 |
|
|
 |
|

|
by mary jo Posted Fri October 12, 2007 @ 12:42 PM
|
|
|
This has been, by far, one of the most intertaining letters I have read on PFB.
I have a few things to add.
First of all, for anyone who thinks this is the worst letter ever on PFB...you obviously werent around during the "Manda" era. LOL!
Secondly..to the OP:
You keep assuming that everyone who doesnt agree with you obviously doesnt have a credit card..as well as no life.
Yet what you are failing to understand here is that it is beyond obvious to everyone BUT YOU that YOU are the one who has no clue how a credit card works.
Let me give you an example of when a credit card company with reimburse you. A few months ago someone got hold of my credit card and bought songs from an internet site. It wasnt me so I called my c.c. company and had the number on my card cancelled and a new one sent out and I filed a dispute with them. After investigating the situation they gave me my money back.
They will NOT reimburse you for buyer's remorse.
Online auction sites are a gamble at best. Sometimes you get a really great product at a great deal and sometimes you loose your money. The only one I remotely trust is EBAY and even then I dont order anything from anyone unless I check them out really well.
You took a chance, you gambled, and you lost. I hope YOU learned your lesson as you are so apt to tell everyone else. You are the one who made the mistake here, not the people who replied to your letter and not the credit card company.
Its amazing to me that not one single person here agreed with you yet you still think you are right. Fact is, you couldnt be more wrong! Yet you choose to ignore the facts and you have done nothing but insult those trying to help you out.
The only thing you have done here is proven yourself to be highly ignorant about many things.
I sincerely hope that you calm down and open your mind so you can understand the inner workings of a credit card, online shopping, and how to interact with your fellow human beings.
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|

|
Ahhh ok!
by ColoradoCOP Mon October 15, 2007 @ 10:31 AM
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
That was a well versed break down of the OP screwed line of reasoning...Kudos!
T D understanding that should be as easy as point & click BAM! you have a new pair of $34 knockoffs...enjoy the purchase.
OR
Better yet OP, since you dont want the shoes & you are obviously stuck with the purchase, why not turn the experience around & bring the shoes to goodwill. You never know who you may help out by providing a pair of shoes (not sure if they are heels) to a woman in need.
Reply
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|

|
by Harleycat Posted Tue October 2, 2007 @ 9:46 AM
|
|
|
O.K. Hulkamania..
Let's see if we can explain this to you in simple terms.
You transacted with someone for some LV shoes and used your Suntrust card to pay for them. So Suntrust sends this person $34 and they send you merchandise. (Yes, we know it was not as depicted)
Suntrust then sends you a bill for $34. So, technically, they are the go between in this transaction.
You try to return the merchandise so that Suntrust could get their $34 back but the seller has disappeared off the face of the earth.
You, again, ask Suntrust to act as a go between to get your money back. They also cannot find the seller so they can't get your money back. So, now, you want Suntrust to give you your money back but they won't.
Why won't they you ask? Because if they did, they would be out $68. They paid the seller $34 and now you want them to pay you $34.
By your thinking, you think the only one who should lose in this is Suntrust. That makes no sense. You entered into this transaction not them. They were only the go between.
Reply
|
|
 |
|
|
by Jugi Posted Mon October 1, 2007 @ 9:26 PM
|
|
|
HULK ANGRY
Reply
|
|
 |
|
|
|
This letter is a bit hard to follow. These letters do get sent to the companies. They are very unlikely to take this as seriously as you would like them to because the letter is poorly written and hard to follow.
Typically you dont want to use ALL CAPS when writing a business letter. Also the tone of the letter is very unprofessional and pretty condescending.
When I was a store manager, letters like these were discarded. You can still get your point across that you are upset in a polite way. This letter makes you appear irrational and almost hysterical.
From what i can gather from your letter, the bank is right, and they are just following policy. You can't just dispute charges because you feel that they are wrong. If you still have the item you paid for then you have no grounds for disputing a charge.
Reply
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|

|
by (i still come around so don't get too uppity) vc Posted Mon October 1, 2007 @ 7:36 AM
|
|
|
You can't un-ring a bell.
You can't un-read a letter either. Damn it.
Reply
|
|
 |
|
|
|
Please, take about 10 minutes, calm down, and re-write this letter as if you have a little bit of common sense. Your account is YOUR responsiblity. You should have expected a scam on the shoes if it said they were only 34.00, think about it, you can't even get REAL Nike's for that price... just go by this simple rule, if it sounds too good to be true, chances are... it is.
Good Luck none the less.
Reply
|
|
|
by T D Posted Sat September 29, 2007 @ 9:54 PM
|
|
|
YOU DON'T KNOW WHAT I KNOW. WE REAP WHAT WE SOW.
WORRY ABOUT WHAT YOU KNOW. YOU ARE NOT PERFECT AND NEVER WILL BE.ugly
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
by a_simple_girl Posted Sat September 29, 2007 @ 12:04 PM
|
|
|
$34 for a pair of Louis Vuitton shoes? Wow, you are cheap as cheap can get.
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
you got exactly what you paid for. CRAP.
Good lord!
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|

|
by donno Posted Fri September 28, 2007 @ 2:07 PM
|
|
|
I saw a red balloon today. I never saw a red one before.
Reply
|
|
|
|
 |
|

