 |
|

|
by Venice Posted Sun November 22, 2009 @ 5:56 PM
|
|
|
There is currently a letter to Aces Bar & Grille about tipping not being mandatory. While that may be true, it doesn't necessarily mean it comes without consequence.
In what I believe is a separate incident, two college students were arrested, handcuffed and transported from the Lehigh Pub in Bethlehem, PA after failing to pay a mandatory 18 percent gratuity. The circumstances are very similar to the letter, but apparently this occurred in a different restaurant.
So next time you're thinking about not leaving a tip for ANY reason, keep in mind that you might find yourself behind bars.. and I don't mean the ones that serve drinks!
http://articles.moneycentral.msn.com/SmartSpending/blog/page.aspx?post =1393099&_blg=1,1393099
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|

|
by Venice Posted Thu October 15, 2009 @ 5:29 PM
|
|
|
A major part of forming an opinion about a company or product is determining the credibility of a letter. The reality is that letter writers are going to paint themselves in a good and favorable light in order to make their complaint sound valid, or they're not going to include all the details in their letter. That's understandable. But that's also why hearing from other people, especially those with inside information, is crucial.
I want to see responses to a complaint before I am willing to write a company off based entirely on a letter. There are always two sides, and it's better to hear different opinions, even if it's only speculation, than to make a decision based on one side only. That's why I think comments serve a valuable purpose. If we took every complaint at face value, we'd boycott everything. There has to be some skepticism to balance things out and to help us make logical and informed decisions.
I think PFB would prefer to do away with commenting altogether, but in my opinion that would be a terrible disservice to consumers who visit the site to research companies and products. I think comments help provide readers with a broader picture than the letter alone.
I do not know how helpful PFB is to letter writers, but I personally do not find the site to be as helpful without comments. And with commenting down to a minimum, I now realize just how important they are.
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|

|

|
Learning
by Venice Sun October 18, 2009 @ 6:28 PM
|
|
|
 |
|

|
by Venice Posted Sat October 10, 2009 @ 6:40 PM
|
|
|
When I first found this site, I was thrilled to see a place where disgruntled consumers could speak out and exchange information. However, the letters made me realize that I was a bit behind the times when it came to the extent of consumers' expectations and sense of entitlement. There were so many complaints that just seemed insignificant to me. Things that people used to accept as part of life were now perceived as enormous inconveniences and opportunities to make a quick buck or get a free meal. I'm not saying that all the complaints were trivial, but it seemed that people were finding fault with just about everything from rude employees to cold fries, perhaps for a moment in the spotlight or to possibly come out ahead. It was intriguing, to say the least.
Just as intriguing were the people who commented on the letters, especially the ones that hoped to bring these consumers back down to Earth with a hefty dose of reality. And that's how I first became familiar with someone who often shocked me with her comments and was at times offensive but ended up being my good friend.
She was a member of this long before I came along and was known for her blunt remarks and honest reactions and opinions. It was understandable why some people were put off by her style, but when I realized that we had a lot in common, I got to know her better. And I'm so happy I did. She is one of the most honest and trustworthy people I know. And despite her tough girl act, she is filled with kindness and compassion. Anyone who took the time to get to know her would agree.
As a loyal and addicted member of PFB for many years, she participated frequently with comments and discussions, as well as writing letters. When the old moderation program was implemented, she never complained and even said she understood why moderators were needed. She followed the rules to the best of her ability because she didn't want to put the moderators on the spot. She didn't whine or storm off like some others did but simply played by the rules. I had a lot of respect for that.
And now my respect for her has grown. She was recently banned from PFB when her frustration with the site forced her to speak her mind. As usual, her words were harsh, but they were also truthful. She stood up for herself and for others knowing that it would be a risk, and it was no surprise when she was banned. When she told me what happened, the first thing she said was that at least she could still read the letters because that's what she loved the most. We used to joke about how we were both hopelessly addicted to PFB and would probably never completely leave. Well, now she's completely gone. She can't even read the letters.
I'm trying to think of a way to end this post, but I'm coming up empty. I don't know what else to say. Nothing good can come of this. It just amounts to another lost member.
Reply
|
|

|

|
I'm sorry
by Donno Sun October 11, 2009 @ 12:13 AM
|
|
|
|
|

|

|
I noticed
by Donno Sun October 11, 2009 @ 8:21 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|

|
Hi Wolf!
by Venice Wed October 14, 2009 @ 5:04 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|

|
Off topic?
by Donno Thu October 15, 2009 @ 10:35 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|

|
Obsessive?
by Venice Thu October 22, 2009 @ 5:11 PM
|
|
|
|
|

|

|
Franese
by Venice Wed October 21, 2009 @ 4:46 PM
|
|
|
|
|

|

|
Franese
by Venice Thu October 22, 2009 @ 5:18 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|

|
YIKE!
by Wolf Sun October 25, 2009 @ 4:56 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|

|
by Venice Posted Tue September 1, 2009 @ 9:10 PM
|
|
|
Remember the story about my roof?...
Well, once again I'm sitting at home minding my own business and trouble knocks at my door in the way of a letter informing me that my refrigerator is possibly part of major recall of models that can go on fire.
So I stick my head inside the refrigerator looking for the model/serial numbers and am somewhat relieved to see that the serial number is one digit off.
We've had this refrigerator for almost nine years, and other than despising the user-unfriendly design, it has served us well and has never needed any maintenance or repair.
But the power of suggestion can be a forceful thing.
Ever since receiving the recall notice, I've been noticing an occasional burning smell inside the refrigerator that I am convinced was never there before. I tried telling myself that it was my imagination, but it seems to be getting worse. I asked my daughter, who is not easily alarmed, if she smelled anything unusual, and she confirmed the smell of smoke or something burning.
I really, really don't want to replace the refrigerator right now. Not only is it a lot of work, but I looked at new ones and don't like any of them.
So, what are my choices?
~Replace the refrigerator now with something I don't like.
~Wait for it to start smoking and hope that I'm home at the time.
~Keep telling myself that there will be no fire, and it will just burn out.
And to top it all off, my Sears card has probably been canceled due to non-use, and I would most likely want a Sears Kenmore if I do buy a new refrigerator.
Did I mention that I really don't want to replace the refrigerator?
Reply
|
|
|
|

|

|
Yes
by Venice Thu September 3, 2009 @ 9:39 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|

|
by Venice Posted Tue September 1, 2009 @ 7:49 PM
|
|
|
Yes, it's true! I sent out emails to every member of PFB in an attempt to brainwash them into agreeing with me and forcing them to post comments that would result in being suspended and banned!
Wait, it gets better!...
I did it because I wanted to hurt Greg!
Seriously folks, could this get any more ridiculous?
Reply
|
|
 |
|

|
by Venice Posted Mon August 31, 2009 @ 6:41 PM
|
|
|
Please bear with me. Or better yet, don't even read this if you're tired of the nonsense.
I have been put in the awkward position of being accused of something that simply isn't true, and I'm not sure what I'm supposed to do about it. I could just not say anything and hope that the truth will prevail, but under the circumstances, I feel the need to explain.
Apparently there are people who believe that I have been contacting members and riling them up to the point of being suspended or banned. I understand the need to blame someone for what's going on here, and that I'm an easy target, but I can't just let these accusations go over my head.
I have NEVER contacted anyone at any time to ask for a following, to gain support or to encourage them to post comments. On the contrary, people have contacted me for information, advice or to simply let off steam. I was not going to pretend that I did not agree with their concerns. And I have actually been motivated by them .
I was asked by Rowdy to post a comment in my profile saying that he was suspended. I decided to post it in his blog so the people involved in the conversation there would know why he wasn't responding. I didn't realize that he was unable to see the comment and found out later that he could not even access the site. However, the post was written for him and the people involved in the conversation, and no one else. I thought that was obvious, and I didn't see anyone lining up to join forces. However, some people took it the wrong way.
Sometimes I am given too much credit for having the ability to influence people or change things. Much of what I say is off the top of my head or thinking out loud, and I am often surprised when on occasion people agree with me because I usually feel like I'm in it alone. This idea that I am somehow forcing people to have the same opinion as mine and then encouraging them to comment is absurd and delusional. Not only would I never do anything like that, but I'm just not that important.
The only reason I'm bringing this up again is because I am tired of being accused of things that are not true. I did not have the email addresses of the people who were suspended or banned prior to them contacting me, however, my address has always been in plain sight. Isn't that proof enough that I am not instigating a revolution?
Is PFB going to take any responsibility at all for the problems on the site, or are they just going to blame everything on me?
The reason I posted here was to get this away from Rowdy's blog. I asked several times to move the discussion elsewhere but was flatly denied. So now I'll be the one criticized for doing it here.
It's funny. I finally gave in to the fact that I was fighting a lost cause. I've been trying to move forward and make the best of it, but I somehow got dragged into something that I never intended or expected to gain any momentum. I really don't know what I'm supposed to do anymore.
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|

|
Harley
by Venice Tue September 1, 2009 @ 8:31 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|

|
Right, Deb
by Venice Tue September 1, 2009 @ 6:09 PM
|
|
|
|
|

|

|
Sorry
by Venice Tue September 1, 2009 @ 6:58 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|

|
Also
by Venice Tue September 1, 2009 @ 11:03 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
sigh...
by Nichole K Wed September 2, 2009 @ 5:38 PM
|
|
|
|
|

|

|
Nichole
by Venice Wed September 2, 2009 @ 6:13 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
Harley
by Nichole K Tue September 1, 2009 @ 10:06 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|

|
Also...
by Venice Wed September 2, 2009 @ 11:59 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|

|
Michelle
by Venice Wed September 2, 2009 @ 5:07 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|

|
by Venice Posted Sun August 30, 2009 @ 6:17 PM
|
|
|
After its second major overhaul in less than ten years, Walmart is having another grand reopening! The last remodeling attempt was a waste of time and money. After months of construction, rubble and noise (much of which occurred over customers' heads), the store looked no different than before. But this time I can actually say it looks better. Of course there is still the same Walmart "feel", but the layout is completely different and the aisles are wider. I only took a quick look, but I'm anxious to go back and check it all out.
Coincidentally (?), the supermarket where I shop has implemented a new pricing program. Yes!.. lower prices!!! I don't need lower prices to keep me out of Walmart, but hopefully this strategy will work on the people who are fooled into thinking Walmart is cheaper.
For a small area, we have a lot of competition here. There are two major supermarkets (Shop Rite and Stop & Shop), in addition to Walmart. There are two Rite Aids (used to be three) and a large CVS, along with Stop & Shop pharmacy and several privately owned ones. Oh, and let's not forget Target, which has a little bit of everything and competes with all the other stores, including Kohl's!
I love competition.
Reply
|
|
 |
|

|
by Venice Posted Thu August 27, 2009 @ 6:30 AM
|
|
|
No, not the one I caught on vacation, but the people who think they are a "good catch" for businesses and should be treated like royalty.
Sorry, but I don't understand the mindset that businesses have to bend over backwards to keep a customer and give in to every demand. Yes, there was a time when businesses might have viewed customers as always being right, but things have changed.. and drastically.
When I first discovered PFB, the one thing that amazed me the most was the blatant sense of entitlement. I wondered when people became so unforgiving and picayune about the smallest and most insignificant inconveniences. Things that in the past were overlooked or tolerated as being a part of life. Should one minor mishap in a restaurant or store subject a business to outrageous and unreasonable customer demands? And even worse, the threats that ensue when businesses refuse to give in?
That's not the way it used to be. I've been a consumer for a long time, and I remember when businesses and customers were on the same side. Businesses were willing to do whatever it took to keep customers, and customers had the decency to accept no for an answer. They had more pride than to squabble over a dime or demand special treatment. If special treatment was offered, it was genuine and not from the fear of being badmouthed, especially on the internet. There was a common ground back then. A feeling of being in it together. An understanding. And that's what is sorely missing today.
I am neither pro-consumer or pro-company. I have always been pro-fairness. I won't let a company walk all over me, and in return I do not take advantage of companies by making threats of boycotting, badmouthing, or anything else. If I find myself at odds with a company, I always look for a compromise. You might be surprised how often companies are more than willing to work with a customer who has a good and fair attitude. I don't really think it's necessary to threaten a company with an ultimatum. If you go about it the right way, you have a good chance of coming out ahead. You might not get exactly what you expected, but at least you'll walk away with some dignity and sense of good faith.
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|

|
by Venice Posted Wed August 19, 2009 @ 5:53 AM
|
|
|
If you found your way in here, then I guess you're wondering why I closed my profile. Under the circumstances, I thought it was a good idea for my blog to take a vacation. Since I have so many objections to what's been going on, it just felt wrong to continue posting blog entries. I'm hoping that things will change soon so I can open my profile and continue to bore you all with my corny stories.
In the meantime, I'll still be reading, posting and checking things out. You can leave comments here if you'd like. I'll check in every once in a while to see if there's anyone here.
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|

|
Thanks...
by Venice Sat August 29, 2009 @ 4:54 PM
|
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|

|
by Venice Posted Tue August 11, 2009 @ 7:01 AM
|
|
|
Frito-Lay discontinued its Tostitos Restaurant Style Salsa in 2007 to make room in its lineup for new dip flavors, including Fritos Zesty Bean and Cheese, and Tostitos Creamy Spinach. But devotees were not willing to let go of the discontinued salsa, which they said lived up to its promise of matching what they got at restaurants.
The company received more than 1,600 phone calls and e-mails within a few months asking for the product's return. That was more than twice as many as for any other product that year, Frito-Lay's Snack Chat blog reports, and the requests kept coming in 2008.
Impressed, the Tostitos marketing team responded by bringing back the product. Frito-Lay says its response proves that it's worth telling the consumer-affairs department what you think.
Reply
|
|
 |
|

