 |
|
|
by vickie davenport Posted Fri May 25, 2007 @ 2:44 PM
|
|
|
Use the government site for this town. Go to the health departmrnt site. Yo will see inspection reports of this restaurant. Write the restaurant with copies of the last two reports, especially if negative. Also, send to the newspaper. You can also let the health department know about your illness. I had a similiar experience with a restaurant. The restaurant was closed untl they corrected the unsanitary conditions. We have a responsibility to report unsafe practices.. Find out where the Red Lobster headquarters are and notify them along with the inspection reports. I assure you you will get a response. The criteria for food poisoing vs 'flu' or stomach upset by other causes is that food poisoning causes symptoms about 6 hours after eating the food. Occasionally, you might get aymptoms even three hours after eating especially in children, but on the average it is six hours. Restaurants do not want you to know about the health department's reports. If you can't find them and you want to pursue this, you caqn get them under the authoriy of the 'Freedom of Information' Act. This info is online. Good luck.
Reply
|
|
 |
|
|
by Dawn Burton Posted Sat May 19, 2007 @ 12:26 AM
|
|
|
The next question is did you eat strawberries that same day? I know several people that have had "seafood allergies" when combined with strawberries! P.S. Red Lobster & other chains are not a good option when looking for quality.
Reply
|
|
 |
|
|
by KateM Posted Wed May 9, 2007 @ 6:12 PM
|
|
|
I think this letter was well-written, without attitude and claimed exactly what we're looking for. She only wanted the money back that she paid for the undercooked food, and stated she would use it at another location since she was afraid to eat at the same location where it had originally occurred.
I think that's a heck of a lot better than what we're hearing on here lately.
Cheers- (hope they respond.)
Reply
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
Problems like that are difficult to claim. Your best bet would have been to go to the hospital. With blood and stool sample tests they could have pinpointed the type of bacteria involved, if indeed it was food poisoning, as well as the most likely source. Myself, I have had a touchy digestive system all my life, and can get the symptoms you described above just by eating or drinking something my system didn't like, even if it's perfectly good and safe. Questions:
Did you eat something you'd had before or was it new?
As soon as you noticed the problem, did you say something to the waiter, the host/hostess, the manager, anyone before leaving? I don't care how busy a place is, if something's wrong, esp. with seafood, then I'm waiting around until I get some results.
Reply
|
|
 |
|
|
by tina lou Posted Mon May 7, 2007 @ 10:33 PM
|
|
|
I ate at a Red Lobster here in South Bend, Indiana. Several hours later, I began violently vomiting. My stomach completely cramped, and I was unable to hold down even water. Yesterday, the same thing. My limbs ached, I was unable to get comfortable. My joints felt like they were going to come out of socket. That is how uncomfortable it was. I had a fever w/ diarrhea and passed out several times. Today, I am still unable to hold anything down. It is a disgrace. I have no food allergies. The people handling the food know that if not prepared correctly can cause serious harm to the customer. It isn't always the fault of the handler, but in such cases...
About 2 weeks ago I was given uncooked shrimp at our local Chili's. Fortunately I caught it. But my tongue touched the meat and that was enough to give me a complete food aversion.
I think you're right in seeking compensation. The cooks need to be more careful. It isn't your fault they did not do their job correctly. Don't listen to feedback saying you're just doing it for a free meal. They are lucky to be still retaining your business. As for "what you're teaching your son", you are teaching him not to settle for bad service, and food poisoning. I know that personally, I will never eat at either establishment again.
You shouldn't be expected to settle and PAY for all "the extras" that you received. And if my child were to have gotten sick b/c of someone's lack of professionalism trust me...they would be getting more than a demand for a gift card.
Good luck, I am in full support of your view.
Reply
|
|
 |
|
by Cubjunkie Posted Sat May 5, 2007 @ 11:54 AM
|
|
|
One night in February 2000 I ate at a Red Lobster.
The next day I had a lot of pain and had to go to the hospital.
I delivered a healthy 7 pound 9 ounce baby boy.
Just because you get sick the next day does not equal food poisoning just like eating at Red Lobster did not make me 9 months pregnant.
But you did do the right thing by calling them and saying you might have gotten sick. Restaurants need to know.
Reply
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
Why do you want free food from them if the food made you sick. Sounds like you just want free meals. What a good lesson you are teaching your son.
Reply
|
|

