Just because YOU have not seen anything but JPEGs does not mean that others have not seen actual printed documentation.

You've written to the Supreme Court. They've already been asked to, on several occasions, to take action to prevent Obama from taking the oath. They, as a group, have decided that there is no need to take such action.

If others, those with extensive legal background and experience with the Court, cannot persuade the Court to take action, what makes you think that your letter would make a difference?

You're certainly entitled to try, so I'm not saying that you shouldn't have written and sent this letter. Just asking what makes you think that this letter will be treated with any more consideration than those from people like Alan Keyes, Leo Donofrio, or Philip Berg?