 |
|
by Cubjunkie Posted Sat May 5, 2007 @ 11:56 AM
|
|
|
I never listened to Imus I found him to be a pompous butt.
But everyone has a simple device on their tv or radio it's the on/off and tuner buttons.
If people are offended and tune him off he will go off the air.
Reply
|
|
 |
|
|
by MYANGEL Posted Fri May 4, 2007 @ 11:33 AM
|
|
|
You know I am so tired of the double standards there is.
I hear black comedians refering to whites as crackers and all kinds of other racist remarks, and what happens? Not a dang thing. Blacks refer to themselves with the "N" word and that is normal, and accepted.
There are special shows on TV for blacks only. All is accepted. If whites had a show only for whites, you would never hear the end of it.
Anytime a white person makes any kind of negative comment about blacks, here come Jesse Jackson, AL Sharpton, and a slew of others to the rescue!! Give me a frickin break!
If your going to chastise whites for this, you need to look in the mirror first.
Can you play the race card anymore?? Things need to be equal.
Reply
|
|
 |
|
|
by WAXMAN1 Posted Tue May 1, 2007 @ 3:44 PM
|
|
|
Another Thing I was in a WALMART and I have heard a particular employee, Gail make racist remarks and without being fired....bad stuff like the joke about "how to Baby sit a ___ Lick his lips an stick Em to A Wall"
Reply
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|
|
by WAXMAN1 Posted Tue May 1, 2007 @ 3:38 PM
|
|
|
I recall IMUS on 66NBC said "Im Dedicating This Song to Dr Rene Richards" Then he played "A Man Ill Never Be" by BOSTON ....no one complained
Reply
|
|
 |
|

|
by bratt Posted Sat April 28, 2007 @ 7:35 AM
|
|
|
Imus is just like Howard Stern in that his act has not changed since the beginning of his career. Why is it that he has been fired for saying the same crap hes been saying forever now? I don`t agree with him and don`t watch his show and really all this does is show how spineless msnbc has been for so long if this comment gets him fired. I also don`t think he should have gone on the apology tour that he was forced to go on by the ever racist likes of Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson. Can`t we all just get along? Damn and tell a joke or two.
Reply
|
|
 |
|
|
by Terry Niebuhr Posted Tue April 24, 2007 @ 11:34 AM
|
|
|
All I can say is if the Rutgers team is that fragile to be emotionally scarred and hurt by a few mere words then they are in for a rough life after college.
I am sure all of us on here have been called worse and I am fairly sure most of us have not overreacted or played the victim card.
Reply
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
People wrongly think that freedom of speech means the right of an individual to say anything they want...and to some extent that is true. But it also means that sometimes we have to listen to things we don't want to hear. Yes, the man was wrong. But in a way, we have learned valuable lessons about racism and ignorant behavior. We have learned NOT to be or act like Imus. Shutting him down only sets a precedent to silence individual voices. Better to let him rant for all to see and reject him based on his obvious stupidity! Open forum creates a stronger America. We the people...are smart enough to recognize crap when we hear it!
Reply
|
|
 |
|
|
by Pax Posted Wed April 18, 2007 @ 4:27 PM
|
|
|
I agree. I am tired of people saying racist things just because of freedom of speech. that is NOT what freedom of speech means. Imus is just one of so many who think because they are "celebrities" and I use that word loosely, they can say pretty much what they want and that needs to be stopped immediately. But look at how we have progressed tv-wise. Now they are allowed to say "bitch", they advertise "erectile dyfunction", how to "stop" your period, etc. what's next, orgies on prime time? ugh, I am disgusted with what is going on in television today and it can only get worse unless the consumer complains diligently.
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|

|
Genuine question
by Official Resident of The Netherlands ! Fri April 20, 2007 @ 9:54 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
ED
by Lou Lou Tue April 24, 2007 @ 10:10 AM
|
|
|
 |
|
|
by Mike Holly Posted Tue April 17, 2007 @ 1:38 PM
|
|
|
Liane, just call Don Imus white trash. give him a taste of his own medicine. Freedom of speech can't stop him from using raial slurs so express your freedom of speech and call him something he will not like.
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
I agree
by A A Thu April 26, 2007 @ 11:43 AM
|
|
|

