|
|
Accused of Trying to Defraud Target
Posted Fri September 21, 2007 12:00 pm, by Mathias F. written to Target Corporation
Write a Letter to this Company | Rate this Company
On Friday, September 21, 2007 I bought, among other things a "Pur" water filtration system at the Target Store on Bou Avenue in Rockville, Maryland. At about 12:45 pm that day, when my wife came home for lunch I wanted to install the filter on our kitchen faucet. But when I opened the box, we discovered that the filter was not in new condition in fact, it looked like a used filter that had been put into the box by mistake. (As far as we recall, the box was not sealed when we opened it.) Later that afternoon, I went to return the filter at the Target store were I purchased it. The managers there refused to accept the return and refused to refund our money, saying "we don't sell things like that" and accused me of trying to return a different filter from the one I had bought that morning. Clearly the accusation was that I had taken a new filtration system out of the box, had replaced it with a used system, and then went back to the store in an attempt to defraud Target. I was and am outraged by this accusation. (It's not only an insult to my moral standards but also to my intelligence: who would do something as stupid as that??)
After leaving the store I called guest services. I was eventually transferred to a supervisor there, who after talking to the managers at the store said she was backing the store's versionthat is the accusation that I bought a new filtration system and tried to return a used system in an attempt to defraud Target. She did transfer me to a higher-level supervisor, who also said he was backing the store's version. When I asked him what he would do if he was in the situation I was he said "I would return the product to the store immediately. By your own admission you waited two hours!" I was and am puzzled by this remark. Was the implication perhaps that my waiting (and completing some work I had to do) shows that I am guilty of trying to defraud Target?
I would like to register an official complaint against both supervisors with whom I interacted at the store in Rockville and the two guest services employees with whom I spoke on the phone. I am outraged, and find it hard to put the extent of my outrage into words, that four different Target employees would accuse me of trying to defraud the store.
I have no idea how the defective product got on the shelf. What I do know are the following facts:
1) Target sold us a defective product, and we believe it is Target's responsibility to exchange this product for a new and fully functioning one.
2) I was accused by several employees of Target of engaging in illegal and highly unethical behavior and these employeesall four of themowe me an apology for their behavior.
Reply
| Log In/Create an account | 87 comments |
|
|
| PlanetFeedback Comments are subject to strict terms and conditions. We reserve the right to deny site membership privileges to any individuals acting inappropriately. |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
by Matthew Shields Posted Mon October 8, 2007 @ 4:38 AM
|
|
|
"who would do something as stupid as that??" People try to do that all the time. Target employees didn't check the return, and now they're sticking you with it. Target also should not be restocking returned merchandise without disclosing it.
Reply
|
|
 |
|
|
by Dii Posted Fri September 28, 2007 @ 2:26 AM
|
|
|
Take the Store Manager to small claims and sue for the replacement or cost of the filter system. Name all the employees that you talked to for replacement of the unit ini the complaint.
I wish that would situation happen to me. I hate big business and their lack of concern for a regular guy trying to live a normal life.
Reply
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
by Batman Posted Wed September 26, 2007 @ 8:44 PM
|
|
|
Hi.
I hate to be the one who says, "I will never shop at your establishment again" threat rarely works.
They honestly don't care about one person; and,
rarely do we keep our threat/promises. Either render the threat useless.
Another issue raised by others, and the first thing I thought, was "How does Target know you didn't?" They don't. They simply know the item is not in sale condition, you have it, and therefore, posession is 9/10 of the law.
About the only way you can explain your position successfully, is to demonstrate that it is unlikely you had time to change things, and run back to the store.
I've learned over the years to inspect packaging carefully. And, if possible, to open the item, and make sure it contains everything its supposed to, etc.
And, while you might not even consider doing such things, as having been explained, not everyone has a solid moral character. I remember attempting to explain to Best Buy that a Visioneer scanner they had placed on the "opened items" section was wrong. They of course did not want to acknowledge they had been taken. But, it didn'take a genius to realize that the model the scanner lid had was not the same model it belonged to. Unfortunately, someone had purchased a newer model, and exchanged it with their older model, and simply exchanged the covers. Since they were the same, it didn't matter to them. The only difference in covers, was model numbers. But, in the models? the more expensive model had more buttons, more features. So, yes, people do this. And, in all honesty, they will make the same claims. And, stores dont want to take the loss. That's for sure. And, of course, we who get ripped off don't want to get stuck either.
Sadly, someone will lose on these propositions. Therefore, let me again, strongly urge you to pay attention to the packaging. That is really the best way to protect yourself. You can't count on store employees doing their job correctly. Which is how these things happen to start with.
Reply
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|

