 |
|
by Kandi C Posted Mon December 17, 2007 @ 11:58 AM
|
|
|
If you think Kmart is bad, try RALPH'S GROCERY STORES! If your a RALPH'S CLUB CARD MEMBER or a member of the PET CLUB CARD/WINE CLUB CARD PROGRAM then this one's for YOU!
Ralph's Pet Club Card Program gives you $9.00 for every $100.00 you spend on Pet Products. It's a CASH REBATE that prints automatically at the bottom of the register tape at the end of the shopping trip that qualified. The "coupons" or "cash rebate certificates" are assigned an expiration date by Ralph's and its usually within days or purchase.
The Checker is suppose to point out the coupon so you don't miss it and loose your reward. A lot of times they don't print for whatever reason (tapes sticks, the Checker tears it too quickly and gives it to the shopper behind you instead etc.) and if you are concerned that you missed yours then you can bring in your Club Card and the Manager can scan it and give you any rewards that are earned without the coupons. They track your purchases on your card.
I found out that these CASH REBATES don't really EXPIRE at all! Ralph's assigns an expiration date in hopes that you cannot possibly use it in time and when you don't they claim the money as "unclaimed property" without an taxes or penalties.
I was in line the other day when an Elderly Couple tried this and they found that they had over $300.00 in earned rebates that had accumulated & the Manager allowed them to have it. NO EXPIRATION DATE!
So flash forward a few months and I see that certain STORE MANAGERS are being fired for this as Ralph's is calling it UNAUTHORIZED DISCOUNTING for allowing People to have their rebates earned. When the Manager enters the code from the coupon/rebate the Customer earned by swiping the club card, the register allows it and there is no EXPIRATION DATE. The club card program has gone on for years now and these rebates just keeping adding up to $100's of lost dollars for Consumers and Shoppers.
So I tried this for myself last night, and found that they allowed me to use these rebates that are years old now by swiping my club card.
Funny how that Manager can still be employed and do the same thing that the others did and were fired for?
IS THERE SUCH A THING AS CORPORATE POLICY ANYWHERE? IF THERE IS CAN SOMEONE PLEASE POINT IT OUT FOR ME?
Reply
|
|
 |
|
|
by Posted Wed November 21, 2007 @ 11:48 PM
|
|
|
Wow! You have some fucking nerve!
Reply
|
|
 |
|
|
by bob bob Posted Sat November 10, 2007 @ 3:03 PM
|
|
|
I shop at Meijer for groceries and often they have chex mix bags buy one get one free, and i also have a coupon for save .50 on 2. It does work, because one bag costs around $1.79 - so I get 2 bags for that price, but then they take .50 off and another .50 (double coupons) so I get 2 bags of them for .79. Pretty good deal, but they're not free. I paid for 2 (1.79) and got the coupon taken off. If it were a b1g1 free coupon, I wouldn't expect it to work.
Reply
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|
by T. C. Posted Mon November 5, 2007 @ 9:13 PM
|
|
|
Best solution. Do away with coupons and reduce the prices across the board but we all know you would loose money because not everyone uses coupons.
Reply
|
|
|
|
 |
|
by T. C. Posted Mon November 5, 2007 @ 1:12 PM
|
|
|
Most sales such as this and coupons themselves do not allow double dipping and that is what this is. The computer would not allow this to happen because it has a bigger brain than the cashier.
Reply
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
by Angelic Princess:) Posted Tue October 30, 2007 @ 7:27 PM
|
|
|
A customer had a coupon with no limit on it and is trying to buy an
item
that is "buy one get one free," how many times are we allowed to scan
a
coupon for this purchase?
Only one coupon can be used when a customer is purchasing a Buy 1 Get
1
free item, because the customer is only purchasing one item.
Reply
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|
|
by B Ball Posted Mon October 29, 2007 @ 11:55 PM
|
|
|
Any store coupons or discounts are completely separate from a manufacture coupon, so you can end up getting items for free.Maybe the store employees and just too incompetent to know that.
Reply
|
|
 |
|
|
by April Smith Posted Tue October 23, 2007 @ 2:52 PM
|
|
|
Wait, what happened?
It was buy one get one free...what was the problem with that? I don't get it.
Reply
|
|
 |
|
|
by lucyinthesky Posted Sat October 20, 2007 @ 5:09 PM
|
|
|
I agree with you on all your points. However, let me play devils advocate for Kmart since I am a Training Coordinator of a Corporation and I know first hand about this kind of situation.
When people are hired and trained, they are bombarded/flooded with a vast amount of information about the rules and regulations of the company, employee benefits, not to mention meeting all sorts of people. Once they start their training, often the next day, they are once again bombarded with information-all of which they are told is crucial to remember. In their honest effort to remember everything...they retain very little and it's not their fault. I blame the company and supervisors who do not followup with new employees with a training plan to ensure that they KNOW the things they are supposed to. If not, one badly trained employee mimicks another badly trained one and it goes unchecked until the CEO can't figure out why no one is shopping at their store.
In your case, I'm willing to bet their is a policy at the front desk and no one knows where it is or has never been shown!
Reply
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
I have a question. Is the purpose of these boards to insult everyone? I have been reading several and none of them are very nice. Constructive criticism is one thing, but most of these posts are insulting, condescending, and rude. Some of you people need to take a look at what you are saying to others. It is almost like some enjoy being hateful. I feel sorry for you if that brings you pleasure.
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
Oh goodness
by April Smith Tue October 23, 2007 @ 2:57 PM
|
|
|
|
|

