money to another boa account be PENDING? Don't tell me it's my fault, I was withing twenty seven cents , even by their records for three days, then 94.73 in the red after 95 dollars worth of charges. If they felt I was really 8.73 short, why did they allow me to continue to use my debit card? They thrive on these horrible practises. I will tell you it was upsetting, very, very upsetting, it cost me the right to purchase a gift for my grandchild for Christmas. I KNOW of people who have had their fees reversed, they won't do it if you are weak on their economic rung scale.
Reply
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|
|
by Justice P. Posted Sat October 18, 2008 @ 10:10 AM
|
|
|
Bottom LINE. Bank of America is scamming its hard working customers........
On October 18,2008 to my dismay to date I have been charged 13 Overdraft fees totaling $455. They are scam artist and they do not care about their customers. They are sooooo fradulent, they have made billions, upon billions of dollars off of overdraft fees! This makes noooo sense at all! They scam their customers and have no problem doing it. They will give you the "you need to monitor your transactions speech" but the truth is they make a third of there revenues off this practice so they will continue. Unless you have Boku dollars and are not living from pay check to pay check (which is not the case for average Americans) do what I am about to do, and that is withdraw every penney and run as fast as you can before they find another reason to reach into your pockets and take your hard earned money!!!!!!
Reply
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
by jimbo75 Posted Thu July 31, 2008 @ 12:17 AM
|
|
|
I hate Bank of America. They have caused me so much stress in my life you have no idea. They will do everything possible to charge customers overdraft fees. For example, instead of posting credits first and then debits, it's the opposite. Debits are posted first and then credits. I did an online transfer from my savings to my checking at around 11 pm. Seven transactions came pending after midnight. This stupid bank instead of posting my transfer first (credit) posted the debits, thus charging me seven overdraft fees. At this bank it really depends who you talk to. I decided I was going to fight this to the end. Th overdrafts were over $300. I went to two local branches and spoke to the manager who told me that they go into some decision database and the decision came back negative to refund me any overdrafts because i was given one three months ago for a transaction of $2.25. I went to another local branch ans spoke to manager and she said that she would refund me two fees but that she had to close my checking account and open a new one in order for her to refund fees. I said no no. Then, i went to another local branch and spoke to a very nice carismatic guy who understood what happened to me and he was kind enough to refund me six fees. Conclusion here is at bank of america if one person doesn't help you don't stop there, go to the next one. They have the power to refund fees.
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
by mcdmario Posted Fri May 16, 2008 @ 8:47 AM
|
|
|
Heres how it works......Every Bank
You are not charged fees when things post the same day. Credits post before debits.
Most likely the items actually posted the night before (which you didnt see until the next day). Meaning that you were actually a day late.
My advice for you is to look deep and place blame where it belongs on yourself for not managing your accounts properly. Dont write checks out until the funds are already there. End of story, quickest way to avoid fees at any bank!!
Reply
|
|

