 |
|
by tom a Posted Thu July 12, 2007 @ 11:40 PM
|
|
|
look you have 30 days to return it after that it's yours . what you think you can pay 4- and keep something as long as you want.... ya im sorry mr. Bank manager i'll pay you 1 car payment and keep the car as long as i want.
that makes you dumb WHY? would anyone let you do that.
its simple you pay to RENT it NOT keep it. RETURN IT when its due. And it doesnt matter if they loose money or not from the 1 copy Its their money you want to loose money of course not nobody does. when you people whine about " Oh i kept this movie for a whole month because I'm too STUPID to return it when I know it's due" you make yourself look like a idiot...
p.s we love it because we Laugh so hard because your soooo stupid making fun of you is easy... moron
Reply
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
by April Smith Posted Fri June 29, 2007 @ 1:57 PM
|
|
|
Reply
|
|
 |
|
|
|
Oh please if you were a responsible adult this would never have happened.
Reply
|
|

|
Oh PLEASE
by valjo Wed June 20, 2007 @ 2:32 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|

|
by mary jo Posted Sun June 17, 2007 @ 10:44 AM
|
|
|
"I feel like I have been robbed!"
I am guessing thats exactly how BlockBuster felt when you didnt return their movie.
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
by blondie615 Posted Fri June 15, 2007 @ 2:45 AM
|
|
|
read the fine print, its states "you are screwed" if you dont return in time.......you didnt notice charge on account?
Reply
|
|
 |
|
|
by ed wilson Posted Mon June 11, 2007 @ 4:33 PM
|
|
|
Did you ignore all the phone calls. You get one every week when you're late. You would have had a least 4 phone calls and they would explain the fees.
Reply
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
Back before the no late fees thing (this also happens with the same terms in Canada) I was a day late returning a movie to Blockbuster. Knowing that I had made the error, I was ready to pay the late fee. I went to the counter to return the movie, and even though I was a day late, they waived the fee. I dont know why they did, I just know that they rang it in, told me my balance was zero and wished me a nice day. At that moment, Blockbuster cemented itself as my rental location of choice. There have been other times that I have been late, and have had to pay, I never expected that one act ot be the norm.
It is never the campany's fault if you dont read the terms of service.
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
by Buddy Posted Sun June 10, 2007 @ 7:37 PM
|
|
|
Well, maybe next time you'll remember to return the movies you rent on time. This is no one's fault but your own.
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
by Rand Posted Sat June 9, 2007 @ 10:24 PM
|
|
|
I feel sorry for your daughters. The next time something like this happens, my suggestion is to tell them, "I'm sorry, but Mommy bought/stole a movie from Blockbuster and until she pays for the movie she took, they won't let her rent any more."
Reply
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|

|
by Sarah H Posted Sat June 9, 2007 @ 2:16 PM
|
|
|
I have the blockbuster online membership and I absolutely love it. Their policy is very clear...if you return a movie more than a week later than you rented it out, you pay a $1.25 restocking fee. Once you have a movie for 30 days, you own it, and your account will be charged the fee. This all printed on the receipt when you rent the movie. It's an unfortunate mistake, but you do owe them the money. You learned a lesson the hard way but now you know so you won't do it again.
Reply
|
|
 |
|
|
|
Of course Blockbuster gave you a $25 fee. The movie was 37 days past due! Trust me, after 37 days, they don't expect you to return the movie. So, they have to buy a new copy of the movie, and charge you with the fee. I'm guessing that next time you'll bring the movie back in time.
Reply
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
by Mike Z. Posted Thu June 7, 2007 @ 10:54 PM
|
|
|
If you really dont want this movie, one option available to you is to have blockbuster buy it back. They buy used movies. Now, youre not going to get the $24.99 back (nor do I think you deserve it), but they will probably give you around $5 for it. I know you may tear up having to give up such a critically acclaimed movie such as the covenant =) but at least you will get something for it.
Reply
|
|
 |
|
|
by betty boop Posted Thu June 7, 2007 @ 8:43 PM
|
|
|
Michelle,
Are there any other places that rents movies in your area? Maybe Netflex online would be an option. I am not sure of the timeline but you can buy movies online at Amazon,Barnes & Noble, etc. Sorry about the ordeal.
Reply
|
|
|
|