|

|
Mike,
by PaintedLady Wed April 18, 2007 @ 2:05 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|
|
by A A Posted Mon April 16, 2007 @ 8:15 PM
|
|
|
Good bye free speech. Hello hypocrites like Jackson and Sharpton doing anything they want because if you disagree they will call you racist and try to destroy your life.
I wonder what would have happened to Imus had he referred to New York as Hymie Town. I guess some people are free to say what ever they want because of the color of their skin, but others must be held to a higher standard because they happened to be born white.
Anyone who disagrees with this, please feel free to explain why Jesse Jackson is allowed on television and radio after "Hymie Town." -Don't bother, we all know there is a dobule standard.
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
So
by A A Thu April 19, 2007 @ 9:23 PM
|
|
|
|
|

|
And...
by Lou Lou Thu April 19, 2007 @ 10:20 AM
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
NAACP
by Lou Lou Thu April 19, 2007 @ 10:41 AM
|
|
|
 |
|
|
by athaleah05 Posted Sun April 15, 2007 @ 7:54 PM
|
|
|
I agree that he should be fired, what he said was atrocious, foul, ignorant, vicious etc. But I also have a question. He said comments refering to African Americans in a degrading way. But how often do you hear rappers on MTV or young kids calling each other the N word or talking about b--- and h-e. When is other types of media going to take responsibility for this. Here are rappers such as 50 cent and Ludacris blaring these comments all the time, and what do they get for it? A grammy or an MTV music award? Imus get's fired. Yes, I understand that Imus is white, They are black. I get that. But when will people stop saying that it is okay for one group to say something, and another not. The words are degrading, vulgar, and not a postive comment to say. So why should one race be reprimanded and the other praised? The words are awful no matter who says them. And it is time that we recognize that. These comments do nothing but spread stereotypes and ignorance. And I say that it is time that African American's. Caucasian's. Latino's, Jew's, EVERYONE stop endorsing ignorance and sterotypes. Go Rutgers!!!!!
Reply
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|

|
by >Leanne< Posted Sun April 15, 2007 @ 8:52 AM
|
|
|
He did it. I don't agree with what he did but he did it. It was a horrible insensitive thing to say. He is getting his due pay now but there will always be another venue he can go to because he has contributed much in other ways including with autism. It will be interesting to see what happens, and how this moves forward. I hope this negative can bring about more positives in the end.
Reply
|
|

|

|
Article
by >Leanne< Mon April 16, 2007 @ 8:47 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
All I have to say is that I think Republicans are happy with this Don Imus situation. It gets the News channel's focus off of actual important stuff such as the war in Iraq. While people are talking about Don Imus, the whole Anna Nicole crap, and other random entertainment stuff, they forget about what's really important. I swear, it's been over a week and we're still talking about it. Sure what Imus said was wrong but we just need to get over it!
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|

|
Wrong!
by mary jo Mon April 16, 2007 @ 9:38 AM
|
|
|
 |
|
by SZ Posted Sat April 14, 2007 @ 4:26 PM
|
|
|
I have never been a fan of Don Imus. I watched him a bit a few years ago when he was broadcasting remote from NH when the presidential primary was held. I found him to be an equal opportunity insulter--lights on but in the dark.
That being said, I do not feel he should have been fired. If I don't like a TV broadcast, I know how to operate the remote.
More importantly, I'd be willing to make a wager: 99.9% of the Rutgers women's basketball team had no IDEA who Don Imus was--until Sharpton and Jackson entered the fray. I'm sure Janell will disagree, but I feel those two create dissention among us, even in our own race. They presume we lack the intellect to think for ourselves, thus should blindly follow their 'preachings.'
Don Imus will find his firing to be a blessing in disguise. He'll sign onto satellite radio and rake in more $$$ than when with CBS-MSNBC. Case in point: Howard Stern.
An aside: When I saw this letter posted, I had to click on PFB's Mission Statement again. I don't quite see how it fits in with what I read. But I guess this falls again under the 'freedom of speech' mantra. :)
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|

