|
|
Three Tables Arent Enough At Red Lobster
Posted Tue January 10, 2006, by Elaine W. written to Red Lobster
Write a Letter to this Company | Rate this Company
I have been a regular customer of the Red Lobster in Clarksville, Indiana for the last 10 years, dining there at least once a week, but a recent change has made me rethink my plans.
I have always been able to come in as a call party for my favorite server, Tony Goforth, and be seated right away. When I came in in mid-November, the hostess said, "He has a table that is about done, so it will be a minute." I thought it was odd, since I was never seated in his section, but I sat and waited for 20 minutes and was finally taken to my "usual" table.
When Tony came out he told me that the reason for my wait was that Red Lobster had instituted a "3 table rule"..that no server could have more than 3 tables seated at a time.
I think that this rule will end up costing you business. When someone comes in to eat, they don't want to cool their heels in the lobby because a server has 3 tables. Most of the more experienced servers can handle many more tables than this, so it is unnecessarily limited the amount of money they can make by telling them they can only have 3 tables. In the past, the servers had the discretion to ask for more tables or ask the hostess not to seat them until some of their customers have left. The managers and hostesses also had a pretty good idea of which servers could handle more tables and which could only handle a couple at a time and seat them accordingly.
I don't know if this is a local policy or a corporate decision, but I ask that you please reconsider this. When I come to Red Lobster to eat, I don't want to waste up to an hour waiting for a table when the restaurant isn't busy because my server has 3 tables. Please return to the old policy of seating the patrons if the server has a table in their section and want to take that party..this is much better for the employees AND the customers, and ultimately will be better for your business.
Reply
| Log In/Create an account | 18 comments |
|
|
| PlanetFeedback Comments are subject to strict terms and conditions. We reserve the right to deny site membership privileges to any individuals acting inappropriately. |
 |
 |
 |
|

|
by Jordan Posted Thu September 28, 2006 @ 7:16 PM
|
|
|
You obviously know very little about being a server, because if you did, you would know how hard it is to take care of more than three tables at once. so my advice to you is....YOU TRY IT AND SEE HOW YOU LIKE IT.
Reply
|
|
 |
|
|
by Lynn Kutaj Posted Thu March 23, 2006 @ 12:52 PM
|
|
|
Obviously you have limited knowledge of the food service industry. Servers do not decide the number of tables in their section; management (namely corporate) does. The limit of 3 tables is to provide great service to all tables, not mediocre service to ten tables. If it was up to the servers, sure, many would probably opt to take another table. If you have ever eaten at Mimi's cafe or Denny's, then you know that more tables isn't necessarily good. Then you would probably be complaining that once you got sat, you waited too long for drinks, refills, the check, etc. I assure you that the majority of restaurants implement this policy FOR the customers.
Reply
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
by JuliePie Posted Fri January 13, 2006 @ 2:37 PM
|
|
|
The three-table policy is instituted so that people DO NOT have to wait. Unless, of course, they request a specific server. It's great that Tony is such a great waiter, and I would hope that you feel that he is worth waiting for, rather than complaining. Better to wait because he is busy than wait because he needs to catch up!
The restaurant where I work gives servers 3-4 table sections on busy weekend nights. I used to work in a lounge where I had 14 tables in my section! Can I handle more that 3 or 4 tables? Absolutely! But on weekends, they like to give smaller sections to avoid "double-seating". The more people that are on the floor, the longer it takes to go through a rotation, avoiding this problem which can lead to poor service even from some of the best servers.
That being said, it's a shame that a server with a section adjacent to Tony's couldn't have loaned him an empty table and then taken one of his on the next go-around. Maybe that is against the rules, but I don't see why any establishment would deny a server and regulars this way. We do this all the time, and the managers don't even know. We just tell them the table wanted to move or something.
Oh, and don't worry about lost tips. I made $150 in 4 hours with a 3-table section one Friday night.
Reply
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|
|
by Tammy DelNegro Posted Fri January 13, 2006 @ 10:43 AM
|
|
|
For me though, personally? I would rather wait and have good service, rather than have someone who has 6 tables and have rushed service. I HATE waiting for 10mins for a drink refill.
Cause, yes they do have less tables, but in the long run, the tips may be more cause they are providing a better service.
The 3 table thing is a corporate level decision. My friends husband used to work as a waiter at the Olive Garden up in CT. It is owned by the same company, and we also had to wait for his section a few times because of the 3 table policy.
Reply
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
She thought you were being rude because you called her spoiled. She is not really spoiled she is just mad at the service of waiting when she did not have to wait before because she did not expect it or something. And I doubt those two posters know each other. Just because someone disagrees with you does not mean that they are the same person or know each other personally. If you are trying to make your point stronger by doing that well you are not doing a good job of it. It's like me saying you are sticking up for Tony because you are Tony, or Tony's friend. Does not make sense.
Reply
|
|
|
|

|

|
Chris
by Elaine Williams Sun January 15, 2006 @ 1:59 AM
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
by CatFan Posted Thu January 12, 2006 @ 3:19 AM
|
|
|
This is a very stupid management decision. I only hope they increased the server's wages to cover the loss in tips!
Your letter is very well written. I hope you get a positive outcome.
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|
|
by Daley Posted Thu January 12, 2006 @ 12:43 AM
|
|
|
I agree with Elaine, I also know this server and know he can handle more than three tables at a time. He is an excellant server.
Reply
|
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
|
|