|
|
portrait coupon deception and poor customer relations
Posted Tue July 3, 2007 12:20 pm, by margaret h. written to JCPenney Company, Inc.
Write a Letter to this Company | Rate this Company
I recieved a coupon for portraits which stated in bold print," NO SITTING FEE." I took this to mean I would not be charged a sitting fee. Well, I made an appointment, dressed up my family of four, and drove 30 minutes to the nearest studio at Citris Park Mall in Tampa, Florida. It turns out that the very small print directly contradicts the above bold statement. I was indeed required to pay a $30 sitting fee. The manager of the portrait studio was unsympathetic to our frustration and continuously refirmed to me as "hon" which I DID NOT appreciate. (" Hon, you need to read the small print.")
Your coupon deception and poor manners were not appreciated. Picture People studio was happy to take our pictures WITHOUT the ridiculous sitting fees or "fine print" deceptive tactic. They also refrained from the referring to me as "hon" and instead referred to me as " Mrs. Hansen."
I would like an apology for the inconvenience and wasted gas and toll money spent. I would also suggest encouraging your MANAGERS to address customers by their given name rather than condasending pet names.
Reply
| Log In/Create an account | 47 comments |
|
|
| PlanetFeedback Comments are subject to strict terms and conditions. We reserve the right to deny site membership privileges to any individuals acting inappropriately. |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
by dsfdsf s. Posted Fri March 4, 2011 @ 10:53 AM
|
|
|
Next time, write on the back of the coupon:
"By using the coupon, JCP agrees to offer the client a $200 gift card with no expiry date"
and after they tell you read the fine print, tell them to read the fine print on the back.
Reply
|
|
 |
|
|
by Kid Tested Posted Tue February 26, 2008 @ 1:04 AM
|
|
|
I work For JCP Portraits & I appologize for that associate calling you "Hun" I don't believe she was tring to insult you, just calm you down... which obviusly had the oppist effect. And I appologize!
As for the rest I guess it's a lesson learned... always read the entire coupon. As a Graphic Artist the bold print is to get your attention (which in this case work a little too well) But as with just about any offer there are detail "Fine print".
Reply
|
|
 |
|
|
by Kid Tested Posted Tue February 26, 2008 @ 12:47 AM
|
|
|
Actaully I am looking at one of our coupons right now & It States "Free Sitting Fee for First Peron OR Apply $9.99 towards the purchase of a portrait Club. A $9.99 sitting fee per additional person."
It's not that small & how is it her fault you didnt read the coupon do you usually not read them? You don't have to pay the sitting fee you could buy the Portrait club & have no sitting fee's for 2 whole years! Which is normally 39.98 - 9.99 = 29.99. the same you'll pay for each addiotional person @ 9.99 7 not have to do it again for 2 years.
Also I'm sure it gave you $3.99 or $4.99 sheets which is Much less then you paid for @ Picture people at $17.99 a Sheet.
I hate to say it but your own neglagance might of cost you quite a bit more in the long run.
Reply
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|
|
by NICHOLAI Posted Wed September 5, 2007 @ 9:40 PM
|
|
|
You would like an apology because you didn't read the coupon? Get real! Most studios only waive the sitting fee if you join a Portrait Club or something like that. There must be more to your story because no establishment would print "Free Sitting Fee" and then right below it state "We lied. There is a sitting fee." I have seen a lot of portrait coupons where it does say NO SITTING FEE but right below that it states "With Portrait Club Membership" or something to that affect. You must be leaving that detail out to make the company look very bad so you can have something to "blame" them for because you didn't read the coupon and feel stupid.
Reply
|
|
 |
|
|
by Paula Posted Mon July 9, 2007 @ 3:39 PM
|
|
|
Ok she didnt read the fine print!!!! It happens I am looking at a JCP coupon rigt now and at the top in about at 40FONT it says not sitting fee and then at the bottom in about a 4FONT the first person has no sitting fee and each additional is 9.99. The print is really small and it can be deceptive she made a mistake SO WHAT! The tone of the letters seems as if she is more upset about being called HON than anything else. Well Mrs. Hansen I would be upset about the HON reference to.
Reply
|
|
 |
|
|
by Posted Sat July 7, 2007 @ 6:16 PM
|
|
|
Learn to read everything, and stop whinign for freebies becasue you did not read
Reply
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
My family wasn't big on family portraits (i think i found one set from 1988... i was 4) So can someone please clear up what a "sitting fee" is for me?
I appreciate the fact that you did not like to be called "hon". But would you care if the sitting fee was waived? Not saying that YOU are like this, but I know of people who try to pick things to be mad about after the fact if they didn't get their way. Although if you truly would have been offended anyway then never mind that bit. I personally don't care if people use pet names for me, but when i worked customer service i never used pet names, because they can be inappropriate to some.
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
by S. Brown Posted Thu July 5, 2007 @ 12:22 PM
|
|
|
Every coupon I've ever seen for JCP Portraits has No Sitting Fee in bold and the not so fine print at the bottom states that the free sitting is for the first person - - each additional person is $9.99.
This doesn't sound like coupon deception to me - - it sounds like yet another consumer didn't read the entire offer before packing up the family and heading to get their pictures taken.
Reply
|
|
 |
|
|
|
The small print...tricky but a fact of our consumer lives...
...my beloved mom, who is wonderful and intelligent often forgets about small print and has had a number of frustrating times because of it. I always want to support my mom, but when you're at the store, and I can see the small print and the store's position versus my mom's, I hate to say that I often have to side with the business. It's not the business' fault you didn't read the whole coupon.
I would agree that small print is tricky and I wish that companies would be more upfront and not use the tiniest font known to humankind to let you know the details of the 'deal'...ah well, keep smiling.
Reply
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
|