|
by Never Gonna Be Queen Now ! Posted Sat April 14, 2007 @ 10:16 AM
|
|
|
Personally, I dont think he should have been fired. Ofc, I also didnt believe that Bill Mahr should have been fired when he said that the 911 terrorists werent cowards and that lobbing missles from thousands of miles away was more cowardly. People are hired for these positions BECUASE they are controversial. They're coddled, supported and encouraged to be outrageous in order to draw in and keep listeners/viewers and then, when they go one step too far in some people's eyes, they're yanked off the air, fired and hushed up. And yet people like Ann Coulter (who truly is evil incarnate and deserves nothing but misery in her life) are being blasted onto us from every corner, because as evil as her opinions are, they fit into the mindset of the ruling party of the moment. BUt, as much as I detest her, I dont think she should be fired either. THey're sensationalists and nobody with any brains takes these shock jocks' words as truth. But you can't push someone to be outrageous one moment and then throw them out the next because you got what you asked for.
Reply
|
|
 |
|

|
by Sarah H Posted Fri April 13, 2007 @ 2:33 PM
|
|
|
If Imus is fired how come all the other assholes on the news aren't (Bill O'Reilly, Michael Savage, Rush Limbaugh, etc etc)?
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
"I wish I'd taped the phone conversation I had today with the editor of the Sunday Times in London when I had to explain exactly what "nappy-headed hos" were. He had images of garden tools crowned with diapers."
Reply
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|
|
by Zoomie Posted Fri April 13, 2007 @ 2:16 PM
|
|
|
Imus.... What Price should he pay?
Rev Al, perhaps you should cast the 1st stone, just as YOU did regarding your comments of the Yale Soccer Team.
Rev Jessy, you the second stone... as your marriage vows meant nothing, with your romp in the hay.
CBS.....How many must die for YOU to support "THE CONSTITUTION". You decision was based solely on economics ! Nothing more Nothing Less !
I have listened to Imus once...didn't care for him then, and don't care for him now. However as a Vietnam Veteran, I supported his rights then, and I support his rights NOW!
CBS ....You R Wrong !!!
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
Because
by A A Mon April 16, 2007 @ 8:24 PM
|
|
|
 |
|
|

|
LMAO
by TwinkleToes Fri April 13, 2007 @ 11:45 AM
|
|
|
 |
|
|
by joanna beamon Posted Fri April 13, 2007 @ 12:16 AM
|
|
|
I was raised to believe that noone has the right to say something derogatory about another human being and no where in our Constitution does it say that we can do that. So why do all of these people that use derogatory terms towards another human feel that they have a right to do that and we are violating their first amendment rights to interfere in someones else pursuit of happiness and cause them misery. Those young women were pursuing what made them happy, playing basketball and Mr. Imus decided he wanted to take that away. Now he has no right to do that, spread his misery around its is in our Constitution for every to pursuit what make them truly happy. He is just jealous that he can't be as beautiful as those young ladies. Or shoot a basketball like they do. When you are an old ugly acting man, you treat everyone like you think of yourself, a nappy headed hoe. Yeah I seen his hair,its tangled,oops forgive me full of naps. And he must be a little on the promiscuious side and wants to dropping them tighty whities for every pretty woman he can see. He only told the world what he is and how he feels about himself and it ain't pretty. He needs some behavior modification, serious psychiatric help. Ignorance can kill and cause you death in more ways than one. It killed his show and caused that nice paycheck to wither away and die and if he was as smart as he thought he was he wouldn't have never ever said that.
I hope he learns to pursue happier, positive conversations and thoughts and quit spread misery around.
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|
|
by Jugi Posted Thu April 12, 2007 @ 9:20 PM
|
|
|
Don Imus is a nappy-headed ho.
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|