|
McDmario
by DLee55 Thu August 7, 2008 @ 2:56 PM
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|
|
by Kenneth B. Posted Wed April 2, 2008 @ 11:26 AM
|
|
|
I have paid Bank of America over $2000 in overdraft fees in the past 12 months, they usually hit me for around $250 at a time. It really hurts when you are constantly trying to catch up and it holds you back even more and you overdraft again for another $250. This is the kind of thing that would put an end to most people. I had signed up for overdraft protection at one point too but i guess it's not set up properly. I have seen them literally move 5 or 6 super small transactions into the negative(after my account bottomed out) to make them show under overdraft even though they were posted before my account actually went negative. I don't know what to do. I'm going to close all 4 of my accounts and leave them.
Reply
|
|
 |
|
|
by Johnny Lick Posted Wed October 31, 2007 @ 1:12 PM
|
|
|
You miss the point.
It has nothing to do with whether or not his guy should have bounced a check or two. Of course not. The point is the manipulative methods the banks use to process transactions to maximize fees. There is no doubt it's a deceptive practice roughly equivelent to payday loans.
Your argument consists of everyone keeping a cushion and not spend more than they have. Well, I hate to tarnish your silver spoons but not everyone has a cushion income and many live paycheck to paycheck. If they mak a mistake in transactions by spending $200, $10 and $5 when they only have $209 in the bank why should they have to pay $70 worth of overdraft fees ($35 x2 for $10 and $5) when the transactions could clear in the opposit order.
The answers simple - Banks want to extract the maximum fees possible for their benefit at the expense of the consumer.
And the orginal Author is right, the banks do lie about it. They tell you "It's for your own good. We don't want your car payment bounce". The reality is all those tr4ansactions are going to clear anyway, they are selecting the order for their benefit against their customers best interest. That's what this is all about, the banking industry taking advantage of those customers who can least afford it.
If you still argue "personal finance! personal finance!" then you are still too heartless to get the point and should probably work for the bank. They are the enemy of consumers in every way.
Reply
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
by becky wilkes Posted Thu May 31, 2007 @ 10:58 AM
|
|
|
I did an online chat session with a Bank of America Customer Service rep. He confirmed what I knew about Direct Deposits: I copied and pasted the conversation. Read below:
Ryan: Hello! My name is Ryan. Thank you for choosing Bank of America's Online Banking Text Chat. We do value your business. To begin, could you please provide your complete name as it appears on your statement?
you: When two transactions come into the Bank on the same day, a Credit and a Debit-which do you process first?
you: Sally
Ryan: Thank you Sally. I can certainly help you with that. What type of credit is it? Deposit?
you: A Direct Deposit -paycheck from my employer
Ryan: It could depend on when the deposit is processed. If it is processed overnight like most direct deposits are, the deposit would post first.
you: Do I have full access to my Direct deposited paycheck on the day it is processed?
Ryan: Yes you would.
you: It is only with checks that are deposited at an ATM that you don't have full access to the funds, right?
Ryan: That is correct.
Reply
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|
|
by becky wilkes Posted Thu May 31, 2007 @ 10:45 AM
|
|
|
This has happened to me many times by Bank of America. The point is that when there is a debit and credit to the account on the same day, Bank of America will process the debit first. I work for the State of Kansas and my HR person told me that my paycheck is deposited into my account in the early morning-around 2-4 a.m. So, then Bank of America employers process transactions in the morning-they are purposely processing Debits before Credits.