|
EH!
by Twinkle Toes (is back!) Thu April 26, 2007 @ 10:06 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
yea but...
by Angelic Princess:) Thu May 3, 2007 @ 12:23 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
I am back to 100% and feeling so lasting effects of the food poisoning. Sonya from Red Lobster called me and requested some info from my receipt. She then apologized and thanked me for bringing this matter to her attention. They will be sending me gift certificates for a new visit. I must say though, it will be quite a while before Lobster looks good again! Thanks for all the good wishes and interesting points of view. You were all GREAT!
Reply
|
|

|

|
Great!!
by >Leanne< Mon April 23, 2007 @ 7:37 PM
|
|
|

|

|
Yay!
by Official Resident of The Netherlands ! Tue April 24, 2007 @ 1:15 AM
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
SHE DID ALL THE RESEARCH AND GOT NONE OF THE CREDIT!!!
Sorry for the mix-up. Thanks for the great info. I thought it was worth sharing.
Reply
|
|
|
|

|

|
I think we should
by Official Resident of The Netherlands ! Tue April 24, 2007 @ 1:15 AM
|
|
|

|

|
BTW
by pokervixxen Tue April 24, 2007 @ 9:11 PM
|
|
|

|

|
I tell you what
by Official Resident of The Netherlands ! Wed April 25, 2007 @ 2:04 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|

|
uh ok
by pokervixxen Tue April 24, 2007 @ 3:57 AM
|
|
|

|

|
Liar
by Official Resident of The Netherlands ! Tue April 24, 2007 @ 1:18 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|

|
"elicit" n/t
by Official Resident of The Netherlands ! Tue April 24, 2007 @ 7:24 AM
|
|
|

|

|
LMAO
by pokervixxen Tue April 24, 2007 @ 4:13 PM
|
|
|
|
|

|

|
Understood
by pokervixxen Tue April 24, 2007 @ 8:47 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
by >Leanne< Posted Wed April 25, 2007 @ 12:06 PM
|
|
|
*Glycerin or saline. In almost everyone, these substances cause no reaction. So one or the other is used as a negative control. If you react to glycerin or saline, you may have sensitive skin, so your reactions to the allergen extracts will need to be interpreted with caution.
I just saw this and had to interject only because I make homemade soap from scratch and glycerin is a natural byproduct of soap so it would be very rare, although not impossible, to be allergic to glycerin.
This page was too long to copy here so here is the link on lanolin.
http://dermnetnz.org/dermatitis/wool-alcohols-allergy.html
I'm not agreeing or disagreeing, but just adding some info on the subject because of personal interest is all :)
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|

|

|
Ladymac
by >Leanne< Wed April 25, 2007 @ 1:10 PM
|
|
|
|
|

|

|
LMAO
by >Leanne< Fri April 27, 2007 @ 8:11 PM
|
|
|

|

|
But
by >Leanne< Fri April 27, 2007 @ 8:13 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
by SZ Posted Sun April 22, 2007 @ 1:36 PM
|
|
|
Since your husband is a doctor, is he not aware that all cases of food poisoning are to be reported to the CDC? Federal law mandates this report.
The terminology 'food poisoning' is tossed about willy-nilly by anyone who develops a belly ache and has the runs. Although I don't doubt you developed these symptoms, I highly doubt it was food poisoning. This can only be determined (as others have stated) through lab tests.
Another reason I believe the wrong term was applied to your symptoms is the fact that within 24 hours of ingesting what you determined to be undercooked lobster, you were feeling 'better.' Recovery does not come that quickly.
A few years ago I developed these same symptoms. There was no relief within 24 hours and the next day I visited my physician. Even with the prescribed medications, I was very ill for four days. During the time I was ill, a history of all foods consumed (that I could remember) prior to my becoming ill was taken. It was during the summer and I had made myself a tuna salad sandwich. One of the first things checked was the mayonnaise in my refrigerator. Negative results, along with several other items. Since I had consumed all the tuna salad I made, that could not be tested. However, I still had some of the tuna itself left. Eureka! The canned tuna was the culprit. The remainder of the tuna was removed from my refrigerator, sent to the CDC, where they contacted the packer. From there, it was in their hands.
Do not ASSUME because you have a stomach ache, the runs, cramping, etc., that you have food poisoning. That is a very strong and dangerous claim to make if nothing was done to prove it so.
Reply
|
|
|
|