|
by Gino Posted Thu July 5, 2007 @ 12:18 AM
|
|
|
If there's one thing I've learned, it's this :Always read the enire ad. The bold and the fine print and any caveats on the back page of the circular. I would rather make a phone call before to make absolutely sure, and I'd ask to whom I am speaking and what their job duties are. Some retail stores, I'm not sure of JCPenney, but some stores "outsource" certain services such as optical and photo services.
Not knowing what the fine print actually said, it's difficult to know for sure what actually transpired and if deception was an issue at all.
The "hon" thing would bug me as well, but I would correct them and keep correcting them until they know how to address me.
I don't understand the need for a written apology, but apprently it does fill some need. I've asked for one myself a few times and I still don't know what I was thinking at the time.
As far as compensation, I don't think it's deserved. It was your choice and free will that made you get in the car and drive etc...not JCPenny's coersion.
Reply
|
|
 |
|
|
by Batman Posted Wed July 4, 2007 @ 7:40 PM
|
|
|
First, I can appreciate you did not appreciate being called "hon". It also seems to me you could have been a bit more assertive there. "It's Mrs. Hansen, not Hon".
But, in all honesty, I'd rather be called "Hon" than some other names people have been known to use.
Second, I don't think they were intentionally being deceptive. Depending on a couple circumstances, I would be willing to change that opinion.
They did clearly state that the first person's sitting fee is waived.
However, it is deceptive in that they did say "NO SITTING FEE". I agree it should be stated "NO SITTING FEE 1st person"
I'm no so kind to them on the $20 value, however. Since you were there, you would know better than I, if they normally charge a $20 fee for the first person. If they do, no deception. If not, then it is.
I'd probably be upset also. I'd be upset at me, for having not read the terms; but, also with the fact they did not word the offer correctly. I'd probably not win my case, either. So, at that point I'd have to make a decision. Is it worth the price for the portraits, or should I have them keep them? Knowing me, it'd be their's.
Reply
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|
|
by Angelic Princess:) Posted Wed July 4, 2007 @ 7:00 PM
|
|
|
read EVERYTHING on the coupon and don't assume anything. And also, lighten up on the "hon" thing.. its not like he was touching or harrassing you.
Reply
|
|
 |
|
|
by JulieM Posted Wed July 4, 2007 @ 12:01 PM
|
|
|
JC Penney has long been known for the deceptive portrait studios. I used one of their "No sitting fee" coupons once. Pictures turned out great. When I ordered I was charged a sitting fee. I told them they had my coupon sitting right there that said "no sitting fee". The girl stumbled and hemmed and hawed and finally told me that there was no sitting fee for the portrait, but a fee for ordering which just happened to be the amount of the normal sitting fee and they didn't have an entry for the ordering fee so they just charged it under sitting fee.
Though those pictures were darling, I walked out. I called Marvin Zindler the old and crazy consumer reporter for Channel 13 in Houston (yes that Marvin Zindler of the Chicken Ranch fame) and I had my portraits the next day sans "sitting fee" along with an apology from the manager.
Looks like they are up to the same old same old.
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
by A A Posted Wed July 4, 2007 @ 10:30 AM
|
|
|
I am soooooooooooooooooooooo sorry.
There. My apology is worth the same as anyone elses (not a damn thing), so you can take my apology and print it, frame it, and bask in it's glory.
Case closed.
Reply
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
maybe not
by Batman Wed July 4, 2007 @ 9:54 PM
|
|
|
|
|

