 |
|
|
by Ken V Posted Tue August 8, 2006 @ 8:05 AM
|
|
|
This is a better story than the one last year when several Wal-Mart associates were fired after it was learned they were shooting cats in the back of the Supercenter with a pellet gun.
Reply
|
|
 |
|
|
by lovescats Posted Mon August 7, 2006 @ 1:48 PM
|
|
|
This is a horrible and cruel way to try and get rid of kittens. The stress of all those kids poking and prodding them is absolute terror for the poor cats. Parents never seem to understand the horrors they are allowing their kids to put the animals through by letting them handle them.
In my city, this is not legal even outside the store. People are not allowed to try to give away or sell baby animals at any public places, period.
If the store managers won't send these idiots packing, the cops will. And if the the Humane Society is called, they will confiscate the animals and bring them to the shelter which is what the irresponsible pet owners should have done in the first place.
I agree the manager at Wal Mart was certainly remiss in not taking care of this situation. Good for you for trying to help those poor kitties.
Reply
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|

|

|
Did he
by Leanne L Mon August 7, 2006 @ 4:17 PM
|
|
|
|
|

|

|
I wonder
by Leanne L Tue August 8, 2006 @ 10:10 AM
|
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
by starla Posted Tue August 1, 2006 @ 12:31 AM
|
|
|
That's odd that they were allowed into the store with the kittens in the first place.
Reply
|
|
 |
|

|
by its all about the meow Posted Sun July 30, 2006 @ 7:53 PM
|
|
|
All RESPONSIBLE pet lovers know there is NO such thing as a FREE kitten! Most Veterinary offices would have taken them and gave them their shots AND spayed or neutered them And then found them good homes. P.S. That is the CUTEST kitty picture, thanks for posting it :)
Reply
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|

|
by Venice Posted Fri July 28, 2006 @ 3:23 AM
|
|
|
Oh, PFB... that picture isn't helping. I'm not a cat lover, but I'll take those kittens, please.
Reply
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|

|
by Leanne l Posted Wed July 26, 2006 @ 9:15 PM
|
|
|
Meow
Sorry I just had to! hehe
Reply
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
Ab-sol-ut-ely Free!!!
What to do with teenage boys peddling illicit felines at the local supermarket?
My guess is that they were trying to do something good (as I can think of many, many ways that teenage boys could be spending time in a less desirable fashion). I don't condone their actions due to all of the potential legal ramifications, health issues, animal rights problems, and public outcry. But has anyone thought about dropping pointing out to these teenagers problems with what they are doing? If they were jerks at that point, then get the manager involved -- or get someone that could do something.
Of course, being inside was a little wierd I have to admit.
Reply
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
by blondie615 Posted Wed July 26, 2006 @ 1:42 AM
|
|
|
I'VE HEARD THEY SELL EVERYTHING AT WAL-MART, BUT THATS FRICKING HILARIOUS! THOSE DINGBATS PROBABLY DIDNT HAVE PERMISSION, BUT WHEN THE WAL-MART DINGBAT WAS NOTIFIED, THE ORIGINAL DINGBATS SHOULD HAVE BEEN THROW OUT. HILARIOUS! ALSO NOT VERY SANITARY....
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
by Eagle_Lover Posted Wed July 26, 2006 @ 12:47 AM
|
|
|
Somthing very similar happened to me a guy my age (teenager) walked up to me and asked if I could give him some gas money because he ran out. It was his own fault plus I didnt know the scam-artist. Scary that walmart allowed that to happen.... selling kittens in the store! that is what a animal shelter is for. but I do feel sorry for the kittens
Reply
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|
by Contrary Posted Tue July 25, 2006 @ 9:27 PM
|
|
|
While I doubt that Wal-Mart gave explicit permission for the kids to bring the kittens into the store, they certainly gave their tacit permission when it was obvious they knew about it and allowed it to continue.
These were obviously not bad kids looking to cause trouble. In fact, I'd go so far as to say they were probably unaware that what they were doing was wrong.
After all, how could it be bad to try to find a home for a kitten?
The blame for this must lie sqaurely with the store's staff, even though it's obvious that their intentions were good, as well.
But, good intentions or not, you're right,LadyMac, it was not a good situation. I'm sorry your little guy got so upset and I hope he's feeling better now.
(also, I hope all the kittens got new homes with responsible, loving owners. And then I hope the parents of the teenagers made sure that their particular kitten factory was spayed)
Reply
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
Wow, I guess your Walmart is more clueless than the others. If I tried to walk in my Walmart with kittens, I think they would notice. I believe that what they were doing was illegal by going in to the store and doing this. However, they can stand outside of Walmart and ask.
Reply
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|

|
by Evil Erik Posted Tue July 25, 2006 @ 12:36 PM
|
|
|
I'd just like to say, I love the title for this letter.
How could you possibly see the line, "Enticing children with free kittens at Wal-Mart," and not want to read the corresponding letter? You wouldn't. It is, in my opinion, the perfect teaser.
Bravo!
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|

|
AWESOME!
by tickytack Tue July 25, 2006 @ 2:35 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|

|
Well then
by Leanne l Tue July 25, 2006 @ 3:13 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|

|
Yup.
by Evil Erik Wed July 26, 2006 @ 2:19 PM
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|

|
by MA Loper Posted Tue July 25, 2006 @ 9:42 AM
|
|
|
I have never heard of such a thing!
There was one poor lady who was harassed at a Sam's Club for bringing her service dog into the building and sitting him in the seat of a shopping cart. I can't imagine how these children brought in multiple kittens and got away with it if a service dog was discriminated against.
Unfortunately, I think you need to get the local manager involved before you can go to WalMart Corporate, but I wouldn't let this rest. Something is very odd about the store even allowing something like that to happen.
Reply
|
|

