|
|
Privacy Rights Violated - FRCA Rights Violated - Basic Human Rights Violated...
Posted Fri February 16, 2007 9:25 pm, by Yolette D. written to Verizon Local Telephone (and FIOS)
Write a Letter to this Company | Rate this Company
DEAR VERIZON:
I serviced two phone numbers with Verizon for two different addresses, but requested that both bills be sent to my personal physical address.
The bills were being sent to me for a while until a few months later when Verizon allowed the other party other than myself, the sole account holder, the ability to bypass the security system and not only change the billing addresss but to completely close the account leaving a full balance behind.
Because of this change, I was not receiving the bills for a while, which led to my account being past due, which ultimately led to Verizon assigning the bill to a collection agency.
After I realized I was not receiving the bills, I did some investigation and found out that I was already sent to collections. I finally obtained a letter from the collection agency, Solomon & Solomon, which I immediately paid.
I have complained and attempted to give my side of the story with absolutely no luck. In fact, the reps at Verizon refuses to even CONSIDER the possiblity of Verizon making a mistake. They instead tell me they can't do anything about it and that it will remain on my credit report.
Yes, my privacy rights has been violated, and I have been denied mortgages because of this discrepency that lowered my score by 60 points.
My dream of owning a home to better provide for my family has been put on hold because of this injustice. My basic human rights are being tampered with.
Verizon should take responsibility for its actions and delete the negative information from my credit reports. Not only is it illegal but it's highly immoral.
Reply
| Log In/Create an account | 127 comments |
|
|
| PlanetFeedback Comments are subject to strict terms and conditions. We reserve the right to deny site membership privileges to any individuals acting inappropriately. |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
 |
|
|
by Rhet Canter Posted Mon March 5, 2007 @ 5:40 PM
|
|
|
Does your credit score being lowered by 60 points prohibit your from buying a house? It doesn't. I'm sure there are a lot of other credit issues going on in your life than the missing phone bill. And....if you get it every month and then all of a sudden it stops coming in the mail, wouldn't you notice something like that? Most of us would. Did you think the bill paying fairy paid it for you? I'm really sorry about the loss of the American dream of owning your own home to better the quality of your family, but there is more to that task than owning a home. It's basic principles and you don't seem to have much of those. I think this letter is a hoax. Too hard to believe.
Reply
|
|
 |
|

|
by calm Posted Thu March 1, 2007 @ 7:10 PM
|
|
|
I recall a really long dealing I had with T-Mobile right before I decided I'd rather not have a phone than deal with them any further (T-Mobile has the only plan I've found yet that meets my needs).
Someone would come on the line and ask me for my phone number and social security number and so on and then we'd talk for a few minutes and I'd get transferred and put on hold, and after awhile someone else would come on the line and ask me for my information and so on and then we'd talk for a few minutes and .... Well, you get the picture.
Eventually someone asked for my social security number and I asked why I had to repeat it over and over again.
She told me it was "for [my] protection". After all, she said, I wouldn't want any unauthorized people phoning up to make changes to my account.
I told her I agreed with that, and that's why I had answered the questions the first four (or whatever) times, but since I kept getting transferred from person to person I would have thought that my identity was established.
Yes, she said, but I wouldn't want any unauthorized people phoning up to make changes to my account.
I asked her whether she could tell that I had been transferred from a different CSR and that she wasn't the first T-Mobile employee I'd spoken to on that phone call.
Yes, she could.
Well, I asked her, did she have any doubt that whoever I'd already talked to had validated my identity.
The information, she said, would have to have been gotten.
Then why did I have to answer the question again?
So unauthorized people couldn't change my account.
I asked her what she thought the odds were that someone had broken into my apartment while I was on hold, incapacitated me, and gotten on the phone but had been unable to find my wallet, which is where I keep my social security card.
Looooong pause.
I recited my social security number.
While I've never dealt with Verizon, I find it quite credible that Verizon got your personally identifying information from the other person before making any changes. I do think it's a problem that the people closest to us are likely to have access to information sufficient to steal our identities simply by being close to us. But I also think a lot of us are pretty careless with information that the people around us don't actually need and which should be kept a secret. (There's an ex-boss who gave me her unbelievably obvious AOL password years ago, and I always wonder whether, when I left the company pretty angry with her, she bothered to change it. I'm not going to go try logging in with her old password, but I'm very curious to know whether I could if I were inclined to.)
If the other party was in fact able to "look" exactly like you to the Verizon CSRs, then I fail to see what they could have done without risking the opposite problem: you calling in to make changes to your account and finding out that you weren't allowed to.
Reply
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|

