|
|
Today's Bait And Switch Letter--Circuit City Owes Me For The Hassle
Posted Mon March 6, 2006, by chas m. written to Circuit City
Write a Letter to this Company | Rate this Company
I attempted to buy the (2) Kingston memory KGT KVR333SO512R at the local store (47905). I was told I could only get rebates for one module per household per purchase. If I wanted both modules, I would have to have the rebates sent to two different addresses in two different names from two different purchases. I declined any purchase.
I feel that this condition was purposely left out of the weekly circular to entice customers to come into the store & settle for less than what they'd wanted. This appears to be, imho, a variation of "bait & switch".
Your cashier appeared bewildered that I had enough integrity to refuse any purchase; after all I could have one module & add some memory, according to her. Why should I settle for just part of the upgrade?
I will be letting others know of this tactic from Circuit City via internet forums.
Thanks for wasting my time & ruining a part of my day. Go ahead & try to justify this crap.
Losing customers? Examine your relations via return policies & rebate policies.
1) eliminate rebates, as you surely rely on them being unfilled so you still make princely sums
2) detail your conditions
3) provide the items to me at the advertised price
4) compensate me for the hasssle
Reply
| Log In/Create an account | 27 comments |
|
|
| PlanetFeedback Comments are subject to strict terms and conditions. We reserve the right to deny site membership privileges to any individuals acting inappropriately. |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
by Gerald R Posted Sun March 12, 2006 @ 10:17 AM
|
|
|
I'm surprised that they would let you know (and just about offering you to do it) about how to commit rebate fraud --- use 2 different names, addresses, receipts. If I were at CC hdqt that's what I'd investigate -- not your inane complaint.
Reply
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
|
by SZ Posted Thu March 9, 2006 @ 12:59 PM
|
|
|
The tone of this letter and subsequent responses by you, Chas, proves a couple of things:
1) You don't comprehend what is clearly printed; and
2) You don't have any friends!
The cashier appeared bewildered that you had enough 'integrity' to refuse any purchase? No, the cashier appeared beweildered that you didn't understand how rebates work.
Regarding #2: I've received more than one rebate on items purchased. Simply had them rung up as two separate transactions and then had the second rebate mailed to a friend who in turn gave it to me when received.
Thank God I was forced to live in Peru for only 5-1/2 years (job transfer)--I was glad to get away from people like you.
Reply
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|

|
by Erik Posted Wed March 8, 2006 @ 11:14 AM
|
|
|
"I feel that this condition was purposely left out of the weekly circular to entice customers to come into the store & settle for less than what they'd wanted. This appears to be, imho, a variation of "bait & switch"."
This is about as much a variation of "bait & switch" as I'm a variation of a hippopatamus. Which is to say, not at all.
No, what this is really a variation of is some guy not reading the Terms of Service carefully enough, and then turning around and blaming the store for it. But that doesn't sound quite as dramatic as "bait & switch," now does it?
"Your cashier appeared bewildered that I had enough integrity to refuse any purchase;"
Not to burst your bubble, but your integrity isn't what she was bewildered by. If anything, she was probably bewildered by your choice to martyr yourself for such a ridiculous cause.
"I will be letting others know of this tactic from Circuit City via internet forums."
And how's that working out for you? Judging by the reaction you've gotten from this particular forum, I'm guessing not very well.
"1) eliminate rebates, as you surely rely on them being unfilled so you still make princely sums
2) detail your conditions
3) provide the items to me at the advertised price
4) compensate me for the hasssle"
1) Those of us who do understand how mail-in rebates work and use them correctly aren't going to be too pleased with them being tossed out just because you can't quite grasp the concept.
2) As has already been pointed out to you, they did detail their conditions. You just didn't bother to read them.
3) They were perfectly willing to provide you with the advertised price. You're the one who bawked at the offer. I'm certain that the offer still stands, provided you're willing to accept the terms. If you're not, that's not exactly their problem.
4) They offered you a deal. You declined. End of story. The only "hasssle" in this situation is the one you're raising. Circuit City is under no obligation to reward you for your inability to grasp reality.
"Thanks for wasting my time & ruining a part of my day."
Ditto.
Reply
|
|
 |
|
|
by gennee Posted Wed March 8, 2006 @ 7:00 AM
|
|
|
The cashier appeared "bewildered" at your "integrity?"
Abolutely wonderful. That made my day. I'm still chuckling.
To repay you, I'm going to do you a favor and explain what bait and switch is. It's good to know what we are talking about if we don't want to be laughed at.
Bait and switch requires "bait," which is a product a store advertises but has no plans to sell to you. It doesn't actually exist, or, if it does, it's never going to leave the store at the advertised price. It's not for sale, it's bait to get customers in the door. The memory chip in the ad WAS for sale and they were willing to sell it to you, so it wasn't bait.
Bait and switch also requires a "switch." When you walk into the store to buy the bait, the salepeople will pressure you into buying ANOTHER product. That didn't happen here. Nobody tried to talk you out of buying the advertised product and talk you into buying another product, did they? No switch.
Basically, you let your mistaken perception interfere with your own best interests here and walked away from a good deal. That's not integrity.
Reply
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
by Buddy Posted Tue March 7, 2006 @ 7:28 PM
|
|
|
If I only had a dime for everytime I read about a customer wanting compensation for their wasted time....
Reply
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|
|
by CatFan Posted Tue March 7, 2006 @ 4:02 PM
|
|
|
Chas, please read all of the replies to your post. Brenny was kind enough to point out to you that you were notified before entering the store, quoting to you the part of the ad. After his/her post, you continue to claim the 'price' was changed at the checkout and you didn't know anything till you got to the till.
I appreciate your frustration at your perceived ill-treatment, but your continued chastisement of the store for something that someone has proved to you they did not do does not reflect well upon you.
Reply
|
|
 |
|