|
by Venice Posted Sun August 9, 2009 @ 7:32 AM
|
|
|
So far this summer has brought two tragedies that have changed the lives of so many people forever.
The crash on the Taconic is just inconceivable to me. How does a mother with a van load of kids end up behind the wheel with alcohol and marijuana in her system? There's something so wrong about this. I just can't make sense of it. And there's a slim chance of ever knowing what really happened because the eight people involved are dead.
And now another accident over the Hudson River. Only this time there were no survivors after a small plane collided with a tour helicopter, causing both to crash into the water.
This summer needs to come to an end quickly. It has just been a time of grief for so many people.
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|

|
by Venice Posted Wed August 5, 2009 @ 11:49 PM
|
|
|
They have been really sloppy lately. Not so much spelling thanks to the built-in spellchecker. But I've been leaving words out of my sentences causing them to make no sense. I've managed to catch some mistakes before posting, but a lot are getting by. Maybe it's just the lazy, hazy days of summer.
Hopefully, better when the over get back normal soon.
See!.. I did it again.
Reply
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|

|
by Venice Posted Tue August 4, 2009 @ 7:35 PM
|
|
|
Well, actually one request. But it was a very special request by Renee (rxgirl) who is sending her little guy off to kindergarten.
This was written by the former editor of my local newspaper, Mike Levine, who passed away suddenly in 2007. Of all his countless columns, this one is timeless and probably the most memorable.
Warning: Get out the tissues.
Mike Levine, Executive Editor
Times Herald Record
The First Day of School
September 5, 2006
Dear reader,
I wrote this column a decade ago. Since then, parents have told me it's a
way they mark the arrival of September's first school bus. I've added a few
lines for today. Here's to a safe and healthy year for all our children:
Quick, before they leave this morning. Take a good look. Touch their faces,
run your hands through their hair.
We got antsy with them last month, but now we want time to stand still.
Like falling leaves and chilly mornings, some great force signals us today.
We are aware of life passing.
See the kindergartner with a brave, bewildered smile watching her mother
cry as the school bus pulls away. The high-school freshman with a lump in
his throat hears his father whisper everything will be OK. Brothers and
sisters who fought all summer now hold hands.
Today is proud, today is helpless, today is tomorrow. This is a special
morning, wrenching and sacred.
As a young reporter, I'd wonder why. What's the big deal about the first
day of school? I would write down quotes in my notebook and comprehend
nothing.
Then I became a parent. I found out. We mark time by today.
On this morning, we remember our own parents and our own childhood. We are
filled with the smell of old raincoats, the sticky bond of classroom glue,
the childhood knot of worried excitement. We were so small and lost.
(Secret: A part of us is still lost. We tell no one.)
Now we have children of our own. On this morning, we remember the holy
moment of their birth.
We see this is all just a matter of time. Once, we thought our children
were ours alone. Each September, on this day, we learn better. Nothing is
ours to keep.
Time passes through our eyes this morning. We see our children as newborns,
we picture them as grown-ups. We see them walking their own children to
school.
Time passes in the beat of a heart. I have seen my first kindergarten boy
walk into his dorm on his first day of college. A few days ago, my younger
son left for college. I stood there, at once empty and full, as frightened
and proud as the morning his first school bus pulled away.
Come on, it's getting late. The bus is coming up the road. I'll keep this
short.
Make sure they have everything they need. Double check. Write their name on
the book bag. Sweetheart, did you remember your lunch money? Dad, don't
call me mushy stuff in front of the other kids.
They are right. Like the summer birds leaving us, our children know what to
do. Like September leaves waving on the trees, we, too, give way to the
winds of change.
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|

|
by Venice Posted Tue July 28, 2009 @ 11:30 PM
|
|
|
It's getting crowded down there again, and I hate when everyone has to crouch in the corner. It's hard to listen when there's no room to breathe.
I sent a suggestion to Maegan about the moderation rules, and it made me think of something else. I'm not a fan of extreme moderation, mostly because it's so subjective. And when the term "or variations thereof" appears repeatedly in the rules, there's a risk of one opinion being inconsistent. So I started to think that along the lines of the Kitchen Table, there could be a panel to determine comment removal. I'm not talking about the obvious ones, but ones that are open to interpretation. What's inappropriate to one person could be completely acceptable to another. I think the panel should consist of three people ruled by majority. Doing it that way would help make people feel like they're being treated fairly instead of wondering why some comments are removed and not others.
Also, as I was submitting my suggestion to Maegan, I started wondering about a few things. When these matters are discussed at the meeting, will the person who made the suggestion and the community at large be made aware of the discussion and the outcome? Will the community have an opportunity to express opinions about the suggestions, or are these closed door meetings? Will majority rule when making decisions? How much information about the meetings will actually be given to the community?
I realize this is a new endeavor and that the KT is still sorting things out. I just thought I'd mention some things they might want to consider.
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|

|
I agree.
by Just Jeffrey Thu July 30, 2009 @ 9:43 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|

|
by Venice Posted Fri July 24, 2009 @ 9:16 PM
|
|
|
It was getting a little crowded down there, so I thought I'd continue the discussion up here.
As I was reading all the comments here and in the original post, I had an idea that might have better succeeded in putting out the welcome mat. It comes from something someone else jokingly said (Donno, I think), but I think it might be exactly what is needed.
Maybe there should be a blog called The Family Room where everyone could express their ideas and feelings without fear of having them deleted. That way everything would be out in the open, no one would feel slighted, and there would be a lesser feeling of animosity. I know that sounds a lot like the Suggestion Box, but since PFB decided that something besides the Suggestion Box was needed to improve the site, I think The Family Room would be a good alternative. I think it would help bring the community together by making everyone feel equal, and also show a willingness and desire on the part of PFB for everyone to be heard firsthand without having to go through a process that could take months.
I really haven't had a chance to think this through, and I'm sure reasons will be brought to my attention why this idea won't work, but I just thought I'd put it out there for now.
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|

|
Hi Venice
by Donno Sun July 26, 2009 @ 2:40 PM
|
|
|
|
|

|

|
Tee hee
by Donno Sun July 26, 2009 @ 6:18 PM
|
|
|
|
|

|

|
P.S.
by Venice Sun July 26, 2009 @ 7:59 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|

|
by Venice Posted Mon July 20, 2009 @ 6:13 PM
|
|
|
I finally got a chance to read all the responses to the Kitchen Table post, and I think I understand why this approach may not be the best way to bring the PFB community together.
Thinking back, the original moderation program was a disaster and as Deb mentioned, resulted in one member permanently leaving the site. And other projects involving PFB members were also not widely accepted. There was controversy over ShopperCast and Mommage, as well. I've come to the conclusion that anything that involves selecting certain PFB members ends up leaving other members with hurt feelings. I realize that adults should be able to deal with this kind of thing, but as is always said on PFB, you can't fault someone for their feelings.
Maybe anyone who is asked or volunteers to work behind the scenes on PFB should be anonymous. That way all members are on equal ground without anyone having to feel slighted. This is just my observation, and I'm sure some of you will disagree with me, but after thinking about it, things never seem to work out when a public announcement is made naming a certain member or members.
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|

|
I had...
by Just Jeffrey Thu July 23, 2009 @ 3:29 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|

|
Brenda
by Venice Wed July 22, 2009 @ 4:42 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|

|
Harley
by Venice Wed July 22, 2009 @ 5:45 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|

|
Deb
by Venice Sat July 25, 2009 @ 2:14 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|

|
Oh my
by Venice Fri July 24, 2009 @ 5:44 PM
|
|
|
|
|

|

|
And
by Venice Sun July 26, 2009 @ 8:27 PM
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|

|
by Venice Posted Thu July 16, 2009 @ 1:27 AM
|
|
|
Just when I thought the life of Michael Jackson couldn't be sadder, I turned on the television to see a never before seen video of his hair on fire in the Pepsi commercial. I remember when it happened and seeing pictures of him being put in an ambulance, but I never realized the extent of his injuries.
I watched with horror and shock as the flames rose from his head while he spun around in what must have been unimaginable fear. When the fire was put out, he was left with a burned bald spot on the top of his head but still managed to wave to his fans.
This was undoubtedly the defining moment in Michael Jackson's life. A life of pain, pain killers, disfigurement, surgeries, recoveries, more pain killers, Vitiligo, Lupus, and more pain killers. And all that on top of being self conscious about his looks in the first place thanks to a father with the sensitivity of a rock.
I am now convinced of several things. Despite fame, fortune and unbelievable talent, Michael Jackson was a tormented and lonely man who suffered more than his share of pain, ridicule and humiliation. I believe he was a kind and gentle human being who truly cared about others and would never hurt anyone. I do not believe he was a child molester and do believe he was innocent of all the charges against him. I think his addiction to prescription drugs began with the Pepsi commercial, and that being rich and famous enabled him to obtain the drugs he needed.
All one has to do is see how he raised his three children to know what kind of person he was. Now that the children are becoming more public, I have heard nothing but praise about their upbringing. Seeing and hearing about the children has restored my faith. Everything I've heard about Michael Jackson in the last few weeks has pushed me off the fence I've been on all these years and onto Michael's side.
Why do we always learn more about a person in death than we do in life?
The only hope now is that Michael Jackson's life and death will change the way prescription drugs are dispensed to celebrities and anyone else with the means to buy a doctor. Unnecessary deaths of people like Michael Jackson, Anna Nicole Smith, Heath Ledger and others must be a thing of the past. Not one more child should be left without a mother or father, nor should another mother or father be left without a child.
Reply
|
|
|
|

|

|
Well
by Venice Sun July 19, 2009 @ 12:47 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|

|
by Venice Posted Sat July 11, 2009 @ 1:09 AM
|
|
|
If your pet needs to fly, and you want the skies to be friendly, have no fear, Pet Airways is here!
Pet Airways is a pet only airline offering first class travel in the temperature controlled main cabin, not in cargo. Your pet will be safe and comfortable, be monitored by a trained pet attendant and will never be left unattended.
And get this... all protocols and pet handling procedures are conducted under the guidance of famed Lassie veterinarian, Dr. Jeff Werber!
Wondering what it costs? Fares are as low as $149!.. a small price for peace of mind.
Is this the new trend in pet travel? Is it something you would consider doing? Will it catch on?
http://petairways.com/
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|

|
by Venice Posted Fri July 3, 2009 @ 6:20 AM
|
|
|
I've been having a discussion with Ben in the Honda letter (http://tinyurl.com/muot5g) about the responsibility of parents in the upbringing of their children. I disagree with his attitude that someone needs to be blamed when a child's behavior is not acceptable, but let me start by saying I do agree that parents have a responsibility to do their best. Unfortunately, I do see many parents who depend too heavily on outside sources to teach their kids things that should begin at home.
Most parents start out thinking their child will be the most well-behaved, intelligent kid on the block, at family gatherings and in the classroom. And most parents try very hard to make sure that their child lives up to those expectations. But sometimes no matter what parents do, how hard they try or how much help they seek, some children will never be what society views as an acceptable child. But that does not, I repeat DOES NOT mean that the parents are irresponsible.
Before I became a parent, I was judgmental of other parents who I believed were not raising their children the way I would raise mine. And even after I had my first child, I still judged parents who couldn't seem to get their kids to behave. My child was perfect after all, so how hard could it be? I thought parents who couldn't control their kids were irresponsible and self-centered.
And then I had another child and everything changed. And I mean everything. I suddenly found myself with an infant that I was convinced came from another planet. If I wasn't in the delivery room at the time of birth, I would have denied ownership. I had been around a lot of kids in my life, but this little creature I brought home from the hospital defied everything I knew or thought I knew about children. I was at a complete loss and began to seek help because it was obvious that traditional and conventional parenting skills and methods were not going to work.
The bottom line is that sometimes a child's behavior is simply out of the parents' control. Sometimes there is absolutely nothing a parent can do, even with the help and support of every possible professional, including pediatricians, teachers, social workers, psychiatrists, neurologists and child development experts, just to mention a few.
I have had the opportunity and pleasure to know many parents and children over the eighteen years since my son was born, and it's been my experience that most parents do not hope for or enjoy a child that misbehaves. When most people decide to have children, they start out with the best of intentions. Do you think they wish for a child who will never listen, not follow rules and throw tantrums in public? Of course not. Every parent wants that perfect child, and most parents are ready, willing and able to be responsible. But sometimes all the good intentions, knowledge, skills and experience mean nothing, and not only are parents left helpless, but they also have to be subjected to onlookers pointing fingers and making accusations with no knowledge or understanding of the situation.
Now when I see a parent struggling with a misbehaving child, I don't immediately blame or condemn that parent. I ask myself what life must be like raising children who defy conventional parenting. And I don't have to look far for the answer. Drawing on my own experience, I see the situation in a completely different light and am not so quick to blame the parent. So the next time YOU see a parent struggling with a spirited child, don't be so judgmental. You have no idea what is going on in their lives or how much the parents are doing or how hard they are trying. And remember too that children do not enjoy being out of control or making spectacles of themselves. If given a choice, kids just want to be like everyone else. It's just as difficult for the kids as it is for the parents. And the last thing families need is to be judged by people who have no idea what's going on.
And it doesn't necessarily end with childhood. This can follow a person into adulthood, as well. Ben seems to think that everyone behind the wheel knows the difference between right and wrong. It has been my experience that too many drivers actually do not know the difference. Should we blame the parents? I also asked Ben how he would handle a child who was incapable of knowing the difference between right and wrong, but he neglected to answer. I wonder what Ben or anyone else would do if despite doing everything by the book, their child was not able to be molded into what society views as acceptable.
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|

|
by Venice Posted Thu June 25, 2009 @ 7:30 PM
|
|
|
When I heard about the death of Ed McMahon, I had a feeling the bad news about Farrah Fawcett wouldn't be far behind. Then I started wondering who would complete the trio of deaths. But not even in my wildest dreams did I think it would be Michael Jackson.
Ed McMahon was simply an institution. Farrah Fawcett's true talent surfaced in movies like "The Burning Bed", "Small Sacrifices" and "Extremities". And there really aren't enough words to describe Michael Jackson.
I hope there's a break in time before the cycle of three deaths begins again. This is a lot to absorb in one week.
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|