|
by Sava Posted Thu March 1, 2007 @ 12:15 PM
|
|
|
I agree with a previous poster - one bad mark on your credit report will NOT bar you from getting a mortgage! And a 60 point lowering? That's noticeable, but it's not the end of the world. Let's put it this way: I have a Chapter 7 bankruptcy on my record, and I can STILL obtain a mortgage albeit at higher interest rates, but it IS possible!
Question: did this other person know your info (address, name, SSN, etc.)? If so, they could have changed your info simply by calling Verizon and claiming to be you. If they gave Verizon all the correct info, how would Verizon know it wasn't really you? They wouldn't - and if that is what happened, the only person violating your rights is this other person who apparently doesn't know how to pay on time.
Just a note: the fact that you wanted both bills to go to you rather than to have the other person receive his/her own suggests that you already knew this person wasn't the most responsible human being around. If you went ahead and got a phone line for this person anyway, you have to simply chalk it up to bad judgment and move on.
Reply
|
|
 |
|
|
by vzjackl1 Posted Sat February 24, 2007 @ 2:09 PM
|
|
|
Yollette, I work for Verizon IN CUSTOMER SERVICE, CSR's are REQUIRED to validate the identity of EVERY caller, this is done several ways, MOSTLY by asking for a piece of information that can only be found on the bill, such as the last payment made or more often the customer code. So, if as you say the bills were coming to you, how did this "unauthorized" person obtained that information??
Several other people have also responded, and I have to 100% agree, if you were not receiving the bill WHY then did you not call and ask what was going on?? You KNOW you should be receiving a bill every month. Perhaps it was because youi were trying to pull something over on Verizon? thinking that perhaps THEY screwed up and just happened to forget to bill you?? You obviously have access to the internet, why did you not try to access your bills online?? It takes almost a YEAR for Verizon to send a bill over to a collection agency. From the date the service is disconnected, you would then receive your next bill, then a month after that you would receive your final bill, then if unpaid months three and four, you would receive reminder bills. By month five after the service is disconnected, your account goes into a "written-off" status, and if at that point it is still unpaid it goes to the verizon internal final bills department, where they try to investigate, and see what is going on, and get the bill paid. ONLY after several months there will it go to a collection agency!!!
Also just an FYI for you and anyone else.... if you have THAT many concerns about someone else accessing your information, such as maybe a child who may have access to the bill, you can always call customer service and set up a VERBAL PASSWORD, anytime you would call into the office the CSR will ask for that password, and no infor will be given without it... JUST make sure it is something only you will know, and you will REMEMBER it!! If I only had a $1.00 for every customer that got angry with me because I could not give them the info they wanted because they did not remember the password THEY chose!!
Reply
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
by Gonda! Posted Fri February 23, 2007 @ 11:51 AM
|
|
|
So when "Mr Mistery" called and closed the one account, the phone service had to have been turned off, and you didn't notice this? Who was the other party using the service, if any? Would they have notified you? That would be clue number one.
Reply
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|

|
by Crazy Erik Posted Thu February 22, 2007 @ 11:07 AM
|
|
|
My right as a human being to not be annoyed by other human beings has been violated. Somebody get Amnesty International on the phone.
Reply
|
|

|

|
LOL! n/t
by Giselle Fri February 23, 2007 @ 7:15 AM
|
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
|
|
by Retail G Posted Mon February 19, 2007 @ 10:14 PM
|
|
|
Don't you need to be human to have basic human rights?
Reply
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|