|
Because
by April Smith Wed October 24, 2007 @ 5:28 PM
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
by TwinkleToes Posted Tue October 16, 2007 @ 3:41 PM
|
|
|
While I completely agree that coupons and good deals rule... I'm not sure of how something like this would work. I would think that you have to actually BUY one to get one free meaning you would have to pay for one for every one you get free. If there are stores that do this, perhaps you should keep an eye out for a store that does it.
The real issue here isn't the use of the coupon though. It is the lack of a policy in place at KMart. I find that even when there is a policy in place, it is often misunderstood by the employees and even the managers. They often do what they want anyways and by time it comes to the attention of the corporate office, you missed the sale anyways. The suggestion that they have a policy in place isn't an unreasonable one though.
Reply
|
|

|
Oh wow
by April Smith Tue October 23, 2007 @ 3:02 PM
|
|
|
 |
|
|
by JuliePie Posted Tue October 16, 2007 @ 8:56 AM
|
|
|
Will you coupon scammers stop trying to pull this business!!! So help me when the day comes where coupons are done away with because people can't use common sense and follow the rules. You are going to ruin it for the rest of us!!
I have never had a problem with a coupon in my life!! I wonder why that is?
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
Oh good god
by April Smith Tue October 23, 2007 @ 3:04 PM
|
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
I'm sorry i f i tried to say you were getting freebies. What you were attempting do was really resourceful on your part. Kmart should have a iron clsd policy for all the stores, not letting managers make them up as they go along.
Reply
|
|
|
|
 |
|

|
by ~Fiƒi-la-ƒlea~ Posted Sat October 13, 2007 @ 5:54 PM
|
|
|
According to the coupon website you are in, I read that the coupon is working for the 2000 (calorie?) mascara only and a woman in there had taken all the different makeup to the register to scan to find out which one it worked with.
Reply
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I think that you are getting me mixed up with the OP. I never asked for anyone's approval. I thought that this forum might be good to debate this issue in a civilized manner. It seems that there is no reasonable debate - no middle ground. If you disagree with someone, you come out in attack mode.
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
by Cubjunkie Posted Sat October 13, 2007 @ 10:15 AM
|
|
|
A scam artist tries crying to Planet Feedback.
Anyone with an IQ above 3 would know that you can't get stuff for free which you were trying to do with your scam.
Reply
|
|
|
|