It is simply a matter of Bank of America making money off of its customers. It is GOOD accounting practices to process a Credit first and then a Debit. My roommate used to work at Bank of America. She told me that she quit working there because Bank of America takes advatage of customers by processing Debits before Credits. When my paycheck is directly deposited in my checking account-I have access to those funds the same day. It is only with checks that you deposit into an ATM-that you don't have full access to your money. If it is true that you don't have full access to your direct deposited paycheck, then Bank of America shouldn't have full access to your funds as well. Afterall- The State of Kansas isn't paying Bank of America, it's paying me. There are many people who have their bills directly withdrawn from their bank account on the same day that they get paid. If you were performing these transactions in your checking account, you would credit your account first-before paying out money for bills. There are other banks out there that respect their customers and don't take advantage of them. I suggest switching banks. Bank of America is a huge corporation and they became that way because they take advantage of their customers. They are not to be trusted. Many people have had good success with local Credit unions.
Reply
|
|
 |
|
|
by JWolfe Posted Wed May 23, 2007 @ 2:55 PM
|
|
|
I as well have been through the EXACT SAME SITUATION, only a bit more. I bank with Wells Fargo and in a string of bad luck and Wells Fargo kicking me while I was down was charged around $300 in overdraft fee's. Even though my account was only $100 under. They refused to remove the charges. I informed them that this would happen again because I was going through hard times, unless the fees were removed. They did not remove them and I went under during my next pay period.
However, this time accruing almost $700 in overdraft fees for only being under by $200. Which I only took out because I knew I would need money for the rest of the week. So here's what happened.
READ THIS!!! !! THIS IS HOW BANKS WORK !!
I had a series of small debit charges: $5-$10-$20 lunch and grocery charges. What they did was take my LAST transaction of $200 and remove that off my account first immedietly putting me in the negative then charge me $34 per each little transaction that went through after that. They take the largest transaction and credit against your AVAILABLE balance first, that way they can maximize the overdraft fees. Had they processed the transaction in the order the occured I would have been charge $34 not over $650.
!! READ THE ABOVE PARAGRAPH!!THIS IS HOW BANKS WORK!!
When I called them about this they told me because this was my fault, they could not remove any charges and I've just finished paying TODAY the overdraft fees. I hate Wells Fargo, but after researching other banks, I'm not sure I could switch to them either. I've been a customer with Wells Fargo since I was 16 and that's how they treat they're long time customers.
Reply
|
|
 |
|
|
by 20yrs Posted Sat May 12, 2007 @ 8:31 AM
|
|
|
My friend went through the same experience. Also occurring over the last few months. There were holds placed on his account he was unaware of, they never showed on his online banking and cost him a lot of money. He also had his rent check returned to the real estate company and almost was evicted. That was when he said good-bye. That kind of service is uncalled for. He too called everybody all of whom could not give him an answer jsut kept transferring him. They even went so far as to lie and tell him they do not manage their ATM machines it is a different company and they only empty it once a week. How do they maintain an accurate daily balance of accounts that way? Sounds very fishy to me. Also, several people have told me not to use that bank. Surprised there are not more complaints posted about them. Maybe the FDIC needs to be called to audit their consumer practices.
Reply
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
|

