 |
|
|
by Alexandra Posted Thu November 16, 2006 @ 2:12 PM
|
|
|
I don't approve of PETA's terrorist tactics. There are better ways of getting your point across. Splashing paint on people and forcing your point of view on people are not good ways.
I hesitate to call *anyone* a "terrorist" because of their opinions...but PETA crosses the line time and again.
A PETA person can explain why they're vegan but they SHOULD NOT force people to adopt a vegan lifestyle. I don't care if you only eat vegetables...I love meat and will continue to eat it.
Reply
|
|
 |
|
|
by blah blah Posted Fri September 8, 2006 @ 1:10 PM
|
|
|
PETA does not support terrorism. This poster above is simply misinterpreting things he reads from websites without doing his own research. PETA does do extreme things to back their causes, such as picketing animal testing clinics. But not terrorism. idiot
Reply
|
|

|

|
Actually
by vc Fri September 8, 2006 @ 8:41 PM
|
|
|

|
Wasn't ALF
by JuliePie Sat September 9, 2006 @ 12:31 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
by blah blah Posted Fri September 8, 2006 @ 1:08 PM
|
|
|
After reading the original post, all I can think of is, I think being a cashier at KFC is the perfect job for you.
Reply
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|

|
by MA Loper Posted Wed September 6, 2006 @ 11:48 AM
|
|
|
Although I realize I'm going to pay dearly for throwing myself into this fray, I have to say that this isn't the kind of letter that can honestly be solved by PFB.
KFC and most other corporations do not give a rat's rear end (pun fully intended) what we as consumers think of their practices (regardless of what they may say to our faces). In the end, they will continue to uphold whatever practices net them the highest yield, with little regard for who gets hurt in the process. Sad, but the almighty dollar still reigns!
With that being said, in my mind, people who support/advocate extremist PETA activities are like the extremist members of the Right to Life Movement.
You can't advocate peace and concern for animals and then hatch plans to blow up buildings and crash private functions, defacing personal property and possibly injuring people just to make your point.
Likewise, you can't condemn the ending of a fetal life and then murder the physician who performed the procedure. That's hypocritical.
I am glad that people speak their mind and that we live in a country where it is acceptable to do so, but I think it's important to keep in mind that it's not fair to look down on or mistreat others because they don't agree with you. Speak your mind and be done with it. There is no rule that says that everyone MUST agree with you ALL the time.
If you don't want your beliefs and values questioned and condemned, then don't question or condemn the beliefs and values that others hold!
Reply
|
|

|

|
THANK YOU
by Iconophiliac Wed September 6, 2006 @ 6:41 PM
|
|
|
 |
|
by Mr. Mafia Posted Tue September 5, 2006 @ 7:34 PM
|
|
|
Do you have any proof that PETA supports terrorism, or are you just using the term terrorism lightly, because if you are they won't take your letter seriously. I know planetfeedback changes titles sometimes, but I doubt they changed it this time.
Reply
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
by bullywug Posted Tue September 5, 2006 @ 5:16 PM
|
|
|
People before chickens? Dude, you got issues.
Reply
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
|