|
by Chris M Posted Thu April 12, 2007 @ 8:47 PM
|
|
|
My opinion of Imus as a talk show host - Boring and uninspiring.
My opinion of his comments - disgraceful and ignorant.
However, with that said, him getting fired and all of this press is just silly. Does CBS and MSNBC have the right to fire him? Certainly. Do people have the right to protest what he said? Certainly. Does the first admendment apply here? Not really. It's a job. No one is stopping him from calling them the same name out on the streets.
His comments were wrong, and as I said, ignorant and disgraceful. I still can't help but feel that the "reaction" by the players and coach was not played up a great deal by the media coverage and the need to hold a press conference.
As other have said - where is the out cry when rappers and other idiots sing to the masses about the same or worse. They often speak about killing cops, beating wives/girlfriends, etc. Oh yes, I forgot, they are an entertainer and often of th same race, so it's a free pass.
As for Imus, who really was an idiot, I suppose he should stop letting minorities with cancer come to his ranch.
I still don't like the guy, never did, but I hate hypocrites even more.
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|

|
by calm Posted Thu April 12, 2007 @ 8:18 PM
|
|
|
I disagree with you on what's wrong with the comments.
If these women were not students, were not athletes, were not the sort of young women who are telegenic and who are valued by a large chunk of society, they would still not deserve to be spoken about that way. They don't have to be physically strong and good at tests and hard-working and beautiful and regular volunteers and dutiful daughters and loyal friends and all that in order to deserve to be spoken of with respect. It's not that there are some people it's okay to demean and others it's not. There are still people in the world who are routinely talked about in demeaning terms to the point that an awful lot of people who can immediately see that these specific comments are not appropriate don't even recognize that the language they use is demeaning.
And yes, I am speaking in the moral sense here when I talk about what's okay. I am not calling for government censorship.
Reply
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|

|
by donno Posted Thu April 12, 2007 @ 8:17 PM
|
|
|
This comment a few days afterwards made me think twice. Obviously he was comparing his situation to Michael Richards in that comedy club. Actually it made me think once, and I didn't like it. What he did was on a par with Richards, IMHO.
I was a fan of Imus, but I freely admit the long established shortcomings people have voiced here. I also belive that what he said was way over the line. His firing was deserved. I personally found him very entertaining, and the guy he had on posing as Clinton, Dr Phil, and that Bo security guy (which developed into having the real Bo Dietl on the show) was super. I also liked the phone interviews with politicians, sports figures, etc. It was nice to hear thsse people sound like regular Joes, instead of playing to the media or a political party.
The bottom line is he will find a home somewhere - satellite radio probably. What to do now at 8am?
Reply
|
|
 |
|
|
by Brian D. Posted Thu April 12, 2007 @ 6:07 PM
|
|
|
This whole uproar about his comments is only because he was a caucasian saying it. I am pretty sure if it was someone like Richard Pryor who said it nothing would have come from it.
CBS fired him only because they were going to lose major cash from sponsors pulling ads.
Reply
|
|
 |
|
|
by Mike Holly Posted Thu April 12, 2007 @ 5:20 PM
|
|
|
I am glad they fired Imus but the thing is many other people have said controversial remarks and not just shock jocks. Many singers and actors have said them too. The thing is the Ist Amendment unfortunately allows people to say things on their mind, even though others may disagree. however, the Ist Amendment does not protect people from the consequences of things they say. CBS has just as everyright to fire Imus just as he had every right to say what he said.
Reply
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
Well,
CBS fired him.
Reply
|
|
 |
|
by Janell Posted Thu April 12, 2007 @ 12:28 PM
|
|
|
Because I tire of people talking about "rights" and "freedom of speech" where this is concerned, I feel the need to clarify something. The first amendment guarantees that Congress shall pass no law abridging the freedom of speech or of the press. That's it. That's what it guarantees. That does not mean that you can say whatever you want wherever you want. Don't believe me? Go to work and call your boss an a**hole. Then waive the first amendment in his face after he fires you and see how far that gets you. Or swear at someone or call someone a name in a Planetfeedback.com discussion thread. Or come to my house and call my daughter a nappy headed h* (I dare you). In all three cases, you'll quickly find that there are limits to what can be said in certain situations, and this is a good thing. If Imus wants to join the neo-Nazis marching through my hometown on April 20, he has the right to do so and scream what he wants while doing it. Similarly, MSNBC has the "right" to decide they will not allow verbal attacks against private citizens on their public airwaves. I'm not sure why this is hard to understand.
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|

|
by SueMagoo Posted Thu April 12, 2007 @ 12:13 PM
|
|
|
okay... this guy is obviously an idiot... but he is well protected by the same rights as the rest of us.
Reply
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|