|
by mary jo Posted Tue March 7, 2006 @ 10:46 AM
|
|
|
I agree with everyone else.
The only person who lost anything here is you.
You pitched a fit and instead of taking what you could get you left without anything. Your problem...not theirs.
Then you demand compensation?! LOL! Yeah..thats going to happen. The only thing you WERE entitled to was a rebate on ONE item IF you had purchased it. Since you didnt, you deserve nothing.
Reply
|
|
 |
|

|
by Alley Posted Tue March 7, 2006 @ 9:30 AM
|
|
|
Were you born yesterday? Honestly, if i was the company president, i would have felt bad up until you said the word "crap". I personally woulnd't give you ANYTHING after i read that. I understand your mad.. but USUALLY with ALL rebates, its only on one of the items unless mentioned otherwise. I hope you know your attempt at letting them know they lost "such an important customer" has most likely NOT affected them whatsoever. have a GREAT day:)
Reply
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|
|
by Cor H Posted Tue March 7, 2006 @ 6:57 AM
|
|
|
Your third request frankly bewilders me: provide the items to me at the advertised price.
Your entire letter is about the rebate, not the price. At what point were you not being charged the advertised price?
As for this ruining part of your day, I would suggest reprioritizing your life so that this minor misunderstanding should have no more affect on your day than an easily-scratched itch.
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
by Applejacker Posted Tue March 7, 2006 @ 2:24 AM
|
|
|
"eliminate rebates..." Rebates help control greedy people from trying to cash in on multiple items, denying others of the opportunity. "Compensate.." = "Look at me, I'm greedy.." Bait and switch? You apparently don't have a clue what "bait and swtch" really is.
Reply
|
|
|
|

|

|
Sheesh
by tickytack Tue March 7, 2006 @ 11:34 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
How?
by gennee Wed March 15, 2006 @ 1:39 PM
|
|
|
 |
|
|
by Alan M Posted Tue March 7, 2006 @ 12:32 AM
|
|
|
This letter is silly. Rebate limitations are the norm in the industry, usually 1 per person/household.
Bait and switch - not on a bet. Honestly this letter truly deserves the round file.
Reply
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|

|
by Brenny Posted Mon March 6, 2006 @ 10:44 PM
|
|
|
Are you new to rebates?
The one per household is a standard and common condition of rebates. It is ALSO printed in Circuit City's sales flyer. "Limitations per household or customer may apply" I am quoting that directly from the flyer.
You are not entitled to any compensation!
Reply
|
|
 |
|
|
by p d Posted Mon March 6, 2006 @ 10:39 PM
|
|
|
Boy, I bet you've got them sweating bullets over your letter.
What a jerk.
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|