|
by Venice Posted Sun June 21, 2009 @ 7:05 PM
|
|
|
http://tinyurl.com/l7xfsj
Reply
|
|

|

|
Good info
by Donno Mon June 22, 2009 @ 10:31 AM
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|

|
by Venice Posted Sat June 20, 2009 @ 2:05 AM
|
|
|
No, not the movie... my son! Well, hopefully not the movie. But this is high school not college!
Yes, today's the day, and it comes with a multitude of mixed feelings. There are so many things I'm going to miss, but I'm also breathing a sigh of relief. His school years have been quite an adventure, and I think I'm finally ready to turn it into a memory. He's taking college courses over the summer, so things may not be all that different. We'll see.
His goal is still to be a math teacher, and although he was disappointed about not being accepted into his college of choice (mostly because he applied too late), I think it worked out for the best because it was going to be too much of a transition. So he'll be going to community college for at least a year (possibly two), which will be an easier adjustment. I'm a little skeptical that he's going to be able to buckle down and do the work, but at least he's willing to try. If this doesn't work out, he'll have to start thinking about other alternatives.
So, Congratulations to all the Graduates of 2009! May all your dreams come true.
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|

|
by Venice Posted Tue June 16, 2009 @ 7:08 PM
|
|
|
Since the name Howard Stern was brought up in the Letterman letter, I started thinking exactly what it is I love about these men. I admit that I don't always find them funny and even think they are disrespectful and downright disgusting at times (well, mostly Howard), but I have also seen both men not be afraid to reveal their other side. I accept that they have jobs to do like everyone else, and that I have a choice whether or not to watch them. So I think the real question is how I feel about these two men as people and fellow human beings. And in that respect, they are both people I would be proud to know and welcome into my life.
My first exposure to Howard Stern was years ago on his television show. At first, I really didn't know what to make of him. I couldn't have been too offended though because I kept tuning in. It wasn't until his book and movie "Private Parts" that I actually understood where he was coming from and what he was about. I couldn't help but respect and admire his intelligence and accomplishments.
Same with Letterman. I'd been watching him for years but the most insight I ever got into his real life was after his heart surgery and birth of his son when he started revealing things about himself that made me see him in a different light, especially when he opened up about his dad.
If Howard had never written "Private Parts" and David never had heart surgery, I would have still continued to be a supporter because my instinct in the first place was to like these men. And every time I see the two of them together, I realize how much alike they are and how lucky their families are because they are both true family men. Just as an example, David and Howard are the only two celebrities I ever heard take full responsibility for the failure of their first marriages. I think here's something to be said for that, at least for me.
Reply
|
|
 |
|

|
by Venice Posted Sun June 7, 2009 @ 11:32 PM
|
|
|
In PFB's Moving Forward post, I was accused of enjoying edgy conversation. At least I think it was an accusation. But I took it as a compliment.
The truth is that it's the reason I've hung around this site for so long and why it's killing me to see it change so drastically. It was the edgy conversations that first attracted me to PFB and definitely what kept me coming back. Some of you may think that's a character flaw, but that's who I am, and I have no desire to change. I enjoy being me.
However, don't think for one moment that I don't know I can be annoying, too. I've been annoying people my entire life. It's nothing new. But when I believe in something, I have to give it my best. I don't stop, I don't hide, and I don't leave. I may not always win and may even gain some enemies along the way, but the most important thing to me is knowing I did my best.
That's why I haven't given up on this. I still believe in PFB.
I miss everyone who has left (with a couple of exceptions) and the edgy conversations that took place. I miss the friendliness and familiarity of the people. I miss hearing feedback from commenters I grew to respect, regardless of their commenting style. I miss the whole concept.
I know nothing I say will change anything, but I probably won't stop trying until either my computer self-destructs or I get the heave-ho, whichever comes first.
Reply
|
|

|
re:edgy
by kathleen m Sun June 7, 2009 @ 11:42 PM
|
|
|

|

|
AHHHH
by mary jo Mon June 8, 2009 @ 1:05 AM
|
|
|
|
|

|

|
Yeah.
by calm Mon June 8, 2009 @ 8:42 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|

|
by Venice Posted Sun June 7, 2009 @ 6:46 AM
|
|
|
http://tinyurl.com/q8vawh
Now play nice, boys. Don't make me have to break you up... haha!
I'm not taking sides because you both have valid points.
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|

|
Ah
by Donno Sun June 7, 2009 @ 9:25 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|

|
by Venice Posted Sat June 6, 2009 @ 2:07 AM
|
|
|
Why do so many letter writers not understand that when they share a letter, it's subject to comments? When a letter writer chooses to click the "share" box, they waive their right to privacy. I do not believe it says anywhere in the letter generator that comments are subject to the approval of the letter writer.
If someone chooses to share their letter for the sake of warning other people, the simple solution to not seeing the feedback is to not look at the comments. Just share the letter and be done with it. If the letter writer chooses to read the feedback, the commenters shouldn't be subjected to rudeness from the writer simply because they have expressed an opinion or (**gasp**) offered advice.
If a letter writer simply wants to share information without getting any feedback, then that person should have enough restraint to ignore the comments. If the letter is shared for the purpose of gaining support, then the writer has to be willing to accept the negative feedback, as well.
Letter writers can't have it both ways.
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|

|
by ♫Venice♫ Posted Mon June 1, 2009 @ 7:50 AM
|
|
|
I know you want to say something, so go ahead. Don't be afraid. You can say whatever you want here.
Are you enjoying the revised TOS, or do you find it too restrictive? Have you cut back on your commenting because you're worried about getting a demerit? Do you think the new rules are a good idea, or are they making you feel nervous and uneasy? Do you think giving up some freedom is a good trade off for a site that is less opinionated? I'm curious if people prefer a safe PFB or one that's more engaging.
As a letter writer, would you be open to constructive criticism? Do you think it would help you write a better letter and improve communication? Or would you only want to hear feedback that supported your letter and complaint? Do you think the moderation should only apply to comments made directly to letter writers? Should commenters be permitted to speak freely amongst themselves with out worrying about the consequences?
If you could change one thing about the new rules, what would it be?
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|

|

|
I agree
by Donno Sun June 7, 2009 @ 2:26 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|

|
Same here
by ♫Venice♫ Mon June 1, 2009 @ 5:44 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|

|
Gerald!
by Venice Thu June 4, 2009 @ 4:03 PM
|
|
|
|
|

|
censorship
by kathleen m Sun June 7, 2009 @ 10:01 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|

|
Wrong
by ♫Venice♫ Fri May 1, 2009 @ 5:23 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|

|
Wow
by ♫Venice♫ Fri May 1, 2009 @ 5:02 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|

|
Hi, Rowdy
by ♫Venice♫ Tue May 5, 2009 @ 12:18 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|

|
by ♫Venice♫ Posted Wed April 29, 2009 @ 6:04 AM
|
|
|
I just wanted to mention how sad I was to hear that Bea Arthur passed away. I didn't watch "The Golden Girls" during its initial run but have seen every episode at least a dozen times in reruns. I guess I was too young the first time around and didn't want to be reminded that I too would someday be a golden girl. But when I rediscovered the show in reruns, I was instantly hooked. Dorothy (Bea Arthur) and Sophia (Estelle Getty) were my favorite characters, and now they are together again.
So thanks Bea for such memorable characters like Maude and Dorothy. In my mind you will live forever because you'll be in home everyday until I see you in the big TVLand in the sky!
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|

|
by ♫Venice♫ Posted Mon April 27, 2009 @ 11:14 PM
|
|
|
Since I have been prohibited from furthering this discussion with you on your letter, I'm posting here. I hope you see this.
I wanted you to know that until I read your response about discrimination, I couldn't figure out your actual complaint, which I have said before. In the context of my original comment, the use of the word discrimination had nothing to do with race, religion, sex, etc. So I was surprised and even shocked to read your reply at the time, which I think was your first and honest reaction to my comment. I asked if you thought the treatment you received at B&N was a matter of discrimination because that would explain why you made a mountain out of a molehill.
I have pretty much either said or insinuated all of this before without it being removed, so I'm not sure why it was removed now.
I would also like to say again that if you think it was discrimination, you should let B&N know because that's wrong, and they should know what happened. Otherwise, I'm back to square one of not understanding your complaint. I think I've asked this before, and I apologize if I don't remember your answer, but what is it you want B&N to do in order to keep you as a customer? Is it that you want a written policy and/or sign so you can choose to go elsewhere?
I found your letter intriguing, and I'm just trying to understand the complaint and what the store can do to please you.
Reply
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|

|
by ♫Venice♫ Posted Sun April 26, 2009 @ 6:13 AM
|
|
|
I've seen some interesting discussions here, but nothing quite like the one about leaving your child alone in a store. I know that some parents think nothing can happen to their kids, but to actually make a case that it's a parent's choice not to watch their child goes beyond my comprehension. Being a free-spirited parent is one thing, but to deliberately put your child in danger based on principles is downright selfish. I'm trying to understand this way of thinking, but I'm coming up empty. I just can't seem to justify it in my mind.
How do you make someone understand the way it feels when a child is missing? I can't figure out how any parent could knowingly take that risk, or why they would think it's in the child's best interest. When a child is taken, I'm sure he or she is not thinking how lucky they are that their parent thought they were mature enough to be left alone. I think they're frightened out of their mind and might even wonder why their parent wasn't protecting them. Would any parent want that to be their child's last thought?
I can't imagine how many parents would give anything for a second chance, but that chance usually dies in the the split second a child is abducted. I realize that people can't live in fear, but I just don't see the harm in not taking unnecessary risks especially with something where there's no turning back. I don't understand what is gained, but I do know what is lost.
Natalee Holloway was a full-grown, mature adult, but I'm sure a day doesn't go by that her mother doesn't agonize over not being able to protect her daughter. I realize that at some point there is nothing a parent can do, but isn't it natural parental instinct to want to keep children safe from harm at any age?
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|

|
by ♫Venice♫ Posted Fri April 24, 2009 @ 6:54 PM
|
|
|
He comes and goes, and always seems to suddenly resurface whenever he sees an opportunity to question my comments. That's not the problem. The problem is he does so without knowing my commenting history (located in my profile) and admits that he has no intention of reading it. He prefers to post accusations with no evidence to back them up.
So, Wayne, unless and until you read my entire commenting history, you are nothing more than a nuisance and source of hot air. The only reason you have targeted me is because all the other people you had issues with are gone. The least you should have done was make sure there was some merit to your mission. But you have failed miserably. Not just because you refuse to read my comments, but because there is nothing in them to prove you are right.
Reply
|
|
 |
|

|
by ♫Venice♫ Posted Thu April 23, 2009 @ 5:42 AM
|
|
|
Remember when that title was best known as an Academy Award winning song from the movie "The Poseidon Adventure" and made Maureen McGovern a household name back in Seventies? Well, it's come a long way baby.
The Morning After is now known as Plan B, the emergency contraception pill.
When I first heard about this pill years ago, I thought it was a great idea and a good solution to an unwanted pregnancy. Well, at least better than some of the alternatives. But the more I read about it, the more I realized that it was not as simple or safe as women were being led to believe. There were potential risks and complications involved. That's probably why it originally required a doctor's prescription and why women needed to be under doctor's care. When it became available over the counter, I figured it was safer and had less side effects, but I was still surprised that something like that would be available to anyone without first being advised by a doctor. I realize a person is no longer a minor at 18, but it bothered me to think of an 18-year old girl making such an important decision on her own. Some might take the pill out of fear without realizing there are other alternatives, and some might even rely on the pill as a primary method of birth control. I didn't know which was worse.
Now that the age has been lowered to 17, I'm not sure what to think. Is that where it will end, or will this pill eventually become available to all females? I have a daughter, and it would haunt me to know she used the morning after pill for the wrong reasons, at any age. But using it as a minor without really knowing what she was doing and possibly thinking it was her only option would break my heart.
The world is a complicated place, and I don't claim to have the answers, but I know when something feels wrong. And this feels wrong. Instead of a Plan B for minors, maybe more effort should be put into stressing the importance of Plan A, which is how not to become pregnant in the first place. I know it's tough for some parents to discuss these things with their kids, but maybe it's time to get over that. I can't think of a better time or reason to bring everything out in the open now that the morning after pill is available over the counter to minors.
Reply
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|

|
by ♫Venice♫ Posted Tue April 21, 2009 @ 6:37 AM
|
|
|
I find it interesting that Miss California thinks her anti same-sex marriage opinion cost her the Miss USA crown. As part of the competition, she had to answer a question from Perez Hilton on whether she thought same-sex marriage should be legalized.
This was her reply:
"In my country, and in my family, I believe that a marriage should be between a man and a woman."
In a later interview, she explained by saying, "I said what I feel. I stated an opinion that was true to myself and that's all I can do. It is a very touchy subject and (Hilton) is a homosexual and I see where he was coming from and I see the audience would've wanted me to be more politically correct. But I was raised in a way that you can never compromise your beliefs and your opinions for anything." She said she wouldn't have it any other way.
I saw Hilton on Larry King Live, and he agreed that Miss California's answer did cost her the crown. I didn't see the show, but he said the audience booed her answer. He said he would have preferred her to be politically correct instead of honest.
Do you think she did the right thing by being true to herself, or should she have given the answer everyone wanted to hear? Do you admire her for her honesty or think she did a very foolish thing?
What would you have done?
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|

|
by ♫Venice♫ Posted Sun April 19, 2009 @ 6:17 PM
|
|
|
Have you seen/heard Susan Boyle?.. the contestant on Britain's Got Talent? She is living proof that no one should ever judge a book by its cover. Just search her name on YouTube, and you'll see what I mean. She went from complete obscurity to being an overnight sensation. And she deserves every bit of it!
Reply
|
|
|
|
 |
|

