HOME SHARED LETTERS RATINGS MY PLANET COMMUNITIES MISSION SIGN UP!
Shared Letters

Join and browse our exclusive open discussion forums and talk about whatever you like.

Channels
» The Suggestion Box
» Company Responses
» PFB Feedback Line
» Consumer Podcasts
» Mommy Talk & Daddy Dialogue ™
» Shared Letters


Newsletter

Sign up for PlanetFeedback's "Consumer Café" email newsletter!





Best Buy, I Have Never Been So Disgusted With a Company Ever

Posted Mon April 30, 2007 12:00 pm, by Katherine V. written to Best Buy

Write a Letter to this Company  |  Rate this Company


I bought a camera from your company in August of 2006, less than a year ago. It was a Kodak EasyShare. I was willing to spend a good amount of money on this camera because I wanted to keep it for a long time. On top of the camera I bought an extended warranty. I was assured by my salesperson that this warranty would cover any type of damage. I even specifically asked him questions about dropping my camera in the toilet, or dropping it on the floor. I thought these situations were unlikely but I wanted to make sure everything was covered. I bought the warranty, feeling confident in the purchase of my product.
I have been extremely careful with my camera. I don't leave it in my car and i even have a camera case for it. However, even with my extremely cautious handling of my camera, the zoom lens stopped working about a month ago. I took my camera into the store to get it repaired or replaced, since that is what I was told would happen if the product was damaged. About two weeks after having my camera serviced, the company told me that I had corrosion damage and it was not going to be fixed or repaired. I asked the service representative how this could possibly happen if I took such good care of it. Basically, I was told that corrosion is just something that happens because the camera is never fully encased and any sort of moisture could damage it. I can tell you for a fact that I never had it in any humid or moist place. The representative then told me again that these things just happen naturally.
I have had problems with Best Buy before but I was sure this time your company would have stood by their product, since I was overly assured. Moreover this damage was not even my fault, even though I was told that damage that was my fault was covered by the warranty. I am disgusted by this experience. i am sure there are some people that can afford to constantly buy new cameras yearly, but I am not one of those people. Additionally, I will be graduating college this weekend and i don't have a camera becuase your company decided that they would not back their product you sell and the extended warranty you charge at an additional cost. I can honestly say that I have never in my life felt so taken advantage of on numerous occasions by one store. It makes me very discouraged to know that Best Buy is on top of the competition by using such dishonest tactics that take advantage of their customers.
I sincerely hope you have taken the time to read this, because maybe even then I would feel some sort of customer service. However, I still will never step foot into your store again and strongly encourage everyone I know to think twice about where they buy their expensive products from. Being that your company sells products that are easily damaged without misuse i do not think my friends and family would appreciate shopping at your store either.

Either Service and fix my camera or replace it with a new one, just like they told me would happen with an extended warranty.


Reply



Log In/Create an account | 25 comments
     Add to your del.icio.us  del.icio.us    Digg this story  Digg this  
PlanetFeedback Comments are subject to strict terms and conditions. We reserve the right to deny site membership privileges to any individuals acting inappropriately.
by MYANGEL Posted Fri May 4, 2007 @ 11:24 AM

I sure feel your pain! You know I am so tired of this type of thing
going on with companies, that I will not buy any extended warranty
anymore. There is ALWAYS some dang reason they refuse to fix
something. So I feel like why bother anymore.

Reply
by DeVoidx Posted Fri May 4, 2007 @ 2:10 AM

Best buy covers lots of things in their warranties, like power surges.
so if for some reason a lot more voltage than is supposed to were to
go into your camera and somehow fry it, they would cover it... you are
graduating college, figure it out.

Reply

by Lynn F. Posted Wed May 2, 2007 @ 12:42 AM

I think extended warranties can be helpful. I have a friend that just
had a washing machine replaced with a brand new one. Some people are
saying just the oposite and that you should never pay for a warranty.
What if a good company sold one of these warrantys for $1? I think
that would be great and wouldn't pass it up. You should just be
educated about it like you are the thing you are buying.