|
The CDC
by JuliePie Mon April 23, 2007 @ 6:15 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
by JuliePie Posted Sun April 22, 2007 @ 12:09 PM
|
|
|
Bambi, I'm sorry you were sick. I hope that you are feeling better, and that an important lesson was learned from all this. If your food was undercooked, you have to speak to the manager at the time. I know you are not one to be assertive, but restaurants can't honor claims of food poisoning/bad food after the fact.
Even if your husband is a doctor, and all your symptoms point to food poisoning, you really do need lab tests to prove it was food poisoning. THEN, it is almost impossible to prove where it came from. Unless multiple people got sick at this location, you are probably out of luck. I know; my son and I had salmonella (confirmed with blood and stool samples), and OMG, does the CDC do a thorough investigation after that diagnosis!! But they pretty much told me that unless there were reports of multiple people with the same illness that had eaten where we had, that they can't go placing blame on restaurants.
Hopefully, when you notice your food is not cooked properly in the future, you won't eat it, send it back, and ask for a refund then.
Reply
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|
|
by Rhet Canter Posted Sun April 22, 2007 @ 10:57 AM
|
|
|
So your husband is a doctor and you can only afford to eat out at a cheap restaurant chain? Ya know......there are way better restaurants out there. And to think that you expect a coupon equal to the value of your cheap meal......get real! Not going to happen. Just because you got the poopers after eating.......doensn't sound like food poisoning to me. It sounds more like "I like cheap food syndrome" to me.
Upgrade dear. Upgrade.
Reply
|
|

|

|
afford?
by Kimbot Sun April 22, 2007 @ 11:23 AM
|
|
|
|
|

|

|
Snob
by Official Resident of The Netherlands ! Sun April 22, 2007 @ 2:48 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
In answer to some of the questions regarding whether or not it was food poisoning. I do not have irritable bowel syndrome and I have not had diarrhea for at least 7 months or so, when I had a bad case of the flu. I had a light lunch that contained no meat and ate this meal at 6pm on 4-19-07. I felt somewhat nauseous around midnight at bedtime and woke up with full stomach cramps around 8am which were then followed by diarreah most of the day. As mentioned my husband is a doctor and as to my husband's medical ability to diagnose this as food poisoning, most physicians are able to recognize it by the symptoms I have just described. If the patient has no prior history and no other flu like symptoms, it would be foolish to order lab tests to confirm what is fairly obvoius to any basic med student. For some good news, I am feeling much better today. I just have a sore stomach from the cramping.
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
Bambi, I wish more letter writers on PFB would respond to criticism with the same level-headed, calm attitude you have displayed. I've seen letter writers freak out because some had legitimate problems with the complaint -- some get pretty nasty and ridiculously defensive and take things personally. In my opinion, you have been great.
Reply
|
|
|
|

|

|
Bambi
by Venice Sat April 21, 2007 @ 10:45 PM
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|
|
by dawniedawn67 Posted Sat April 21, 2007 @ 10:11 AM
|
|
|
Can you imagine how quickly businesses would go under if they reimbursed everyone who had diarrhea after eating in their restaurant?
It is dangerous to make assumptions on what caused an enteric illness unless a stool sample has been taken and an investigation done by the local health department.
There are 1001 things you encounter each day that have the potential to cause diarrhea and stomach cramping. It may not have been the food at all - the person opened the door to the restaurant right before you did might have had the norovirus on their hands and it was transferred to you when you opened the door. This is also a valuable lesson that you should ALWAYS wash your hands right before eating.
Was the lobster the only food you ate that day? While it definitely COULD have made you sick, there is no proof that it definitely IS what made you sick, and if your husband is indeed a doctor he should know this.
Reply
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
Well, I just have to add something...
People do eat raw lobster and fish. It's called carpaccio.
My husband tried to make lobster one. He didn't cook it enough and it was nearly raw. I ate a few bites, like you did. I didn't get sick.
I am also curious as to how your husband diagnosed your food poisoning. Did he take stool samples or blood tests?
Reply
|
|