|
by ♫Venice♫ Posted Wed April 15, 2009 @ 2:48 AM
|
|
|
If she is guilty, I don't understand how it could not be due to mental illness. Isn't the crime itself proof that she is not of sound mind? What's the alternative? Is it possible for a sane person to commit a crime like this? What could the motive possibly be? I also don't understand how her family can say she is normal and not know she is ill. She's been living for 28 years. How could no one know? Why didn't she get help? I'm sure she didn't develop mental illness overnight. If she pleads guilty, what could her defense possibly be if not by reason of insanity?
For the sake of the families, I hope this never goes to trial.
Reply
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|

|
by ♫Venice♫ Posted Tue April 14, 2009 @ 9:34 PM
|
|
|
Well?
Those Obamas have good taste!
Reply
|
|
 |
|

|
by ♫Venice♫ Posted Sat April 11, 2009 @ 1:10 AM
|
|
|
Well, I got through Good Friday remembering not to eat meat! It's the only religious thing I do all year. I grew up not eating meat on Fridays until the Pope said it was okay. Hmmm.. so why was I doing it all those years? I never understood that.
Anyway, speaking of Easter, it was around this time three years ago that PFB first introduced blogs. I didn't know what a blog was or what I was supposed to do with one. Then I saw Brenda's (aka Brenny) blog, which was one of the first to be opened. She simply said "Happy Easter", and I thought, Oh, I can do that! And so I did. Since then, I've used my blog as sort of a journal of things I want to remember. If it ever disappears, three years of my life will go with it. I've always regretted not starting a journal when my first child was born. I had plenty of time so there was no excuse. I was never one to keep a diary, so I guess that's why I never thought of keeping a journal. But I've learned that when you write things down, it frees up your mind for other things. Because the older you get, the more things there are to remember. So this blog came in handy for me, and it also gave me the chance to talk to many of you along the way.
We broke tradition here at our house a few years ago when we stopped coloring eggs on Good Friday. I really miss it though. If I didn't feel ridiculous doing it alone, I probably would go ahead and do it anyway. No more Easter baskets either. I miss that even more because now there's no candy for me to sneak. I usually go to Target after a holiday and stock up at 50% to 90% off, but this year Target really cut back on the Easter merchandise, so I don't think there will be much left. Oh, well.. too bad for me.
It's going to be quiet here all weekend. My daughter is working again this year, and my son is working, too. I usually don't mind the peace and quiet, but on holidays it makes me reminisce. I'll be glad when the weekend is over.
I hope you all enjoy your holiday. And please.. eat a piece of candy for me!
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|

|
by ♫Venice♫ Posted Tue April 7, 2009 @ 7:14 PM
|
|
|
I need advice. My son wants to have a movie night at his girlfriend's house and stay over. The parents will be home, and there will be supervision, but still...is this really a good idea? My daughter's circle of friends had coed sleepovers, but I always figured there was safety in numbers!.. I know, pretty naive on my part. But I knew all the kids and their families, so I allowed it. But I'm not sure about this. I think he wants to feel trusted more than anything else right now. And I do trust him. But.. but.. but.. well, you know what I mean.
I know I'm old, but I'm really not naive. Sometimes I think I imagine more than my son is even thinking. Some of the things I worry about don't even cross his mind. It's a good thing I keep them to myself or I might give him ideas!
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|

|
by ♫Venice♫ Posted Sat April 4, 2009 @ 11:31 PM
|
|
|
I try not to say too much about this because I do not have an autistic child and am not really experienced or as informed as I could be. But after watching Jenny McCarthy, Jim Carrey and the lineup of experts on Larry King again, I am more convinced than ever that vaccines play a part in this disorder.
McCarthy and Carrey are in no way saying not to vaccinate your children. Their concern is with the scheduling and amount of vaccinations that came about after 1989. With that I must agree. My daughter was born in 1983, and I never felt uncomfortable with the amount of vaccinations or the ages at which they were given. My son was born in 1991, and the scheduling wasn't much different for him, but I have a feeling he escaped the bombardment of vaccinations that were being given at that time, possibly due to the good judgment of my pediatricians.
I posted something here awhile back about a family I also saw on Larry King whose daughter received an outrageous amount of vaccinations at one time and soon after became autistic. That was the first time I realized how much the vaccination process had changed since my kids were that age. I was never really sold on Jenny McCarthy's theory, but after hearing that story I believed she should be heard and taken seriously.
The most disturbing thing I learned from the recent show is that there are no studies being done comparing the children who receive all these vaccinations to the ones who don't. Apparently everyone is so busy arguing about this that they are neglecting to do the actual research. It's hard to believe that the most obvious method of determining if there's a connection between autism and vaccinations is being ignored. When is everyone going to stop debating the issue and being so defensive and actually start doing something productive?
I do agree with McCarthy and Carrey when they stress the importance of parents being informed instead of placing all their trust in pediatricians. When they showed the list of all the vaccinations currently being given to babies under the age of one year, I was shocked. I don't think I would just allow my baby to be subjected to so many vaccinations in such a short amount of time without knowing everything I possibly count about them. It would seem dangerous and just feel wrong.
Vaccinations used to be something that required very little thought and had few risks or consequences. But everything has changed. Today's parents have a huge responsibility in deciding what is right for their child. I think that's just more proof that sometimes progress complicates lives even further.
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|

|
by ♫Venice♫ Posted Thu April 2, 2009 @ 5:10 PM
|
|
|
I know it's just a television show, but it's more than that to me. I've been watching ER since it premiered 15 years ago. I remember Chicago Hope debuted around the same time, and at first I got the two shows confused. Even though they were on different networks, I actually thought they were the same show. But it didn't take long for me to figure it out. In the beginning the distinction between ER and Chicago Hope was the storylines. ER focused on the graphic nature of an emergency room, while Chicago Hope was more about the people and their personal lives. The shows competed successfully for a long time, until Chicago Hope finally threw in the towel. At a point when ER started to become a bit monotonous, it took its cue from Chicago Hope and began focusing on the characters and their lives. I think that's when ER finally made a permanent mark in television history. I think that's how it managed to survive 15 years without losing its appeal. I also think the secret to ER's success was finding good replacements each time a character left the show. Every actor/character who took part in the series came in with their own baggage, helping to bring something new and fresh. That's how it kept viewers tuning in each week.
The most memorable moments for me were all the untimely deaths, with Dr. Greene's demise being the saddest. It felt like I lost a member of my own family. Dr. Pratt's departure was unexpected and just as sad. And, of course, who could forget what happened to Lucy, Carter, Gant, Gallant and Romano? My favorite character, Carter, survived his attack but eventually moved on and left the show. When Morris came on board, I couldn't stand him. He was just a bumbling idiot, and I couldn't understand what they were thinking by bringing in such an unlikable character. I would have never guessed that Morris would become the most lovable character of the entire series, and a terrific doctor.
The episodes where Carter and Kovac went to Africa were some of the most memorable ones of the series. I think I even wrote a letter to NBC suggesting a spinoff show. They were powerful episodes that I will always remember. But if I had to pick one episode as the most memorable, it would have to be the one where Dr. Greene couldn't deliver the baby. What started out as a routine delivery just kept going downhill, and the tension continued to build until it reached an unbelievable ending. I will never ever forget that one.
There were so many guest stars over the course of the 15 years that I can't even begin to remember them all, but I think the episode tracking the death of Ray Liotta in real time left the biggest impression on viewers. I also enjoyed the recurring roles of Red Buttons, James Cromwell, Alan Alda and Sally Field, whose part as Abby's mentally unstable mother was performed so convincingly.
I am going to miss ER. I like to think that the cameras were taken away but the people still exist and are going about the business of savings lives and struggling with their own lives, with the only difference being I can no longer make them part of MY life on Thursday nights.
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|

|
by ♫Venice♫ Posted Wed April 1, 2009 @ 9:00 PM
|
|
|
THIS!.. is American Idol. Don't say it. I already know I'm pathetic. And I won't even get into the reason I started watching the show in the first place because people who know me are sick of hearing it. And I don't blame them. Regardless, I still watch.
Now, I was never really a fan of Motown. I could take it or leave it. But since Adam Lambert performed "Tracks of My Tears" over a week ago, I just cannot get it out of my head. I never gave that song a second thought, and now Adam's version is playing in my head constantly. Not in an annoying way, but having more of a soothing effect. I'm not sure why, but I'm trying not to like him. However, the more I see and hear, the faster he's growing on me. Whether he wins or not, we haven't seen the last of Adam Lambert.
My other favorites right now are Allison and Kris. If you listen to Allison without watching, you would never guess she's a 16-year old girl. Aside from her obvious natural talent, she seems like an ordinary teenager, and so unpretentious. I usually don't prefer female singers, but I really like Allison. And Kris is the same way. He seems like just a regular guy, no attitude at all. I love his laid back style. And it doesn't hurt that he's so darn cute!
There's a lot of good talent this year. At this point it comes down to personal taste... and the right song choice!
Gotta go... it's coming on!
Reply
|
|
|
|

|

|
I know!
by ♫Venice♫ Thu April 2, 2009 @ 3:01 PM
|
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|

|
by ♫Venice♫ Posted Wed April 1, 2009 @ 3:10 AM
|
|
|
The authors of "Eat This, Not That!" came out with a list of the good, the bad and the ugly of food served at major chain restaurants. The results of their investigation was very surprising to me. See what you think.
Chick-fil-A: A-
Subway: A-
Jamba Juice: A-
Au Bon Pain: A-
Boston Market: B+
Cici's Pizza Buffet: B+
McDonald's: B+
Taco Bell: B+
Wendy's: B+
Baskin-Robbins: D+
Carl's Jr.: D+
Denny's: D+
Dairy Queen: D+
Ruby Tuesday: D+
Chili's: D
Uno Chicago Grill: D
Chevy's: D
On the Border: D-
Romano's Macaroni Grill: D-
Baja Fresh: D-
Applebee's, IHOP, Outback, T.G.I. Friday's: F
It looks like fast food places are on the right track, with full blown restaurants being some of the worst places to eat. McDonald's.. a B+?!! That's almost an A! Chili's.. a D?!! Oh, the horror. I love Chilli's!
I think the reason for the F's is because those chains do not offer nutritional information. I guess that's kept under lock and key because people would have chest pains just looking at the fat and calorie content off their favorite dishes.
For more details on the food choices at these restaurants, you can see the article here:
http://health.msn.com/nutrition/articlepage.aspx?cp-documentid=1002350 19
Reply
|
|
 |
|

|
by ♫Venice♫ Posted Sun March 29, 2009 @ 9:04 PM
|
|
|
The first gay person I knew personally was my brother's brother-in-law. I was very young at the time and didn't really know what to think. No one ever spoke about it and questions were never asked. And then he died suddenly, but again no one really spoke or gave any explanation. I liked him. I thought he was friendly and nice.
As I started to know more gay people as I got older, I'll admit I didn't understand, but I also had no opinion one way or the other. I think many people have opinions and/or fears based upon the way they were raised. And I do not recall my parents ever saying one derogatory word about gay people (or anyone else). I'm serious, never. I think that's why I didn't see gays as a threat or as 'bad people'. The only thing I knew for certain was that being gay was not a choice. It was obvious to me that people do not choose to be gay.
When my daughter entered middle school, she started having a lot of gay friends, some of them being her closest ones. It was at that point I really started to understand. I realized how good it was that things were changing. That people, especially teenagers, didn't have to cover up their feelings and pretend to be someone they're not. It made me realize how hard it must be to live that way. And why should anyone have to?
Just like those "The More You Know" PSAs on television, I think the more you know and understand about gay people, the more you realize there's no room or reason for criticism or judgment. I don't think people should concentrate on anyone being different, but should think more about what's the same. Because when you get right down to it, the things that really matter are the same in everyone.
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|

|
by ♫Venice♫ Posted Sun March 29, 2009 @ 5:57 PM
|
|
|
Is it just me or are more letter writers demanding that an employee be fired? What gives? Are people so stressed and frustrated that seeing someone fired will make them feel better? Is it a misery loves company mindset? I don't know what's going on, but no matter how badly I am treated by an employee, I would never demand they be fired. I would never want to feel responsible for the consequences that result in someone losing their job. That certainly wouldn't make me feel better.
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|

|
by ♫Venice♫ Posted Tue March 24, 2009 @ 7:59 PM
|
|
|
I've had enough. I'm not going to silently stand by while the following people are stereotyped and judged:
People using credit
Nursing mothers
Large people
Older women
People with tattoos and/or piercings
Parents
If I'm leaving anything out, I'm sure someone will let me know.
It's one thing to have an opinion, but to constantly insinuate that people are inferior to you just because they don't live by your rules is wrong and shouldn't be allowed here. I don't see any difference in this conduct and racism.
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
I AGREE!
by thinkingitthrough Thu March 26, 2009 @ 1:11 PM
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|

|
by ♫Venice♫ Posted Sat March 21, 2009 @ 11:22 PM
|
|
|
Having a child with a peanut allergy is one of the hardest challenges. Peanuts are everywhere. It must be almost impossible to send a child out into the world everyday with confidence that they will not come in contact with peanuts. But thanks to an experimental treatment, a new therapy might be the answer to ridding people of their allergy for good.
Under doctor's supervision, patients are fed miniscule amounts of the food they're allergic to. Five of nine children with peanut allergies who swallowed small doses of peanut protein daily for over two and one-half years can now eat unlimited amounts of peanuts without any signs of allergic reaction. Not only do they not develop hives, wheeze, or exhibit other symptoms, but immune system changes suggest they've completely outgrown their allergies.
It sounds like it works similar to vaccinations or allergy shots, except this therapy takes longer. But if my child had a peanut allergy, I'd be the first in line to sign up for treatment. This is really a breakthrough that could improve and even save lives, and finally give parents some peace of mind.
Here's more info:
http://www.webmd.com/allergies/news/20090316/new-therapy-may-knock-out -peanut-allergy?ecd=wnl_day_032109
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|