|

|
Sometimes
by ~Fiƒi-la-ƒlea~ Sun October 14, 2007 @ 8:59 AM
|
|
|
|
|

|

|
Many stores
by ~Fiƒi-la-ƒlea~ Sun October 14, 2007 @ 8:23 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|

|
by Elaine Williams Posted Fri October 12, 2007 @ 3:35 PM
|
|
|
I work at a different store and our system requires that you actually pay for an item to get the buy one get one free, or if a coupon is for so much off the purchase of 2 items and we have a buy one get one free offer on it, then you won't be able to use the coupon. "Purchase" means "paid for", so if you are taking advantage of the BOGO sale we are having on the item, you can't count the free items you are getting from that as "Purchased" items. Therefore you cannot use a BOGO coupon to get all of your items free, because you didn't buy enough items to use it. If a coupon is good for $1.00 off two and you use a BOGO sale, you haven't purchased two.
I see this all the time at our Service desk too. We quite often have a sale where you buy one pair of shoes, get the second pair for $1.00. People will buy two pairs of shoes, then try to return one and expect to get the full price back. No, you only paid $1 for the second pair of shoes, you are not going to get back the full price and keep the other pair for $1....when you return one that negates the sale deal so you only get back $1....sorry.
Stop trying to get something for nothing...K-Mart was perfectly within their rights to refuse your BOGO coupons in this instance as you had not fulfilled the purchase requirements as stated on the coupon. Your only legitimate beef is with the confusion on policy at the call center.
Reply
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|

|
by ~Fiƒi-la-ƒlea~ Posted Fri October 12, 2007 @ 1:24 PM
|
|
|
A friend just emailed this to me.
http://www.hotcouponworld.com/forums/kmart/55966-free-max-factor-makeu p-oct-7th-13th.html
Reply
|
|

|

|
Charming.
by Evil Genius Erik Fri October 12, 2007 @ 4:11 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
I coupon...
by TwinkleToes Mon October 15, 2007 @ 9:15 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
What is BOGO, anyway?
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
by gina a Posted Thu October 11, 2007 @ 8:33 PM
|
|
|
How many items were you trying to purchase, anyway?
In order to use the buy one get one free coupon, you'd have to get at least 3 items, not 2.
Item #1: You pay full price for this
Item #2: Free, due to the store's BOGO sale
Item #3: Free, since you already paid full price for item #1.
I work at Kmart and we certainly do take BOGO coupons, but I could see the register not accepting the coupon when it's used in conjunction with a BOGO sale. About the only real corporate rules about coupons that I know of are that they cannot be expired (duh) and they cannot be printed off the Internet. Managers (assistant and store managers, not service desk supervisors) do have the power to bend the rules some in order to satisfy the customer.
I think you should have politely requested to speak to the manager on duty about the conundrum - you may have gotten more results that way.
Reply
|
|

|
Wow
by Sapna Fri October 12, 2007 @ 12:09 AM
|
|
|
|
|

|
My problem
by Sapna Fri October 12, 2007 @ 11:35 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
All over a coupon, maybe if you cried in front of the CSM, or cashier they would feel bad for you had give you what you wanted.
Reply
|
|
|
|

|
This
by Deanna H Wed October 10, 2007 @ 7:33 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
actually..
by Angelic Princess:) Thu October 11, 2007 @ 3:10 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
omG
by Angelic Princess:) Thu October 11, 2007 @ 3:09 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|

|
Hey
by burkhagirl Fri October 12, 2007 @ 10:40 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
so now..
by Angelic Princess:) Thu October 11, 2007 @ 4:08 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|