|
by Jeffrey Posted Mon February 19, 2007 @ 10:31 AM
|
|
|
I was going to defend Yolette, at least a bit. But then I saw how offensive her posts were and I reconsidered.
OK, that's not fair. I won't stoop to Yolette's level. So, here goes...
While the point many have made about how Yolette is responsible for paying the bill, even if the bill doesn't arrive, is true... I find it a side issue.
The thing in this letter that struck me was that someone, not Yolette, called and had the address changed. Now, I have to wonder, how did this happen?
From what I can tell, it was a relative. Right? Therefore, it's certainly possible that this person had sufficient information to claim to be Yolette. As with the woman who lost her IRA to her husband's "gambling" with the account, there is relatively little a company can do to stop an "in-the-know" person from accessing someone's account. For example, the most common security question has been "what is your mother's maiden name." I'm sure that there are are many people that know this. My wife, my sister, my mother, my uncle, my cousin (who's currently under some serious criminal charges), and several others would know this. My criminal cousin can also answer where I grew up, my maternal grandfather's middle name, and several other questions about me. Really, the only commonly used "security" question she doesn't have is my SSN.
But my wife knows my SSN. Should we ever get divorced, she's got the ability to mascarade as me, because she knows the answer to EVERY security question that'd ever throw at her. Sure, I could start using fake ones to throw her off, but...
So, what I want to know is... did Verizon not follow minimal security procedures. If this person called and said "pssst... I'm not Yolette, but please let me access her account," it's one thing. It's quite another if Verizon asked for a couple pieces of information, for which the person got it right.
And that point, Verizon was acting responsibility. What more could they have done, really?
Which brings up to the point many of the others are making: when Yolette stopped receiving the bills, this should have been a tip-off to her that something was amiss.
Yolette, I have to say that I find your responses to people here to be very rude. But you DID choose to share your letter. In doing so, you AGREED to allow others to comment. If you want to comment in a rude way, that's your choice. However, don't pretend that you didn't know that people would comment. You manually checked the box that said you wanted to share. And there IS text to the effect that people can comment, right there.
Reply
|
|
 |
|

|
by Gino Posted Sun February 18, 2007 @ 9:05 PM
|
|
|
Hi Yolette,
When, exactly, did the fact that you weren't getting bills from Verizon (a "Fixed" expense YOU should have been looking for) and just how many unpaid bills does one let "fly by" before picking up a phone and calling a company?
The predicament you find yourself in is your OWN fault. Please find me the law that says I'm entitled to homeownership.... I've been paying a mortgage for over 20 years and if this is true, the bank owes ME big time!!!
Reply
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
by Buddy Posted Sun February 18, 2007 @ 8:22 PM
|
|
|
And why did you not call them when you were not receiving bills to find out what was going on? Bills for the most part arrive at around the same time every month. If you don't receive one when you're supposed to, CALL THE COMPANY!!!! Just because you don't receive a bill does not mean that you do not owe them the money!
Reply
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|
|
by JuliePie Posted Sun February 18, 2007 @ 7:00 PM
|
|
|
I hate when people blame their bills being past-due because they didn't receive them.
You knew you would be getting a cell phone bill, and when it didn't come, what did you think? That they weren't going to charge you anymore? I know when my bills are due, and if they don't come in the mail, I call and get the balance and payment mailing address so I can send the payment out. You know, so it will be paid on time and not affect my credit.
Reply
|
|
 |
|
by SZ Posted Sun February 18, 2007 @ 2:08 PM
|
|
|
Hey, Yollette (or whatever username of the moment) got an idea for you! Sue your so-called blood relative on the Judge Joe Brown TV show. Whenever I wanted to get a few good laughs, I've tuned into him. Just before he bangs down his gavel on ridiculous cases such as this, he'll come up with something like 'So Sad--Too Bad!'
I don't suggest Judge Judy, though. You'll get one evil-eye stare, a swipe of her sharp tongue that cuts you down at the knees, and--Dismissed!
As far as your 'right to privacy,' you gave it up when you checked the box that said to make your letter public.
Reply
|
|
 |
|