|
by ♫Venice♫ Posted Fri March 20, 2009 @ 3:22 AM
|
|
|
I know some people think it's wrong, but I thought it was terrific. It's a great way to get to know the President in a relaxed setting with a little levity thrown in. I don't know how much of it, if any, was rehearsed, but his quick wit came across as genuine. His comments about the Secret Service were exceptionally funny. And when he talked about Michelle and the kids, it really seemed like he was just an ordinary guest. When it got down to business, I thought he answered the questions with confidence and honesty.
Nice job, Mr. President!
Reply
|
|

|

|
So, okay
by ♫Venice♫ Fri March 20, 2009 @ 4:07 PM
|
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|

|
by ♫Venice♫ Posted Mon March 16, 2009 @ 10:58 PM
|
|
|
I have given a lot of thought to homeowners who are facing foreclosure and sometimes regret drawing a hard line, especially when it comes to veterans like Joseph (Citibank letter "Crimes of fraud and home theft") and families that really were fooled into thinking they could afford to borrow more than they should. However, I have no sympathy at all for people who got in over their heads due to greed, status, etc. I don't think those people should be helped or bailed out. At least they had the chance to live the American dream. Some people never do. And although I feel sorry for those people who were never able to buy a home, they are probably the ones who will get through this mess with the least amount of harm, and hopefully they'll have an even better opportunity to be homeowners in the future.
Reply
|
|
 |
|

|
by ♫Venice♫ Posted Mon March 16, 2009 @ 6:12 AM
|
|
|
When I read that the creator of Bozo the Clown died, I didn't realize how significant Alan Livingston's life was.
As a music executive at Capitol Records, he signed Frank Sinatra, then at a low point in his career, and introduced him to arranger Nelson Riddle. Together, the pair produced "I've Got the World on a String" and "Young At Heart," which led to Sinatra's comeback.
When he left the record label in the late 1950s to work in television, he produced the western series "Bonanza." He returned to Capitol Records as president in the 1960s and signed the Beach Boys, the Band and Steve Miller.
When he heard the Beatles song "I Want to Hold Your Hand," he agreed to release the single and brought the Fab Four to the United States in 1964 to promote it. Capitol, which was partly owned by the Beatles' record company EMI in the United Kingdom, earlier had rejected the group's initial hit singles as unsuitable for the American market.
What a legacy. Alan Livingston certainly left his mark. Sometimes it takes a passing for us to realize a person's accomplishments. The entertainment industry lost a true pioneer.
Reply
|
|
 |
|

|
by ♫Venice♫ Posted Sun March 15, 2009 @ 3:00 AM
|
|
|
Does Disney own and operate chicken farms now? Or are they just putting their name and characters on a product produced by another company? Is there actually a market for this? I realize these eggs are fortified, but what would make someone buy Disney eggs instead of, let's say, Eggland's? Is Disney in it to promote healthier eating, or do they think this is a profitable venture? Will kids find eggs more appealing if they see a picture of Mickey Mouse stamped on the shell? With the price of eggs having gone up so much, I can't imagine buying Disney eggs which most likely cost more than ordinary brands. Sorry, but I think this is just weird.
Reply
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|

|
by ♫Venice♫ Posted Tue March 10, 2009 @ 2:30 AM
|
|
|
A few years ago, we had our roof replaced. The roofing company gave us a list of addresses of homes with roofs they'd installed so that we could see the different colors and styles. We spent over a month riding around the county looking at roofs, and I drove the company and my family crazy because I couldn't decide. We even took pictures of all the homes hoping it would make it easier to choose.
After agonizing over the decision, I finally picked what I thought would be the perfect combination of colors. I was very comfortable with my choice and couldn't wait to see how it looked on my house. When the boxes were delivered, they were marked with the color/style I had chosen. The workers spent an entire day removing the old roof and installing the new one (by the way, if you ever have your roof replaced, DO NOT stay home.. big mistake) and when it was completed, they called me outside to sign off on the work. I agreed to sign but made it clear that without climbing up on the roof, I had no idea if the work was completed or acceptable. For all I knew, there could have been a huge hole up there! But we had investigated a lot of companies and got a lot of estimates prior to hiring this one, so we did have confidence in their workmanship and professionalism. The only thing bothering me was that because of the way the house is situated, it's very hard to actually see the roof. But from what I COULD see, it looked very different from the one we picked. I figured it was just the angle and tried to put it out of my mind.
So I was recently deleting pictures from my computer and stumbled upon the ones of the house with the roof we choose. I was shocked to see just how different it looked, and I am now convinced that the wrong roof was installed on our house. It never occurred to me that it was the wrong roof because the boxes were marked correctly. But now I realize that the boxes might have been wrongly labeled.
If I'm right, do you think I should tell the roofing company about it or just be happy that I have a new roof with a 50-year warranty that so far has not given us any problems? It isn't ugly or anything, but it definitely doesn't look like the roof we saw on the other house. I know I shouldn't be letting this bother me, but I really did agonize over picking something I would be happy with for the rest of my life because this roof should definitely outlive me. And if it IS the wrong roof, what can I really expect them to do? Replace it?.. Nah.
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|

|
by ♫Venice♫ Posted Sun March 8, 2009 @ 6:14 PM
|
|
|
Is it just me, or has the word "billion" become meaningless? In terms of money, what once seemed like an unimaginable amount is now pocket change. How are we supposed to expect our kids to have any concept of a dollar as they witness the government give away billions. If *I'm* having trouble processing it, I wonder what's going through the minds of children. Just another reason these bailouts may be doing more harm than good by creating another generation that's oblivious to the value of money.
Reply
|
|
 |
|

|
by ♫Venice♫ Posted Sun March 8, 2009 @ 7:06 AM
|
|
|
And it's dark outside. I feel like I'm in an episode of The Twilight Zone... you know, the one where the sun never rises and it only gets darker.
When is the government going to stop messing with Mother Nature?
Reply
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|

|
by ♫Venice♫ Posted Wed March 4, 2009 @ 1:07 AM
|
|
|
Can someone please make her go away? This woman is getting exactly
what she set out to get, which is attention! And there's going to be no end. I am tired of seeing her face everywhere and listening to her trying to rationalize her choices. I saw her having a conversation with her mother where she behaved like a spoiled two-year old. Her blatant disrespect for the caregiver of her children was hideous. I just wanted to take her protruding lips and tie them in a knot.
I sincerely hope those babies are taken away from her so she can attempt
to give her other children the attention and support they need. She has created a scenario where everyone is going to suffer, while conveniently being incapable of understanding the reasons. She can deny her desire for assistance all she wants, but the fact remains that it is physically, emotionally and financially impossible to singlehandedly raise a brood that size. Oh, wait!.. she can always use her mother who is supposed to love and support her unconditionally.
And shame on me for throwing another log on the fire, thereby allowing it to spread.
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|

|
by ♫Venice♫ Posted Sun March 1, 2009 @ 9:54 PM
|
|
|
On Feb. 13, 2006, Central Park was blanketed in 26.9 inches of snow in a matter of hours, the biggest snowstorm since record keeping began 1869.
Hmmm... will that record be broken today?
Probably not. But March is definitely coming in like a lion. And you know what THAT means?...
SNOW DAY!... ugh.
Reply
|
|
 |
|

|
by ♫Venice♫ Posted Mon February 23, 2009 @ 1:19 AM
|
|
|
Oops!.. I mean, and the Oscar goes to...
Once again I suffered through the first three hours and then fell asleep just as they were about to announce the big winners. I woke up just in time to see Kate Winslet win!.. hooray for her! But was so disappointed that Mickey Rourke lost. Sean Penn did it again. He stole the Oscar from Johnny Depp for the first Pirates movie, and now he took it from Mickey Rourke. I was rooting for Mickey. Without even having seen The Wrestler, I think his comeback is amazing. He may not have the looks anymore but obviously still has the talent. And his dog just died. Not that any of that makes him deserving of an Oscar, I just wanted to see him win.
It must have been so hard for Heath Ledger's family to accept his award. I keep wishing I could go back in time and stop him from dying. Some things may be meant to be, but some things aren't, and I think his death was a glitch in the universe, a mistake. Things aren't always the way they're supposed to be. I think he fell through the crack between right and wrong when no one was looking.
The original scores sounded like one big arrangement with no distinction in between. And what a lack of songs this year. Three? That's it?.. and two from the same movie? So much for Hugh Jackman singing about musicals coming back.
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|

|
by ♫Venice♫ Posted Tue February 17, 2009 @ 2:55 AM
|
|
|
I can't get over some of the comments about breastfeeding... comparing it to defecating/urinating/exposing penises in public? How do those things compare to breastfeeding? Am I missing something?.. because I fail to see the connection.
Some women do not use bottles at all. Does that mean they should never leave the house? It's hard to reason with a hungry baby and also hard to predict when that hunger will occur. I nursed both my babies in public places, and no one even knew I was doing it. And I have never seen a woman deliberately overexpose herself to get attention. Is it really all that common? I'm sure most mothers are as discreet as possible, but as with everything else, there will always be some women who ruin it for the others.
It's no wonder too many women are hesitant to nurse their babies. It seems the public is not very accepting of this choice. And yes, if a woman chooses nursing over bottles, she will have to do it in public places. I can't figure out why people are so uncomfortable with this.
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|

|
by ♫Venice♫ Posted Sat February 14, 2009 @ 5:24 PM
|
|
|
That's all.
Reply
|
|
 |
|

|
by ♫Venice♫ Posted Wed February 11, 2009 @ 11:00 PM
|
|
|
We have had three cars at different times with a slow leak in the front passenger side tire. My husband says it's a coincidence. I say he's crazy. What are the chances of the same tire on three cars owned at different times having a slow leak? There are very few coincidences, if any, and I don't think this is one of them.
All three cars were kept in the garage. We both examined the garage floor and can find nothing that would damage a tire. The tires on the car that stays outside in the driveway are all fine.
I've tried very hard to come up with an explanation, but nothing makes sense. Why that one tire, and on three different cars?.. it's so weird.
Do you believe in coincidences?
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|

|
by ♫Venice♫ Posted Wed February 11, 2009 @ 1:49 AM
|
|
|
http://vids.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=vids.individual&VideoID=5 1947578
Reply
|
|
 |
|

|
by ♫Venice♫ Posted Tue February 10, 2009 @ 12:46 AM
|
|
|
I wish someone had told me I could buy a house that I couldn't afford, and then ask to have the mortgage modified to suit my income.
I wish I could have had all the kids I wanted, knowing I couldn't support them, and then expect taxpayers to take on the responsibility. Or better yet, sell my story to Oprah for a million dollars.
I wish I hadn't lived my life by the book, taking full responsibility for all my actions and decisions.
What was I thinking? Where did it get me? I'm not making headlines or being interviewed on television. No one cares that I've always done the right thing and never expected or asked for anything. Maybe I've been going about this all wrong.
I wish I had known I could do whatever I wanted and then blame someone else for the consequences and expect to be assisted.
Reply
|
|
 |
|

|
by ♫Venice♫ Posted Sun February 8, 2009 @ 6:11 PM
|
|
|
I know a lot of people are against using store discount cards, but I've been using my Shop Rite Price Plus card for over 25 years and have never had a problem. I get great discounts, promotions, etc. and have never seen one disadvantage to using it.
Now I have an even bigger and more important reason to use my Price Plus card.
Check it out:
The same technology behind free turkey promotions is helping ShopRite alert consumers to a potential source of salmonella: recalled peanut products.
Automated calls are going out to ShopRite shoppers who use the chain's Price Plus cards and who bought something that's part of the massive recall sparked by contamination at the Peanut Corp. of America most recently, some Kashi TLC Chewy Granola Bars and all Kashi TLC Chewy Cookies.
The message offers refunds for customers who return the products. No Kashi products have been linked to illnesses.
ShopRite, part of the 220-store Wakefern Food Corp. based in New Jersey, issues the Price Plus cards for its loyalty points programs from the free turkey offer to the Kids' Club and Baby Bucks programs to the store coupons that print out with shoppers' receipts.
ShopRite spokeswoman said the chain has notified customers of recalls since 2000, starting with live calls and direct-mail cards. In 2005, it started using automated calls.
The spokeswoman said customers can opt out of the promotional offers that come with the card except for recalls. Any Price Plus member who bought recalled goods will be called.
If you are concerned you might have purchased recalled peanut products, there's a way to find out. Call ShopRite toll-free at 800-746-7748 or visit the Food and Drug Administration online: www.fda.gov/oc/opacom/hottopics/salmonellatyph.html
Reply
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|

|
by ♫Venice♫ Posted Fri February 6, 2009 @ 4:53 PM
|
|
|
Could someone please give me a condensed version of the RIT letter? When I first saw it, my mind shut down. So I went back a second time but still couldn't get myself to read it. When I looked at it the third time, I was shocked to see how many people actually read that thing!
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|

|

|
Thanks
by ♫Venice♫ Sun February 8, 2009 @ 5:51 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|

|
by ♫Venice♫ Posted Tue February 3, 2009 @ 2:44 AM
|
|
|
When my daughter told me she wanted to go to David's Bridal, I didn't know whether or not to advise her against it. My only opinion of David's Bridal is based on the letters here on PFB, and we all know that's not very good. So I sorta mentioned it but figured there was no harm in checking it out.
Neither of us knew what to expect so we just went with the flow. We were pleasantly surprised to find that everyone was very friendly and helpful, and all the customers seemed to be very pleased with the staff. My daughter's consultant was extremely nice, very patient and helpful. Although she naturally wanted to make a sale, when we finally finished after being in the store almost two hours, she completely understood why my daughter was undecided and didn't try to make her feel guilty about not purchasing a dress. I really appreciated that.
I'm so glad I didn't let the letters stop us from going. I have no idea if my daughter will actually buy a dress from David's Bridal, but I wouldn't hesitate to go back. Now that I think of it, I don't seem to have any of the problems in my local chain stores that people complain about here. I really think a lot depends on the location and the employees, especially the managers.
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|