|
by Brad F Posted Mon September 4, 2006 @ 10:32 PM
|
|
|
The Center for Consumer Freedom butted heads with a People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) spokesman yesterday on the Fox News Channel's "Your World with Neil Cavuto." Combining obfuscation, denial, and half-truths, PETA desperately tried to defend its record of supporting terrorism and terrorists. Read on for some of the highlights -- and once you're through, sign our petition to yank PETA's tax exempt status.
After we mentioned PETA's $70,000-plus gift to dedicated arsonist Rodney Coronado, Cavuto directed this question to PETA:
This Rodney Coronado guy, I don't know much about him -- I just need to know this, because this is a big deal. If he was found guilty of blowing up a facility, and spent time for doing that, would you continue to fund him?
To which PETA responded:
Absolutely not. If he needs legal fees before he's been convicted of a crime, then we'll consider helping him out. We do not fund illegal activities. That's a simple, straight fact.
Of course, as we mentioned on Fox News, PETA's own tax returns show a $1,500 gift to the terrorist Earth Liberation Front (ELF), a donation made after ELF activists had been convicted of various violent crimes. PETA has subsequently offered several conflicting justifications for that bit of insanity, but whatever the reason, they clearly funded illegal activities, since that's all ELF does.
After PETA's remarks about Coronado's right to legal counsel, Cavuto chimed in: "This is a guy who blew up a facility. Why would you even countenance [funding him]?" With the metaphorical noose tightening, PETA's talking head replied: "At the time he was innocent, and everybody knows people are innocent until proven guilty."
While that may be true in a court of law, PETA certainly knew Coronado had in fact been planning to burn down a Michigan State University research lab. In Coronado's official "sentencing memorandum," U.S. Attorney Michael Dettmer wrote that PETA president and co-founder Ingrid Newkirk arranged ahead of time to have Coronado send her a pair of FedEx packages from Michigan -- one on the day before he burned the lab down, and the other shortly afterward. "Significantly," wrote Dettmer, "Newkirk had arranged to have the package[s] delivered to her days before the MSU arson occurred." (Emphasis in the original)
There's more yet. After we noted that PETA's Bruce Friedrich "stood up in front of a public audience and advocated people going out and blowing up restaurants and blowing up medical laboratories," PETA's rep retorted: "That's not what he said. What Bruce said was that he wished some places would burn down, that are hideously abusing animals." Just to keep the record clear, here are Friedrich's actual words:
If we really believe that animals have the same right to be free from pain and suffering at our hands, then, of course we're going to be, as a movement, blowing things up and smashing windows ... I think it's a great way to bring about animal liberation ... I think it would be great if all of the fast-food outlets, slaughterhouses, these laboratories, and the banks that fund them exploded tomorrow. I think it's perfectly appropriate for people to take bricks and toss them through the windows ... Hallelujah to the people who are willing to do it. [click here to listen]
PETA went on to insist that in 2001, the year Friedrich lionized arsonists, PETA "gave $200,000 to humane societies and SPCAs for their local work ... All of our finances are detailed in our annual report which people can check out at PETA.org." Well, we looked at PETA's webiste, and there's no way to verify this claim. On documents that PETA files with the IRS, the group listed less than $8,000 in gifts to humane societies and SPCAs during 2001. In that same year, they gave $5,000 to Animal Liberation Front's militant Josh Harper and $1,500 to the Earth Liberation Front. PETA either misled Fox News viewers or the IRS. Here's one final exchange between host Neil Cavuto and PETA, which speaks for itself:
CAVUTO: Where do you draw a line between [raising animals for food] and animals that are used in research, for either cancer or multiple sclerosis or things like that?
PETA: The fact is that none of this research is necessary.
CAVUTO: How do you know, are you a doctor?
PETA: I'm not a doctor, no.
CAVUTO: How do you know?
PETA: We have been researching cancer for decades, using animal experiments. Do we have a cure for cancer? Of course we don't.
CAVUTO: Do we have treatments for cancer? Of course we do.
PETA: But in the 21st century, don't we have technologies that can get us past this? There's is no need to be slicing these animals open --
CAVUTO: Dan, would you be open to trying some of these experimental drugs on a rat before your mom?
PETA: It doesn't work like that, Neil. It is not a fair comparison. The fact is --
CAVUTO: It would be for me, Dan. I'd like to try it out on a rat before giving it to a loved one.
Reply
|
|
 |
|
|
|
please do continue to eat that contaminated and diseased meat.
Fast food markets use spent laying hens and dead and dying animals for their food productions.
so please be my guest, eat it. stuff yourself.
:)
Reply
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
Peta, arn't they the ones that said that fish feel pain when they get hooked on a fishing line?
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
by emt_c Posted Sun September 3, 2006 @ 8:18 PM
|
|
|
How many times are you going to post this ? You did it back in July, as well. Didn't get enough responses then?
Reply
|
|
|
|
 |
|

|
by Alley Posted Sun September 3, 2006 @ 4:45 PM
|
|
|
people have different opinions. some people dont eat meat.. some people don't eat other certain things. i dont think thats your place to tell a company any differently.. even though it IS your opinion.
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|

|
by Iconophiliac Posted Sun September 3, 2006 @ 2:25 PM
|
|
|
There was a post deleted here.
What happened, pfb team?
It was about Penn & Tellers episode about PETA and allegations of them (PETA) supporting actions to blow up buildings in which animal testings are performed?
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|

