 |
|
|
by Consumer Rights Activist Posted Fri August 24, 2007 @ 2:35 AM
|
|
|
If you were charged on your cell phone bill for ringtones or other mobile content that you never authorized and/or you were sent unsolicited SMS text messages and you want to fight back against these companies, get in touch with some class action attorneys.
These fellows are investigating unauthorized cell phone charges and wireless SMS text spam and might be able to help you:
http://www.ClassActionConnect.com/?q=node/680
Reply
|
|
 |
|
|
by Angelic Princess:) Posted Sat July 14, 2007 @ 4:17 PM
|
|
|
I just have to say this.. on the news the other night, I saw Sprint and Nextel are cancelling customer's accounts if they call CS too much. Maybe I should start calling nonstop and make up bogus complaints to get them to cancel OUR account early? lol jk!
Reply
|
|
 |
|
|
by Richard S. Posted Thu July 12, 2007 @ 12:01 PM
|
|
|
Sprint just let everyone know what they have to do to get out of their contracts if they are unhappy with their service.
I suggest that anyone who uses Sprint call customer service once a day for a couple of months. Let Sprint know what they think of this.
Reply
|
|

|

|
Until...
by Jeffrey Mon July 16, 2007 @ 8:51 AM
|
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|

|
by Sarah H Posted Tue July 10, 2007 @ 5:30 PM
|
|
|
Haha I just watched a story about this on the news about 5 minutes ago. All cell phone companies suck. I agree with you, you wouldn't need to call customer service if they'd stop making problems on your bill. I think they're going to get a lot of bad press about this. They deserve it. I hope they didn't have the nerve to charge you an early termination fee.
Reply
|
|
 |
|
by S. Brown Posted Mon July 9, 2007 @ 6:03 PM
|
|
|
http://www.usatoday.com/tech/news/2007-07-09-sprint-disconnects-custom ers_N.htm
The above link is to the article in USA Today stating that Sprint Nextel is terminating the service of customers that call customer service too frequently.
I'm too tired to get into this debate or even express an opinion - - just wanted to pass along the link.
Reply
|
|
|
|
 |
|

|
by Jeffrey Posted Sun July 8, 2007 @ 7:32 PM
|
|
|
This is real and has been reported in the main stream press (e.g., Wall Street Journal).
"Apparently, this was about 1000 customers. The Wall Street Journal reported that terminated subscribers called an average of 25 times a month at a rate 40 times higher than average customers, according to Roni Singleton, a spokeswoman for Sprint. Some of the calls were related to billing issues, she said."
25 times a month is about once a day.
While Michael was trying to resolve a legit issue, the fact is that he DID call "pretty much every day." When Sprint runs their query... they see that Michael has placed some 30-odd calls in the last month.
The question for Michael: prior to just recently, were you a frequent caller? If this patten only just started, it seems all-the-more outrageous that they'd cancel. On the other hand, if you're someone who (for whatever reason) has been calling frequently for some time... that's a somewhat different story.
The other facet to this is that many of those cancelled were SERO customers. Seems that SERO has been royally abused. People signing up for SERO (perhaps using an employee's name they got off a forum or web site instead of actually knowing someone), then calling and asking for "better deals." Several of those complaining about being canceled are known on the Sprint forums as people who make it a habit of asking for things like being able to transfer an existing account to SERO (explicitly not allowed), asking for extended N&W hours (e.g., start at 6 instead of 8 or 9), asking for credits for dropped calls/failed downloads (to the tune of dozens a month), and so forth. Not saying Michael was an abuser, but the fact that he was a SERO customer AND he made 30-odd calls in the past month... you can see how he's end up on a list of customers would rather not have.
Reply
|
|
|
|

|

|
SERO
by Jeffrey Mon July 9, 2007 @ 7:09 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|

