HOME SHARED LETTERS RATINGS MY PLANET COMMUNITIES MISSION SIGN UP!
Shared Letters

Join and browse our exclusive open discussion forums and talk about whatever you like.

Channels
» The Suggestion Box
» Company Responses
» PFB Feedback Line
» Consumer Podcasts
» Mommy Talk & Daddy Dialogue ™
» Shared Letters


Newsletter

Sign up for PlanetFeedback's "Consumer Café" email newsletter!





Three Tables Arent Enough At Red Lobster

Posted Tue January 10, 2006, by Elaine W. written to Red Lobster

Write a Letter to this Company  |  Rate this Company


I have been a regular customer of the Red Lobster in Clarksville, Indiana for the last 10 years, dining there at least once a week, but a recent change has made me rethink my plans.

I have always been able to come in as a call party for my favorite server, Tony Goforth, and be seated right away. When I came in in mid-November, the hostess said, "He has a table that is about done, so it will be a minute." I thought it was odd, since I was never seated in his section, but I sat and waited for 20 minutes and was finally taken to my "usual" table.
When Tony came out he told me that the reason for my wait was that Red Lobster had instituted a "3 table rule"..that no server could have more than 3 tables seated at a time.

I think that this rule will end up costing you business. When someone comes in to eat, they don't want to cool their heels in the lobby because a server has 3 tables. Most of the more experienced servers can handle many more tables than this, so it is unnecessarily limited the amount of money they can make by telling them they can only have 3 tables. In the past, the servers had the discretion to ask for more tables or ask the hostess not to seat them until some of their customers have left. The managers and hostesses also had a pretty good idea of which servers could handle more tables and which could only handle a couple at a time and seat them accordingly.

I don't know if this is a local policy or a corporate decision, but I ask that you please reconsider this. When I come to Red Lobster to eat, I don't want to waste up to an hour waiting for a table when the restaurant isn't busy because my server has 3 tables. Please return to the old policy of seating the patrons if the server has a table in their section and want to take that party..this is much better for the employees AND the customers, and ultimately will be better for your business.


Reply



Log In/Create an account | 18 comments
     Add to your del.icio.us  del.icio.us    Digg this story  Digg this  
PlanetFeedback Comments are subject to strict terms and conditions. We reserve the right to deny site membership privileges to any individuals acting inappropriately.

by Jordan Posted Thu September 28, 2006 @ 7:16 PM

You obviously know very little about being a server, because if you
did, you would know how hard it is to take care of more than three
tables at once. so my advice to you is....YOU TRY IT AND SEE HOW YOU
LIKE IT.

Reply
by Lynn Kutaj Posted Thu March 23, 2006 @ 12:52 PM

Obviously you have limited knowledge of the food service industry.
Servers do not decide the number of tables in their section;
management (namely corporate) does. The limit of 3 tables is to
provide great service to all tables, not mediocre service to ten
tables. If it was up to the servers, sure, many would probably opt to
take another table. If you have ever eaten at Mimi's cafe or Denny's,
then you know that more tables isn't necessarily good. Then you would
probably be complaining that once you got sat, you waited too long for
drinks, refills, the check, etc. I assure you that the majority of
restaurants implement this policy FOR the customers.

Reply


I do know how things work at this particular one by Elaine Williams Tue May 2, 2006 @ 3:34 PM
by JuliePie Posted Fri January 13, 2006 @ 2:37 PM

The three-table policy is instituted so that people DO NOT have to
wait. Unless, of course, they request a specific server. It's great
that Tony is such a great waiter, and I would hope that you feel that
he is worth waiting for, rather than complaining. Better to wait
because he is busy than wait because he needs to catch up!

The restaurant where I work gives servers 3-4 table sections on busy
weekend nights. I used to work in a lounge where I had 14 tables in my
section! Can I handle more that 3 or 4 tables? Absolutely! But on
weekends, they like to give smaller sections to avoid
"double-seating". The more people that are on the floor, the longer it
takes to go through a rotation, avoiding this problem which can lead
to poor service even from some of the best servers.

