 |
|
by Venice Posted Thu October 15, 2009 @ 5:29 PM
|
|
|
A major part of forming an opinion about a company or product is determining the credibility of a letter. The reality is that letter writers are going to paint themselves in a good and favorable light in order to make their complaint sound valid, or they're not going to include all the details in their letter. That's understandable. But that's also why hearing from other people, especially those with inside information, is crucial.
I want to see responses to a complaint before I am willing to write a company off based entirely on a letter. There are always two sides, and it's better to hear different opinions, even if it's only speculation, than to make a decision based on one side only. That's why I think comments serve a valuable purpose. If we took every complaint at face value, we'd boycott everything. There has to be some skepticism to balance things out and to help us make logical and informed decisions.
I think PFB would prefer to do away with commenting altogether, but in my opinion that would be a terrible disservice to consumers who visit the site to research companies and products. I think comments help provide readers with a broader picture than the letter alone.
I do not know how helpful PFB is to letter writers, but I personally do not find the site to be as helpful without comments. And with commenting down to a minimum, I now realize just how important they are.
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
by Venice Posted Sat October 10, 2009 @ 6:40 PM
|
|
|
When I first found this site, I was thrilled to see a place where disgruntled consumers could speak out and exchange information. However, the letters made me realize that I was a bit behind the times when it came to the extent of consumers' expectations and sense of entitlement. There were so many complaints that just seemed insignificant to me. Things that people used to accept as part of life were now perceived as enormous inconveniences and opportunities to make a quick buck or get a free meal. I'm not saying that all the complaints were trivial, but it seemed that people were finding fault with just about everything from rude employees to cold fries, perhaps for a moment in the spotlight or to possibly come out ahead. It was intriguing, to say the least.
Just as intriguing were the people who commented on the letters, especially the ones that hoped to bring these consumers back down to Earth with a hefty dose of reality. And that's how I first became familiar with someone who often shocked me with her comments and was at times offensive but ended up being my good friend.
She was a member of this long before I came along and was known for her blunt remarks and honest reactions and opinions. It was understandable why some people were put off by her style, but when I realized that we had a lot in common, I got to know her better. And I'm so happy I did. She is one of the most honest and trustworthy people I know. And despite her tough girl act, she is filled with kindness and compassion. Anyone who took the time to get to know her would agree.
As a loyal and addicted member of PFB for many years, she participated frequently with comments and discussions, as well as writing letters. When the old moderation program was implemented, she never complained and even said she understood why moderators were needed. She followed the rules to the best of her ability because she didn't want to put the moderators on the spot. She didn't whine or storm off like some others did but simply played by the rules. I had a lot of respect for that.
And now my respect for her has grown. She was recently banned from PFB when her frustration with the site forced her to speak her mind. As usual, her words were harsh, but they were also truthful. She stood up for herself and for others knowing that it would be a risk, and it was no surprise when she was banned. When she told me what happened, the first thing she said was that at least she could still read the letters because that's what she loved the most. We used to joke about how we were both hopelessly addicted to PFB and would probably never completely leave. Well, now she's completely gone. She can't even read the letters.
I'm trying to think of a way to end this post, but I'm coming up empty. I don't know what else to say. Nothing good can come of this. It just amounts to another lost member.
Reply
|
|

|

|
I'm sorry
by Donno Sun October 11, 2009 @ 12:13 AM
|
|
|
|
|

|

|
I noticed
by Donno Sun October 11, 2009 @ 8:21 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|

|
Off topic?
by Donno Thu October 15, 2009 @ 10:35 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|

|
If
by Brendalala Thu October 15, 2009 @ 11:47 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|

|
Wow
by Brendalala Wed October 21, 2009 @ 6:36 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|

|
Nope
by Brendalala Thu October 22, 2009 @ 8:44 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|

|
If
by Brendalala Thu October 15, 2009 @ 12:05 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
by Venice Posted Tue September 1, 2009 @ 9:10 PM
|
|
|
Remember the story about my roof?...
Well, once again I'm sitting at home minding my own business and trouble knocks at my door in the way of a letter informing me that my refrigerator is possibly part of major recall of models that can go on fire.
So I stick my head inside the refrigerator looking for the model/serial numbers and am somewhat relieved to see that the serial number is one digit off.
We've had this refrigerator for almost nine years, and other than despising the user-unfriendly design, it has served us well and has never needed any maintenance or repair.
But the power of suggestion can be a forceful thing.
Ever since receiving the recall notice, I've been noticing an occasional burning smell inside the refrigerator that I am convinced was never there before. I tried telling myself that it was my imagination, but it seems to be getting worse. I asked my daughter, who is not easily alarmed, if she smelled anything unusual, and she confirmed the smell of smoke or something burning.
I really, really don't want to replace the refrigerator right now. Not only is it a lot of work, but I looked at new ones and don't like any of them.
So, what are my choices?
~Replace the refrigerator now with something I don't like.
~Wait for it to start smoking and hope that I'm home at the time.
~Keep telling myself that there will be no fire, and it will just burn out.
And to top it all off, my Sears card has probably been canceled due to non-use, and I would most likely want a Sears Kenmore if I do buy a new refrigerator.
Did I mention that I really don't want to replace the refrigerator?
Reply
|
|
|
|