|
by Harleycat Posted Sun February 18, 2007 @ 8:36 AM
|
|
|
I originally was not going to answer this post because of the tone of your replies but as a Telecommunications Analyst of 26 years, I feel I must chime in.
I've worked (placed service orders, closed accounts, etc.) with every major carrier and some smaller ones in the United States, Canada and Puerto Rico. I have never been able to make a revenue effecting change without proving who I am, who I work for and being listed on the account as an authorized person. I can obtain service calls without such information but when I want to close accounts or change service features, I must do so on company e-mail and, if there is any question, I must provide our federal tax ID. With some carriers, our billing person is not allowed to dispute a bill without authorization from me because I placed the order. I currently have over 800 sites and this has been the case with every single one.
Whoever made these changes must have had some personal information of yours in order to do it. The record at Verizon would have to show what rep closed the account and what steps they took to verify the callers indentity.
It's not clear whether you were getting one bill or two. Your original post said two bills and a reply said one account with two numbers. Either way, I don't understand why you didn't notice you were not getting both bills or that the one bill was much lower than it usually is. For some reason, I don't get a paper cable bill each month and I don't have the patience to wait on the phone to correct this. Each month I go online and find out how much I owe them and pay it.
As far as your credit score goes, unless you already have poor credit, one negative should not effect your ability to get a mortgage. I have one outstanding collection issue on mine which I have not been able to resolve. All the mortgage company asked for was a letter explaining the issue and we got the mortgage at a great interest rate.
I don't see how your privacy rights have been violated unless they gave your personal information to someone without your permission. From the looks of this, someone already had your information and used it when they called Verizon. Unfortunately, the Verizon reps are not psychics and have no way of knowing it's not you calling. I'm als curious as to how they violated your FRCA rights, please explain. They had a bill, in your name, that was not paid. They sent it to collections in order to receive payment. Unless the collection agency used methods to obtain payment that were against the law, your FRCA rights were not violated.
If you want to avoid this in the event you do something like this in the future, I would suggest password protecting the account so no one but you can make any changes.
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|

|
by Lee H. Posted Sun February 18, 2007 @ 12:44 AM
|
|
|
You are right Yolette that some people use this website to simply argue with anyone they can. It is unfortunate, but that is the price for free speech.
Ultimately, I would agree with the observation that you become responsible for your own account. It takes a great deal of time, I believe, before Verizon would have sent your account to a collection agency. I would think you should have noticed that you were not being billed and contacted them on your own. If the negative mark on your credit was because of late payments, it is correct regardless of the reason.
It is a good lesson learned, as someone else pointed out, that the time to deal with the negative mark was before paying the debt. Upon receive the letter from Solomon & Solomon, you would have been better off to request a signed document stating the confusion and confirming no negative marks be placed upon your credit report. With such a document, you might have grounds for removing the negative mark. Now, however, I'm afraid you'll find it much more difficult, if not impossible.
I would further point out the benefit to not addressing other posters as you have done. Many companies that receive letters through this website read the further dialog which takes place. In this case, that additional dialog does not bow well for you or your cause.
Work on your credit. Build it up as you can. Make sure to pay your debts on time and your score should be back up within the year.
Reply
|
|

|

|
Unfortunately...
by It-doesn't-pay-to-behave Tracy Sun February 18, 2007 @ 10:34 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|

|
IMHO
by Lee H. Tue February 20, 2007 @ 12:54 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|

|
4.
by Venice Wed February 21, 2007 @ 3:29 AM
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|

|
by Chris M Posted Sat February 17, 2007 @ 10:21 PM
|
|
|
Ok, I will post my first unbiased opinion before reading the string of responses below.
Verizon, in my opinion with the information only as you present it, was wrong in giving someone else the ability to close the account. I am very interested to know how this person did this though. I have never been able to make changes like that with any company without answering some security questions.
Maybe this relative had your SSN, etc?!
Now, you are responsible for your credit. What you did, in essence, was even more risky than co-signing.
You used your credit as the primary and sole account holder, your personal information, etc to open this phone up. Yes, it was for a relative. However, you should have known something was odd when you started not getting the bills. For all you knew, someone was stealing out of your mailbox. At that point, you should have been all over Verizon, trying to track down what happened.
In the end, I think you are a very mean spirited person - at least that is how you are coming across on here. However, if the facts are as presented by you, then I do think Verizon should try and help figure out what went wrong in their security system.
However, in the end, you are still responsible for your credit.
Reply
|
|
|
|