|

|
Carpaccio?
by pokervixxen Sat April 21, 2007 @ 1:59 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|

|
by pokervixxen Posted Fri April 20, 2007 @ 10:17 PM
|
|
|
Shellfish is transluscent when it is undercooked that's what she meant by describing it as "clear". It would be very rare to see a case of food poisoning present itself as early as the next morning, it takes a minimum of twelve hours for symptoms to begin. Besides the likelyhood of contracting food borne illness through undercooked fish doubtful, it would have to be cross-contaminated to ellicit those symptoms.
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|

|
For myself
by >Leanne< Sat April 21, 2007 @ 1:03 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|

|
or....
by >Leanne< Sun April 22, 2007 @ 2:13 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|

|
Juliepie!!
by pokervixxen Sun April 22, 2007 @ 4:05 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|
|
by p d Posted Fri April 20, 2007 @ 6:11 PM
|
|
|
So you took the food to a lab to have it analyzed? Is that how you know it made you sick?
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|

|

|
No way
by pokervixxen Sat April 21, 2007 @ 3:14 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|

|
by Venice Posted Fri April 20, 2007 @ 4:30 PM
|
|
|
Bambi, do you realize that anyone can make this kind of complaint. Do I even need to tell you what would happen if restaurants honored everyone's request for a refund, with no proof whatsoever provided by the customer?
After you took a few bites of the lobster and realized it was raw, what did you do? Did you continue eating, or did you tell someone that the food was raw? Did you let your son eat the cold food? If you ate the food knowing it was not properly cooked or not at the proper temperature, without letting your server or the manager, or anyone know, then I think you must take responsibility for the consequences. If you did not eat the food, then certainly you wouldn't have paid the bill, right?
Do you see why your complaint just doesn't add up?
Reply
|
|
|
|

|

|
Please do!
by pokervixxen Sat April 21, 2007 @ 1:07 AM
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|

|
by donno Posted Fri April 20, 2007 @ 4:21 PM
|
|
|
From what you have described, I am inclined to believe your food was prepared/served improperly.
You should have let them know immediately that your meal was uncooked. If you son's meal was cold; again, that should have been mentioned immediately. Crab legs aren't cheap either.
Unfortunately, you have to be a squeaky wheel sometimes. If you really couldn't wait for the meal to be prepared again, you should bring that to their attention. They probably would not charge you. I can't imagine if you didn't finish the meal they would charge you and then offer a coupon for your next visit. If I were the manager, I would do the former.
Ultimately, I can't understand why you would you pay for this meal.
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
What was "recently"? Last night? Last week?
If it wasn't important enough to complain to the waitperson or manager, it isn't important enough to send a letter to corporate headquarters.
By the way, lobster isn't clear when it's cooked -- it's white, so I have no idea what you mean by that.
I also find it impossible to believe that it took "a few bites" to figure out that you were eating raw shellfish.
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|

|
Wrong again
by pokervixxen Sat April 21, 2007 @ 3:23 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
by S. Brown Posted Fri April 20, 2007 @ 11:19 AM
|
|
|
You were unhappy with the quality of the food you and your son were served, and it sounds like you have some valid complaints. However, you didn't give the manager an opportunity to resolve the situation and you paid the bill. You may have been "unable to wait for new meals" but surely you had time to speak to the manager. Since you paid the bill and left without saying anything, I see no reason why you should receive a gift certificate.
How many times do people need to be told that the time to discuss food quality and service issues is while you're still at the restaurant and before you pay the bill?
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|