|
Yes
by Venice Thu September 3, 2009 @ 9:39 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|
by Venice Posted Tue September 1, 2009 @ 7:49 PM
|
|
|
Yes, it's true! I sent out emails to every member of PFB in an attempt to brainwash them into agreeing with me and forcing them to post comments that would result in being suspended and banned!
Wait, it gets better!...
I did it because I wanted to hurt Greg!
Seriously folks, could this get any more ridiculous?
Reply
|
|
 |
|
by Venice Posted Mon August 31, 2009 @ 6:41 PM
|
|
|
Please bear with me. Or better yet, don't even read this if you're tired of the nonsense.
I have been put in the awkward position of being accused of something that simply isn't true, and I'm not sure what I'm supposed to do about it. I could just not say anything and hope that the truth will prevail, but under the circumstances, I feel the need to explain.
Apparently there are people who believe that I have been contacting members and riling them up to the point of being suspended or banned. I understand the need to blame someone for what's going on here, and that I'm an easy target, but I can't just let these accusations go over my head.
I have NEVER contacted anyone at any time to ask for a following, to gain support or to encourage them to post comments. On the contrary, people have contacted me for information, advice or to simply let off steam. I was not going to pretend that I did not agree with their concerns. And I have actually been motivated by them .
I was asked by Rowdy to post a comment in my profile saying that he was suspended. I decided to post it in his blog so the people involved in the conversation there would know why he wasn't responding. I didn't realize that he was unable to see the comment and found out later that he could not even access the site. However, the post was written for him and the people involved in the conversation, and no one else. I thought that was obvious, and I didn't see anyone lining up to join forces. However, some people took it the wrong way.
Sometimes I am given too much credit for having the ability to influence people or change things. Much of what I say is off the top of my head or thinking out loud, and I am often surprised when on occasion people agree with me because I usually feel like I'm in it alone. This idea that I am somehow forcing people to have the same opinion as mine and then encouraging them to comment is absurd and delusional. Not only would I never do anything like that, but I'm just not that important.
The only reason I'm bringing this up again is because I am tired of being accused of things that are not true. I did not have the email addresses of the people who were suspended or banned prior to them contacting me, however, my address has always been in plain sight. Isn't that proof enough that I am not instigating a revolution?
Is PFB going to take any responsibility at all for the problems on the site, or are they just going to blame everything on me?
The reason I posted here was to get this away from Rowdy's blog. I asked several times to move the discussion elsewhere but was flatly denied. So now I'll be the one criticized for doing it here.
It's funny. I finally gave in to the fact that I was fighting a lost cause. I've been trying to move forward and make the best of it, but I somehow got dragged into something that I never intended or expected to gain any momentum. I really don't know what I'm supposed to do anymore.
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|

|
Hmm
by Brendalala Tue September 1, 2009 @ 5:43 PM
|
|
|
|
|

|

|
Really?
by Brendalala Tue September 1, 2009 @ 6:59 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|

|
Peacemaker
by Brendalala Tue September 1, 2009 @ 9:41 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
sigh...
by Nichole K Wed September 2, 2009 @ 5:38 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
Harley
by Nichole K Tue September 1, 2009 @ 10:06 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
by Venice Posted Sun August 30, 2009 @ 6:17 PM
|
|
|
After its second major overhaul in less than ten years, Walmart is having another grand reopening! The last remodeling attempt was a waste of time and money. After months of construction, rubble and noise (much of which occurred over customers' heads), the store looked no different than before. But this time I can actually say it looks better. Of course there is still the same Walmart "feel", but the layout is completely different and the aisles are wider. I only took a quick look, but I'm anxious to go back and check it all out.
Coincidentally (?), the supermarket where I shop has implemented a new pricing program. Yes!.. lower prices!!! I don't need lower prices to keep me out of Walmart, but hopefully this strategy will work on the people who are fooled into thinking Walmart is cheaper.
For a small area, we have a lot of competition here. There are two major supermarkets (Shop Rite and Stop & Shop), in addition to Walmart. There are two Rite Aids (used to be three) and a large CVS, along with Stop & Shop pharmacy and several privately owned ones. Oh, and let's not forget Target, which has a little bit of everything and competes with all the other stores, including Kohl's!
I love competition.
Reply
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|
by Venice Posted Thu August 27, 2009 @ 6:30 AM
|
|
|
No, not the one I caught on vacation, but the people who think they are a "good catch" for businesses and should be treated like royalty.
Sorry, but I don't understand the mindset that businesses have to bend over backwards to keep a customer and give in to every demand. Yes, there was a time when businesses might have viewed customers as always being right, but things have changed.. and drastically.
When I first discovered PFB, the one thing that amazed me the most was the blatant sense of entitlement. I wondered when people became so unforgiving and picayune about the smallest and most insignificant inconveniences. Things that in the past were overlooked or tolerated as being a part of life. Should one minor mishap in a restaurant or store subject a business to outrageous and unreasonable customer demands? And even worse, the threats that ensue when businesses refuse to give in?
That's not the way it used to be. I've been a consumer for a long time, and I remember when businesses and customers were on the same side. Businesses were willing to do whatever it took to keep customers, and customers had the decency to accept no for an answer. They had more pride than to squabble over a dime or demand special treatment. If special treatment was offered, it was genuine and not from the fear of being badmouthed, especially on the internet. There was a common ground back then. A feeling of being in it together. An understanding. And that's what is sorely missing today.
I am neither pro-consumer or pro-company. I have always been pro-fairness. I won't let a company walk all over me, and in return I do not take advantage of companies by making threats of boycotting, badmouthing, or anything else. If I find myself at odds with a company, I always look for a compromise. You might be surprised how often companies are more than willing to work with a customer who has a good and fair attitude. I don't really think it's necessary to threaten a company with an ultimatum. If you go about it the right way, you have a good chance of coming out ahead. You might not get exactly what you expected, but at least you'll walk away with some dignity and sense of good faith.
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
by Venice Posted Wed August 19, 2009 @ 5:53 AM
|
|
|
If you found your way in here, then I guess you're wondering why I closed my profile. Under the circumstances, I thought it was a good idea for my blog to take a vacation. Since I have so many objections to what's been going on, it just felt wrong to continue posting blog entries. I'm hoping that things will change soon so I can open my profile and continue to bore you all with my corny stories.
In the meantime, I'll still be reading, posting and checking things out. You can leave comments here if you'd like. I'll check in every once in a while to see if there's anyone here.
Reply
|
|