Im sorry to hear the problems you are having with your camera. get
another one for your graduation. That is once in a lifetime.

Reply


by donno Posted Tue May 1, 2007 @ 11:08 PM

Extended warranties are a cash cow for the companies selling them. I
would never, ever, under any circumstances, buy an extended warranty.

You seem to placing a lot of blame of Best Buy's doorstep. I wonder
if you should be complaining to Kodak?

Sears Hardware sells extended warranties at the cash register. I have
stood in line behind three people in a row who were offered extended
warranties. Much more profitable than placing racks of candy at the
checkout. How many candy bars = 1 year extended warranty on a hand
drill?

I think the reason you are so upset with Best Buy is the extended
warranty they sold you. Let this be a learning lesson - extended
warranties are designed to take your money and put it in someone
else's pocket.

You asked before you bought if dropping a camera in the toilet was
covered?

Reply

actually I slightly disagree by Angelic Princess:) Thu May 3, 2007 @ 12:20 PM

by MA Loper Posted Tue May 1, 2007 @ 9:04 PM

While you might THINK you are exceptionally cautious with your camera,
you'd be amazed how easily digital cameras can be damaged.

Sometimes just taking the camera from a cold environment to a slightly
warmer environment (I don't know where you live, so I don't know how
cold it gets there.) can cause that condensation they mentioned (I
know, I used to have to take pictures for work and sometimes we'd take
pictures outside the building and when I came back in , my lens would
fog up!)

And I hate to tell you, Kodak is kind of low on the quality scale as
far as digital cameras go, but if you want to get remedy on something
that appears to be a workmanship issue, you might consider contacting
Kodak instead.

Warranty or not, somethings just aren't covered and no amount of
complaining will get them to go against that.

Reply
by Angelic Princess:) Posted Tue May 1, 2007 @ 8:02 PM

Do you ever COMPLIMENT a company? and also, how long was the
extended warranty for?

Reply


by papaspot Posted Tue May 1, 2007 @ 6:26 PM

I consider Best Buy to be the Walmart of the electronics world. Their
prices may be a little bit lower than average but if you ever need any
kind of service (or if you need to talk to someone that knows jack
about the products they sell), you're outta luck. Calling the store to
see if they have an item in stock is a little bit different. With
Walmart, they'll tell you that they have it in stock (every time)
whether they do or not. With Best Buy, you'll never talk to an actual
human being.

Reply


Best Buy on Mopac Hwy. Austin - Texas by Bill R Tue May 1, 2007 @ 10:42 PM


Tulsa by papaspot Wed May 2, 2007 @ 4:46 PM

by mary jo Posted Tue May 1, 2007 @ 4:08 PM

I was pretty much with you up to this point:


"Being that your company sells products that are easily damaged
without misuse i do not think my friends and family would appreciate
shopping at your store either."


I have this same camera. I have no idea where it was bought from
because it was a gift. I have had it for over two years now and I have
used it to the point where I have about worn it out. Literally. I
pretty much have my camera with me all the time and I take sometimes
hundreds of pictures a month. It still works great and the only time I
ever had a problem with it was because the batteries and the camera
card needed to be replaced.

But the fact here is that Best Buy didnt make the camera. You should
be sending this letter to Kodak, not Best Buy. If your warrenty doesnt
cover the damage then it doesnt cover that. That is an issue you
should deal with Best Buy about BUT, to blame them for selling
products that are easily damaged without misuse is just wrong. My
Kodak Easy Share camera has been in hot cars, cold cars, banged on
tables and chairs, dropped on the floor. Its been played with by my 16
month old nephew. Its been in every condition possible except snow
because I live in the south and we dont get snow. And it works
absolutely wonderfully with no problems. Its beat up and scratched up,
but it works! But if you are going to accuse someone of making an
inferior product, that blame should go to Kodak. However, in this
case, you would be wrong. Its the best camera I have ever had! Maybe
you got a fluke bad one, or maybe you caused damage to it that you
dont want to own up to. But this is one good camera! I am in the
process of looking for a new camera now because I need something a
little more high tech. But if I didnt I would definately buy another
one of these and I have recommended them to many people.