|
maybe
by Batman Wed July 4, 2007 @ 9:55 PM
|
|
|

|
Yes it is
by Batman Mon July 9, 2007 @ 7:49 PM
|
|
|
|
|

|
It was
by Batman Thu July 5, 2007 @ 7:24 PM
|
|
|
 |
|

|
by Blackrack Posted Wed July 4, 2007 @ 7:49 AM
|
|
|
Fine print is still print, and its point is to make people like you, who only read the bold print, use it and therefore end up spending more money than they intended to. The most common sitting fee deal I've seen is that one person sits free, and it's x number of dollars for each addional person sitting. Seems like this is the case here.
I've never seen the big deal with strangers using pet names. I spent a large chunk of my life in Atlantic Canada, where depending on your gender you are either "buddy" or "missy", neither of which I had a real problem with. "Condesending"? Stop being a brat.
Gas and toll money because you didn't read the whole coupon? Grow up.
Reply
|
|
 |
|
|
|
Usually at department store studios like this sitting fees are waived when you have a photo club membership. The coupon will then sometimes apply a different discount. If you're not a club member you get free sitting for one person. She was charged for the rest of the people in her group (looks to be about $10 each for the family of four with one person free with said coupon).
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
This is always plainly written out on the coupon. The "fine print".
Reply
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|
|
by shaun Posted Tue July 3, 2007 @ 11:40 PM
|
|
|
As everyone else is pointing out, it seems suspicious that you don't explain this small print. Because of that being the case, I don't think an appology for the small print is required.
I would alway think using Miss in place of hun would be more proper.
Reply
|
|
 |
|
by Peregrina Posted Tue July 3, 2007 @ 8:14 PM
|
|
|
Ugh, I hate it when strangers refer to me as hon or sweetie or any sort of pet name. My family gets away with it because they're family and shooting them is bad juju. Strangers get the hairy eyeball and I repeat my name until they finally catch the clue.
That being said, in the future, read the small print. Whenever I see stuff like 'free' or 'no interest until' etc, I always read the fine print because I just know there is a catch.
Reply
|
|
 |
|

|
by BellaSera Posted Tue July 3, 2007 @ 4:52 PM
|
|
|
Actually, I kind of agree with the OP here (although she doesn't specify what the fine print said...gee, wonder why). If the fine print directly contradicts the "no sitting fee" in big, bold letters, then I'd say that's a bit deceptive (but not illegal).
Of course, this doesn't let the OP off the hook for not reading the small print. If Margaret had done that, perhaps she wouldn't have wasted gas and toll money.
And as to being called "hon", yeah, I'd have to agree compeletely with the OP on that one. It's incredibly condescending. I would've just looked at the guy and said,"Thanks for clarifying that, BABE."
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|

|
by Max Power Posted Tue July 3, 2007 @ 1:30 PM
|
|
|
At least now you know where to take your money.
Reply
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
|
|
|
You have every right to stand up for yourself and tell somebody, "I'd appreciate/prefer it if you called me Mrs. Howard, if you don't mind. Thank you."
But what did the small print say?
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|