|

|
It worked!
by The Return of BellaSera Fri August 21, 2009 @ 11:11 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
by Venice Posted Tue August 11, 2009 @ 7:01 AM
|
|
|
Frito-Lay discontinued its Tostitos Restaurant Style Salsa in 2007 to make room in its lineup for new dip flavors, including Fritos Zesty Bean and Cheese, and Tostitos Creamy Spinach. But devotees were not willing to let go of the discontinued salsa, which they said lived up to its promise of matching what they got at restaurants.
The company received more than 1,600 phone calls and e-mails within a few months asking for the product's return. That was more than twice as many as for any other product that year, Frito-Lay's Snack Chat blog reports, and the requests kept coming in 2008.
Impressed, the Tostitos marketing team responded by bringing back the product. Frito-Lay says its response proves that it's worth telling the consumer-affairs department what you think.
Reply
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|
by Venice Posted Sun August 9, 2009 @ 7:32 AM
|
|
|
So far this summer has brought two tragedies that have changed the lives of so many people forever.
The crash on the Taconic is just inconceivable to me. How does a mother with a van load of kids end up behind the wheel with alcohol and marijuana in her system? There's something so wrong about this. I just can't make sense of it. And there's a slim chance of ever knowing what really happened because the eight people involved are dead.
And now another accident over the Hudson River. Only this time there were no survivors after a small plane collided with a tour helicopter, causing both to crash into the water.
This summer needs to come to an end quickly. It has just been a time of grief for so many people.
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
by Venice Posted Wed August 5, 2009 @ 11:49 PM
|
|
|
They have been really sloppy lately. Not so much spelling thanks to the built-in spellchecker. But I've been leaving words out of my sentences causing them to make no sense. I've managed to catch some mistakes before posting, but a lot are getting by. Maybe it's just the lazy, hazy days of summer.
Hopefully, better when the over get back normal soon.
See!.. I did it again.
Reply
|
|
 |
|
by Venice Posted Tue August 4, 2009 @ 7:35 PM
|
|
|
Well, actually one request. But it was a very special request by Renee (rxgirl) who is sending her little guy off to kindergarten.
This was written by the former editor of my local newspaper, Mike Levine, who passed away suddenly in 2007. Of all his countless columns, this one is timeless and probably the most memorable.
Warning: Get out the tissues.
Mike Levine, Executive Editor
Times Herald Record
The First Day of School
September 5, 2006
Dear reader,
I wrote this column a decade ago. Since then, parents have told me it's a
way they mark the arrival of September's first school bus. I've added a few
lines for today. Here's to a safe and healthy year for all our children:
Quick, before they leave this morning. Take a good look. Touch their faces,
run your hands through their hair.
We got antsy with them last month, but now we want time to stand still.
Like falling leaves and chilly mornings, some great force signals us today.
We are aware of life passing.
See the kindergartner with a brave, bewildered smile watching her mother
cry as the school bus pulls away. The high-school freshman with a lump in
his throat hears his father whisper everything will be OK. Brothers and
sisters who fought all summer now hold hands.
Today is proud, today is helpless, today is tomorrow. This is a special
morning, wrenching and sacred.
As a young reporter, I'd wonder why. What's the big deal about the first
day of school? I would write down quotes in my notebook and comprehend
nothing.
Then I became a parent. I found out. We mark time by today.
On this morning, we remember our own parents and our own childhood. We are
filled with the smell of old raincoats, the sticky bond of classroom glue,
the childhood knot of worried excitement. We were so small and lost.
(Secret: A part of us is still lost. We tell no one.)
Now we have children of our own. On this morning, we remember the holy
moment of their birth.
We see this is all just a matter of time. Once, we thought our children
were ours alone. Each September, on this day, we learn better. Nothing is
ours to keep.
Time passes through our eyes this morning. We see our children as newborns,
we picture them as grown-ups. We see them walking their own children to
school.
Time passes in the beat of a heart. I have seen my first kindergarten boy
walk into his dorm on his first day of college. A few days ago, my younger
son left for college. I stood there, at once empty and full, as frightened
and proud as the morning his first school bus pulled away.
Come on, it's getting late. The bus is coming up the road. I'll keep this
short.
Make sure they have everything they need. Double check. Write their name on
the book bag. Sweetheart, did you remember your lunch money? Dad, don't
call me mushy stuff in front of the other kids.
They are right. Like the summer birds leaving us, our children know what to
do. Like September leaves waving on the trees, we, too, give way to the
winds of change.
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|