Reply


Easyshare line by papaspot Tue May 1, 2007 @ 6:33 PM
by Rand Posted Tue May 1, 2007 @ 2:18 PM

Moisture damaging electronics is very common. That's why new products
have those small packets of silica gel (or other compounds that absorb
moisture) placed inside the packaging.

Moisture is a part of our atmosphere -- you don't have to be
underwater or live in a high-humidity location to be in a
moisture-rich environment. A camera case, no matter how expensive or
how frequently it is used, cannot protect against moisture. A simple
solution is to keep a moisture-absorbing packet with the camera when
it is not in use. The instruction booklets of all of my cameras warn
about the effects of moisture.

In my camera-buying experience, it's always helpful to ask what kinds
of situations are not covered by the warranty. Every time I asked my
camera salesperson, I was always told to read the warranty.

Your best bet may be to make your warranty and product buying
decisions based on what the warranty covers, what the product features
are and what kind of maintenance is your responsibility.

The lack of a camera shouldn't mar the experience of a college
graduation. I hope you center your attention on this significant
achievement and not on anything else.






Reply


by Bill R Posted Tue May 1, 2007 @ 12:30 PM

Katherine,
I hope that taking this to their coporate level will get you some
degree of satisfaction.
In hindsight I might have left off most of the last two paragraphs
referencing honesty and your plan to tell friends and family.
I've read that camera and cellphone maufacturers now place a chip or
some sort of device in their goods that can tell a tech if the item
was submerged in water or if it was simply casual contact.
That being said something else to be aware of is the constant movement
from the an air conditioned envirmonent to the outside world can cause
condensation and thus corrosion.
Good luck and do stop back and let us know how your effort shakes
out.
Bill R.

Reply

by Harleycat Posted Tue May 1, 2007 @ 11:34 AM

Personally, I don't think these extended warranties are worth the
paper they are written on. There are so many exclusions that it's
next to impossible to get anything covered under them. I would never
believe that any item would be covered due to customer damage, dropped
in the toilet, etc and this moisture damage thing seems to be one they
always try to pull on the consumer.

I do hope you get this resolved. Have you tried contacting Kodak to
see if they will cover it under the manufacturers warranty? If they
have a 1 yr warranty they should repair it.

Reply
by A A Posted Tue May 1, 2007 @ 11:14 AM

I think you got screwed. One thing I learned about warranties is that
if it does not explicitly state something, it is not covered. I do not
care what a salesperson tells me, if it is not in writing it is not
covered.
About 90% of the time I look at the cost of the warranty and compare
the price of what I think a new one will cost after a year and usually
don't get it.
The most warranties seem to save you on smaller items is $100 to $200,
and if the item lasts 2 years it seems to be a break even. I just
don't trust paying $50, $80, $100 for an extended warranty because I
know every time something happens it will not be covered and no one
actually seems to cover damage other than component failure not matter
what they say. Once you tack on shipping, rush charges etc that often
are not covered it ends up not saving you a lot.
I hope they make it right.

Reply


by Cee Dub Posted Tue May 1, 2007 @ 11:00 AM

Geez...you got a very raw deal. I hope they fix this problem for you.
It sounds like you were a very careful consumer. You asked all the
right questions, you made sure that your camera would be covered and
they told you it would. I wish I had some helpful advice, but
unfortunately, I don't.

Your letter is very well written and you are very clear and to the
point. There should be a "model letters" section here for all the
poor misguided souls who can't seem to grasp the concept. I hope you
hear from them soon.