|
by Becks Posted Tue September 25, 2007 @ 1:38 PM
|
|
|
I thought this letter was well written, despite your apparent outrage. You did NOT resort to all caps or swear words! Good for you.
I hope this situation is addressed and rectified.
Reply
|
|

|
thanks
by Mathias Wed September 26, 2007 @ 10:58 AM
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
One day, I needed a new toaster. I bought the cheap $10 toaster at Target and took it home. It didn't work -- the lever that moves the bread down to be toasted didn't actually stay down, so you had to hold it down yourself if you wanted toast. Not good.
I took it back and got another, identical toaster (thinking the first one was just defective/bad luck). This 2nd toaster did the same thing as the first one. I returned this toaster for money/store credit and headed back to the toasters to bump it up a notch expense-wise.
What I found was the first toaster I had purchased (remember, the one that was defective). I could tell they had just taped the box back up and put it on the shelf because I had written someone's phone number (in a pinch) on the box, and that number was still on the box on the shelf. I got out a marker, and I wrote on every single box of that specific toaster: "DEFECTIVE."
Shame on that Target store for returning defective merchandise to the shelf for someone else to buy and deal with.
Reply
|
|
|
|

|

|
Wow
by donno Wed September 26, 2007 @ 8:53 PM
|
|
|
 |
|

|
by MA Loper Posted Mon September 24, 2007 @ 4:52 PM
|
|
|
(Great name - BTW, my Great, Great Grandfather was named Mathias!)
You would be amazed at the stuff people pull. I have seen with my own eyes that things can show up in the wrong box (and sadly, they don't always check them well to make sure all parts or There or for usage) when taking in a return. I myself bought a clearance booster seat at Babies R Us for my son - turns out that not only was it a USED seat, it wasn't even the right seat (or even the brand) pictured on the box. And BRU almost gave me a hard time over it, but eventually gave in and refunded it to me.
But the way this manager handled things makes me more suspicious of him. Typically (in our store anyway) the LOD's (managers) would bend over backwards, even when it was CLEAR the guest was not in compliance with the returns policy. Almost makes me wonder if this guy KNEW they had taken in and put out merchandise for sale that was used and he got caught, so he cracked down.
Again, just a theory, but I can't find any other logical reason for his insistence that YOU must have returned used goods (I have NEVER in all my days heard of a Target LOD or other management staff flat out accusing the guest - it's just not allowed!)
Worst case scenario (if disputing the charge doesn't work) try contacting PUR to see if they can help. I can bet they want a happy customer and would be glad to help you out.
Reply
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
The sad truth of this is that there are people who are dishonest and will do things like this. Because some people are dishonest, honest individuals end up being treated like they've done something wrong. I understand why it happens, but it doesn't make it right. When you feel like you're being accused when you've done nothing wrong, it's frustrating.
I hope you are able to exchange the product.
Reply
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|

|
by Jeffrey Posted Mon September 24, 2007 @ 9:35 AM
|
|
|
They have mishandled this. While people DO lie, cheat, and steal, an attempt to return an item like this, with receipt, should definitely result in them giving you a new one.
However... you say "It's not only an insult to my moral standards but also to my intelligence: who would do something as stupid as that??)"
You're right. No one would be stupid enough to put an old filter into a box and then return it.
But, if that's the case... then how DID a used filter end up on the shelves. At some point, someone must have used the filter, put it in the box, and somehow had it put on the shelves. So, yes, apparently there are people who are THAT stupid.
So, while I still agree with you, you're not making a very good claim by implying that no one would do such a thing. Obviously, someone had.
Reply
|
|
 |
|
|
by DeeM Posted Sun September 23, 2007 @ 5:01 PM
|
|
|
Dispute the credit charge with your card company, if it was a charge and file a complaint with the Better Business Bureau. I have learned to check everything I buy that comes in a box by taking it out and inspecting it unless it is in a sealed package.
Anything that looks like the box has been opened or resealed is not acceptable to me. I have also learned through past mistakes to remove several boxes from the shelf and take one from close to the back, comparing to be certain it is the same item. I also will accept nothing that comes out from the stockroom that has been opened (like a printer or computer).
I have heard more than one case of empty electronic item boxes being sold. This seems to be especially so with gaming devices and the like. I suspect switched package contents happens more often than we might imagine.
Reply
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
If I were the one working, I would have done the return. I do understand why they didn't. It's all up to the store you go to because each one has their own interpretation and application of the policies.
Reply
|
|
 |
|
by ghostbuster Posted Sun September 23, 2007 @ 12:40 AM
|
|
|
Not to be rude or anything, but how are they to know you are telling the truth. I mean they probably get that story lots of times.
Reply
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|
|
by U B Posted Sat September 22, 2007 @ 10:59 PM
|
|
|
"who would do something as stupid as that??"
Evidently the guy that returned it before you.
This has happened to me before (Not Target). When it did, the store apologized and said sometimes they take non defective returns and put them on the shelf if they were returned "as new". The thing I happened to buy looked like it was about a year old.
I think if you had the receipt they should have honored the return.
Reply
|
|
 |
|