|
correction
by betty boop Thu June 7, 2007 @ 8:53 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|
|
by Angelic Princess:) Posted Thu June 7, 2007 @ 8:31 PM
|
|
|
"I was in tears at this point because my daughters were upset that they would not be seeing the movies that they had picked out. "- here is an answer for your daughters..."your mommy wasn't responsible and kept a movie WAY past its due date, THIS is why you can't watch your movies."
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
by Mike Z. Posted Thu June 7, 2007 @ 2:02 PM
|
|
|
As a former 5-year employee of Blockbuster, I think I can shed some light on this issue. You were charged the $24.99 becuase when you rented it, it must have just come out within the previous couple of weeks. I just looked up this movie, and saw it was released 01/02/07. That means you rented it sometime in the month of January, and you just got around to returning it now. After the movie is 7 days late (They actually give you 10 days, but dont tell you), the price of the movie is charged to your credit card. Since this was a hot new release at the time, the price was $24.99. If it had been an older movie, you would be charged a used price (the current $14.99 price) Hot new releases are constantly checked out, and since you decided to keep this movie 5-6 months blockbuster lost a great deal of rental revenue during its first month of release. You still have 30 additional days to return the item and you will only pay $1.25 (the $24.99 price is refunded to you). At some point blockbuster says to themselves (after 37 days), "I guess Michelle isnt going to return that copy of the Covenant that she has had the last 5-6 months. You even received recorded messages and postcards in the mail reminding of the outstanding item. At this present point, they dont want the movie back because there isnt nearly as much demand for that title anymore. And the manager is right, you are taking away profits from his store, and he would rather have you shopping somewhere else. Go to Hollywood Video and screw them over. Oh, and John Antioco will soon not be the CEO of the company. He is resigning once his replacement is found. He's the idiot that came up with this whole ridiculus "no late fees" thing. Great idea, lets sacrifice about 20% of our revenue so deadbeat customers will cost us more money. Im sure glad I got off this sinking ship a few years back.
Reply
|
|
 |
|
|
|
Please tell me this is a joke....ha ha ha. If not, someone please save this woman from herself.
Reply
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|

|
Ass-uming.
by betty boop Thu June 7, 2007 @ 8:49 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by betty boop Posted Fri June 8, 2007 @ 12:04 AM
|
|
|
Again, consistent.
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|

|
by calm Posted Thu June 7, 2007 @ 11:50 AM
|
|
|
I suspect that Blockbuster does not regard shoving movies into a drop box designed for returning rentals or piling them on the counter with returned rentals to be an adequate way of taking an item you have purchased back to the store and going through the return process.
Even if they did, it seems odd to me that you would have a movie for so long that it would become a purchase and not at least ask a clerk whether there was anything you need to do -- especially since it seems as if you didn't consult your contract until after they made you aware of the overdue bill -- and then show up with your kids expecting to use your account as if nothing had happened. Obviously there has to be some system to ensure that people don't rent movies and keep them for all eternity, even if that system does not rely on late fees, so it's fairly easy to realize that "no late fees" isn't the whole story. And of course if you incur charges and don't do anything about them they won't give you any more movies. Why would someone extend credit to someone else who has shown a willingness not to pay?
Since they do apparently agree to accept the movie back for a restocking fee regardless of the window, and since the movie is now selling for $14.99, it seems to me that it would be reasonable and fair for them to refund you $14.99 minus the restocking fee -- and minus any other charges for making the movie unavailable for them to rent. After all, you aren't buying the movie now. You already bought it when the price was higher (and when they presumably had to replace it because they try to only have on hand the number they actually need). You're only just now, when the movie is selling at a lower price, alerting them to the fact that you want to return the movie. Because, as I say, putting a movie you own through a rental return slot is more the act of someone who is confused than someone who is trying to relinquish ownership.
But when you start accusing them of upsetting your children (by insisting that you pay your bills) and making you cry (by insisting that you pay your bills) and taking advantage of customers (by insisting that you pay your bills) and having a bad attitude (for not thinking that your business is worth all that much given that you don't give them much money even when you are paying on time), you lose a certain amount of my sympathy. I suspect you have lost a certain amount of Blockbuster's sympathy, too, because many people do not want to be unfairly accused of being mean to children. Everything they have done, with the possible exception of not giving you a few dollars back once you said you wanted to return the movie, is something that you agreed they could do.
And just as a heads-up, when I lost 2 Netflix disks I paid $20 for each one. And that was after using up at least a third of my month's Netflix fees (2 to 2 1/2 weeks, 2 of 3 movies out) not renting anything else while I tried to find them. So I don't really think that Blockbuster's policy is unreasonable.
But I really wish that when you found you had the movie you had gotten in line and handed it to a clerk. It could have saved you and your daughters and the clerk and the manager an awful lot of frustration.
Reply
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
|
|
|
When BB came out with their "return it whenever you like" policy, the fine print was pretty clear about the limitations of the "whenever."
Reply
|
|
 |
|