|

|
GULP!
by MA Cunningham Tue August 11, 2009 @ 2:19 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|
by Venice Posted Tue July 28, 2009 @ 11:30 PM
|
|
|
It's getting crowded down there again, and I hate when everyone has to crouch in the corner. It's hard to listen when there's no room to breathe.
I sent a suggestion to Maegan about the moderation rules, and it made me think of something else. I'm not a fan of extreme moderation, mostly because it's so subjective. And when the term "or variations thereof" appears repeatedly in the rules, there's a risk of one opinion being inconsistent. So I started to think that along the lines of the Kitchen Table, there could be a panel to determine comment removal. I'm not talking about the obvious ones, but ones that are open to interpretation. What's inappropriate to one person could be completely acceptable to another. I think the panel should consist of three people ruled by majority. Doing it that way would help make people feel like they're being treated fairly instead of wondering why some comments are removed and not others.
Also, as I was submitting my suggestion to Maegan, I started wondering about a few things. When these matters are discussed at the meeting, will the person who made the suggestion and the community at large be made aware of the discussion and the outcome? Will the community have an opportunity to express opinions about the suggestions, or are these closed door meetings? Will majority rule when making decisions? How much information about the meetings will actually be given to the community?
I realize this is a new endeavor and that the KT is still sorting things out. I just thought I'd mention some things they might want to consider.
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
by Venice Posted Fri July 24, 2009 @ 9:16 PM
|
|
|
It was getting a little crowded down there, so I thought I'd continue the discussion up here.
As I was reading all the comments here and in the original post, I had an idea that might have better succeeded in putting out the welcome mat. It comes from something someone else jokingly said (Donno, I think), but I think it might be exactly what is needed.
Maybe there should be a blog called The Family Room where everyone could express their ideas and feelings without fear of having them deleted. That way everything would be out in the open, no one would feel slighted, and there would be a lesser feeling of animosity. I know that sounds a lot like the Suggestion Box, but since PFB decided that something besides the Suggestion Box was needed to improve the site, I think The Family Room would be a good alternative. I think it would help bring the community together by making everyone feel equal, and also show a willingness and desire on the part of PFB for everyone to be heard firsthand without having to go through a process that could take months.
I really haven't had a chance to think this through, and I'm sure reasons will be brought to my attention why this idea won't work, but I just thought I'd put it out there for now.
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|

|
Hi Venice
by Donno Sun July 26, 2009 @ 2:40 PM
|
|
|
|
|

|

|
Tee hee
by Donno Sun July 26, 2009 @ 6:18 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|

|
Oh well
by Brendalala Tue July 28, 2009 @ 11:39 AM
|
|
|
|
|

|

|
Ugh again
by Brendalala Tue July 28, 2009 @ 12:44 PM
|
|
|
|
|

|

|
No.
by Brendalala Tue July 28, 2009 @ 1:47 PM
|
|
|
|
|

|

|
Well
by Brendalala Tue July 28, 2009 @ 3:54 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
by Venice Posted Mon July 20, 2009 @ 6:13 PM
|
|
|
I finally got a chance to read all the responses to the Kitchen Table post, and I think I understand why this approach may not be the best way to bring the PFB community together.
Thinking back, the original moderation program was a disaster and as Deb mentioned, resulted in one member permanently leaving the site. And other projects involving PFB members were also not widely accepted. There was controversy over ShopperCast and Mommage, as well. I've come to the conclusion that anything that involves selecting certain PFB members ends up leaving other members with hurt feelings. I realize that adults should be able to deal with this kind of thing, but as is always said on PFB, you can't fault someone for their feelings.
Maybe anyone who is asked or volunteers to work behind the scenes on PFB should be anonymous. That way all members are on equal ground without anyone having to feel slighted. This is just my observation, and I'm sure some of you will disagree with me, but after thinking about it, things never seem to work out when a public announcement is made naming a certain member or members.
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|

|
I asked
by Brendalala Wed July 22, 2009 @ 4:16 PM
|
|
|
|
|

|

|
Yes
by Brendalala Wed July 22, 2009 @ 4:54 PM
|
|
|
|
|

|

|
Oh my gosh
by Brendalala Wed July 22, 2009 @ 5:32 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|

|
attitude
by Brendalala Thu July 23, 2009 @ 9:52 AM
|
|
|
|
|

|

|
Of course
by Brendalala Thu July 23, 2009 @ 12:05 PM
|
|
|
|
|

|

|
I know
by Brendalala Thu July 23, 2009 @ 3:23 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|

|
Nope.
by Brendalala Fri July 24, 2009 @ 5:50 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|