|
by donno Posted Sat September 22, 2007 @ 8:25 PM
|
|
|
I browsed the responses and I see a wide array of responses. I see many people are eyeing you suspiciously. Frankly, I believe you. Your letter is well thought out, sincere, and written by someone with a fair amount more than half a brain.
Maybe it is because I haven't worked in customer service, but it seemss logical to me that some idiot before you committed the illegal act. I think Target put the box back on the shelf after it was returned.
I hope you get some satisfaction out of your complaint, but with all these employees ganging up on you I don't know how you can prove what happened. This situation sucks.
Reply
|
|
|
|
 |
|

|
by SumnerMan Posted Sat September 22, 2007 @ 6:47 PM
|
|
|
Although I may not agree with Ahsha's conclusion she does raise a good point. Why did you want a refund instead of an exchange?
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|
|
by Angelic Princess:) Posted Sat September 22, 2007 @ 6:30 PM
|
|
|
This is just another reason why returned items should not be resold. I bet you that if it was the original item, there would have been a seal on it. Although most of the time, you can tell if an item has been opened before or not. This is why, when customers' at my store return high priced items, but also the other items, we always open the package to make sure its the right item of the box. People DO cheat companies (gotta love scum!)
Reply
|
|
 |
|
by Ahsha Posted Sat September 22, 2007 @ 5:17 PM
|
|
|
Why did you want a refund instead of an exchange? You obviously wanted it (At about 12:45 pm that day, when my wife came home for lunch I wanted to install the filter on our kitchen faucet.) An exchange would have been the logical move, then your integrity and moral standards would be vindicated.
Also, many, many people would do a thing like that (It's not only an insult to my moral standards but also to my intelligence: who would do something as stupid as that??)
I think your outrage is because you didn't get away with a sneaky.
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
agreed
by NICHOLAI Sat September 22, 2007 @ 11:26 PM
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
by Janell Posted Sat September 22, 2007 @ 4:00 PM
|
|
|
Same thing happened to me at Wal-mart, my heart goes out to you. In my case, a brand new $80 Eureka vacuum turned out to be someone's used old Hoover. I called first and then drove back, just knowing they'd call me a liar and I'd be out $80. They challenged me all right, after all they "check every return" so they found it unlikely that a customer, say, bought a new Eureka, took it out of the package and put their old vacuum in, then returned it for the cash, but in the end the manager took my word and gave me a new vacuum. I now know to open anything costing more than $20 in the parking lot and carefully check it over - that way I've got the lot security cameras proving I didn't pull a switcharoo. Good luck.
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|
|
by April Smith Posted Sat September 22, 2007 @ 1:56 PM
|
|
|
I see a lot of people suggesting that it is acceptable for Target to act this way because of other people that MAY try to defraud them. Frankly, if you own a business you suffer losses. And this would be one of them. Target has insurance for this kind of crap. Though they won't use it because the claim is so small, they can and do report it on their taxes at the end of the year. All thefts are tallied up and reported as a loss. Target is rapidly losing it's customers due to this and their return policy in general. They think they are making money by preventing fraud. If they would look at how many customers they are losing versus how much fraud they are preventing, they would be changing policy. I have told MANY of my girlfriends to not register at target for their baby shower because you can't return anything. Each and everyone of them had no idea about this and refused to register there. That is hundreds of dollars per person. Sorry for the ramble.
Reply
|
|