That being said, it's a shame that a server with a section adjacent to
Tony's couldn't have loaned him an empty table and then taken one of
his on the next go-around. Maybe that is against the rules, but I
don't see why any establishment would deny a server and regulars this
way. We do this all the time, and the managers don't even know. We
just tell them the table wanted to move or something.

Oh, and don't worry about lost tips. I made $150 in 4 hours with a
3-table section one Friday night.

Reply

by Tammy DelNegro Posted Fri January 13, 2006 @ 10:43 AM



For me though, personally? I would rather wait and have good service,
rather than have someone who has 6 tables and have rushed service. I
HATE waiting for 10mins for a drink refill.

Cause, yes they do have less tables, but in the long run, the tips may
be more cause they are providing a better service.

The 3 table thing is a corporate level decision. My friends husband
used to work as a waiter at the Olive Garden up in CT. It is owned by
the same company, and we also had to wait for his section a few times
because of the 3 table policy.

Reply


Re: Three Tables Arent Enough At Red Lobster by Chris M Thu January 12, 2006 @ 7:35 PM

Re: Three Tables Arent Enough At Red Lobster by Daley Fri January 13, 2006 @ 2:23 AM

Re: Three Tables Arent Enough At Red Lobster by Daley Fri January 13, 2006 @ 2:26 AM

by Chris M Posted Fri January 13, 2006 @ 4:26 PM

Daley,

I was not being rude. The person, whom I am assuming you know or is a
friend of yours(?), came across with the attitude of self-entitlement.
If you want to wait for a server, great. Just acknowledge that it
may take longer because of the 3 table policy, a policy that helps the
other 99% of the world that does not request a wait staff get in, get
good service and leave.

Not being mean, being honest about the letter writer Elaine and her
"desires".

Reply
by zachary gryffindor boy Posted Fri January 13, 2006 @ 7:13 PM

She thought you were being rude because you called her spoiled. She
is not really spoiled she is just mad at the service of waiting when
she did not have to wait before because she did not expect it or
something. And I doubt those two posters know each other. Just
because someone disagrees with you does not mean that they are the
same person or know each other personally. If you are trying to make
your point stronger by doing that well you are not doing a good job of
it. It's like me saying you are sticking up for Tony because you are
Tony, or Tony's friend. Does not make sense.

Reply


Rude by Chris M Sat January 14, 2006 @ 11:13 AM


Chris by Elaine Williams Sun January 15, 2006 @ 1:59 AM


highly agree! by Jordan Thu September 28, 2006 @ 7:19 PM
by CatFan Posted Thu January 12, 2006 @ 3:19 AM

This is a very stupid management decision. I only hope they increased
the server's wages to cover the loss in tips!

Your letter is very well written. I hope you get a positive outcome.

Reply

The reality is that you make MORE tips!! by Rob B Tue January 17, 2006 @ 3:27 PM


That is true up to a point by Elaine Williams Thu January 26, 2006 @ 2:22 AM

by Daley Posted Thu January 12, 2006 @ 12:43 AM

I agree with Elaine, I also know this server and know he can handle
more than three tables at a time. He is an excellant server.

Reply

by Aleyria Posted Wed January 11, 2006 @ 1:15 PM

I completely agree with you. Its ridiculous to only allow a competent
server 3 tables at a time. Like you stated a hostess will know how
many tables each server can handle at a time and the act accordingly.
When I was a hostess and regular customers came in for a particular
server we would seat them even if the server was slammed because as a
regular they are usually much more patient and willing to put up w/ a
server thats busy, just to sit in their section. This is just another
example of retail managers disallowing their employees to think.

Reply




Home | Shared Letters | Ratings | Login | Communities | Categories | RSS | Contact Us | Terms & Conditions | Privacy Policy | FAQ
Copyright 2013 © All Rights Reserved PlanetFeedback.com | Web by Cicada