|
by ♫Venice♫ Posted Tue January 27, 2009 @ 6:26 PM
|
|
|
Twenty-three banks just got $386 million. Do you think that's enough for them to stop squeezing every possible penny out of their customers? Or is it just enough to cover raises, perks and bonuses?
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|

|
by ♫Venice♫ Posted Mon January 26, 2009 @ 5:57 AM
|
|
|
I watched some of the SAG Awards last night. Every time I watch award shows it makes me laugh when actors rely on the prompter to say a few sentences. I mean, they're ACTORS!.. isn't memorizing lines what they do for a living? I just think it's funny.
Most of my favorite shows are coming to an end... Lost, Monk, Nip/Tuck, ER. All I'll have left is House. I better start getting interested in some new programs, but I'm afraid reality shows are taking over. Medium is coming back, but I don't think that will last much longer either. Soon I'll have nothing to watch except reruns.
And speaking of Lost, I just want to say... I love that show!
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|

|
by ♫Venice♫ Posted Tue January 20, 2009 @ 1:39 AM
|
|
|
So why am I not more enthused and excited? I'm not sure. I think part
of it is that I'm still holding a grudge. But even more so, I wish it had been kept more low key. I appreciate the significance of this event, but
so many people gathered in one place is unsettling. In cases like this,
I don't think there can ever be enough security. All I know is that I can't wait for this day to be over. And I pray that everyone gets through it unscathed.
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|

|
by ♫Venice♫ Posted Thu January 15, 2009 @ 4:47 PM
|
|
|
So, I turn on the computer and see an email alert from CNN...
"US Airways passenger jet down in Hudson River"
Okay, don't panic, I tell myself.
My daughter is coming home today, and although she left on Delta, I'm not sure about the return flight. The next words I see are "LaGuardia Airport". Now I'm starting to feel panic set in. Since she left from LaGuardia, I'm assuming that's where she'll return. I look up her itinerary but there's no info about the return flight.
What next?...
I turn on the television and see the plane in the river. I hear the voice of a passenger giving a blow-by-blow description of what happened. The only words I really hear are "everyone got out". So I go back to the computer to find more information. The flight was TAKING OFF from LaGuardia. I take a breath and my heart starts beating again.
But I won't rest until I know she's home.
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|

|
by ♫Venice♫ Posted Thu January 15, 2009 @ 3:21 AM
|
|
|
I have always felt that customer service is a two-way street. I've been a consumer for a long time and can count on one hand the number of confrontations I've had with retail employees. I take into consideration that the employees deal with hundreds of customers a day while I'm only dealing with one employee, making it only right for me to be the one with more patience. In most cases, an employee's demeanor is a direct reflection of the customer's attitude. In other words, if you are friendly and respectful, I can almost guarantee that's what you'll get in return.
Even if a customer encounters the employee from hell, it's no excuse for the customer to stoop to that level. Not only don't two wrongs make a right, but it's not the way to get things done. I'm not saying the customer should back down, but being firmly polite and reasonable can make a difference. And if all else fails, you can't be afraid to ask for a manager before things get out of hand. Complaining after the fact via email or letter is much less effective than doing it on the spot.
Between companies being short-staffed with overworked and frustrated employees, and consumers looking to make the most of every dollar, it's no wonder tempers are flying high in the retail environment. But it doesn't have to get ugly unless you let it. If, as the customer, you find yourself at an impasse, instead of lashing out at an employee who may not have the authority to satisfy you, ask for a manager. And keep your cool. Losing your temper, being disrespectful or calling people names will not help you get what you want. No one deserves or wants to be belittled, either in person or in a letter. It's childish. And it doesn't say much for your own character and credibility. If a customer believes in their complaint or request, there's no reason to resort to name-calling or personal attacks.
The next time you approach a cashier, try smiling and saying hello. Even a simple conversation can change the atmosphere especially if the cashier is already on the defensive. A kind word can go a long way. I've seen a look of relief many times on the face of a cashier after hearing a simple hello from the customer.
Remember, it's a two-way street.
Reply
|
|
 |
|

|
by ♫Venice♫ Posted Mon January 12, 2009 @ 8:40 AM
|
|
|
While temperatures here are freezing, my daughter and her boyfriend are basking in the Caribbean sun. They decided to take a vacation in lieu of Christmas/birthday gifts. She called me on Saturday and something in her voice told me to brace myself. Being the neurotic that I am, the first thing that came to mind was bad news, but when she blurted out the words "I'm engaged!", my angst instantly turned to joy. Hearing her sound so happy was something I've been waiting a long time for. The only thing that would have made me happier was if they weren't so far away. I would have loved to seen their faces when they broke the news.
Apparently he had this all planned, and it was very romantic. We didn't talk long so I don't have a lot of details. As soon as they get home and I find out more, I'll fill you in.
Me?.. a mother-in-law? Are there instructions somewhere online for that?
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|

|
Thanks!
by ♫Venice♫ Tue January 13, 2009 @ 4:35 PM
|
|
|
|
|

|

|
Thanks!
by ♫Venice♫ Thu January 15, 2009 @ 4:35 PM
|
|
|
 |
|

|
by ♫Venice♫ Posted Thu January 8, 2009 @ 3:26 AM
|
|
|
If you're thinking about being unfaithful, you better be certain you don't have something your spouse might want returned... like a kidney!
A doctor from Long Island who donated his kidney to his wife in 2001 now wants it back because she cheated on him and filed for divorce. In lieu of the kidney, he'll take $1.5 million.
He gave her the kidney not only to save her life but in an attempt to save their marriage, which had been affected by her health problems. Her life was saved, but the marriage failed. He's now asking for the kidney to get to her act reasonably in the divorce case, claiming she is restricting access to their children.
Obviously he won't get his kidney back, but do you think he should be compensated in some way? Hopefully, all he really wants is for her to be fair and reasonable, especially with the children.
Reply
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|

|
by ♫Venice♫ Posted Mon January 5, 2009 @ 8:10 PM
|
|
|
Even though it's been a few days now, I am still shocked over the death of Jett Travolta. I've been a fan of John Travolta since his sweathog days. He was born and raised in a town not far from where I grew up in New Jersey, and his father's name was Salvatore, just like my father's. I mostly enjoyed his earlier career in movies such as "The Boy in the Plastic Bubble", "Saturday Night Fever", "Grease", "Urban Cowboy", "Michael" and most recently "Face-Off". I'm not too familiar with the other movies on his long list of accomplishments, but these are ones that have always been my favorites.
I can't stop thinking about my own son at the age of 16. Being right in the middle of the teenage years is a confusing time for kids and parents. It's a point when you can really start to see the person your child will be. It's the beginning of a new chapter that makes you want to go back and reread the story from the beginning in an attempt to hold on. It's hard for me to imagine a life ending at that age instead of moving forward.
Anyhow... if *I'm* still in shock, can you imagine how Jett's family feels? Even with all the fame and exposure, they somehow managed to create their own world to raise and protect their kids. In a way, I think that makes it even harder to lose someone. I remember John saying once in an interview that the family didn't live on a set schedule like most people. They would do things in the middle of the night if they felt like it. I remember thinking how cool that would be for a kid. It just goes to show that good parenting has no limitations. Jett probably had more fun and adventure crammed into 16 years than most kids could ever dream of. And in that sense, he was a very lucky boy.
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|

|
by Venice Posted Wed December 31, 2008 @ 7:05 PM
|
|
|
Do you know why?...
♫do~do~do~do... do~do~do~do... do~do~do~do♫..
That's right!... a semi-annual event...
Fourth of July and New Years!
Still don't know?
Here's a hint...
Next stop... the SciFi Channel
Would anyone like to guess what **I'm** doing New Years Eve?.. and all day tomorrow?
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|

|
by Venice Posted Thu December 25, 2008 @ 8:09 PM
|
|
|
A few days before Christmas, I always reach a point where I just want to be over and done with it. It just seems like there's so much planning, and it's over in the blink of an eye. I wish there was some way to reverse the process.
And now comes the mad dash to stores for exchanges and sales. Nothing irritates the wallet more than being able to buy something for half price (or less) that you just gave as a gift (at full price)... ha!
But that's the routine... every year... year after year.
I think it's the reason I'm not as enthusiastic about Christmas as I used to be.
I think I'm getting old.
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|

|
by Venice Posted Wed December 10, 2008 @ 4:13 PM
|
|
|
When I posted these lyrics last year, it was with the hope that by some miracle the world would change. This song comes to mind every year at this time, but I'm afraid in the end it's just a song.
Don't give up yet. There's always hope...
So this is Christmas
And what have you done
Another year over
And a new one just begun
And so this is Christmas
I hope you have fun
The near and the dear one
The old and the young
A very merry Christmas
And a happy New Year
Let's hope it's a good one
Without any fear
And so this is Christmas
For weak and for strong
For rich and the poor ones
The world is so wrong
And so happy Christmas
For black and for white
For yellow and red ones
Let's stop all the fight
A very merry Christmas
And a happy New Year
Let's hope it's a good one
Without any fear
A very merry Christmas
And a happy New Year
Let's hope it's a good one
Without any fear
War is over
If you want it
War is over
Now...
~John Lennon
Reply
|
|
 |
|

|
by Venice Posted Fri December 5, 2008 @ 7:29 PM
|
|
|
I remember the O.J. Simpson murder acquittal like it was yesterday. I remember everything about that day, including the way I felt. When I watched the slowly traveling white Bronco, I also remember naively thinking that this case wouldn't even make it to trial. Certainly this person was guilty. But we live in America, and suspects are innocent until proven guilty. Sounds fair, doesn't it? Well, it's only fair when the system is in good working order. But as we all know, the system is not foolproof.
I read that the Goldmans take a bit of the credit for O.J.'s current incarceration. Their relentless pursuit of his assets to satisfy a $33.5 million wrongful-death judgment "pushed him over the edge" and led him to commit the robbery to recover some of his valuable sports memorabilia. I believe that's true, but I think there's more to it than that. It was just a matter of time before justice and a higher power caught up with him. Violence combined with stupidity is a risky combination. It's time for O.J. Simpson to be a man. He's had the luxury of freedom long enough, and if there's any bit of conscience in his being, he'll take his punishment with gratitude that it was delayed for so long. I hope he's wise enough to check his arrogance at the door when he enters his walls of confinement. His new neighbors may not be as friendly as he's assuming they'll be. He may find himself at the mercy of an overpowering inmate anxious to make him understand how it feels to be on the receiving end.
Reply
|
|
 |
|

|
by Venice Posted Mon December 1, 2008 @ 10:35 PM
|
|
|
As you all probably know by now, I felt very strongly about Hillary Clinton being the next President of the United States. I have always felt that if this country was ever going to have a woman President, Clinton would be the one ready, willing and able to take charge. The outcome of the primaries confirmed that regardless of qualifications and experience, the country is not ready to embrace the thought of a woman as Commander in Chief. It was a relief to me that she was not asked to be Vice President, and that she wasn't put in the position of having to make that decision. Being Vice President is the only thing that would have bothered me more than her not being President. It would have been an unnatural order of things.
But now, as Secretary of State, she has a real chance of changing the world, or at least making a difference.
If I had heroes, she'd be one of them. I admire and respect her. I wish I had her strength and perseverance, and I am always amazed how she faces so many challenges and so much adversity but manages to rise above it all. If I had a problem or a job to tackle, I'd want her on my side. She believes in herself and in her capabilities. And she doesn't let anyone convince her otherwise.
I think she's a natural for this job, and her biggest challenge will be keeping a lid on Bill. Good luck, Hillary!
Reply
|
|
|
|

|

|
Experience
by Venice Wed December 3, 2008 @ 6:43 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|

|
by Venice Posted Tue November 25, 2008 @ 2:10 AM
|
|
|
Are you cooking or lucky enough to get someone else to do it? What's on the menu?.. traditional or something new? My daughter is on a salmon kick so I'm making a salmon patty appetizer. This is new territory for me, but I'll try anything once. Wish me luck!
Will you be venturing out on Friday? I usually don't, but last year my daughter hit all the stores and said it wasn't bad. Maybe this year I'll join her... or maybe I'll just sleep after my tryptophan overdose.
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|

|
by Venice Posted Sat November 22, 2008 @ 4:27 PM
|
|
|
I was only ten years old, but that didn't stop me from understanding the impact that the assassination of President Kennedy had on everyone in the country. Like most people, I remember exactly where I was when I heard the tragic news. I remember my parents being very upset. My father, brother, uncle and cousin drove down to D.C. to witness history in the making while the women stayed home with the girls in the family. We spent every minute in front of the television set. The images were very disturbing, but the one that has stayed with all these years was the First Lady's bloody suit. It just made everything so real. It was a terrible and frightening time for a ten year old.
Reply
|
|
 |
|

|
by Venice Posted Fri November 21, 2008 @ 8:14 PM
|
|
|
I have quite a few cards I never use. I've been using my Amazon Visa exclusively for several years now. So today I get a letter in the mail from Chase informing me that one of my two Chase cards was canceled on November 10. How nice of them to notify me after the fact. I'm glad I didn't try to use it within the last ten days, or I would have found out the hard way. I'm starting to understand how some letter writers feel about banks messing around with their accounts. I realize this is how it's going to be for now, but the least these banks could do is send out timely letters so people know where they stand.
It looks like the American spending spree is finally coming to an end.
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|