|
by Amanda Posted Thu May 10, 2007 @ 10:10 AM
|
|
|
As a bank teller...
Part of our growth of a bank is people who overdraft. It pays our stockholders. It allows us to have a budget to work with. They have already bent over backwards for you in the past. Why do they need to do it again? You are taking advantage of generosity.
Another rule of thumb. We have this disclosed in our account disclosures; Funds need to be in your account 2 days prior to transactions. I am going to assume it was check written. Don't write them until the money is there. Or if it was Debit card transactions, don't swipe unless you know it's there ahead of time.
Another thing to look into: See if BoA offers an overdraft protection line of credit. We offer it where I work. You apply for either a 500 or 1000 dollar line. When you overdfarft, there is no OD fee, they pull from the line. Then, on your statement closing date each month, they automatically withdraw 10% of the outstanding balance if you haven't made a payment. I have it, and it's a wonderful option. All you end up paying is 13% interest, which is usually less than one overdraft fee.
Reply
|
|
 |
|

|
by MA Loper Posted Thu May 10, 2007 @ 9:09 AM
|
|
|
Again, this is why companies don't do courtesy things for customers.
I would be willing to bet you your $245 in overdraft fees that the last time they reversed your fees, they explicitly told you it was a ONE TIME ONLY COURTESY refund. But you conveniently forgot that part, huh?
And yet you had the audacity to try and get them to do it again by asking why they did it the last time! Unbelievable!
Clearly you have a problem managing your money - that is not BOA's problem. You have not shown them that you have the sense and responsibility about you to handle your finances, so why should they take you on your word that if they cough up nearly $600 in charges that you incurred through your carelessness that you will somehow do better.
And all for a "chance" of you handling your financial affairs better going forward? I don't see that happening any time soon, James. You should be thankful they haven't closed your account altogether - you're a liability.
I can see this scenario now - if they cave and give you the $595, in 6 months, you'll be back on PFB again, promising to do better if they will refund you however much they charged you next time in overdrafts.
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|
by Alikat24 Posted Thu May 10, 2007 @ 6:57 AM
|
|
|
James,
I don't believe for one second that you deserve any credit. When the payments you set up came out of the bank the money was not there. Therefor they can either bounce the check or place you in overdraft. I think they fact they were willing to overdraft you is a sign that the bank is working with you, but under no circumstance should they refund the charges associated. If you are supposed to get paid on one day, then you set your payments up for the day after. It's very simple reasoning. Also you seem to have a history of doing this, why did you not learn the first time when they were willing to work with you? I work in a call center. If i saw someone with a history of getting credit for something, yet continues to behave the same way to incur the charges I would deny the credit as well. As obviously being courteous and giving you credit didn't teach you any better method of managing your money maybe paying the fees will !!
Reply
|
|
|
|
 |
|
by Peregrina Posted Wed May 9, 2007 @ 9:14 PM
|
|
|
Why should they? You expect them to basically fogive nearly $600, with no assurances or guarantees that you will do better in the future. I've been in your shoes and I did not blame the bank one bit when they - sent those guys out to break my knees - I mean, when they made it clear it was my mess and my responsibility to fix.
Stop whinging about your mistakes, get it fixed and the future take responsibility for your own actions.
Reply
|
|
 |
|
|
|
It sounds like BoA has been more than accommodating with you in the past with your spotty financial handling. I know it can be difficult managing finances if you are living on a paycheck to paycheck basis, but there are ways of dealing with the problems. For one, always, always, ALWAYS, write checks or make payments when you already have the money. Most utility companies and business of that nature will work with you to change the billing cycle to better accommodate your pay periods. You may also look into low-income and budget programs for utilities, as well as downgrading to more basic packages for the less necessary utilities (cable, cell phones, etc.). Budget yourself. Allow for money for needed expenses, food, etc. then save a little. Always save a little. It'll add up, and it's nice to have if an emergency arises. The $10 you were going to splurge and buy a meal out, or a cool T-shirt you saw, save it! Put it away and hold onto it. Start a savings account.
I don't think that BoA will work with you anymore, and you shouldn't use "maybes" to cushion your falls, because as you can now see, the safety net may not always be there. It's time to stand up and take personal responsibility for your finances.
Reply
|
|

|
lol
by MOMOFJJD Wed December 17, 2008 @ 6:42 AM
|
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|

|
by Gino Posted Wed May 9, 2007 @ 1:55 AM
|
|
|
Banks have tightened up policy over the past few years and while I can understand why this problem is happening, I really can't fault them for sticking to their policy. There's a point where they can no longer accomodate someone with "complementary fee refunds" and still operate efficiently as a profit making business. They have to raise the fees for everyone if all people banked on the 'wing and a prayer' theory of checkbook balancing or reconsider staying in business at all.
I have a feeling you may be young or new at banking. Maybe seek some advice from friends or family on the basics.
The way things work so quickly now with processing checks, the days of "grace periods" and "making nice nice" for customers are almost over.
Perhaps try some discipline, buld up a cushion in your checkbook, or even though it costs more, perhaps consider overdraft protection if all else fails
I wish you all the best and hope that this is a learning experience for you. Good luck.
Reply
|
|
 |
|

|
by Lee H. Posted Wed May 9, 2007 @ 1:32 AM
|
|
|
Oh James, what are you doing!?
Without reading everyone else's replies, I have to tell you that you need to learn financial management. You shouldn't be trying to time payments as you have been and are on the path to further problems.
BOA is in no way going to really want your business with you costing them so many difficulties.
Seriously, get some financial management help.
Reply
|
|