|
hmmm
by Angelic Princess:) Sat September 22, 2007 @ 2:19 PM
|
|
|

|
You are
by April Smith Sun September 23, 2007 @ 3:35 PM
|
|
|
|
|

|
And that
by April Smith Sun September 23, 2007 @ 3:37 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
by Marty5223 Posted Sat September 22, 2007 @ 12:39 PM
|
|
|
If you paid by credit card simply dispute the charge. It is a simple process...tell them you got a used item instead of a new item and had no clue. Chances are you will get all your money back!
A very similar thing happen to me. I had purchased a DVD at Target. I found it much cheaper a few weeks later at Sam's Club. I was going to return it and buy the one from Sam's. I still had the receipt and it was just like I purchased it sitting in my wall unit.
Customer service left the counter and spoke to someone behind a door that was partially open. Next thing I know I was surrounded by security.
Turns out the DVD had been carefully slit along the top of the package. I honestly had no clue. It was done very carefully. I had just recieved my DVD player as a gift. This was like only the 2nd DVD I had ever purchased. I am now very careful to check and recheck everything I buy to make sure it as it should be in the package.
I was very upset....but realized coming from retail background how this must look to the store. Anyway the store manager allowed me to swap for the same thing with a product in the package. I stil ended up paying a lot more for it than I would of paid if I had gotten the one from Sam's Club. They could check their computers and see I had Never returned anything to them without a reciept. That said I was happy I did not end up paying 45 dollars for an empty DVD carton.
Reply
|
|
|
|
 |
|
by franese Posted Sat September 22, 2007 @ 10:48 AM
|
|
|
I absolutely believe you, but we've had people on this site do this exact same thing, or suggest that peole do this. We have Adam who sees nothing wrong with exchanging something at Target even though it wasn't purchased there; and recently someone had a defective camera (and a lot of immature coworkers) - it was suggested that she purchase a new camera, then go back with the receipt and the old camera and return/exchange it.
Now, that's just a few people, but imagine how many people do this and think it's just fine. It's unfortunate that you're caught in the middle.
Good luck to you.
Reply
|
|

|

|
Who?
by ColoradoCOP Sat September 22, 2007 @ 11:53 AM
|
|
|
|
|

|

|
Thanks
by ColoradoCOP Sat September 22, 2007 @ 12:19 PM
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|
|
by Mike Holly Posted Sat September 22, 2007 @ 9:01 AM
|
|
|
If some target employees accuse me of fraud, i'll sue them for slander.
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|

|
Just because
by April Smith Sat September 22, 2007 @ 1:50 PM
|
|
|
|
|

|
if..
by Angelic Princess:) Sat September 22, 2007 @ 6:28 PM
|
|
|

|
wow
by April Smith Sun September 23, 2007 @ 3:44 PM
|
|
|

|
why thank you
by Angelic Princess:) Tue September 25, 2007 @ 1:15 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|

|
by ColoradoCOP Posted Sat September 22, 2007 @ 2:09 AM
|
|
|
Although, I no longer shop at target, because of their rapidly decreasing customer service, I have to agree that this would sound suspicious. But, I wish you luck and I hope that you win this one!
Reply
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|
by Michelle O Posted Sat September 22, 2007 @ 1:25 AM
|
|
|
Did you by any chance make this purchase with a credit card? If so, you might have some recourse by disputing the charge with the credit card company. Isn't there a way to dispute a charge when you didn't get the product/service that you paid for? Anyone know for sure?
Good luck - I think this stinks! Although I do like shopping at Target, I strongly feel that they are going too far in the other direction - from too lenient to far too suspicious.
Reply
|
|
 |
|
|
|
There are actually people that would do such a thing. That is why they are suspicious. I think someone before you bought a new water filter and returned it with their old used filter to get their money back. Target did not check what was in the box and put it back on the shelf for someone else to buy. You happened to be the unlucky person that got the used filter that someone else returned. If you could somehow get proof that they did not check the product before putting it on the shelf then hopefully you can prove your innocence.
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
insult?
by Mathias Sat September 22, 2007 @ 7:51 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|

|
Well
by ♥Venice♥ Fri September 28, 2007 @ 4:39 AM
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
Mathias, I believe you 100%. I completely get how insulted you are that someone thinks you would defraud anyone or anything. If this happened to me, I don't think I would have written such a civil letter. Good job. Good luck!
Reply
|
|

|
thanks
by Mathias Sat September 22, 2007 @ 7:51 PM
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|