|
MA Loper
by Batman Wed July 26, 2006 @ 8:10 PM
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|

|
by Leanne l Posted Tue July 25, 2006 @ 9:17 AM
|
|
|
I've seen people giving away animals in front of our walmart too, on several occasions. However, I think most of the times there were cages and it was an organization doing this. But I do remember one specific time with kittens also. I stayed away because you just don't know what you are getting yourself into and if they were not properly taken care of you could get toxoplasmosis (sp) which my own aunt got by petting a stray and now lost vision in one of her eyes for it. She was very sick for a long time with that. Definitely go through the proper channels to give or get a kitten. And Walmart should monitor who is out there too.
Reply
|
|

|

|
Worse
by tickytack Tue July 25, 2006 @ 9:51 AM
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
Am I the only one wanting to call shenanigans on this letter?
I just can't imagine a Wal*Mart store letting people bring kittens in. I can't imagine a Wal*Mart letting a kitten be hawked in front of the service desk.
Thus, I call shenanigans.
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|

|
by Gino Posted Tue July 25, 2006 @ 12:36 AM
|
|
|
Your "best case scenario" aside....
There's some very very serious issues with the contents of this letter That should have been addressed immediately to customer service and management. Child dosen't understand or can't handle "NO"??? Point child away from the enticement possible added stress no longer paralyzing you from acting. If you don't get management to act,a quick call to 911 in this case was not in the realm of unreasonable.
There's a bacteria or parasite or something in cat feces...if it gets into a pregnant woman's system, it puts her and her unborn child at great risk of serious illness or even the loss of her child.A paper cut, small wound or a hand brought to the mouth to cover a sneeze is all that it takes...
Code Adam and Amber Alert Issues....Lock all doors and get every employee involved. kittens are one m.o. predators use.. One of those "teens" could have been a small adult on some nefarious mission...
Health Issues. Pharmaceuticals are dispensed and food items are handled and sold. Contamination and cross contamination can and does happen and spreads very quickly.
It was important enough to let management know while in the store. So to err on the side of safety they could call the healh dept or 911 and have them and the kittens escorted out and some measures taken to clean the areas if not the whole store.
. Something should have been done
Added Stress? Lame excuse
Any department store isn't the place for kittens. Outside the store where people at least have the choice to walk away is a bit better...
For any adult to realize there's a problem and wait to get home to call???? Well that's responsible and acceptable because you and your child are home safe.
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|

|

|
its called
by Leanne l Tue July 25, 2006 @ 1:42 PM
|
|
|
|
|

|

|
Darn...
by tickytack Tue July 25, 2006 @ 2:56 PM
|
|
|

|

|
My Aunt
by Leanne l Tue July 25, 2006 @ 2:57 PM
|
|
|

|

|
he he he
by Gino Wed July 26, 2006 @ 6:41 AM
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
If he was luring the kids out of the store they should have called the police on him.
Reply
|
|
|
|

|

|
AND...
by Tracy M Tue July 25, 2006 @ 2:32 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|

|
Exactly
by tickytack Tue July 25, 2006 @ 3:17 PM
|
|
|
|
|

|

|
*Blush*
by tickytack Tue July 25, 2006 @ 4:52 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|

|
Heh...
by Tracy M Wed July 26, 2006 @ 9:38 AM
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|
|
by p d Posted Mon July 24, 2006 @ 10:37 PM
|
|
|
You say you didn't speak to a manager in the store because you didn't want to go to customer relations as it would subject your son to a kitten.
Does that mean that one of the guys giving them away was up there? I'm confused.
I agree with you that one of the kids could have been lured out. Which begs the question-----So what if your son would have been subjected to a kitten? What if they WERE perverts and some child was taken because not one person complained to the manager?
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|

|
We have
by Leanne l Tue July 25, 2006 @ 10:54 AM
|
|
|
|
|

|

|
He will be
by Leanne l Tue July 25, 2006 @ 12:43 PM
|
|
|
|
|

|

|
sing?
by Leanne l Tue July 25, 2006 @ 3:03 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|

|
Bowl?
by tickytack Tue July 25, 2006 @ 4:12 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|

|
correction
by AmandaBanana Wed July 26, 2006 @ 9:30 AM
|
|
|

|

|
My father
by Leanne l Wed July 26, 2006 @ 9:39 AM
|
|
|

|

|
i guess
by AmandaBanana Wed July 26, 2006 @ 1:29 PM
|
|
|

|

|
Very true
by tickytack Wed July 26, 2006 @ 1:37 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|

|
you know
by Leanne l Tue July 25, 2006 @ 11:02 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
by S. Brown Posted Mon July 24, 2006 @ 8:41 PM
|
|
|
I 100% agree that this should not have been allowed. Not only for the reasons you describe, but also for the safety and well being of the kittens. This is how pet over-population and animal abuse starts - - these kittens were most likely not spayed/neutered and hadn't had their shots. Picture it - - some kid, without his parents permission, takes a kitten home and Mom or Dad doesn't want it so it gets tossed outside to fend for itself. Bad news any way you look at it.
Reply
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
While I wish every unwanted domesticated animal could find a loving home, the proper way to do it ISN'T to make it so darn easy for people to take one home. I don't want someone taking a kitten home on a whim, or because they're afraid to say "no" to their young child.
Make people seek out pets, and go through the proper channels so we can be assured the pets get their shots, spayed/neutered, etc.
Reply
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
|

|
by mary jo Posted Mon July 24, 2006 @ 9:34 AM
|
|
|
I agree completely with you. They should have never been allowed in the store to begin with! They should have thrown those guys out. Standing outside and hawking free kittens is one thing but walking around inside the store with them is another.
I also agree that this could have been a potentially dangerous situation.
Good letter.
Reply
|
|
|
|