|
by donno Posted Wed October 10, 2007 @ 10:05 AM
|
|
|
Common sense says buy one and get one free. A 50% discount overall. Buy one means there is s transfer of money from the purchaser to the establishment.
I have no sympathy for people who spend their lives trying to twist policies into a pretzel shape to suit their own needs. We earn money to spend money. It is great when we can get a discount on something. Who doesn't want that? But can't a person be happy getting something cheaper rather than taking it for free?
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|
|
by Richard S. Posted Wed October 10, 2007 @ 9:29 AM
|
|
|
Elizabeth : FINALY: I was not interested in the opinion from individuals on wether or not you thought the idea of the coupon with the sale was inline with your morals. I wanted to get acrossed that customer
service was not consistant and sevearly lacking on all employees ends. Each employee had a seperate answer based on opinion and not corporate policy. I mean how hard should it be to get a yes or no answer out of a manager.
If this was your goal, then you could have left out all the detail about what the coupon was for. You could have stated you went to one Kamrt and they told me "X" and when I used those exact coupons at another Kmart, then told me "Y". You chose to state what the coupon was for and how you thought it should be applied, you also stated how the cashier thought it should be and what is done at another Kmart.
I feel you wanted the items for free and now you are complaining to Kamrt because you did not get your way.
Reply
|
|
 |
|
|
by p d Posted Wed October 10, 2007 @ 12:36 AM
|
|
|
You cried? I can think of more serious things to cry about.
Reply
|
|
 |
|

|
by Firebrat Tracy Posted Tue October 9, 2007 @ 11:14 PM
|
|
|
Frustrating? Perhaps...
"Reduced to tears" worthy? I'd certainly hope not.
Seriously...pick your battles. If you could get the items at a different k-mart, why not just go to that one?
If I were in the situation, I'd get annoyed and find a reason to go to the k-mart that allowed me to use the coupons. I simply don't have the time to make all those phone calls, trying to ferret out information on, what? a 4 dollar issue?
Time is money - move on and use it at the store that allows you to do so with no grief.
Reply
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|

|
by SiouxFan Posted Tue October 9, 2007 @ 10:41 PM
|
|
|
The way I see it is that these coupons aren't being used correctly.
When you buy one and get one free, you have to BUY one. Seems simple, but you can't retroactively use another BOGO on a pair that has been rung up.
Yes, it shows on the receipt that you purchased 2, but that's really only for inventory and returns. You only 'bought' one, but you got 2.
It's the same kind of thing with discounts. Let's say, you have 2 10% off entire transaction coupons. Let's say this example transaction is $100. The first coupon takes 10% off the $100 to give you a $10 discount and bringing your total to $90. The second 10% discount takes $9 (10% of $90, it doesn't go back to the original $100 total) and brings the total to $81. In the grand scheme of things, the 2 10% off discounts really only add up to 19% off. So even if you had 10 10% off discounts, it wouldn't be free, the total would actually just get closer and closer to zero, but never reaching it. (Last sentence is really math-y, my apologies)
So while it's not exactly the same, it still has to do with coupons/discounts affecting the transaction so that you can't "go back" to doubly apply the 'buy one, get one' promotion.
If it has worked for you before, great, the business found a way to accept the coupons the way they see fit. But, in my opinion, there is more reasoning not to combine offers such as this, and it is ultimately up to the business to interpret coupons the way they want. If you don't like it, you can choose to do your business elsewhere.
Reply
|
|
 |
|

|
by SumnerMan Posted Tue October 9, 2007 @ 10:14 PM
|
|
|
I now work with a Loss Prevention manager at Walgreens who used to work for Loss Prevention at K-Mart. K-Mart closed down in the San Antonio area but he was hired on by Walgreens. K-Mart has a somewhat stricter policy about coupon usage than does Walgreens (we're sort of liberal) so I had to get him up to speed on the subject.
I'm not that familiar with K-Mart but this is what he told me. According to him K-Mart did not allow a manufacturer's coupon usage (of any type) on top of a store coupon or a sale. Being that he oversaw about a dozen stores I'm pretty certain that this policy was not done on a store by store basis but was corporate policy.
Reply
|
|