|
...
by Megsy Wed February 28, 2007 @ 8:49 PM
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
Oh my dear God in Heaven. You know, while I was reading your letter, I actually, for a bit, felt bad for you. Yes, you got screwed over. It sounds like the person for whom you activated the phone line somehow pretended to be you and duped Verizon into allowing them to change your accout specifications. That sucks. That should definitely be brought to their attention. That person definitely needs to be removed from your personal Rolodex (as my mom used to say).
That being said, I have never and I mean NEVER seen a person spew such vile and hateful vitriol in my life! Wow. You really really really outdid yourself.
You also nailed, right on the head, my personal favorite PFB pet peeve. Not all of us that use this site are "fat" and "eat" and "dookie" in front of our computers. Some of us actually enjoy reading feedback sent to companies so we can take the information provided by others into account when choosing whether or not to patronize a specific company. Not everyone replies to posts with venom and hate. There are very few out there that do so and they are generally ignored. Most on this site provide what can only be called constructive criticism. If you don't like what they say, either don't share your letter, or ignore it. I hate to tell you, Cupcake, that not everyone is going to agree with you. That is life.
Peace to you.
Reply
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|

|
by donno Posted Sat February 17, 2007 @ 9:55 PM
|
|
|
This was interesting for the first 30 seconds. However, it turned into a gift that kept giving and giving. This is a pefect example or someone who makes a post, gets a few common sense replies that they don't like, and proceeds to shoot their mouth and feet off and calls people names. Then the OP can't stump his way out of here without those feet. Does the fact that not one person supports your postion give you a hint?
I suppose you think this a conspiracy of some sort. Everybody is taking advantage of you. Well, it didn't start that way, but your attitude has created a huge bullseye. No, we won't stand around and take your crap without saying something. Sadly, a lot of effort has been wasted on you, and I don't believe you are worth it.
Take your credit score, divide by 10, and you'll find your IQ.
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|

|
Credibility
by SupremeWizardess ofTakingTheGlovesOff Sun February 18, 2007 @ 2:08 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
by A A Posted Sat February 17, 2007 @ 9:49 PM
|
|
|
Basic human rights? A little over the top.
I worked at Verizon way back when and every day I got belittled and yelled at because I would not give out info to people not on the account.
A friend of mine was challenged to a fight over this issue. If anyone wonders why no one in retail cares about the customer, this is why.
They are usually strict about not giving out info if someone is not on the account, but ever day husbands will go into Verizon screaming and trying to get employees fired because they cannot get details on their wives accounts for which they, "pay all the bills every month", but are not authorized.
Damned if you do, damned if you don't.
Reply
|
|
 |
|

|
by calm Posted Sat February 17, 2007 @ 9:39 PM
|
|
|
try to exchange a Christmas gift at the store where it was bought, get turned away for not having a receipt, and subsequently get someone at Target to let you switch?
In any event, since you clearly didn't take the time to see what kind of responses letters like yours get on this site before you clicked on the little button to make your letter public, and since you don't care what other people's opinions of you are, why are you electing to pursue this argument? Please, for your own sake, get a life. You will be happier, I promise.
Reply
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|

|
by Venice Posted Sat February 17, 2007 @ 4:55 PM
|
|
|
I watch American Idol, and I'm not dumb.
Reply
|
|
 |
|

|
by "The One and Only" MA Loper Posted Sat February 17, 2007 @ 4:34 PM
|
|
|
Psycho OP week??
First Phyllis returns, then the paranoid Mystery Shopper & now this one.
Wow, I need some Tylenol!
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
When I responded, I hadn't scrolled down to read other responses. What a delightful, charming person she is!
Let's all keep the mortgage brokers and loan officers and real estate agents who are in the OPs area in our thoughts and prayers. They're going to need all the help they can get.
Reply
|
|
|
|

|
...
by Demarais55 Sat February 17, 2007 @ 3:18 PM
|
|
|
|
|

|
...
by Demarais55 Sat February 17, 2007 @ 3:44 PM
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|
|

|

|
lol n/t
by PaintedLady Sat February 17, 2007 @ 2:39 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|

