HOME SHARED LETTERS RATINGS MY PLANET COMMUNITIES MISSION SIGN UP!
Shared Letters

Join and browse our exclusive open discussion forums and talk about whatever you like.

Channels
» The Suggestion Box
» Company Responses
» PFB Feedback Line
» Consumer Podcasts
» Mommy Talk & Daddy Dialogue ™
» Shared Letters


Newsletter

Sign up for PlanetFeedback's "Consumer Café" email newsletter!





Peeling paint, roof of cab=whose responsibility?

Posted Mon July 13, 2009 6:03 pm, by Jan W. written to Ford Motor Company

Write a Letter to this Company  |  Rate this Company


I have a 2002 Ford F150 Lariat 5.4L Triton Super Cab. My late husband bought it new. He passed away and I paid it off and have had it since 2006. I live in Bellingham, WA.

My husband had an accident in 2005, and the dealer in Sacramento, CA did not mention the roof was showing signs of peeling or bubbling. They did the repairs at their dealership body shop.

I just SAW the roof on Saturday, July 11, 2009. I can't see the roof normally. It happened to be below normal line of sight.

This vehicle was rear ended 8/08, and had over $5k in repairs completed at the Ford dealer. This paint/rust did not happen in just one year. NO one told me about the paint problem, and I feel ONE of your dealers should have seen it, if they were inspecting the vehicle for major damages. A COMPLETE visual should have been performed.

The paint is a dark green metallic. If I had known about the problem, I would have either filed a report with you, requesting investigation into faulty paint, or had the work done myself. Since no one caught it, the damages have had at LEAST an entire cold, wet, snowy winter to further deteriorate.

Help me to get this problem resolved. If either of the dealers had inspected the roof, which should have been within the parameters of their responsibility to determine damages, then this would have either been stopped, or have been under warranty.


Reply



Log In/Create an account | 4 comments
     Add to your del.icio.us  del.icio.us    Digg this story  Digg this  
PlanetFeedback Comments are subject to strict terms and conditions. We reserve the right to deny site membership privileges to any individuals acting inappropriately.

by Harleycat Posted Tue July 14, 2009 @ 8:28 AM

Even if they had spotted it in 8/08, they still would have done
nothing about it since it was already out of warranty. Since your
truck was rear ended, they had no reason to look at the roof.

Reply

by RedheadwGlasses Posted Mon July 13, 2009 @ 7:38 PM

The accident happened after the vehicle likely was out of warranty, so
I suppose (?) that's why they didn't mention the paint issue to you.
(Why do you think it would have been under warranty 6 or more year
after it was purchased?)

Reply




Home | Shared Letters | Ratings | Login | Communities | Categories | RSS | Contact Us | Terms & Conditions | Privacy Policy | FAQ
Copyright 2009 © All Rights Reserved PlanetFeedback.com | Web by Cicada