|
Re:
by Brendalala Fri July 24, 2009 @ 3:55 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|
by Venice Posted Thu July 16, 2009 @ 1:27 AM
|
|
|
Just when I thought the life of Michael Jackson couldn't be sadder, I turned on the television to see a never before seen video of his hair on fire in the Pepsi commercial. I remember when it happened and seeing pictures of him being put in an ambulance, but I never realized the extent of his injuries.
I watched with horror and shock as the flames rose from his head while he spun around in what must have been unimaginable fear. When the fire was put out, he was left with a burned bald spot on the top of his head but still managed to wave to his fans.
This was undoubtedly the defining moment in Michael Jackson's life. A life of pain, pain killers, disfigurement, surgeries, recoveries, more pain killers, Vitiligo, Lupus, and more pain killers. And all that on top of being self conscious about his looks in the first place thanks to a father with the sensitivity of a rock.
I am now convinced of several things. Despite fame, fortune and unbelievable talent, Michael Jackson was a tormented and lonely man who suffered more than his share of pain, ridicule and humiliation. I believe he was a kind and gentle human being who truly cared about others and would never hurt anyone. I do not believe he was a child molester and do believe he was innocent of all the charges against him. I think his addiction to prescription drugs began with the Pepsi commercial, and that being rich and famous enabled him to obtain the drugs he needed.
All one has to do is see how he raised his three children to know what kind of person he was. Now that the children are becoming more public, I have heard nothing but praise about their upbringing. Seeing and hearing about the children has restored my faith. Everything I've heard about Michael Jackson in the last few weeks has pushed me off the fence I've been on all these years and onto Michael's side.
Why do we always learn more about a person in death than we do in life?
The only hope now is that Michael Jackson's life and death will change the way prescription drugs are dispensed to celebrities and anyone else with the means to buy a doctor. Unnecessary deaths of people like Michael Jackson, Anna Nicole Smith, Heath Ledger and others must be a thing of the past. Not one more child should be left without a mother or father, nor should another mother or father be left without a child.
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
by Venice Posted Sat July 11, 2009 @ 1:09 AM
|
|
|
If your pet needs to fly, and you want the skies to be friendly, have no fear, Pet Airways is here!
Pet Airways is a pet only airline offering first class travel in the temperature controlled main cabin, not in cargo. Your pet will be safe and comfortable, be monitored by a trained pet attendant and will never be left unattended.
And get this... all protocols and pet handling procedures are conducted under the guidance of famed Lassie veterinarian, Dr. Jeff Werber!
Wondering what it costs? Fares are as low as $149!.. a small price for peace of mind.
Is this the new trend in pet travel? Is it something you would consider doing? Will it catch on?
http://petairways.com/
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
by Venice Posted Fri July 3, 2009 @ 6:20 AM
|
|
|
I've been having a discussion with Ben in the Honda letter (http://tinyurl.com/muot5g) about the responsibility of parents in the upbringing of their children. I disagree with his attitude that someone needs to be blamed when a child's behavior is not acceptable, but let me start by saying I do agree that parents have a responsibility to do their best. Unfortunately, I do see many parents who depend too heavily on outside sources to teach their kids things that should begin at home.
Most parents start out thinking their child will be the most well-behaved, intelligent kid on the block, at family gatherings and in the classroom. And most parents try very hard to make sure that their child lives up to those expectations. But sometimes no matter what parents do, how hard they try or how much help they seek, some children will never be what society views as an acceptable child. But that does not, I repeat DOES NOT mean that the parents are irresponsible.
Before I became a parent, I was judgmental of other parents who I believed were not raising their children the way I would raise mine. And even after I had my first child, I still judged parents who couldn't seem to get their kids to behave. My child was perfect after all, so how hard could it be? I thought parents who couldn't control their kids were irresponsible and self-centered.
And then I had another child and everything changed. And I mean everything. I suddenly found myself with an infant that I was convinced came from another planet. If I wasn't in the delivery room at the time of birth, I would have denied ownership. I had been around a lot of kids in my life, but this little creature I brought home from the hospital defied everything I knew or thought I knew about children. I was at a complete loss and began to seek help because it was obvious that traditional and conventional parenting skills and methods were not going to work.
The bottom line is that sometimes a child's behavior is simply out of the parents' control. Sometimes there is absolutely nothing a parent can do, even with the help and support of every possible professional, including pediatricians, teachers, social workers, psychiatrists, neurologists and child development experts, just to mention a few.
I have had the opportunity and pleasure to know many parents and children over the eighteen years since my son was born, and it's been my experience that most parents do not hope for or enjoy a child that misbehaves. When most people decide to have children, they start out with the best of intentions. Do you think they wish for a child who will never listen, not follow rules and throw tantrums in public? Of course not. Every parent wants that perfect child, and most parents are ready, willing and able to be responsible. But sometimes all the good intentions, knowledge, skills and experience mean nothing, and not only are parents left helpless, but they also have to be subjected to onlookers pointing fingers and making accusations with no knowledge or understanding of the situation.
Now when I see a parent struggling with a misbehaving child, I don't immediately blame or condemn that parent. I ask myself what life must be like raising children who defy conventional parenting. And I don't have to look far for the answer. Drawing on my own experience, I see the situation in a completely different light and am not so quick to blame the parent. So the next time YOU see a parent struggling with a spirited child, don't be so judgmental. You have no idea what is going on in their lives or how much the parents are doing or how hard they are trying. And remember too that children do not enjoy being out of control or making spectacles of themselves. If given a choice, kids just want to be like everyone else. It's just as difficult for the kids as it is for the parents. And the last thing families need is to be judged by people who have no idea what's going on.
And it doesn't necessarily end with childhood. This can follow a person into adulthood, as well. Ben seems to think that everyone behind the wheel knows the difference between right and wrong. It has been my experience that too many drivers actually do not know the difference. Should we blame the parents? I also asked Ben how he would handle a child who was incapable of knowing the difference between right and wrong, but he neglected to answer. I wonder what Ben or anyone else would do if despite doing everything by the book, their child was not able to be molded into what society views as acceptable.
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|
by Venice Posted Thu June 25, 2009 @ 7:30 PM
|
|
|
When I heard about the death of Ed McMahon, I had a feeling the bad news about Farrah Fawcett wouldn't be far behind. Then I started wondering who would complete the trio of deaths. But not even in my wildest dreams did I think it would be Michael Jackson.
Ed McMahon was simply an institution. Farrah Fawcett's true talent surfaced in movies like "The Burning Bed", "Small Sacrifices" and "Extremities". And there really aren't enough words to describe Michael Jackson.
I hope there's a break in time before the cycle of three deaths begins again. This is a lot to absorb in one week.
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
by Venice Posted Sun June 21, 2009 @ 7:05 PM
|
|
|
http://tinyurl.com/l7xfsj
Reply
|
|