|

|
in addition
by SumnerMan Tue October 9, 2007 @ 10:29 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
by Dru Posted Tue October 9, 2007 @ 9:06 PM
|
|
|
My job used to be the processing of coupons and the training of coupon usage to cashiers. Manufacturers will not reimuburse the store if the coupon is not handled correctly. Primarily, no store has to take coupons, for any reason whatsoever. Secondly, coupons carry no value, or severely diminished value, such as 1/100th of one cent, or some variation. Thirdly, no more than one like coupon per register receipt or transaction, also known as purchase. If I filed a reimbursement claim that had more than one lke coupon per receipt, my claim would be denied, and my store would lose the coupon amount(s), plus the handling fee(s). Fourth, coupons are not to be combined with any other offer, whether stated or not, such examples are the BOGO offers, in store % off promotions, in store coupon offers, just to name a few. This means you can have the coupon, or the offer, but not both.
The problem is not the coupons, but certain stores that have decided to take a loss just to shut up whiney 'costomers'. Customers that cost them money, should be called 'costomers'. When these certain stores process coupons incorrectly, 'costomers' expect other stores to do the same, then get mad when the proper procedures are actually followed.
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
yea..
by Angelic Princess:) Fri October 12, 2007 @ 12:16 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
|
|
by Brian D. Posted Tue October 9, 2007 @ 6:44 PM
|
|
|
If K-Mart has a sale for a buy one get one free and you have coupons for the same how can you expect to get them all for free???
ie: if you select 8 items, you pay for 4 and get 4 free.
There is no way you(or anyone else) are entitled to get all of them free
Reply
|
|

|
Excuse me
by Sapna Tue October 9, 2007 @ 8:10 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|

|
Oh ok n/t
by ~Fiƒi-la-ƒlea~ Wed October 10, 2007 @ 3:57 PM
|
|
|
 |
|
|
by SmartShopper8999 Posted Tue October 9, 2007 @ 6:17 PM
|
|
|
Wow there are some serious morons on this site!
She did nothing wrong she is just an experienced shopper who knows the laws and rules of couponing. AND her problem isnt even the fact they didnt honor the coupon its the fact they have ZERO customer service and no one policy in order. If this sale was anywhere but Kmart she wouldnt have this problem.
SHE is not the problem it is pinheads like those of you who responded with such idiotic replies that are the problem. It is people like you working at Kmart and giving this and other consumers grief out of your own ignorance. Educate yourself then speak.
She IS buying 2 products kmart has chose topay for one of those products at their b1g1 sale so someone needs to pay for the other product - the manufacturer in this case max factor is paying for that product. COUPONs are basically just like money because the store gets reimbursed that amount PLUS a handling fee.
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|

|

|
Grow up
by ColoradoCOP Tue October 9, 2007 @ 8:39 PM
|
|
|

|
whoa
by Nicole F Tue October 9, 2007 @ 9:52 PM
|
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
you should have only been allowed one free item in the first place
you would need to go in and out the store 4 times to use 4 coupons. And if kmart had the same sale, then you can use the coupons another time. or go to a walgreens or whatever and use them
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
by elizabeth murphy Posted Tue October 9, 2007 @ 3:05 PM
|
|
|
1st: The ad does not state "not vaid in conjunction with any other offer"
2nd: The coupon states: "CONSUMER: Redeedm ONLY by purchasing the brand size(s) indicated. May not be reproduced. Void if transfered to any person, firm, or group prior to store redemption. You may pay any sales tax. Any other use constitutes fraud. LIMIT ONE COUPON PER PURCHASE.
3rd: The cshier scanned 8 items, charging me for 4. And not one coupon would scan.
4th: Kmart will be getting reimbursed + $.08 handeling for the item. I as the consumer would be benifiting from the offer given by the manufacture and the offer given by the retailer.
Kmart would recieve the cost of the item they intended to sell. = No loss for the retailer.
Max Factor would be still honoring the same offer they had on the coupon. So they would not be loosing any more money then they intended to in the first place. Manufactures put out free item coupons all the time. The thinking behind this is that you would like the product and become brand loyal.
So everyone would get or offer what they had origionaly promised. ANd the consumer would benifit from it.
FINALY: I was not interested in the opinion from individuals on wether or not you thought the idea of the coupon with the sale was inline with your morals. I wanted to get acrossed that customer service was not consistant and sevearly lacking on all employees ends. Each employee had a seperate answer based on opinion and not corporate policy. I mean how hard should it be to get a yes or no answer out of a manager.
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|