|
by >Leanne< Posted Sat February 17, 2007 @ 2:17 PM
|
|
|
Listen to me. That friend of yours is not your friend and I hope you are reconsidering the terms of that friendship. Why is it that she needed this phone in the first place? Did she not have the money or did she lose another phone due to similar circumstances of screwing others over that she didn't tell you about? Did she make you feel sorry for her and tell you how the world has left her helpless? Is this a long time friend or a new one? I'm only asking this because you did a kind deed for someone who apparently not only "forgot" to pay the bill but actually had the audacity to deal with Verizon and chance things in their system on you behind your back.
My advice to you is to pay your bill off and write to the mtg company your explanation. Never give anything to a friend that will ever jeopardize your credit again. If you want to help them out, give them the independance to stand on their own two feet. There are many phone companies that are private who will allow her to use a phone for either emergencies and set it up for her so she won't make long distance calls and not run up a bill. Research them if you want to stay her friend and give the information to her if she can't do it on her own. Let her make that choice. See if she does or if she whines about it. That will tell you her charachter. Or she can use a pay phone or buy a cell phone cheap with limited use. If she isn't able to, it might be because HER credit is already messed up. And now she shared the wealth with you unfortunately.
Good luck with this.
Reply
|
|
 |
|
|
|
Instead of being such a jerk and taking out your anger on everyone here, take it out on your blood relative who screwed you over.
Reply
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
What a joke. Home ownership is NOT a basic human right.
And if this is the only black mark on your credit report, it won't keep you from own a home. I guarantee that. This is your own fault (you had to notice for a few months that bills weren't arriving) -- or the fault of the person you set up with a phone at your expense.
Verizon isn't at fault in any here. Stop being so overdramatic -- it shows how little you really know about the world to claim that your basic human rights were violated.
You trusted an untrustworthy person then didn't pay attention to your accounts. Don't blame anyone but yourself.
Reply
|
|

|
...
by Demarais55 Sat February 17, 2007 @ 1:48 PM
|
|
|

|

|
Nooo...
by PaintedLady Sat February 17, 2007 @ 2:03 PM
|
|
|
|
|

|

|
Hellooooo..
by PaintedLady Sat February 17, 2007 @ 2:38 PM
|
|
|

|
...
by Demarais55 Sat February 17, 2007 @ 2:46 PM
|
|
|

|

|
ROTFLMAO
by PaintedLady Sat February 17, 2007 @ 2:56 PM
|
|
|

|

|
Sooo...
by PaintedLady Sat February 17, 2007 @ 2:17 PM
|
|
|
|
|

|

|
rofl
by SupremeWizardess ofTakingTheGlovesOff Sat February 17, 2007 @ 2:23 PM
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|

|
...
by Demarais55 Sat February 17, 2007 @ 1:38 PM
|
|
|

|

|
Hmmm,
by PaintedLady Sat February 17, 2007 @ 1:46 PM
|
|
|

|

|
lol
by SupremeWizardess ofTakingTheGlovesOff Sat February 17, 2007 @ 1:47 PM
|
|
|

|

|
Hun
by SupremeWizardess ofTakingTheGlovesOff Sat February 17, 2007 @ 1:46 PM
|
|
|

|
...
by Demarais55 Sat February 17, 2007 @ 1:53 PM
|
|
|
|

|
by PaintedLady Posted Sat February 17, 2007 @ 2:05 PM
|
|
|
if you are soooo unaffected, why are you trying so hard to cut everyone else down?
Reply
|
|
|
|

|

|
Nah,
by PaintedLady Sat February 17, 2007 @ 2:47 PM
|
|
|
|
|

|
....
by Demarais55 Sat February 17, 2007 @ 1:32 PM
|
|
|
 |
|
|
by penelope Posted Sat February 17, 2007 @ 11:45 AM
|
|
|
i don't understand. in half of your very rude and "i'm so smart and your not" responses, you claim that:
"This wasn't a case of two separate accounts. It was one account with
TWO phone numbers, therefore only I had (supposedly) access to it."
and:
"If you care to know, my bills are paid every month, and my account is still open. It is the OTHER phone I opened for someone else that wasn't being paid"
if it is one account with 2 numbers, then like you said, it is just one bill. but then you claim that you paid your line, not the other line. how can that be, when the 2 lines are supposed to come in one bill. if your bills are paid every month you should have realized there was one bill missing. if the other person screwed you over, then he must have had the proper info to make changes to your account. it doesn't matter if it is you blood relative or a stranger. you are responsible to protect your information.
all of your nasty remarks about how you are supposedly more intelligent than all of the people posting their opinion TO THE LETTER YOU MADE PUBLIC, do not help your cause. you made this letter public, obviously you wanted other people to read it and post their opinions. since you don't like our opinions because well they are not the same as yours then you fire away.
oh and please if you must find a way to insult me, try a new thing. the you didn't go to school, or you don't know how to read is getting old.
Reply
|
|

