|
|
EBay's Policy on Image and Text Theft
Posted Thu August 30, 2007 12:00 pm, by Kristine P. written to EBay
Write a Letter to this Company | Rate this Company
According to ebay's policy on image and text theft, it is not allowed. Well I recently had an experience where a seller stole an image from my auction and revised their already started auction and placed it in the description area. I was told that it was not a violation of policy because the other seller's auction started before mine. Regardless, it is still theft and ebay would not take into consideration that the other seller's auction was revised after my own auction had started.
If image theft is against ebay policy then revised listings should be taken into consideration, otherwise ebay is allowing image theft and copyright infringement to take place within auctions regardless of what the policy is. The policy does not state specifically that the listing in question has to start after the original listing. The policy should state that if in fact ebay is going to allow image theft for certain listings, because it certainly was allowed in my case.
Reply
| Log In/Create an account | 14 comments |
|
|
| PlanetFeedback Comments are subject to strict terms and conditions. We reserve the right to deny site membership privileges to any individuals acting inappropriately. |
 |
 |
 |
|

|
by MA Loper Posted Mon September 3, 2007 @ 9:57 PM
|
|
|
Did this other seller originally have an image of his/her own and decided they liked yours better and swapped or added yours? Or did they not have any image at all?
If my memory serves, anything after the first image gets charged, so they can trace EXACTLY when the other seller included your picture and the time would be LATER than when you posted yours.
I'm surprised they would be so lax about this. Do they really want sellers portraying merchandise that may not be in the condition it's shown to be???
I would keep on this. There is no excuse for someone to get away with using your image to sell their item, esp. when your item may not be anything like yours.
Reply
|
|
 |
|
by Bill R Posted Fri August 31, 2007 @ 1:23 PM
|
|
|
Kristine,
What I am going to suggest will not help your current situation but it might help moving forward.
When taking digital pictures set the camera to document the date/time the pic was taken as well as in one of the bottom corners of the subject matter
diplay your business card or some other indentifier specific to you.
One would think this would cover your bases and establish you as the originator of that image.
BillR.
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
by Kristine Potter Posted Fri August 31, 2007 @ 12:16 AM
|
|
|
Let me say, I emailed them a total of 4 times trying to explain in detail when my auction started giving the exact day and time and when the other sellers was revised to show that is was definitely a possibility.
My first email was to report the auction for image theft. At that time I was so upset, I did not think to even look when the seller started their auction, it was nota regular auction, but instead a store listing.
The first email I received was that they did not see the image in the sellers listing.
I responded to that with more detail about the image giving the actual image this time.
They responded with a canned response, the sellers listing does not violate ebay policy because it started before yours so the image cannot possibly be yours.
I looked again to see what was going on since I knew for a fact it was my image. I saw that it was revised and looked at the dates and time. 5 hours after my auction started. I replied again with this information telling them that it was definitely a possibility because the seller had not had any purchase yet and the auction was revised and the dates and times.
They replied with, I understand your frustration, but you need to supply us with the auction that started before the other sellers.
I responded once again with the same info and even went as far as asking if what they are telling me is that it is perfectly fine if someone steals your images, revises their listing and places them in that listing that started earlier? You can change a store listing that started a year ago as a listing for a camera and as long as no purchases have been made, you can revise it at any time and change the entire listing to sell something totally different.
Then the last response I received was another canned response, We've reveiwed the listings and the seller doesn't violate ebay policy because their listing started before yours, so the image cannot possibly be yours.
That's when I had had it with them.
They need to start adhering to their so-called policies because this could happen to anyone else or at least acknowledge the information given.
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|

|
by donno Posted Thu August 30, 2007 @ 9:22 PM
|
|
|
I find it hard to believe they would approve of someone copying your picture and adding it to either an existing or a new auction. I would follow Jeffrey's advice exactly (change the wording). Make sure to include your auction number, which I'm sure you did the first time. Good luck.
Reply
|
|
 |
|
by Jeffrey Posted Thu August 30, 2007 @ 7:37 PM
|
|
|
Looks like you were the victim of someone that didn't have enough time to actually research your complaint.
They checked when the auctions started and made a decision based on that. Not on when the photo was added.
eBay, like many companies, makes a limited number of CSRs deal with so many e-mails in a day that the CSR has to rush through them.
I find that writing another message, but rearranging my words, usually does the trick. For example, make sure the phrase "the copyright-infringing photo was added to listing XYZ on MM/DD/YYYY, 8 days after I posted the same picture" appears at the top of your message.
Good luck.
I hope that this wasn't a case where you were actually harmed.
Reply
|
|
 |
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
I agree! You could be selling a much better version of something than the other seller, and they could steal your image in order to mislead potential buyers.
Reply
|
|
|
 |
|
|