|
by Venice Posted Thu November 20, 2008 @ 6:39 AM
|
|
|
New York City Department of Health released some surprising news: a New Yorker born in 2004 can expect to live 78.6 years, nine months longer than the average American will. In addition, the life expectancy of New Yorkers is lengthening faster than that of other Americans.
Here's why:
The city's wide-ranging smoking ban of 2003 dropped deaths attributable to smoking by 10 percent from 2001 to 2005.
Healthier food options, because New York (like other large cities) attracts a critical mass of people who demand fresh, organic or otherwise superior food choices. The banning of trans fats in restaurants might be another factor.
Perhaps most importantly, New Yorkers walk far more than do suburban Americans, or even residents of other large cities (perhaps due to the fact that New York's high-density urban amenities make walking uniquely viable for shopping, commuting, and other daily tasks). They also tend to walk faster.
The good news is you don't have to live in New York or a big city for a healthier lifestyle. You can stop smoking, eat healthful food and do more walking no matter where you live. It obviously does make a difference.
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|

|
by Venice Posted Mon November 17, 2008 @ 10:58 PM
|
|
|
Okay, I can have an open mind about this, but one thing is bothering me.
I have never known a man that had the natural instinct and/or desire to conceive a child and give birth. I think most men would run for the hills at the mere thought. He thinks of himself as 100% male, but nature is tricky. I think there's a female still hiding in there somewhere. I guess it's possible to have it both ways. I just hope these parents fade into obscurity before the children are old enough to understand how they came into the world. It would be sad to see them become famous for the wrong reasons.
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|

|
by Venice Posted Thu November 13, 2008 @ 1:39 AM
|
|
|
I heard something on the news that was so outrageous, I actually think I heard it wrong, which is possible because I wasn't really paying attention. I hope your sitting down, Rowdy.
Banks want the government to allow huge portions of consumer credit card debt to be forgiven... up to 40% of what is owed.
What?!!
Okay, this is where a line must be drawn. That's just not right. Irresponsible spenders will now be rewarded for their mistakes?!! And what about all the people who have struggled to pay back their debt? What do they get?.. a Blue Ribbon?
This bailout thing is snowballing beyond our wildest dreams.. or should I say nightmares? Unless, of course, you're one of the people getting 40% of your debt knocked off the bill.
Please, someone tell me I heard this wrong.
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|

|
by Venice Posted Wed November 12, 2008 @ 5:42 AM
|
|
|
If someone as cool as Johnny Depp can fear clowns, then I shouldn't care about my own fear. Maybe I'm not such a wimp after all. At least I'm in good company.
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|

|
by Venice Posted Tue November 11, 2008 @ 7:40 PM
|
|
|
When someone comes here to write a letter, they really should check our what the possible consequences are before blindly sharing that letter. You can't just say whatever you want, and then complain when commenters point out what it sounds like. It's hard to believe a person could use this site without noticing **all the comments**. Maybe it's possible if you go right to the letter generator without looking at anything else first. But is that really wise? I guess they count on the letter being removed if they don't hear what they want to hear, making the comments more important than getting the word out. That's too bad.
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|

|

|
Yes
by Venice Wed November 12, 2008 @ 2:33 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|

|
by Venice Posted Mon November 10, 2008 @ 5:11 AM
|
|
|
about anything but Christmas. It's already everywhere.. in stores, on television, and I'm not ready to even think about it yet. I wish we could just skip over the whole season and go right to January and the season premiere of "Lost". Christmas music is the only thing that can get me through these holidays anymore... good old-fashioned Christmas songs.
Reply
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|

|
by Venice Posted Wed November 5, 2008 @ 6:27 AM
|
|
|
I'll bet you think I mean Bo. No, I'm referring to Barack Obama!.. ugh.
Reply
|
|
 |
|

|
by Venice Posted Sun November 2, 2008 @ 6:36 AM
|
|
|
I laughed myself senseless watching John McCain and Tina Fey doing the QVC skit on SNL last night. Senseless enough to vote for McCain? That would be so bad... but it was so good. Those blank collector's plates were just hilarious!.. I'm still laughing.
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|

|
by WantToPlayAGame? Posted Fri October 31, 2008 @ 6:24 AM
|
|
|
Did I scare ya?
Reply
|
|
|
|

|

|
Just wait...
by WantToPlayAGame? Sat November 1, 2008 @ 1:32 PM
|
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|

|
by WantToPlayAGame? Posted Wed October 29, 2008 @ 7:10 AM
|
|
|
I don't know very much about Jennifer Hudson other than she was on American Idol, won an Academy Award, is in a new movie and recently became engaged, but it certainly sounds like she's living her dream. I have a feeling she worked her entire life to get to this point, and now she's faced with one of the worst tragedies a person can endure. I don't know how she's ever going to get through this. I'm sure she would give up everything she's achieved just to have her family back. This is such a cruel turn of events.
Reply
|
|
 |
|

|
by WantToPlayAGame? Posted Fri October 24, 2008 @ 2:37 AM
|
|
|
Do these scenarios sound familiar:
~A beautiful blond undresses and steps into the shower, only to be attacked a few monents later by a man in woman's clothing, who stabs her to death...
~Lost teenagers stumble onto a terrifying family of cannibals who dress in human skin and create furniture and ornaments from human bone and flesh...
~A vicious serial killer kidnaps and slaughters young girls so that he can create a suit from human skin and thus transform himself into a woman...
Elements of each of these blood-curdling films actually occurred. In real life though, the killer's name was not Norman Bates, Leatherface or Jame Gumb... it was Edward Gein. Wisconsin born Ed Gein served as a model for many of the greatest villains to ever ravage across the silver screen: Norman Bates ("Psycho"), Leatherface ("The Texas Chainsaw Massacre"), and the crazed killer, Buffalo Bill ("Silence of the Lambs").
So next time you watch one of these movies, don't let your guard down when it's over. You never know what's lurking in the shadows. And keep in mind that "The Exorcist" was also based on a true story. The Discovery Channel had an excellent documentary on it called "In the Grip of Evil".
7 days...
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|

|
by WantToPlayAGame? Posted Tue October 21, 2008 @ 9:15 PM
|
|
|
I realize I don't know much about politics or the government, but when did early voting become part of a presidential election? I always thought the only early voting was by way of absentee ballots. Has this always been going on and I just never noticed, or is it something new? And is it really a good idea? Wouldn't the results influence people who haven't voted yet? Wasn't that part of the problem in 2000 when exit polls discouraged people from voting?
This just seems to be asking for trouble.
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|

|
by WantToPlayAGame? Posted Tue October 21, 2008 @ 7:03 PM
|
|
|
1 c (250mL) peanut butter
1 qt. (1 L) corn syrup
1/2 cup (125mL) soap
1 oz (30mL) red color
15 drops blue food color
Mix creamy peanut butter with a sufficient amount of white corn syrup to make a runny mixture.
Add (non-sudsy) soap and food colors and mix well.
Stir more corn syrup in until the desired consistency is reached.
Refrigerate unused blood in an airtight container.
Reply
|
|
 |
|

|
by WantToPlayAGame? Posted Fri October 17, 2008 @ 7:14 PM
|
|
|
I've been thinking of all the complaints here, and I think the ones that are most justified are about air travel. I think it's the one industry that has gone downhill the most. I realize there are reasons behind the decline in service, but sometimes I read the letters in amazement at what it takes to get from Point A to Point B, and many times it ends up costing the traveler excessive amounts to reach their destination. I haven't flown in years and have no desire to fly at all anymore. It's just too risky and too much of a hassle.
The cell phone industry is the runner up, but I think a lot of the problem is people not understanding or even reading their contracts. It also seems like the companies are not always accurate or current on the information they provide to customers. You can almost hear the frustration in their voices when you read the letters.
I don't think there's much hope for the airline industry, and people may have to accept it for what it is, but I think cell phone companies could do a better job in servicing their customers. I've never read a cell phone contract, but maybe if they were more simple or in plain language, people would be more inclined to read them.
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|

|
by WantToPlayAGame? Posted Wed October 15, 2008 @ 11:10 PM
|
|
|
Our Pizza Hut closed after being open for thirty years, and now Dominos is gone, too. What's interesting is that the privately owned pizza places are thriving, and we have a lot of them! I guess in my neighborhood, the little guy finally wins. I do miss PIzza Hut, but I'm happy to see that Dominos and their crazy drivers have been run out of town.
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|

|
by WantToPlayAGame? Posted Sun October 12, 2008 @ 6:33 PM
|
|
|
I haven't really kept up with mine, but I wanted to make a playlist so I started going through the songs. Even though there's only a limited amount available, it's still hard to pick only ten. As I was adding songs that have always been my favorites, I realized something. I love lyrics. I love songs that tell a story. That's what is missing from most of today's music, and that's why I lost interest a long time ago. It's all about record labels and money now, and all artistry has gone down the toilet.
Reply
|
|
|
|
 |
|

|
by WantToPlayAGame? Posted Fri October 10, 2008 @ 6:37 AM
|
|
|
I've been trying to keep up with the comments to the letter about The View and the one to John McCain, but all it's doing is confirming why I probably won't vote for either candidate. I just don't believe anything anyone says anymore. I'm tired of facts being twisted and never knowing what is true. I didn't even watch the last debate because I don't think there is anything either of them can say at this point that would make a difference to me. I just keep hearing the same things over and over, and I never really feel any more informed or encouraged in the end. I don't think it's going to matter who's elected. Unless one of them has the ability to perform miracles, I have little hope that things are going to change.
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|

|
by WantToPlayAGame? Posted Wed October 8, 2008 @ 7:14 PM
|
|
|
I don't like clowns. I'm borderline fearing them. So imagine my confusion when I read about a naked clown calendar. Hmmm... naked men with clown faces. Talk about mixed feelings!
Check it out. You might want one... it's for charity!
http://weirdnews.about.com/b/2008/10/06/naked-clown-calendar.htm?nl=1
Reply
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|

|
by ♫Venice♫ Posted Sun October 5, 2008 @ 7:59 PM
|
|
|
the Dodgers are in the playoffs, and the Yankees aren't.
Gotta love it.
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|

|
Yes
by WantToPlayAGame? Tue October 7, 2008 @ 2:54 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|

|
by ♫Venice♫ Posted Thu October 2, 2008 @ 7:11 AM
|
|
|
Can't wait!
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|

|
No
by ♫Venice♫ Fri October 3, 2008 @ 2:40 PM
|
|
|
|
|

|

|
Same here
by ♫Venice♫ Fri October 3, 2008 @ 2:47 PM
|
|
|
|
|

|

|
"The Others"
by WantToPlayAGame? Mon October 6, 2008 @ 5:25 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|

|
by ♫Venice♫ Posted Wed October 1, 2008 @ 3:35 AM
|
|
|
Okay, so I'm hooked on talent shows. What can I say? But there really are so many talented people out there, it just seems logical to bring them to our attention.
Tonight is the finale of America's Got Talent. I really am torn between Eli Mattson and Nuttin But Stringz. Since they are so completely different, I wish they both could win. I think Elton and Billy should step aside and let Eli take over. It's time for a new piano man, and he's definitely the one. And Nuttin But Stringz is a true success story. These guys deserve to win and get a Las Vegas contract. They are incredibly talented, and original too.
So, I can't decide. I don't think it matters though. Success is in the future of both finalists.
And by the way, if you've never seen last year's winner, Terry Fator, look him up on YouTube. He's amazing!
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|

|
by ♫Venice♫ Posted Tue September 30, 2008 @ 3:27 AM
|
|
|
a wish for all my Jewish friends who played a huge role in my life.
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|

|
by ♫Venice♫ Posted Tue September 30, 2008 @ 3:15 AM
|
|
|
A chocolate recall?.. and Oreos, M&Ms and Snickers?!!
Don't panic. The Cadbury chocolate involved is not sold in the United States, but the company is recalling the chocolate made in its Beijing factory after it was found to contain melamine, the industrial chemical that sickened Chinese children.
As if that isn't bad enough, Indonesia's Food and Drug Monitoring Agency said tests last week found melamine in a dozen products distributed nationwide, including M&Ms, Snickers bars and Oreo wafers. Kraft and Mars questioned the findings and plan to conduct their own tests to look into the possibility that the tainted products are counterfeits. In the meantime, Kraft and Mars are both complying with the Indonesian recall.
Can we ever really be sure these products won't make their way into our homes? Soon everything will be stamped, "Eat at Your Own Risk!"
Reply
|
|
 |
|

|
by ♫Venice♫ Posted Sat September 27, 2008 @ 6:05 PM
|
|
|
I never voice a complaint unless I am completely confident it is a valid one. I think that's why I have never had to resort to belittling anyone in the process. My complaints and letters stand on their own. And I don't use questionable language to bring attention to myself because believing in my complaint makes that unnecessary. I don't need or attempt to be cute or funny to make a point, especially at someone else's expense. I've been thinking about all the letters I've written, and not once did I ever resort to making someone else look bad in order to validate my complaint.
When letter writers resort to tactics such as insulting the employees, I think it says a lot about their own confidence in the complaint and their ability to convey it. I guess I should feel sorry for those people, but I don't. Especially the ones who refuse to recognize the ill of their ways and go on to insult the people trying to give them advice. Letter writers shouldn't feel compelled to repeatedly defend themselves if they have the confidence of knowing their complaint has merit.
So that's what I think the problem is... lack of confidence. That's why certain people depend on shock tactics or questionable language to validate their complaint and to attract an audience in the process. The bad news is that it doesn't work. It just makes them look desperate.
Reply
|
|

|

|
Also
by ♫Venice♫ Sat September 27, 2008 @ 9:13 PM
|
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|

|
by ♫Venice♫ Posted Sat September 27, 2008 @ 1:09 AM
|
|
|
My son has a new email address, so I've been sending him emails for a couple of weeks now. Today I asked him if he read any of them, and he said he didn't even get them. I suddenly realized I've been corresponding with a complete stranger who now has my email address. To make matters worse, the address has the word 'freak' in it. Unless it's Criss Angel, I don't think I want to know who's been reading my messages.
Reply
|
|
 |
|