|
by MA Loper Posted Thu April 12, 2007 @ 11:29 AM
|
|
|
While I personally think Don Imus is a disgusting pig, I can't say that I agree with the notion of firing him.
His entire job centers around him saying things that push the envelope - thats why he's labeled a "shock jock." Shock jocks boost ratings and make the TV or radio stations money. More people talk about what he does, more people tune in, more money comes in to the tv or radio stations.
& Trust me, this 2 week suspension is just a handslap from NBC as a show of contrition. They are behind him all the way - look at all the publicity they got out of such a rude and idiotic comment!
Let me put it like this, if the case is that Imus shoud be fired for his blatant ignorance, then why shouldn't Howard Stern, Rush Limbaugh, Bill O'Reilley and Larry King get fired as well? Each of them has suffered from an acute case of foot-in-mouth syndrome over the span of their careers. Yet each of them is still quite gainfully employed.
Again, while I think Imus is about the dumbest level on the intelligence quotient, as an American, I am protected by the First Amendment to be able to say that about him publicly because it is MY opinion.
Thats the thing people don't seem to understand. Freedom of speech is freedom for EVERYBODY, not just a select few. There may be someone who is utterly offended that you are calling for Imus to be fired, but you still have the right to say what you feel because that right is protected.
but I do agree with you 110% that the guy is vermin with little redeeming social value, but I can't begrudge him his right to speak his mind, no matter how tiny that mind may be.
Reply
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|

|
by Lee H. Posted Thu April 12, 2007 @ 12:54 AM
|
|
|
Ironically, I would bet if Imus had the option of doing it all over again, I bet he would.
The same people who have complained and required his firing, have made him more popular than he could have dreamed.
Think about it. A week ago many of you never knew who he was. Now he's a celebrity that almost everyone knows. MSNBC may have allowed him out of any agreement he was in, but he is as popular now as Howard Stern and equally in demand.
He will now get money and notoriety from this you would not have imagined a week ago.
Imus may or may not be remorseful, but he is not, nor should he be, sorry.
Reply
|
|
 |
|
|
|
MSNBC dropped him today.
Is anyone else bothered by the players and coach repeatedly using the word "hurt" to describe how they feel? C'mon, girls! Be pissed! Not hurt! There's no crying in basketball!
Reply
|
|
 |
|
by Janell Posted Wed April 11, 2007 @ 9:46 PM
|
|
|
I fought like heck not to respond, but I wouldn't respect myself in the morning if I didn't.
A group of intelligent, successful young women were unfairly and viciously attacked and maligned by a aged broadcaster who should have known better. Period. If you are attempting to defend him by whining that "Everybody does it" or "Here come the THOUGHT POLICE" or "See? Black people are trying to rule the world once again" I ask you to sincerely examine both your sentiment and your motives. Imus' comments were indefensible, and I'm saddened that's being argued.
And yes he has the right to say them. Just as groups like Prussian Blue have the right to make neo-Nazi hate music and distribute it widely. But we're not talking about some guy sitting around with a beer and a confederate flag spouting nonsense in his shack on the Mississippi. We are talking about a nationally syndicated radio host who, as such, is held to certain standards of professionalism and who should face the consequences when he so egregiously violates them. Imus wants to practice his right to free, racist speech on defenseless young girls? Fine. MSNBC shouldn't be the place to do it. My classroom atmosphere is pretty relaxed, but if I angrily called one of my students a, oh I don't know, slanty-eyed h*? Pale-faced h*? Towel-headed h*? I'd expect to be kicked out on my rear, and rightfully so. And yes, I'd be calling for Tavis Smiley's resignation if he temporarily lost his mind and uttered similar nonsense as well.
Black people aren't trying to "take over," and the insinuation of such is evidence of complete lack of reason, and worse, fear. If any of these girls were your daughter, regardless of your race, you'd be calling for his job as well. And rest assured, I'd be right behind you.
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|