Reply

by Gino Posted Tue May 1, 2007 @ 2:45 AM

The problem as I see it is that salespeople sell products and extended
warranties with poetry, make their salary, plus a bonus for selling
the extended warranty. They then refuse to or make it a difficult
process to comply with the extended warranty, using the prose of the
contract itself and some excuse not to pony up.
The salesman gained your trust and it makes sense to ask these
questions, not because you doubt the company, but just as a
clarification of what he was saying would be covered.

So the problem pivots on the wording of the extended warranty. They
claim it's because the camera was never fully encased and moisture
would damage it (which does not sit right with me. If there is
moisture, would it make more sense if it was incased in something that
would allow moisture to escape?). It's fairly common to have the
customer be blamed for the damage (Saural thinking at best) with the
goal of the customer giving up.

I don't see this letter as a rant of any kind, just someone who feels
betrayed after being lied to. I think getting an independent opinion
is a good idea. There may be some way to work with both the company
and the company that handles the extended warranty.
I believe you have a valid complaint and should be entitled to have it
repaired or replaced.

Reply

by Lee H. Posted Tue May 1, 2007 @ 12:47 AM

To begin with, if I didn't believe in a company's honesty, when
backing an extended warranty, I wouldn't trust them enough to shop
with them in the first place.

There are many products that I wished would just include longer
warranties. Generally, if I'm spending enough money that I would
expect the item to be covered longer than the manufacturer backs the
product, I price out the extended warranties offered by local
retailers. I simply get read the written guarantee that's available
at most retailers and price shop it along with the merchandise. This
approach has served me very well.

So in this instance, I'm not sure if I understand Katherine is unhappy
because she feels the sales associate communicated that things would
be covered that would not or, because diagnostics state that the
camera had moisture damage when it had not.

The letter, in my humble opinion, sounds more like an angry rant
instead of a sensible, reasonable letter. For example, you Katherine
states she'll never go into another Best Buy again, but then requests
service from them.

If you really felt the camera was not damaged due to moisture, begin
by getting their stance in writing. Then take the camera to a
separate service center for nothing more than a written independent
diagnostics. Even though such service may initially cost you the
independent company's bench fee, it will give you the necessary
documentation that their diagnostics were wrong. You would then be
completely within your rights to require them to cover the camera
along with the cost of independent diagnostic cost. If you really
know the damage may have been done by this moisture damage, than of
course you wouldn't risk the time or cost.

Congratulations on your graduation Katherine. That is really a great
accomplishment.

Reply


great response. Lee!!! No big deal, a minor error but an improvement ."then" would make more sense than "than'. by Gino Tue May 1, 2007 @ 2:56 AM


I agree with you, Gino by Venice Wed May 2, 2007 @ 12:43 AM


by Rubbertoe (.com) Posted Mon April 30, 2007 @ 10:49 PM

Yeah, that's a pretty crappy deal... I know many of us have heard
the "it doesn't matter if you drop it, smash it with a hammer, run
over it in your car" type of shpeal in re: to extended warranties.
:-( Good luck.

Reply

by RedheadWGlasses Posted Mon April 30, 2007 @ 10:17 PM

You know, I don't agree with extended warranties: They're a HUGE
profit center for retailers, and generally aren't necessary. But then
when someone DOES get one, they still seem to get screwed!

I agree--you deserve to have your camera fixed (or replaced)!
However, you may want to read the fine print in the paperwork you
signed. Store employees have been known to lie to customers about
these kinds of things, so you must always read the paperwork and find
out what is covered and what isn't.

Good luck!

Reply


Red... you rock!!! N/T by Gino Tue May 1, 2007 @ 2:58 AM


Aw shucks by RedheadWGlasses Tue May 1, 2007 @ 8:49 AM




Home | Shared Letters | Ratings | Login | Communities | Categories | RSS | Contact Us | Terms & Conditions | Privacy Policy | FAQ
Copyright 2012 © All Rights Reserved PlanetFeedback.com | Web by Cicada