|
|
Citibank Employs Underhanded Companies to Collect Money
Posted Thu December 13, 2007 12:00 pm, by shirley m. written to Citibank N A
Write a Letter to this Company | Rate this Company
To Whom It May Concern:
My husband and I have been Citibank customers since 1987 each with an AAdvantage card. These are our primary cards that we have used for almost all of our purchases for 20 years. Now we are planning to cancel our accounts and never do business with Citibank again. Our daughter and her husband also have cards with Citibank and are planning the same.
We just cannot believe that Citibank would do business with a company that knowingly breaks the law.
Our son was behind on his payments to Citibank, but while Citibank still owned his account he offered to pay the entire charged off amount and Citibank refused to take his money.
Instead, afterward, Citibank sold his account to a company that, instead of reporting the delinquency accurately, have done everything they could to damage our son's credit as much as they could by putting blatantly false information on his credit report. They have also sent details about his debt to relatives, despite knowing his current address, in an attempt to embarrass him into complying.
He has offered to pay them if they will only report the debt accurately, but they are refusing to do so despite admitting in writing that its wrong. Their false reporting caused him to lose a house that he and his fiance were in love with and were trying to buy.
I have seen his documentation and have no doubt in my mind that the company that Citibank sold our son's debt to is violating many laws, and a lawyer agreed.
This problem was originally our son's, but that doesn't give anybody the right to break the law, violate his rights, and abuse him. It is shocking to us after all these years of doing business with Citibank that you employ companies that use such underhanded and illegal methods to collect your money.
I can only assume that Citibank would have done the same to my husband and myself if we had ever had difficulty.
Buy back our son's debt from this criminal company and accept his full payment of the charged off amount. Even if you won't discuss the matter with us, discuss it with him. We can provide you with the details you need to investigate it.
Explain to my husband and myself why Citibank does business with companies that knowingly break the law.
Reply
| Log In/Create an account | 27 comments |
|
|
| PlanetFeedback Comments are subject to strict terms and conditions. We reserve the right to deny site membership privileges to any individuals acting inappropriately. |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
 |
|

|
by Gino Posted Fri December 14, 2007 @ 12:16 AM
|
|
|
If a lawyer agreed, it must be right! Maybe the lawyer could convince their lawyer which laws were broken and how.
I think if your son is old enough to be irresponsible with his debt, and with privacy issues the way they are, Citibank does not have to explain to your husband and yourself the actions of the collection agency who took over this debt.
Reply
|
|
 |
|
|
by Rhet Canter Posted Thu December 13, 2007 @ 7:12 PM
|
|
|
He doesn't get to go through life being the victim becuase it's not his fault he didn't pay his bills. And you have to be more than a few months behind with no payments to enter into write off status and then have it sold to a third party. Again.....playing the victim here. And he was trying to buy a house? Man...this is really messed up thinking on your part, your sons part, and whoever else is in support of his victim role. Take responsibility for yourselves. That usually leads to a struggle free life and taking accountability is actually a good thing for society.
You should be ashamed for posting a letter like this on this site. I'm embarrassed for you.
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
I'm going to say something here that may make a few people not like me very much. I was a bill collector for a very short time.
First, if you son feels this debt is inaccurate, he can request a written statement of his debt. When it is turned over to collections, there is an additional charge, so that may be why it is more. However, having the actual statement will help him sort out why they say he owes what he does. There is usually a small charge for this (it was a dime a page where I used to work), but I would think it's worth it.
Second, when you have a debt turned over to collections, you can often get a discount if you pay a lump sum. Once the amount is straightened out ask, "How much of a discount can I get if I pay this all right now?" It may sound rude, but the collectors are actually thrilled to hear this since it means they are going to get paid. This works best if you pay with credit card.
The collection agency can send letters to other addresses if they don't hear back from an individual. They can also call other numbers they have on file. However, I have a question. You state that they revealed details of this debt to relatives. Was these letters really addressed to his relatives? Usually, those are addressed to the debtor in question unless he is underaged or in some manner incompetent.
Other people before had mentioned that this is your son's problem. I know, as his mother, you want only the best for your son, but the other posters are right. The collectior agency can't even speak to you or your husband without permission from you son.
On a final note - I guess I should say why I wasn't a collection agent for long. My boss said my personality was too friendly and perky - and no one wants an upbeat voice on the phone saying they owe money.
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
by SusanB Posted Thu December 13, 2007 @ 2:42 PM
|
|
|
Your son didn't pay in accordance with his cardholder agreement with Citbank so they charged off his account and sold the debt to a third party collection company. It doesn't matter how long you and your husband have had accounts with Citibank or the fact your daughter and son-in-law also have accounts. Your son did not keep up his end of the bargain and is now paying the price. And, the answer to your questions "I can only assume that Citibank would have done the same to my husband and myself if we had ever had difficulty" is a big, fat "yes". Finally, this is your son's problem - - not your's - - and Citibank doesn't owe you and/or your husband an explanation about their collection policies.
Reply
|
|
 |
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
Cut the apron strings, mom. This is your son's battle.
Reply
|
|