|
by ♫Venice♫ Posted Thu September 25, 2008 @ 6:37 PM
|
|
|
The current letters to Target and Lowe's only prove one thing... two wrongs don't make a right. That may be one of the oldest sayings in the book but it couldn't be more true.
If someone doesn't get the customer service they expect, stooping to the level of the bad service is not going to solve anything. Calling the employees names or making degrading remarks about them is no better than the employee's bad behavior or service in the first place. If a customer feels wronged and just wants to vent, I don't think the appropriate way is in a letter to the company. Vent in a blog then write a suitable letter. That way your letter will be better received and increase your chances of a resolution. I'm not saying that all letters should not be taken seriously, but it's just plain old common sense and human nature that says a less hostile letter has the advantage.
Another old saying... you can catch more flies with honey than vinegar. When will people learn how to get what they want with a little finesse and diplomacy instead of being crude and confrontational?
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|

|
by ♫Venice♫ Posted Mon September 22, 2008 @ 5:15 AM
|
|
|
Has anyone seen this show? I can't believe it won the Emmy, and "Lost" lost.
Way to go, Tina Fey!.. Sarah Palin, eat your heart out! And I can't believe, after all these years, SNL got so many nominations.
If you watched the Emmy Awards, then I don't have to tell you the show was awful. It was nice seeing Tommy Smothers, but the Laugh-In tribute was just depressing. The reality show hosts were awkward and boring, and I think the only laugh I got all night was from Steve Martin.
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|

|
by ♫Venice♫ Posted Tue September 16, 2008 @ 11:15 PM
|
|
|
I didn't even have to look. I already knew by the way I felt that there was a big ole full moon up there. So now I not only have to be on the lookout for werewolves, but then I was dumb enough to watch a show about alien abduction. Can the vampires be far behind?
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|

|
by ♫Venice♫ Posted Thu September 11, 2008 @ 1:57 AM
|
|
|
On the morning of September 11, 2001, I was standing in the doorway of the kitchen about to the leave the room, when I saw something on the television that stopped me dead in my tracks. My first reaction was that an airplane had accidentally flown into the World Trade Center. Even though it seemed unbelievable, it never entered my mind that it was deliberate. I watched for a while before stepping away, but within minutes I heard my husband shout that it just happened again! That's when I knew. And the first thing I remember thinking was that nothing would ever be the same again.
Do you remember where you were at that moment and what your first thought was? How did the events of September 11th affect your life?
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|

|
Thanks
by ♫Venice♫ Sat September 13, 2008 @ 2:29 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|

|
by ♫Venice♫ Posted Tue September 9, 2008 @ 1:21 AM
|
|
|
Sometimes I look at my son as if I'm seeing him for the first time... like I've been in a coma but my eyes open just long enough to take a peek. I refuse to believe 17 years are gone, but today is September 9, 2008, and that means my son is 17 years old, whether I believe it or not.
The worst part about this age is that most of the things we did together are now a part of history. The best part is that those things have been replaced by interests that will mold his future. He loves music now more than ever. He plays guitar and drums, sings and writes songs. He's learning how to drive, slowly but surely. He's a high school senior with an opportunity to student teach math at the elementary school. He's planning on going to college. He was Employee of the Month at work. He has a girlfriend. He even cut off all his hair and donated it to Locks of Love. These are all good things, and I shouldn't complain. Right now, I'm just going to enjoy it because I know there are no guarantees.
Reply
|
|

|

|
Wow, ....
by SumnerMan Wed September 10, 2008 @ 12:02 PM
|
|
|
|
|

|

|
Your Blog
by lordsbaby2008 Thu September 11, 2008 @ 1:34 AM
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|

|
by ♫Venice♫ Posted Thu September 4, 2008 @ 2:58 AM
|
|
|
My son goes back to school today as a high school senior. In his honor I am posting Mike Levine's column one more time.
September 03, 2008
Editor's note: Mike Levine, the former executive editor of the Times Herald-Record, wrote this column more than a dozen years ago to mark the beginning of the school year. Mike died in January 2007, but his column on the start of school has become a readers' favorite.
Quick, before they leave this morning. Take a good look. Touch their faces, run your hands through their hair.
We got antsy with them last month, but now we want time to stand still. Like falling leaves and chilly mornings, some great force signals us today. We are aware of life passing.
See the kindergartner with a brave, bewildered smile watching her mother cry as the school bus pulls away. The high-school freshman with a lump in his throat hears his father whisper everything will be OK. Brothers and sisters who fought all summer now hold hands.
Today is proud, today is helpless, today is tomorrow. This is a special morning, wrenching and sacred.
As a young reporter, I'd wonder why. What's the big deal about the first day of school? I would write down quotes in my notebook and comprehend nothing.
Then I became a parent. I found out. We mark time by today.
On this morning, we remember our own parents and our own childhood. We are filled with the smell of old raincoats, the sticky bond of classroom glue, the childhood knot of worried excitement. We were so small and lost. (Secret: A part of us is still lost. We tell no one.)
Now we have children of our own. On this morning, we remember the holy moment of their birth.
We see this is all just a matter of time. Once, we thought our children were ours alone. Each September, on this day, we learn better. Nothing is ours to keep.
Time passes through our eyes this morning. We see our children as newborns, we picture them as grown-ups. We see them walking their own children to school.
Time passes in the beat of a heart. I have seen my first kindergarten boy walk into his dorm on his first day of college. A few days ago, my younger son left for college. I stood there, at once empty and full, as frightened and proud as the morning his first school bus pulled away.
Come on, it's getting late. The bus is coming up the road. I'll keep this short.
Make sure they have everything they need. Double-check. Write their name on the book bag. Sweetheart, did you remember your lunch money? Dad, don't call me mushy stuff in front of the other kids.
They are right. Like the summer birds leaving us, our children know what to do. Like September leaves waving on the trees, we, too, give way to the winds of change.
Reply
|
|
 |
|

|
by ♫Venice♫ Posted Wed August 27, 2008 @ 11:41 PM
|
|
|
I've been watching the convention (something I've never done before), and it has caused me to do a lot of thinking... {Look out!}
I am not an Obama supporter. I was hoping the convention would help sway me into his corner, but what it did instead was to make me realize the one reason I'm not sold. The only things I know about him I learned from either a handful of speeches and a scripted biography. Unfortunately, that's not enough for me. I'm not willing to hire someone for the most important job in the world after knowing him for only a short amount of time. I don't know his track record or accomplishments, if any, and other than being popular, I'm not sure what else he has to offer especially in the way of experience.
John McCain and Hillary Clinton are household names. Most of their cards were put on the table over a period of decades. No matter how you feel about them, you probably formed your opinion based on their lifetimes of public service and being in the public eye. Obama can't offer that background making it hard to form an opinion. He's at the starting line, and I don't believe in going from that point to the top overnight. McCain and Clinton have histories, records, and the experience that goes with that. Regardless of their positions on the issues, I have confidence that they at least know what they're doing. I'm afraid I just can't say that about Obama. That's not to say he doesn't, just that he hasn't had enough time or opportunity to prove it.
Hope is a great thing, but right now this country needs much more. I don't think this is a time to take risks. There's too much at stake. I need more solid ground, and knowing Obama was President would make me feel too shaky.
I was recently accused of having a false sense of security. That's pretty funny considering I'm known for my excessive worrying. A false sense of security is electing Barack Obama as the next President of the United States.
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|

|
Oh, thanks
by ♫Venice♫ Thu September 4, 2008 @ 3:06 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|

|
by ♫Venice♫ Posted Thu August 21, 2008 @ 1:08 AM
|
|
|
Researchers at Tufts University in Massachusetts say they've discovered a way to make "edible optics" from the silk that can be used as sensors for E.coli, salmonella and other potentially deadly contaminants.
By manipulating the natural optical traits of silk, researchers could "program" the sensors to display a hologram warning or change color when they come into contact with unwanted bacteria, the researchers say.
"This is something that would be similar to the hologram on your Visa card," said Tufts researcher Fiorenzo Omenetto.
Cheap, silk-based sensors that resemble transparent pieces of thin plastic could be tossed into a bag of produce, or even used to make the produce bags themselves, researchers say. Films made from silkworm silk could be used to coat salad tongs in a restaurant, or even be shredded and sprinkled on top of your food. Omenetto says that in his experience, it has almost no taste.
Tufts researchers recently published academic papers explaining their silkworm sensors and filed for patent applications. They expect to begin producing prototypes within a year. If they're successful, such sensors could possibly be on the market within the next several years. Sensors could be manufactured for as little as a few pennies each.
What makes the Tufts sensors unique is that they're natural, organic and completely edible, Omenetto said. They're also biodegradable and don't require refrigeration.
"You don't have to eat it, but if you do it's OK," he said. The same can't be said about electronics-based sensors.
Sensors made from silk among the strongest substances found in nature also are much cheaper and more environmentally friendly than electronics-based sensors. The only factory needed for the raw materials is a grove of mulberry trees,Omenetto said.
To make the sensors, Tufts researchers boil the cocoons of Bombyx silkworms, then extract sericin proteins the glue-like substance that holds the cocoons together. The purified silk is then poured into molds and dried. By tapping into the same natural optical properties that can make silk ties or shirts shiny and iridescent, researchers can manipulate the purified silk so that it changes color when it comes into contact with specific substances, like food-borne bacteria.
Scientists have long known about the strength and optical qualities of silk. Silk from spiders has been used for next-generation fiber optics for computing, for example.
Omenetto said spider silk also could be used for food sensors. But extracting mass quantities of silk from silkworms is a lot easier than getting it from spiders, he said.
And besides, Omenetto added, the idea of ingesting spider webs may be even less appetizing for most consumers than eating a little silk from silkworms.
Reply
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|

|
by ♫Venice♫ Posted Wed August 20, 2008 @ 6:42 AM
|
|
|
Or should he die in prison?
In his fifth interview with the parole board, he told the panel that over the years he has come to realize the gravity of what he did, and how it affected not only John Lennon, but his wife, children and anybody who knew him. He also told the parole board that he was seeking notoriety and fame to counter feelings of failure when he decided to kill Lennon.
It took him 28 years to express remorse.
"I would be something other than a nobody, and that was my reasoning at the time," Chapman said.
In its brief decision, the two-member parole panel denied release "due to concern for the public safety and welfare".
I don't have the answer, but I personally think he's better off in prison. Although both John and Yoko would never want retaliation, I don't think that would stop someone from evening the score.
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|

|
by ♫Venice♫ Posted Thu August 14, 2008 @ 2:28 AM
|
|
|
Now that I've revealed in one of my posts that I put off going to the bathroom just seconds short of having an accident, I figured what the heck... let's talk about our idiosyncrasies. What's the strangest thing you're willing to reveal about yourself? I'll go first.
Other than my unusual bathroom habits, when I'm barefoot (which is most of the time), I walk on my toes. Maybe it's not as strange as I think, but I don't know anyone else who does that.
Next?
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|

|

|
strange
by SuzieCat Thu August 14, 2008 @ 8:38 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|

|
by ♫Venice♫ Posted Sun August 10, 2008 @ 7:38 PM
|
|
|
I've seen a lot of people come and go, go and come back, but what I will never understand is why someone would leave and reincarnate into someone else. First of all, the chances of revealing one's true identity are high. Secondly, what's the point? If I ever decided to leave, it wouldn't make sense to return as someone else. If I didn't want people to know it was me, I would have to pretend to be another person with different ideas and opinions other than my own, or my new identity wouldn't last very long. And if my new identity had ideas and opinions different than my own, what would be the point in expressing them? Wouldn't it be pointless?
So there are three choices:
a) Stay and face the music
b) Reincarnate into someone with different opinions to
keep your identity hidden
c) Reincarnate into someone with the same opinions and
blow your cover
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|

|

|
A good movie
by Jeffrey/Branding/Alex Mon August 11, 2008 @ 6:09 PM
|
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|

|
by ♫Venice♫ Posted Thu August 7, 2008 @ 7:28 PM
|
|
|
I know I've mentioned it before, but it has gotten much worse. Either people are just not taking the time to read carefully, or they do not comprehend what they do read. I think some people feel it's more important to pass judgment or voice an opinion than to actually read the letter and contribute something constructive. I can understand not reading all the comments in a long thread, but I at least try to glance at them before I post anything new. Honestly, this is exactly how rumors get started.
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|

|
by ♫Venice♫ Posted Tue August 5, 2008 @ 1:54 AM
|
|
|
I've been too lazy to type anything here lately, but that doesn't mean my mind is on hold. I've been thinking about a lot of things, all being extremely unimportant.
I've been watching reruns of the last season of "Roseanne", which originally aired in 1997. In one episode Roseanne made a comment about "Charlie and the Chocolate Factory". How is that possible? That movie is only a few years old. Was the original Willy Wonka movie based on a book with that title? It's driving me crazy. By the way, "Roseanne" had the worst series finale in the history of television. I understood the point of the lottery thing, but finding out that Dan died from the heart attack was just cruel.
Morgan Freeman was in a car accident in Mississippi. He's 81 years old. I thought he was younger. He's in serious condition. I hope he pulls through. He's one of my favorite actors.
Ebert and Roeper both quit "At the Movies". I've been watching the show since it was first aired on my local PBS station. I remember when Gene Siskel died and Roeper took his place. Apparently Disney wanted to take the show in a different direction. I hope it tanks.
Speaking of movies, I still haven't seen "The Dark Knight", and now I want to see "MIrrors", too. If anyone sees it, let me know if it's worth the price of admission.
Has anyone ever heard of JZ Knight? I saw her and a bunch of other neuro people on Larry King talking about the difference in the mind and the brain. You are what you think... mind over matter. It was fascinating. I had already believed a lot of what they were saying, but there was something about hearing them present their case that made it seem real and possible. If you have enough motivation to do what they suggest, I really do believe you can change your life. I'm not completely sure about overcoming disease, but I'm convinced of everything else. I think I'll try it someday.. maybe.
I've been watching American Idol Rewind just out of curiosity. After see | |