|
...
by Demarais55 Sat February 17, 2007 @ 2:15 PM
|
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|

|
by PaintedLady Posted Sat February 17, 2007 @ 11:30 AM
|
|
|
You yourself state that "both bills were being sent to me for a while," you did not notice you were suddenly getting only one? When did you notice the other party was not paying you? This was within your power to rectify long before your account was sent to collections and it was your free choice to give a phone to an obviously untrustworthy person.
You are right, they should not have changed the billing address without your permission. However, unless they showed this other person all your information while doing the changeover your privacy rights were not violated. As for your basic human rights, you should really reread the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, before you start slamming the other commenters for lack of education.
Having a family member who works for one of the major credit-reporting agencies, I can assure you (and everyone else reading, damn, there goes that privacy again) that 60 points would not effect your ability to obtain a mortgage unless your credit already s#cks to start with. Have a wonderful day.
Reply
|
|
 |
|

|
by Courtney C Posted Sat February 17, 2007 @ 10:32 AM
|
|
|
Wow, first of all, congratulations of showing everyone your true character in less time than it takes to read your post. Your replies to the comments below prove you to be a nasty, foul-tempered person with no ability to converse like an adult. If I were Verizon, I'd refuse to help you too. What a jerk. And Brenda's somment was DEAD on. I don't care if YOUR phone was still functioning, the fact is that you knew you were supposed to pay 2 bills to Verizon every month. If one just stopped showing up and you didn't notice, then this is all yoru fault. The account being closed is a completely seperate issue. You chose to be negligent in keeping up with your own bills. THAT'S why it went to collections. If you had called up Verizon and said "hey, where's my bill?", you could have paid off the amount right then, saved yourself from collections and dealt with the supposed privacy invasion seperately. But no, it was working out in your favor, so why speak up, right?
The fact that you jump to conclusions and make nasty assumptions about people just because they asked you a valid and appropriate question shows that you probably did not speak to the Verizon people respectfully to begin with. How dare you decide that someone doesn't work hard for a living or is uneducated because they call you out on YOUR irresponsibility? Don't make your letter public if you can't handle your shortcomings being pointed out to you. MAYBE Verizon shouldn't have let the other person close the account (and that's a MAYBE because I'm not convinced they did anything wrong. If the person lied to them, that's your friend's fault, not theirs) but the fact that it went to collections and that you can't buy your home is your OWN FAULT.
The only human rights being violated are ours by being subjective to your childish whining and attacks.
Reply
|
|

|
...
by Demarais55 Sat February 17, 2007 @ 11:01 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|

|
Right....
by Courtney C Sat February 17, 2007 @ 11:20 AM
|
|
|
|
|

|

|
I know!
by Courtney C Sat February 17, 2007 @ 11:41 AM
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
by Starlight22203 Posted Sat February 17, 2007 @ 9:37 AM
|
|
|
This is your own fault for lending your credit to someone else... Sorry...
Reply
|
|

|
...
by Demarais55 Sat February 17, 2007 @ 10:05 AM
|
|
|

|
Wow
by Starlight22203 Sat February 17, 2007 @ 12:14 PM
|
|
|
|
|

|

|
but...
by PaintedLady Sat February 17, 2007 @ 12:33 PM
|
|
|
|
|

|

|
People...
by PaintedLady Sat February 17, 2007 @ 1:51 PM
|
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
Umm, how long did it take for you to realize you weren't paying your bill that you are supposed to pay every month?
Reply
|
|

|
...
by Demarais55 Sat February 17, 2007 @ 10:13 AM
|
|
|
|
|

|
...
by Demarais55 Sat February 17, 2007 @ 11:17 AM
|
|
|

|

|
ok
by Courtney C Sat February 17, 2007 @ 11:22 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|

|
No,...
by PaintedLady Sat February 17, 2007 @ 12:02 PM
|
|
|

|

|
ok...
by Courtney C Sat February 17, 2007 @ 12:05 PM
|
|
|
|
|

|

|
and...
by PaintedLady Sat February 17, 2007 @ 12:07 PM
|
|
|

|

|
Well
by SupremeWizardess ofTakingTheGlovesOff Sat February 17, 2007 @ 12:11 PM
|
|
|

|

|
Yeah,
by PaintedLady Sat February 17, 2007 @ 12:16 PM
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|