|
by Evil Genius Erik - Support Compliment Week or I will ruthles Posted Fri September 28, 2007 @ 1:54 PM
|
|
|
9/28/07
Dear Blog:
Today was a big day for me. I ran into Susie Jenkins on the playground and she smiled at me. She is so cute and awesome. I want her to be my girlfriend. I hope she will go to the homecoming dance with me. That would be so great.
That's all I have to write about today. See you tomorrow. TTFN.
-Erik
Reply
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
|

|
by Elaine Williams Posted Fri September 28, 2007 @ 12:25 PM
|
|
|
Seems to me your beef should be with ioffer.com, not with Suntrust unless they are somehow affiliated with the ioffer website. I don't know of any credit card company that would let you keep the merchandise AND take the charge off. Seems like ioffer.com does not have the same buyer safeguards in place that e-bay does. I would have been very suspicious of anyone selling Louis Vuitton shoes for $34...no way those would have been genuine for that price.
I'm not clear about the other part of your complaint. You opened a savings account on the phone and they transferred money without your permission or without you giving the the other account number. What was the other account? Checking? another savings account? a CD? You really need to clarify your complaint a bit more there. If they just transferred the money to another account in your name it wasn't stolen, just moved....unless they emptied your checking account and thereby caused you to have bounced check fees. I don't see how they could have done that without your permission...there are certain rules that need to be followed and most calls of that sort are recorded for customer safety and you should have received a confirmation that the transfer was made.
Reply
|
|
|
|

|

|
to TD
by Elaine Williams Sun September 30, 2007 @ 7:20 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
by S. Brown Posted Thu September 27, 2007 @ 8:42 PM
|
|
|
I realize I'm beating my head against a wall here - - but no credit card company in the world is going to not hold a customer responsible for a $34.00 charge for an item they bought from an auction site that the seller won't accept as a return. It just isn't going to happen and you need to get over yourself and accept the fact that you gambled and lost and it's no one's fault but your own.
Reply
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|
by Ahsha Posted Thu September 27, 2007 @ 6:27 PM
|
|
|
Why would you think you were getting Louis Vitton shoes for thirty four dollars? You set yourself up because you were greedy.
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
Ummm
by rickrooney Fri September 28, 2007 @ 11:54 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
Who weites a mostly in upper case letters.
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
A fool and his money are soon parted. And then fool writes a ridiculous letter of complaint.
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
by joanne Posted Thu September 27, 2007 @ 4:16 AM
|
|
|
Ok, I'm not going to comment on grammer and spelling as I think that you already have an idea from the others of how to write more effective letters. I will however give you a useful piece of information. Louis Vuitton NEVER and I mean NEVER sells items at a discount or through sellers other than the trusted merchants listed their website www.louisvuitton.com. I can guarantee that you will never be able to buy a pair of Louis Vuitton shoes for $34 either. Did you really not expect these to be counterfeit? I think that you knew full well that you were purchasing an illegal knock off and because of that you deserve what you got.
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|

|
What?
by ColoradoCOP Fri September 28, 2007 @ 12:26 PM
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
by geekgirl00 Posted Thu September 27, 2007 @ 12:41 AM
|
|
|
you sound like yoda. just angrier.
Reply
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|
by T D Posted Wed September 26, 2007 @ 6:39 PM
|
|
|
GET A LIFE YOU ALL. MIND YOUR OWN BUSINESS MAYBE YOU MIGHT END UP SOMEWHERE IN LIFE FOR ONCE.I AM DISPUTE WITH SUNTRUST BANK NOT YOU. PEOPLE LIKE YOU THIS IS HOW WE LIVE IN A MESS UP SOCIETY TODAY GROW-UP.
IT SOUNDS TO ME YOU ARE MORE MAD AT ME THAN SUNTRUST.
ALSO THIS IS A FREE COUNTY I CAN BUY WHAT I PLEASE.
MY DISPUTE DOES NOT CONCERN YOU. BYE NOW
Reply
|
|
|
|

|

|
Dumbass
by ColoradoCOP Wed September 26, 2007 @ 7:37 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|

|
LOL
by ColoradoCOP Wed September 26, 2007 @ 10:31 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|

|
?
by ColoradoCOP Thu September 27, 2007 @ 2:41 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
by RetailSouth Posted Wed September 26, 2007 @ 2:05 PM
|
|
|
GRRR!
Hulk buy Louis Vuitton shoes and feet too big and rip shoes. NOW HULK MAD AND WANT REFUND!
GRRRRR! Hulk SMASH Suntrust!
AAAARGH!
Reply
|
|
|
|

|
Me too!
by JuliePie Fri September 28, 2007 @ 2:15 PM
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|
by Peregrina Posted Tue September 25, 2007 @ 9:55 PM
|
|
|
Please re-write this letter and give it to someone with a reading level above 6th grade to proof.
I'm pretty sure you mean you have to watch them like a 'hawk' not a hulk. Hawk have very good eyesight and tend to notice small details like lunch scurrying around on the ground. The hulk is that green guy who realy needs anger management.
I don't know what you mean when you say you tried 'enormous times' to return your merchandise. My admittedly limited understanding of physics says that time is immutable and cannot become larger or smaller, though it might seem like it is stretching out into forever.
Pro mission? Permission, I assume, is what you meant. Again, get someone to proof this letter because it makes no sense in its current form.
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|