|

|
Good info
by Donno Mon June 22, 2009 @ 10:31 AM
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
by Venice Posted Sat June 20, 2009 @ 2:05 AM
|
|
|
No, not the movie... my son! Well, hopefully not the movie. But this is high school not college!
Yes, today's the day, and it comes with a multitude of mixed feelings. There are so many things I'm going to miss, but I'm also breathing a sigh of relief. His school years have been quite an adventure, and I think I'm finally ready to turn it into a memory. He's taking college courses over the summer, so things may not be all that different. We'll see.
His goal is still to be a math teacher, and although he was disappointed about not being accepted into his college of choice (mostly because he applied too late), I think it worked out for the best because it was going to be too much of a transition. So he'll be going to community college for at least a year (possibly two), which will be an easier adjustment. I'm a little skeptical that he's going to be able to buckle down and do the work, but at least he's willing to try. If this doesn't work out, he'll have to start thinking about other alternatives.
So, Congratulations to all the Graduates of 2009! May all your dreams come true.
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|
by Venice Posted Tue June 16, 2009 @ 7:08 PM
|
|
|
Since the name Howard Stern was brought up in the Letterman letter, I started thinking exactly what it is I love about these men. I admit that I don't always find them funny and even think they are disrespectful and downright disgusting at times (well, mostly Howard), but I have also seen both men not be afraid to reveal their other side. I accept that they have jobs to do like everyone else, and that I have a choice whether or not to watch them. So I think the real question is how I feel about these two men as people and fellow human beings. And in that respect, they are both people I would be proud to know and welcome into my life.
My first exposure to Howard Stern was years ago on his television show. At first, I really didn't know what to make of him. I couldn't have been too offended though because I kept tuning in. It wasn't until his book and movie "Private Parts" that I actually understood where he was coming from and what he was about. I couldn't help but respect and admire his intelligence and accomplishments.
Same with Letterman. I'd been watching him for years but the most insight I ever got into his real life was after his heart surgery and birth of his son when he started revealing things about himself that made me see him in a different light, especially when he opened up about his dad.
If Howard had never written "Private Parts" and David never had heart surgery, I would have still continued to be a supporter because my instinct in the first place was to like these men. And every time I see the two of them together, I realize how much alike they are and how lucky their families are because they are both true family men. Just as an example, David and Howard are the only two celebrities I ever heard take full responsibility for the failure of their first marriages. I think here's something to be said for that, at least for me.
Reply
|
|
 |
|
by Venice Posted Sun June 7, 2009 @ 11:32 PM
|
|
|
In PFB's Moving Forward post, I was accused of enjoying edgy conversation. At least I think it was an accusation. But I took it as a compliment.
The truth is that it's the reason I've hung around this site for so long and why it's killing me to see it change so drastically. It was the edgy conversations that first attracted me to PFB and definitely what kept me coming back. Some of you may think that's a character flaw, but that's who I am, and I have no desire to change. I enjoy being me.
However, don't think for one moment that I don't know I can be annoying, too. I've been annoying people my entire life. It's nothing new. But when I believe in something, I have to give it my best. I don't stop, I don't hide, and I don't leave. I may not always win and may even gain some enemies along the way, but the most important thing to me is knowing I did my best.
That's why I haven't given up on this. I still believe in PFB.
I miss everyone who has left (with a couple of exceptions) and the edgy conversations that took place. I miss the friendliness and familiarity of the people. I miss hearing feedback from commenters I grew to respect, regardless of their commenting style. I miss the whole concept.
I know nothing I say will change anything, but I probably won't stop trying until either my computer self-destructs or I get the heave-ho, whichever comes first.
Reply
|
|

|
re:edgy
by kathleen m Sun June 7, 2009 @ 11:42 PM
|
|
|

|

|
AHHHH
by mary jo Mon June 8, 2009 @ 1:05 AM
|
|
|
|
|

|

|
Yeah.
by calm Mon June 8, 2009 @ 8:42 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
by Venice Posted Sun June 7, 2009 @ 6:46 AM
|
|
|
http://tinyurl.com/q8vawh
Now play nice, boys. Don't make me have to break you up... haha!
I'm not taking sides because you both have valid points.
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|

|
Ah
by Donno Sun June 7, 2009 @ 9:25 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|
by Venice Posted Sat June 6, 2009 @ 2:07 AM
|
|
|
Why do so many letter writers not understand that when they share a letter, it's subject to comments? When a letter writer chooses to click the "share" box, they waive their right to privacy. I do not believe it says anywhere in the letter generator that comments are subject to the approval of the letter writer.
If someone chooses to share their letter for the sake of warning other people, the simple solution to not seeing the feedback is to not look at the comments. Just share the letter and be done with it. If the letter writer chooses to read the feedback, the commenters shouldn't be subjected to rudeness from the writer simply because they have expressed an opinion or (**gasp**) offered advice.
If a letter writer simply wants to share information without getting any feedback, then that person should have enough restraint to ignore the comments. If the letter is shared for the purpose of gaining support, then the writer has to be willing to accept the negative feedback, as well.
Letter writers can't have it both ways.
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
by ♫Venice♫ Posted Mon June 1, 2009 @ 7:50 AM
|
|
|
I know you want to say something, so go ahead. Don't be afraid. You can say whatever you want here.
Are you enjoying the revised TOS, or do you find it too restrictive? Have you cut back on your commenting because you're worried about getting a demerit? Do you think the new rules are a good idea, or are they making you feel nervous and uneasy? Do you think giving up some freedom is a good trade off for a site that is less opinionated? I'm curious if people prefer a safe PFB or one that's more engaging.
As a letter writer, would you be open to constructive criticism? Do you think it would help you write a better letter and improve communication? Or would you only want to hear feedback that supported your letter and complaint? Do you think the moderation should only apply to comments made directly to letter writers? Should commenters be permitted to speak freely amongst themselves with out worrying about the consequences?
If you could change one thing about the new rules, what would it be?
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|