|
moron
by John V. Wed December 3, 2008 @ 12:38 AM
|
|
|
 |
|
|
by Cor H Posted Tue May 8, 2007 @ 7:53 PM
|
|
|
Utimately, the consumer has a responsibilty to educate him or herself regarding the terms of doing business with a company and doing his or her part to maintain that relationship amicably.
A bank should not have to hold the hand of a customer and protect him or her from repeated violations of their business agreement.
Employees are required to follow policies, however some allow a customer to browbeat them or elicit their sympathy in an attempt to get repeated exceptions to said policy.
From what the OP has written, the agreement to maintain the funds necessary to cover transactions has been violated repeatedly and employees have been more than accomodating in the past. The most-recent employee has decided that the accomodating needs to stop as the OP has failed to learn from the previous mistakes and seems to think that an exception to a policy is the rule. This failure to understand that making an exception to a policy is not policy itself manifests itself above when the OP writes that he asked why previous representatives accomodated him after being told that they were unable to make additional adjustments has he had been credited in the past.
The bank has not decreed that a certain number of overdrafts are allowed, but leave it to a representative's discretion based upon the history of the account.
If the bank regularly debits transactions before crediting direct deposits, I would advise making certain the deposit has been credited before authorizing any debits.
Reply
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
Also, writing checks that you don't have the money to cover them is called writing a cold check and it is illegal. You can go to jail if you write enough bad/cold checks and/or lose your check writing privileges.
Reply
|
|
 |
|
|
by A A Posted Tue May 8, 2007 @ 7:03 PM
|
|
|
Credit union is the way to go.
It's funny how checks you write clear immediately but checks you deposit don't use the same technology. It's funny how banks clear the largest amount first to cause an over draft and then clear the checks for $20 and $30 after causing them to be an overdraft.
It's funny how banks give you .09 % interest but if you want a loan find ways to justify 10 times that.
It's funny how Credit Unions work with you and yet somehow manage to stay in business.
Reply
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
by TwinkleToes Posted Tue May 8, 2007 @ 6:30 PM
|
|
|
This is why I LOVE my credit union. It may have inconvenient hours but they always credit before they debit. I think we have had 2 overdraft fees in the 6 years I have been there
That said, you should have a tighter hand on what is going on with your account. I'm not perfect, don't get me wrong. I've run it down to less than $20 but I know that I'm at $20... It would be nice of them to refund you but they aren't obligated. I doubt they will as $595 is an excessive amount. You aren't asking for one fee to be reversed. You are asking for MANY.
Either way, I hope you hear back from them. Perhaps they will be willing to work with you. Good luck.
Reply
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
PERSONAL ADULT RESPONSIBILITY!!!
Do I really need to say more?
Reply
|
|

|
Yes.
by TwinkleToes Tue May 8, 2007 @ 6:25 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
|
by freeby4me Posted Tue May 8, 2007 @ 1:56 PM
|
|
|
I would suggest closing your account and going back to the ole' cash in hand policy. Use money orders to pay your bills and use only cash at stores and such. That way you're not buying stuff you dont have the money for.
Reply
|
|

|

|
NO NO NO
by Amanda Thu May 10, 2007 @ 10:15 AM
|
|
|

|
Yes
by kujhac Tue October 14, 2008 @ 10:02 PM
|
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|
by S. Brown Posted Tue May 8, 2007 @ 11:58 AM
|
|
|
Seventeen overdrafts in two months? I'm sure it has been explained to you more than once that debits are processed before deposits and it's obvious you still don't comprehended this concept.
It doesn't matter how much financial difficulty this situation is causing you as you are the one that either wrote checks or authorized debits before your pay check was properly credited to your account - - and you have done this more than once or twice.
I see absolutely no reason why BofA should credit you the fees so you can recover financially and have a better chance of maintaining your account in the future. You letter states that BofA has already refunded overdraft fees for "similar instances" in 2006 so any break they are going to cut you has already been offered.
Sorry to sound so harsh but you obviously don't know how to handle your checking account and this is not justification for a complaint letter or a refund of 17 overdraft fees.
Reply
|
|
 |
|
|
|
I understand what you are going through. I used to bounce checks left and right and I was actually paying the bank more than what I was getting. But I learned to get a check balancing register and stop writing checks before my direct deposit hit the bank. It wasn't easy but I managed self control. If you get a check register and write every thing down in it and consult it before writing checks, and also don't do anything until you know the funds are posted and available, you shouldn't have any trouble.
I don't think you should have all the fees refunded. You were lucky to have one or two of them. You haven't shown that you are a good customer. You are a perpetual bouncer. You didn't learn you lesson after the first one or two, how do they know that you won't just do it again if given the refunds. I know that it is hard digging out of the overdraft hole, but BOA is not going to help, why stop there money flow.
I know that this isn't going to be easy for you, but you should really get a checking register and keep meticulous records, it really will help you in the long run. Try enrolling in a budgeting class also.
Reply
|
|
 |
|