|
But
by Batman Mon July 9, 2007 @ 4:35 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
Damn. I wish Sprint would send me that letter. I would be thrilled! It is disturbing that they would do that, but it doesn't surprise me at all. It's a totally typical Sprint reaction. I think I will make a point to call them more... I am joking, of course, but it is tempting.
You will be better off in the long run. The service from Sprint has hit an all-time low and I have a feeling they will be losing a lot more customers with or without their "customer firings."
Reply
|
|
 |
|
|
by Cor H Posted Fri July 6, 2007 @ 7:23 PM
|
|
|
http://www.switched.com/2007/07/06/sprint-dumps-problem-customers/?nci d=NWS00010000000001
It seems this has become a practice of Sprint.
I do understand that there are people who cannot be satisfied - customers who tie up the phone lines every day and take time away from others. However, if the OP has only been calling to solve the problem, I'm unclear as to why he would be considered a nuisance.
If the OP were a lonely senior citizen or a pesky novice who needed help finding the numbers on the phone itself, I would understand the need to curtail the number of contacts made by him.
Reply
|
|
|
|
by A A Posted Sat July 7, 2007 @ 11:22 PM
|
|
|
I worked at Verizon a while back when it was Air Touch and we had a guy and his brother that spent $200 a month that would come in every month and argue about whatever they could think of to get a credit.
They would come in the same day every month and it literally meant an hour or more of them trying every way to get a credit. Finally I added up the credits on the account for the previous year and they were given $3500 in credits and free equipment. They had spent something like $3000. They were always pretty smug about getting credits because they were a 'gold customer'. The next month they came to me and started to discuss their next credit, I told them the figures. They told me he spent $200 a month and I told him he cost us about $30 a month and it would be in the best interest of the company if he took his business to Ameritech. I said I would give him a credit of $150 but only if he agreed to cancel service and pay the $150 cancellation fee.
I let corporate know about his account and about a week later there was a note that they could not be given a credit under any circumstance for the remainder of the contract.
That is the type of customer that should get the letter.
Reply
|
|
|

|
by Jeffrey Posted Sun July 8, 2007 @ 7:36 PM
|
|
|
The reason is, in part, that he called almost every day. Even if it was to resolve a legit issue... that's excessive... according to Sprint.
The old tip of making a pest of yourself to get your way... backfired.
Michael may have had a legit issue... but when he started calling every day... he got flagged.
The fact that he had a SERO plan (linked to someone no longer with the company) likely bumped him up even more on the "we want to get rid of you" list.
Look at this a different way. Sprint has thousands and thousands of customers that DON'T call every day. Customers have have few, if any, problems. This may not be Michael's fault... but clearly Sprint has many customers that they CAN satisfy.
If you gotta call every day... chance are Sprint can't help you.
Reply
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|
|
by rkcbw0314 Posted Fri July 6, 2007 @ 1:38 AM
|
|
|
Thw way Sprint treated you is outrageous. I strongly encourage you to file a complaint with the Federal Communications Commission. You can do so here:
http://svartifoss2.fcc.gov/cib/fcc475.cfm
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
ARGG!
by Angelic Princess:) Fri July 6, 2007 @ 12:12 PM
|
|
|
 |
|
|
by Batman Posted Thu July 5, 2007 @ 6:58 PM
|
|
|
I took the liberty to call that number. It seems very unprofessional. The voice message sounded like she was coughing and cutting out.
I found a Sprint number, and called that number. They didn't know that number.
I'd call Sprint to verify that letter was not a scam of some sort. And, DON'T use that number to call them. Use a number you know is legit. Or, call 6-1-1.
It may be legit; but, it sure seems suspicious to me; and the Sprint rep I spoke with thought so too.
Reply
|
|
 |
|
|
|
Alot of people see this as a blessing in disguise, and I would have to agree with them, but only if your credit situation allows it.
Sprint I think is THE most lenient with credit then any other cell phone company. Before I had any kind of established credit, Sprint was the only company that would allow me to sign up without any kind of initial deposit. Verizon and Cingular both wanted a $400 deposit, and T mobile wanted $250. So I know there ARE other companies out there, but for me there wasn't. I don't have that kind of money laying around, and I don't know many others who do.
Reply
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|
|
by A A Posted Thu July 5, 2007 @ 4:49 PM
|
|
|
You should send this letter and the one you received to Verizon corporate. I bet they might offer you a pretty good deal to switch to Verizon. When you reach the Corp office they are usually willing to do a little more for you.
Technically you have a contract and even if it says they can terminate at any time without warning, that is not exactly true. But it was probably a good thing they let you go, so you can go elsewhere and get better service.
Reply
|
|
 |
|