|

|
I agree
by Donno Sun June 7, 2009 @ 2:26 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
censorship
by kathleen m Sun June 7, 2009 @ 10:01 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
by ♫Venice♫ Posted Fri May 1, 2009 @ 12:49 AM
|
|
|
Today is three years since I started this blog. I thought I would celebrate by doing something I have never done before.
I have been accused of never having read the TOS. Well, that would be true. I never have. I never felt it was necessary. As far as commenting, the rules seemed simple enough.. no name calling, vulgarity, personal attacks, etc. Not hard to remember.
But then something changed. I'm not sure when or how, or if it happened over time. But what seemed simple became complicated and even inconsistent.
So I decided to take a look at the TOS. I didn't read it word for word, but I did take a long look. To my surprise, it didn't help me understand what is allowed and what is not.
Which leads me to ask you a question, Clete. Why do you keep mentioning the TOS when responding to my comments. How specifically do you believe my comments violate the TOS?
During your first stint on PFB, you targeted certain people. Strangely enough, I was not one of them. You know why? Not only because there was nothing to target, but also because I intentionally ignored you. If you don't believe me or don't remember, just look at your original profile. You will not find one comment to or from me.
When you resurfaced, the people you previously targeted were no longer around, leaving you without a reason to be here. That's when you set your sights on me. However, I can't help wondering why you have a problem with my commenting style now but had none before, considering it hasn't changed.
Could it be that you're running out of people to justify your reason for being here?
Happy Anniversary to me.
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|
by ♫Venice♫ Posted Wed April 29, 2009 @ 6:04 AM
|
|
|
I just wanted to mention how sad I was to hear that Bea Arthur passed away. I didn't watch "The Golden Girls" during its initial run but have seen every episode at least a dozen times in reruns. I guess I was too young the first time around and didn't want to be reminded that I too would someday be a golden girl. But when I rediscovered the show in reruns, I was instantly hooked. Dorothy (Bea Arthur) and Sophia (Estelle Getty) were my favorite characters, and now they are together again.
So thanks Bea for such memorable characters like Maude and Dorothy. In my mind you will live forever because you'll be in home everyday until I see you in the big TVLand in the sky!
Reply
|
|