|
I think..
by Iconophiliac Thu September 7, 2006 @ 8:15 AM
|
|
|

|

|
DVD
by Moof Fri September 8, 2006 @ 12:50 PM
|
|
|
 |
|

|
by Tracy M Posted Sun September 3, 2006 @ 10:40 AM
|
|
|
People before Chickens?
Where on earth would you get such a radical idea like that?
Reply
|
|
 |
|

|
by Beeracuda Posted Sun September 3, 2006 @ 10:30 AM
|
|
|
Oh there are extremists in every group, and PETA is no exception. However, even though I love meat, and will continue to do so, I fully support PETA's efforts to stop animal cruelty. I know that an animal has to lose it's life to provide me with my burger, steak, pork chop, etc, however, there should be a bigger push to humanely slaughter these animals for food.
http://www.petatv.com/tvpopup/video.asp?video=meet_your_meat&Player=wm &speed=_med
WARNING!! The above link is VERY graphic! Watch it with extreme caution!
Reply
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|

|
by Iconophiliac Posted Sun September 3, 2006 @ 9:14 AM
|
|
|
I'm just reading the Wikipedia article about PETA... some of their stuff is okay I guess but some of it is out there.
They are trying to get people to stop drinking milk??? Claiming it has adverse health effects?? What is wrong with them?? They tried to get college students to drink beer over milk. Unbelievable. I'm glad THAT campaign was stopped.
Some of their campaigns do seem rather sensationalist. Mostly their "I'd rather go naked than wear fur" campaign. Way to bring it to the extreme, guys. That's fine if you don't want to wear fur, but there are a LOT of synthetically-made products you could wear. Sheesh. They seem to be making the problem worse than it really is. I dunno.
They do seem to be rather extremist...
Any comments?
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|

|
Brilliant..
by Iconophiliac Sun September 3, 2006 @ 12:14 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|

|
Lol, sorry
by Iconophiliac Sun September 3, 2006 @ 2:23 PM
|
|
|
|
|

|

|
haha
by Iconophiliac Sun September 3, 2006 @ 8:23 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|

|
by DK Posted Sun September 3, 2006 @ 9:14 AM
|
|
|
I agree woth the posters below - I think you can be really passionate, extreene even, about something with out being a terrorist! Terrorusts don't boycott stuff, they blow it up. Isn't there a group called the Animal Liberation Front or something similar that has been convicted of doing the things PETA is being accused of here?
And, I was wondering why just KFC?
Reply
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|

|

|
Hrmm
by Iconophiliac Sun September 3, 2006 @ 2:27 PM
|
|
|
|
|

|

|
Ah,
by Iconophiliac Sun September 3, 2006 @ 8:20 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|

|
It depends
by Iconophiliac Mon September 4, 2006 @ 3:48 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|

|
by Iconophiliac Posted Sun September 3, 2006 @ 8:58 AM
|
|
|
Two guys who worked for the chicken suppliers of KFC (not sure if it was actually KFC or another company, but the chickens were definitely involved in KFC) got fired after we were shown videos of them mistreating chickens by stepping on them, throwing them at walls etc.
Not sure if PETA is accusing them of mistreating them in any other way or not...
Reply
|
|
|

|
by CandyPickletoes Posted Mon September 4, 2006 @ 4:14 AM
|
|
|
I vaguely remember that story but hasn't that been forever ago?
Reply
|
|

|

|
Yup
by Iconophiliac Mon September 4, 2006 @ 8:08 AM
|
|
|
 |
|

|
by Gino Version 1.2 Posted Sun September 3, 2006 @ 1:16 AM
|
|
|
Reply
|
|
 |
|

|
by Leanne L Posted Sun September 3, 2006 @ 1:08 AM
|
|
|
This reminds me a bit of an urban legend with a twist
http://www.snopes.com/business/viral/bovine.asp
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|

|
by mary jo Posted Sat September 2, 2006 @ 11:22 PM
|
|
|
Admit it...you are really Ted Nugent.
Reply
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
I'm getting tired of the word "terrorism" being bandied about, making it essentially meaningless.
I support PETA and have given them money, and I'm not vegan or even a vegetarian. I occasionally eat at KFC but I feel guilty about it (but damn, it's so tasty).
Hyperbole (of which your letter is full) hurts your credibility.
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
by SZ Posted Sat September 2, 2006 @ 5:36 PM
|
|
|
PETA = People Eat Tasty Animals.
Reply
|
|
|
|

|
oh please
by granolagirl Mon September 4, 2006 @ 7:41 AM
|
|
|