|
by Venice Posted Thu July 5, 2007 @ 4:29 PM
|
|
|
Michael, you have just come up with the answer to the most asked question in the history of wireless phones... How do I get out of my contract?
I read Sprint's letter to you, and apparently a surefire way to terminate a contract with no fees and with the company's blessing, is to be a nuisance. That's not to say I think you are a nuisance, but being one might help someone else get the result they're looking for.
Reply
|
|

|
ROFLOL
by Batman Thu July 5, 2007 @ 6:12 PM
|
|
|
 |
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|

|
by (Mostly) Absent Erik Posted Thu July 5, 2007 @ 2:41 PM
|
|
|
I was just reading about this.
http://crave.cnet.com/8301-1_105-9739869-1.html
It wasn't just you that Sprint "fired." It was actually a small percentage of Sprint's customer base who received this same letter. Sprint is claiming that this is being done because frequent complainers are tying up their consumer complaint lines and keeping others from being assisted. The cynic in me would say that Sprint is trying to lower its horrific consumer overturn ratio by getting rid of problem customers before they can get rid of them.
Considering how poorly Sprint is doing in the cellular business and how much smaller their base is in comparison to its competitors, I fail to see how Sprint thinks that terminating a chunk of their consumers is going to turn things around for them. But I guess crazier things have happened.
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
|
by Kendray Posted Thu July 5, 2007 @ 2:04 PM
|
|
|
$30 includes unlimited texting? Quite a bargain I'd say.
'we are unable to meet your current wireless needs..." = You've been buggin' us too much. We're not making any money off your account, so good-bye. By your own admission you call them 'alot' (a lot). Since you first signed on, it was 'every month' to correct their errors. Are you sure you didn't get notification that there was a change in your plan? Check your old bills--it's probably in there. But to placate you, they knocked off $8.00 each time you called.
You've called them 'pretty much every day for the past month.'
I have my own small business and have on occasion had to dismiss a client for just these reasons. Once a complete 175 page report was 'misplaced.' OK--just this one time. A couple of weeks later, the backup material couldn't be located. Good thing I archive my research, which my contract states I don't have to. Alright, here it is. After more than one time of these various requests, I found I wasn't making any money on the project, so terminated our relationship.
At $30/mo. I can understand why they don't care to continue to do business with you. They've given you lots of lead time to find another provider. Let's see what kind of good deals you can get out of the next one.
Reply
|
|

|
?
by A A Thu July 5, 2007 @ 4:45 PM
|
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
In my humble opinion, it sounds like they may be doing you a favour. If they can't get their act together, bring your money and your business to another company...my impression is that in the US there are A LOT of different wireless companies...so do a happy dance!
Reply
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
|

|
by Blackrack Posted Thu July 5, 2007 @ 11:50 AM
|
|
|
Look at it this was, Michael; you're getting away from a company that didn't provide good service at no loss to you.
You should look into where that kit where went, though.
Reply
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
http://planetfeedback.typepad.com/shopping/2007/07/youre-fired.html
Reply
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
|
|
by JohnWalters Posted Thu July 5, 2007 @ 10:31 AM
|
|
|
You were costing the company more money than you put in. Compare what Sprint pays their reps to talk to you and the amount of time you kept them on the phone and what you actually paid monthly. Sprint got probably 30 dollars for every 300 dollars they paid out to employees to spend time talking to you. It looks like they did the right thing from a financial standpoint. I'm surprised more companies don't terminate customers in this fashion.
To be honest, you sound like a lonely guy to spend this much time talking to customer service. Or maybe you just like the way it feels to have someone calling you Sir. Who knows, but you have to realize that although Customer Service is free, you should try to keep your use of it in moderation.
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|
|

|
I've tried.
by Michael Teruel Thu July 5, 2007 @ 5:12 PM
|
|
|
 |
|

|
by Jeffrey Posted Thu July 5, 2007 @ 6:52 AM
|
|
|
Wow.
Since you were on a SERO plan, can you call the employee that referred you. Perhaps they can help/shed some light on the situation.
Anyone, that looks like a classic "Let's fire the customer" sort of thing. Even though it appears that it's not your fault, they've determined that it's just not worthwhile dealing with you.
Which is sort of how consumers feel sometimes. Just fire the company, even when the customer was in error.
Reply
|
|
|
|