|

|
Oh wow.
by BellaSera Wed April 29, 2009 @ 9:56 PM
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
by ♫Venice♫ Posted Mon April 27, 2009 @ 11:14 PM
|
|
|
Since I have been prohibited from furthering this discussion with you on your letter, I'm posting here. I hope you see this.
I wanted you to know that until I read your response about discrimination, I couldn't figure out your actual complaint, which I have said before. In the context of my original comment, the use of the word discrimination had nothing to do with race, religion, sex, etc. So I was surprised and even shocked to read your reply at the time, which I think was your first and honest reaction to my comment. I asked if you thought the treatment you received at B&N was a matter of discrimination because that would explain why you made a mountain out of a molehill.
I have pretty much either said or insinuated all of this before without it being removed, so I'm not sure why it was removed now.
I would also like to say again that if you think it was discrimination, you should let B&N know because that's wrong, and they should know what happened. Otherwise, I'm back to square one of not understanding your complaint. I think I've asked this before, and I apologize if I don't remember your answer, but what is it you want B&N to do in order to keep you as a customer? Is it that you want a written policy and/or sign so you can choose to go elsewhere?
I found your letter intriguing, and I'm just trying to understand the complaint and what the store can do to please you.
Reply
|
|
|
|
 |
|
by ♫Venice♫ Posted Sun April 26, 2009 @ 6:13 AM
|
|
|
I've seen some interesting discussions here, but nothing quite like the one about leaving your child alone in a store. I know that some parents think nothing can happen to their kids, but to actually make a case that it's a parent's choice not to watch their child goes beyond my comprehension. Being a free-spirited parent is one thing, but to deliberately put your child in danger based on principles is downright selfish. I'm trying to understand this way of thinking, but I'm coming up empty. I just can't seem to justify it in my mind.
How do you make someone understand the way it feels when a child is missing? I can't figure out how any parent could knowingly take that risk, or why they would think it's in the child's best interest. When a child is taken, I'm sure he or she is not thinking how lucky they are that their parent thought they were mature enough to be left alone. I think they're frightened out of their mind and might even wonder why their parent wasn't protecting them. Would any parent want that to be their child's last thought?
I can't imagine how many parents would give anything for a second chance, but that chance usually dies in the the split second a child is abducted. I realize that people can't live in fear, but I just don't see the harm in not taking unnecessary risks especially with something where there's no turning back. I don't understand what is gained, but I do know what is lost.
Natalee Holloway was a full-grown, mature adult, but I'm sure a day doesn't go by that her mother doesn't agonize over not being able to protect her daughter. I realize that at some point there is nothing a parent can do, but isn't it natural parental instinct to want to keep children safe from harm at any age?
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|
by ♫Venice♫ Posted Fri April 24, 2009 @ 6:54 PM
|
|
|
He comes and goes, and always seems to suddenly resurface whenever he sees an opportunity to question my comments. That's not the problem. The problem is he does so without knowing my commenting history (located in my profile) and admits that he has no intention of reading it. He prefers to post accusations with no evidence to back them up.
So, Wayne, unless and until you read my entire commenting history, you are nothing more than a nuisance and source of hot air. The only reason you have targeted me is because all the other people you had issues with are gone. The least you should have done was make sure there was some merit to your mission. But you have failed miserably. Not just because you refuse to read my comments, but because there is nothing in them to prove you are right.
Reply
|
|
 |
|
by ♫Venice♫ Posted Thu April 23, 2009 @ 5:42 AM
|
|
|
Remember when that title was best known as an Academy Award winning song from the movie "The Poseidon Adventure" and made Maureen McGovern a household name back in Seventies? Well, it's come a long way baby.
The Morning After is now known as Plan B, the emergency contraception pill.
When I first heard about this pill years ago, I thought it was a great idea and a good solution to an unwanted pregnancy. Well, at least better than some of the alternatives. But the more I read about it, the more I realized that it was not as simple or safe as women were being led to believe. There were potential risks and complications involved. That's probably why it originally required a doctor's prescription and why women needed to be under doctor's care. When it became available over the counter, I figured it was safer and had less side effects, but I was still surprised that something like that would be available to anyone without first being advised by a doctor. I realize a person is no longer a minor at 18, but it bothered me to think of an 18-year old girl making such an important decision on her own. Some might take the pill out of fear without realizing there are other alternatives, and some might even rely on the pill as a primary method of birth control. I didn't know which was worse.
Now that the age has been lowered to 17, I'm not sure what to think. Is that where it will end, or will this pill eventually become available to all females? I have a daughter, and it would haunt me to know she used the morning after pill for the wrong reasons, at any age. But using it as a minor without really knowing what she was doing and possibly thinking it was her only option would break my heart.
The world is a complicated place, and I don't claim to have the answers, but I know when something feels wrong. And this feels wrong. Instead of a Plan B for minors, maybe more effort should be put into stressing the importance of Plan A, which is how not to become pregnant in the first place. I know it's tough for some parents to discuss these things with their kids, but maybe it's time to get over that. I can't think of a better time or reason to bring everything out in the open now that the morning after pill is available over the counter to minors.
Reply
|
|
 |
|
by ♫Venice♫ Posted Tue April 21, 2009 @ 6:37 AM
|
|
|
I find it interesting that Miss California thinks her anti same-sex marriage opinion cost her the Miss USA crown. As part of the competition, she had to answer a question from Perez Hilton on whether she thought same-sex marriage should be legalized.
This was her reply:
"In my country, and in my family, I believe that a marriage should be between a man and a woman."
In a later interview, she explained by saying, "I said what I feel. I stated an opinion that was true to myself and that's all I can do. It is a very touchy subject and (Hilton) is a homosexual and I see where he was coming from and I see the audience would've wanted me to be more politically correct. But I was raised in a way that you can never compromise your beliefs and your opinions for anything." She said she wouldn't have it any other way.
I saw Hilton on Larry King Live, and he agreed that Miss California's answer did cost her the crown. I didn't see the show, but he said the audience booed her answer. He said he would have preferred her to be politically correct instead of honest.
Do you think she did the right thing by being true to herself, or should she have given the answer everyone wanted to hear? Do you admire her for her honesty or think she did a very foolish thing?
What would you have done?
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|
by ♫Venice♫ Posted Sun April 19, 2009 @ 6:17 PM
|
|
|
Have you seen/heard Susan Boyle?.. the contestant on Britain's Got Talent? She is living proof that no one should ever judge a book by its cover. Just search her name on YouTube, and you'll see what I mean. She went from complete obscurity to being an overnight sensation. And she deserves every bit of it!
Reply
|
|
|
|
 |
|
by ♫Venice♫ Posted Wed April 15, 2009 @ 2:48 AM
|
|
|
If she is guilty, I don't understand how it could not be due to mental illness. Isn't the crime itself proof that she is not of sound mind? What's the alternative? Is it possible for a sane person to commit a crime like this? What could the motive possibly be? I also don't understand how her family can say she is normal and not know she is ill. She's been living for 28 years. How could no one know? Why didn't she get help? I'm sure she didn't develop mental illness overnight. If she pleads guilty, what could her defense possibly be if not by reason of insanity?
For the sake of the families, I hope this never goes to trial.
Reply
|
|
 |
|
by ♫Venice♫ Posted Tue April 14, 2009 @ 9:34 PM
|
|
|
Well?
Those Obamas have good taste!
Reply
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|
by ♫Venice♫ Posted Sat April 11, 2009 @ 1:10 AM
|
|
|
Well, I got through Good Friday remembering not to eat meat! It's the only religious thing I do all year. I grew up not eating meat on Fridays until the Pope said it was okay. Hmmm.. so why was I doing it all those years? I never understood that.
Anyway, speaking of Easter, it was around this time three years ago that PFB first introduced blogs. I didn't know what a blog was or what I was supposed to do with one. Then I saw Brenda's (aka Brenny) blog, which was one of the first to be opened. She simply said "Happy Easter", and I thought, Oh, I can do that! And so I did. Since then, I've used my blog as sort of a journal of things I want to remember. If it ever disappears, three years of my life will go with it. I've always regretted not starting a journal when my first child was born. I had plenty of time so there was no excuse. I was never one to keep a diary, so I guess that's why I never thought of keeping a journal. But I've learned that when you write things down, it frees up your mind for other things. Because the older you get, the more things there are to remember. So this blog came in handy for me, and it also gave me the chance to talk to many of you along the way.
We broke tradition here at our house a few years ago when we stopped coloring eggs on Good Friday. I really miss it though. If I didn't feel ridiculous doing it alone, I probably would go ahead and do it anyway. No more Easter baskets either. I miss that even more because now there's no candy for me to sneak. I usually go to Target after a holiday and stock up at 50% to 90% off, but this year Target really cut back on the Easter merchandise, so I don't think there will be much left. Oh, well.. too bad for me.
It's going to be quiet here all weekend. My daughter is working again this year, and my son is working, too. I usually don't mind the peace and quiet, but on holidays it makes me reminisce. I'll be glad when the weekend is over.
I hope you all enjoy your holiday. And please.. eat a piece of candy for me!
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|