|
by donno Posted Thu June 7, 2007 @ 12:46 AM
|
|
|
Blockbuster probably thought it was ridiculous that you kept their movie for 37 days.
If you pressed the point on this and I were the manager, I would have told you to go elsewhere also.
The part about you being in tears - come on now. Grow up and take some responsibility. "I forgot that we even had it..." No, you forgot that you had it, period.
Reply
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
I had a friend that was a manager for BBuster - the way I understand it is not only are you charged the cost of the movie, but there can be additional fees based on the "lost revenue" that would have been (maybe) generated had their movie been on the shelf, available to rent. This may have changed, but I can understand the logic to some degree.
I have had my share of extraordinary late charges ( because I ALWAYS forget to return on time - consequently we only do pay per view now....don't have to leave the house and never late!
Good luck!
Reply
|
|
 |
|

|
by Venice Posted Wed June 6, 2007 @ 6:24 PM
|
|
|
Although I know nothing about Blockbuster or it's policies, I couldn't help noticing that this doesn't make sense:
"If you keep the movie too long a you may be charged the price of the movie however you may return the movie at any time. The customer will be charged a restocking fee."
The wording gives the customer a false sense of security and causes confusion. If you are going to be charged the price of the movie, why would you return it and also pay a restocking fee?
Maybe I'm reading it incorrectly, but that means others might be doing the same.
Reply
|
|
 |
|
|
|
Unfair? What's unfair is for you to keep someone else's property for 37 days.
It doesn't matter that they had "many" copies.
It doesn't matter that you can't comprehend the terms to which you agreed.
It doesn't matter how much the used copies of the movie are selling for now.
You kept the movie well past the due date and you ended up as it's owner by your own negligence.
"No late fees" does not mean keep it forever or return it when you see fit with no repercussion.
Here's a novel idea: accept responsibilty for the situation and count it as a learning experience. Sadly, that's something we see less and less of these days.
Reply
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|
by S. Brown Posted Wed June 6, 2007 @ 4:52 PM
|
|
|
Blockbuster is not taking advantage of it's customers and you have not been robbed.
Dry your tears and either accept the fact that you forgot to return the movie and were charged in accordance with your membership agreement or take your business elsewhere - - and make sure you read and understand the rental agreement.
Reply
|
|
 |
|

|
by Jeffrey Posted Wed June 6, 2007 @ 4:01 PM
|
|
|
When you go late by 8 days, they charge you the full "selling" price of the movie minus the rental fee. If, within 30 days, you return it, they give you THAT amount back minus $1.25 "restocking fee."
Once you hit 37 days, you own it. It's not a late fee. It's $25 to buy. Which is the price, I presume, that it was selling for when you hit 37 days. If it was then selling for $15, then this should have been what you paid.
See http://www.blockbuster.com/stores/membershipTerms
You may feel robbed, but these are the terms.
That said, "any time" does mean "any time." Even beyond 30/37 days. So, I'd suggest that you double check to make sure that there aren't additional sentences, like what's on the web site, that say that this applies only up to 30 days.
Reply
|
|

|
Jeffery
by betty boop Thu June 7, 2007 @ 8:58 PM
|
|
|