|
by donno Posted Tue May 8, 2007 @ 11:04 AM
|
|
|
After seeing statements such as "This has caused me a great deal of financial difficulty and has perpetuated a cycle of overdrafts." I couldn't see looking at this letter with a critical eye.
Yes, a bank gives you one time to screw up. Mine did it about 6 years ago. I made a similar mistake two years later, and they said "sorry, we can't help you." I wasn't surprised - it was my mistake.
I learned my lesson after one charge. It hasn't happened again. You haven't learned a lesson. I know otherwise very nice and productive people, who unfortunately bounce checks and make late payments over and over again.
It sounds like you need to become more responsible with money.
Reply
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
"I feel that once these fees are refunded I will be able to recover financially and will have a better chance of maintaining my account in the future."
You haven't shown any indication of being able to do this up to now.
I've been there. I've been so deep in the overdraft heap that it took some serious digging to get myself out. When I think about all of the money that I lost due to my own negligence, it literally makes me ill.
I learned the hard way and it looks like you're headed in the same direction.
As everyone else has pointed out, don't use that debit or write checks or ANYTHING until you make sure that the cash is in the account.
Good luck.
Reply
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
|
|
|
It's time to start learning basic financial management: Don't cut withdrawals and payments so close to the deposit of funds. I don't understand why you didn't learn your lesson long ago! Do you just have money to throw at the bank?
Reply
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|

|
by calm Posted Tue May 8, 2007 @ 8:06 AM
|
|
|
James, you're doing something that you're not supposed to do: you're authorizing transactions before the money to cover them is cleared and in your account. You agreed when you started this account that they could charge you fees if you did that, and they're taking you at your word. They're exactly right that they don't have to refund you the money you agreed to pay: it is, after all money that you agreed to pay in the event that you spent more money than was actually in your account at the time that you spent it. Which you did.
It's not as if you're someone who never does this and to whom the bank may, as a courtesy, refund a fee or two. It sounds as if at one time you were that kind of customer and they did refund the fees. But by your own account you did this "several" times in 2006 and 17 times in the last two months. You've stopped being a good customer who made a mistake or two and become someone who expects the bank to cover overdrafts without getting anything out of it. Of course you are justified in asking -- you can always ask -- but they're also justified in telling you "No."
And they really don't care how much financial difficulty you've gotten yourself into. I get that you're pointing it out in order to make the case that you will be a better customer in the future if they do this, but your track record, and your failure to grasp why you shouldn't have authorized the charges before your employer's deposit posted kind of hints that you will not, in fact, be a better customer in the future. The bank is there to make money. One of the ways that it makes money is to allow people like you and me to overdraft our accounts and then instead of letting our creditors charge us NSF fees that BoA will never see, ensure that those fees are never an issue and charge us overdraft fees instead.
You've asked (which, as we have both said, you are perfectly justified in doing) and been turned down; I don't think this letter is going to get them to change their minds, so I would suggest that you quit authorizing charges on the day of your employer's direct deposit and wait until the funds are actually available to you before using them.
Reply
|
|

|
Overdraft
by Michael Krieger Thu May 10, 2007 @ 8:27 PM
|
|
|
|
|

|
evil
by xvjsfdjk xkbvsfk Tue October 30, 2007 @ 11:02 AM
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|