|
by Blackrack Posted Tue October 9, 2007 @ 2:43 PM
|
|
|
Many coupons have a clause on them stating that they cannot be combined with other offers. Even both in effect, you should not get one free because you're not buying one...
If an issue like this reduces you to tears, god forbid you ever have any real problems.
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|

|

|
Way to go!
by - Leanne- Tue October 9, 2007 @ 2:52 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
by Nicole F Posted Tue October 9, 2007 @ 2:29 PM
|
|
|
At Sears, coupons cannot be combined with other coupons or special offers. I'm pretty sure it's the same way at K-mart since both chains are owned by the same company.
Anyhow...the coupons say "BUY one, get one free." IMO, you have to buy one in order to get one free. That's just what I think. I say, save the coupon for a later date when K-mart's sale isn't going on and you can still reap the benefits of getting one free.
I think this is also standard retail practice because I can't tell you the number of times I've heard on commmericals "offers cannot be combined" or read in ads that you can't combine such and such with other special offer.
Well, good luck.
Reply
|
|
 |
|
|
|
Waitasecond. Kmart had a sale that said buy one get one free, And you also have a coupon that says buy one get one free. So, I'm still having trouble understanding how they ALL would be free, since by this logic, you arent technically buying anything.
My experience with coupons and special offers, not just as a customer but as an ex-retail employee is that offers cannot be combined. And this is from basically every store I worked for.
"After my 3rd call I was reduced to tears out of sheer frustration on the subject." Call me callous if you want, but I dont have sympathy for you, if you allowed it to get to this point, over couple of dollars. If you are going to let a denial of a coupon reduce you to TEARS then you have other issues that Kmart cannot help you with.
Reply
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
HmMmMm maybe KMart views it as double dipping.
Many times I have encountered built in savings when shopping, then to add a coupon to the same sale product becomes a no go...use one or the other. Ads/coupons in the paper alert the public of sales/offers available if they shop during a certain time frame...while other times shoppers encounter deals while browsing and enjoy savings on the fly.
Perhaps the cashier's machine gave you the built in savings matching the announcement in the paper regardless of you having a coupon or not which rendered the coupon useless.
You have to buy one to get one free, that you did. To get both items free wasnt the goal of this particular deal in store or by the manufacturer.
Just trying to offer why it was a possible no go.
Reply
|
|
 |
|
|

|
I disagree
by Richard S. Tue October 9, 2007 @ 2:10 PM
|
|
|
|
|

|
Hmm
by Sapna Fri October 12, 2007 @ 11:31 AM
|
|
|

|

|
Our
by ~Fiƒi-la-ƒlea~ Fri October 12, 2007 @ 1:35 PM
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
You thought you could combine the two offers and get everything for free? Who thinks that way?
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|

|
Ok
by - Leanne- Tue October 9, 2007 @ 2:36 PM
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
who are you..
by Angelic Princess:) Tue October 9, 2007 @ 11:54 PM
|
|
|

|
I'm Sapna
by Sapna Fri October 12, 2007 @ 12:26 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
by Banrion Posted Tue October 9, 2007 @ 10:30 AM
|
|
|
Regardless of the coupon policy, you were not following the coupon. Both the coupon and the ad specifically state BUY one get one free. In other words you have to spend at least the price of the product to get one for free.
Oftentimes coupons and ads such as these will also state something to the effect of "cannot be combined with other coupons or offers" which also invalidates your attempt at getting something for nothing.
Reply
|
|

|
reply
by elizabeth murphy Tue October 9, 2007 @ 10:39 AM
|
|
|
|
|

|
but
by Angelic Princess:) Wed October 10, 2007 @ 2:14 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|