|

|
I think ...
by burkhagirl Thu December 13, 2007 @ 1:35 PM
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|

|
by donno Posted Thu December 13, 2007 @ 1:12 PM
|
|
|
this all could have been avoided. There is no way in the world Citibank refused to take his money before they wiped their hands clear of this deadbeat.
First of all, this is no longer any of Citi's concern. This letter is going into the cyber trash can, DELETE.
Second of all, your deadbeat son should be writing letters and attempting to clean up his own debts. If he wants a house and the responsibility that comes with it, he needs to start by getting his finances in order.
My mom tried for years to take care of my brother's finances. It all lead to massive, tragic failure, despite her heroic efforts. Your son needs to take care of himself.
Reply
|
|
 |
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|
|
by dawniedawn67 Posted Thu December 13, 2007 @ 9:54 AM
|
|
|
I am not an expert when it comes to this, but from all the reading I've done in trying to repair my own credit, I'll take a stab at explaining things:
1. Your son's account was CHARGED OFF by Citibank when he offered to pay it in full. This means that his account was most likely around 120 days late, not a month or two behind as your letter makes it appear. Once a company has reported a debt as 'charged off', I don't believe that they can still collect on it, because it becomes a 'loss' for them and has to do with how they report to the IRS.
2. In order to recoup some of the money that your son owed them, they sold his account to a junk debt buyer. They now legally own the account, and probably paid pennies on the dollar for it. Once it no longer belongs to Citibank, they are not responsible for how it is handled, and I don't imagine, after being stiffed for money they paid on your son's behalf, that they care how his account is handled by the purchaser.
3. The fact that you are writing this for your son, someone old enough to have a fiancee and buy a house, shows where he gets his lack of responsibility. While he certainly has the right to have his debt reported correctly, the fact that he was unable to purchase this house is no one's fault but his own for not managing his credit in the past. I of all people know that sometimes stuff happens, and we have to choose to pay the important bills and let the credit cards go, but neither then do I blame the credit card companies when I can't buy a house, or pay 15% interest on a car loan.
4. If your credit is so good, and your son is such the vicitm, why didn't you offer to cosign on the mortgage for him and his fiancee?
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|

|

|
Re: IRS
by burkhagirl Thu December 13, 2007 @ 1:42 PM
|
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
|

|
by calm Posted Thu December 13, 2007 @ 8:19 AM
|
|
|
I wish you'd given more detail about Citibank's refusal to take your son's money. Why would they do that? There has to be more to the story than you're saying. It sounds almost as if he was willing to pay the bill *if* Citibank reported the debt in a certain way, and they weren't willing to make that deal; and you wouldn't really expect them to, would you?
You also don't give any details about what illegal things the collection company is doing either. Now, if your son has involved a lawyer you shouldn't be posting about it online at all, but still, since you've addressed this complaint to Citibank you need to do more than establish that the company is breaking the law (which you haven't: you saying that a lawyer agrees that they're breaking the law isn't proof). You need to also establish that Citibank knew that they were going to do that when they sold the debt. Even if you had made an adequate case for lawbreaking to start with, you'd have a long way to go to show that Citibank knows about it.
And since your son apparently has the money, why isn't he paying the debt now? That would seem to be the fastest way for him to get the collection company off his back.
What you have posted is full of holes, and I really have to wonder why. Do the parts you're leaving out make your son look bad? Is your son leaving out the parts that make him look bad when he talks to you about this? Or are you just not skilled at putting together a complete story?
And please, either don't threaten them with a lawyer or hire one (or help your son hire one) and then stand back so that she can do her job. It makes you look weak to have an imaginary lawyer on your team, and it makes you look like your own worst enemy if you've got a real one and you are still posting details of the dispute online.
Reply
|
|
|
|

|

|
Thank you.
by calm Thu December 13, 2007 @ 12:15 PM
|
|
|

|

|
Could be
by burkhagirl Thu December 13, 2007 @ 1:34 PM
|
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
|
|
by Cor H Posted Thu December 13, 2007 @ 7:02 AM
|
|
|
I'm confused about some things: why would Citibank refuse to take payment in full while they still owned the account? If the son could pay the debt, why was he behind?
Also, setting aside that this is really the son's complaint and the letter should really come from him, no letter should be posted here if a lawyer is involved.
Reply
|
|
|
 |
|
|