|
by Aimeyir Posted Wed April 11, 2007 @ 9:24 PM
|
|
|
" I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - Voltaire.
Thanks to the wonderful, glorious First Amendment, Imus has the RIGHT and the FREEDOM to say what he wants, regardless of who agrees or disagrees with it. Frankly, I will take the rantings of a racist and sexist donkeyhole over being arrested by the "thought police" and thrown into jail where I would be tortured and brainwashed into being a good little drone of the Fascist States of America. This is our future if we continue to make these sorts of demands. Freedom has it's price, my friends, and this is it. Hatred is taught, not inbred. Teach your children that saying this sort of thing isn't right, but that the freedom to say it is right.
Reply
|
|
 |
|
|
by Rae Messick Posted Wed April 11, 2007 @ 8:24 PM
|
|
|
I'm sorry, but freedom of speech these days only seems to apply to the "right" things to say. Had a white person been spoken about, nothing would have been done. But, once again - though they speak of equality - the black community wants MORE than equality. I say it's high time we get over our issues of worrying what is said and get down to the basics of caring about each other with reservation - PERIOD! This is the new era and I think we have much larger issues at hand. Not that I'm a great fan of Don Imus, but he does have the right to say whatever he wants and whenever he wants. I do feel, however, that the "pin-him-to-the-wall" attitude and talk of firing him is a huge overreaction, all of course in the vein of racism. Good grief!!!!!
Reply
|
|
 |
|
|
by Cor H Posted Wed April 11, 2007 @ 8:08 PM
|
|
|
If Imus had not apologized, I expect we would be hearing and reading complaints about how, "If he'd just apologize...".
The day when an apology is unacceptable is the day when civility no longer matters, just retribution.
Reply
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|
|
by TwinkleToes Posted Wed April 11, 2007 @ 6:03 PM
|
|
|
So... here's my view in a nutshell.
Media uses racism to make money all the time. They stereotype Asians, Caucasians, Blacks, Middle Easterns and every other race in America. They portray the French as cigarette smoking, American hating romantics. Italians are hairy chested, gold chain wearing mafia morons. Asians are always smart and either geeky or sneaky. Caucasians are either afraid of the black man or wants to be like one while the black man either wants to kill their neighbor or things the cops want to kill him because the cop is white. Sadly it is a part of our society. Do I agree with what he said? No. Do I find humor in it? No. Were there members of his audience that did? Absolutely.
Had a black man said this, would anyone care? I don't think so and that right there is the saddest of them all.
Bottom line, he apologized. He went on Al Sharpton's show and spoke about the issue with him. I think it's time we got passed this. If you want to end racism then do it on a widespread level instead of worrying strictly about one race.
Reply
|
|
|
|

|
Gino!
by TwinkleToes Thu April 12, 2007 @ 8:32 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|

|
by KamenRiderOsaka Posted Wed April 11, 2007 @ 5:04 PM
|
|
|
How can I put this...
Don Imus has the ability and the "right" to say these types of things because he is protected by the first amendement. That will be his argument. Do I think he was right in saying what he said? No. I mean, he called a group of girls "nappy-headed hos" and then a week later said that "it was not said with malicious intent." Sorry, but that seems pretty rude and malicious to me. I don't know anyone that would take that as a compliment.
Don Imus will probably not be fired. A lot worse is said on TV, on the radio (by dj's and in music) and that type of stuff is still on the air. While I don't condone this behavior, he does have the right to say it. Should he have said it? Nope. He said it to cause a stir. He is a "shock jock" for a reason. I have heard worse come out of Rush Limbaugh, Howard Stern, Ton Leykis and many other people, yet they are still around. That, unfortunately, is the reality of it all.
Reply
|
|

|

|
Oops
by KamenRiderOsaka Wed April 11, 2007 @ 5:22 PM
|
|
|
 |
|
|
by jason Posted Wed April 11, 2007 @ 3:55 PM
|
|
|
Liane, I disagree on firing him. Imus draws ratings that equal money. His comments were not the best but that Girls team is not the most classy look lot with all those Gang tattoos.
Reply
|
|
|
by S. Brown Posted Wed April 11, 2007 @ 4:51 PM
|
|
|
You're no better than Imus.
Reply
|
|

|
how so
by jason Wed April 11, 2007 @ 5:02 PM
|
|
|
|
|