|
|
Kids meal overcharge -- IHOP-4492
Posted Wed October 31, 2007 4:20 pm, by jerry c. written to IHOP
Write a Letter to this Company
My wife and I went to IHOP for a cup of coffee and after looking at the menu decided we weren't very hungry; however, we both ordered a smaller portion of food from the kid's section. When we received our check, I noitced a $1 per person charge for "add $1 Kids" was on the check. Our server did not notify us of an upcharge, nor was there anything on the menu. When I asked the cashier she said it was the local manager's policy.
Refund my $2.
Reply
| Log In/Create an account | 33 comments |
|
|
| PlanetFeedback Comments are subject to strict terms and conditions. We reserve the right to deny site membership privileges to any individuals acting inappropriately. |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
by lovescats Posted Mon November 5, 2007 @ 12:20 AM
|
|
|
It should be posted on the menu if there are any restrictions or price difference. It's the same with Senior menus in some places. You get less food at a lower price but people under a certain age are not allowed to order off that menu.
Reply
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
|
by belle Posted Fri November 2, 2007 @ 10:35 PM
|
|
|
Kids meals are usually priced with little to no profit made, so parents can afford to eat out with children.
Our menu says for children under 10, drink included.
If an adult orders a kid meal - they are charged for their drink.
Simple, easy, no "hidden" charges
Reply
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
I think they should have notified you of the charge or charged you what was listed. The age requirement is really not enforcable. If you ordered it for a 14 year old, what would they do, check her ID? ...or say you had a 6 year old with you, but the 6 year old ate a "regular" meal and you ate a "child's" meal? Then what?
I order off the kid's menu, in some cases, too. In my case, it's usually because it's something meatless that they don't have on the "adult's" menu. I don't care about service charges, but I do think it's pretty stupid to have a menu restricted to any particular age group. Some places actually have a "senior" menu, too.
If you can make it for a child or a senior, you can make it for me. Stupid rules are rules that need to be changed.
Reply
|
|

|

|
Then again
by Adam D Sat November 3, 2007 @ 1:16 PM
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
by MartiniDreams Posted Fri November 2, 2007 @ 4:10 PM
|
|
|
Unless it states on the menu that there is an upcharge for adults, there shouldn't have been one.
For everyone else, there are a variety of reasons adults would need (noticed the word "need" not "want") to order from the childrens menu. Anyone who's had stomach surgery for one. I have a relative who can't eat much more than a child portion.
And since it is a childs portion the cost should be relative to the portion and shouldn't matter the age of the human consuming it.
Reply
|
|
 |
|
|
|
What's the problem with adults ordering off the kid's menu? It's not like there's a limited supply and there are hollow-cheeked children staring at their empty plates at the IHOP.
I order from the kid's menu more often than not. Sometimes there's a fee, sometimes not. I do it because it's an actual reasonable amount of food for an adult. The average restaurant portion sizes are 2-4 times larger than they should be. Some people are actually satisfied with 2 chicken tenders and one serving of fries as opposed to six tenders and three servings of fries. What's the problem? The only issue here is that the waitress should have mentioned the fee since it was not printed on the menu. The OP isn't entitled to any refund, but he doesn't deserve to be belittled for wanting smaller portions.
Reply
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|
|
by Angelic Princess:) Posted Fri November 2, 2007 @ 10:20 AM
|
|
|
::shakes my head::
Reply
|
|
 |
|

|
by Adam D Posted Thu November 1, 2007 @ 3:41 PM
|
|
|
It clearly states ON THE MENU "for ages such to such" and THAT is why you got charged, because your older, and supposedly smarter then someone that orders of a kids menu.
Reply
|
|

|
Wow
by ehartsay Mon November 5, 2007 @ 9:11 AM
|
|
|
 |
|

|
by Tom S. Posted Thu November 1, 2007 @ 3:24 PM
|
|
|
Regardless of how people may feel about adults ordering off the children's menu, the restuarant allowed these patrons to do so. The restaurant easily could have refused the order. If there was an extra, unlisted chanrge for an adult to order a child's entre, then the waitress should have stated so at the time it was ordered.
This OP questioned the charge at the time he paid, but was told it was the store manager's own policy. Sure, it may have been a better idea to have asked to speak with the manager, but does anyone REALLY think the manager was going to violate his/her own policy?
I think the guy is entitled to his $2 back.
Reply
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|

|
by Jeffrey Posted Thu November 1, 2007 @ 1:49 PM
|
|
|
The IHOP menu is posted at their web site (http://www.ihop.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=31&Item id=2).
It clearly says "Just for Kids" and "12 and Under."
What part of these two phrases don't you understand?
The waitress should have told you that the kid's menu was not for grown-ups, yes.
Consider the $2 a tiny fee for you not having to actually read and comprehend the words "Just for Kids" and "12 and Under."
Reply
|
|
|
|
by pam none Posted Fri November 2, 2007 @ 11:58 PM
|
|
|
The whole thing apparently.
Reply
|
|
 |
|
by freeby4me Posted Thu November 1, 2007 @ 10:26 AM
|
|
|
You were trying to be cheap by ordering off the kids menu instead of buying a regularly priced meal. You got caught, deal with it.
Reply
|
|

|
*shrugs*
by ehartsay Mon November 5, 2007 @ 9:13 AM
|
|
|
 |
|

|
by "Clete" Posted Thu November 1, 2007 @ 9:50 AM
|
|
|
It begins with a simple letter to Target asking a question about the Salvation Army, a letter which generated 122 responses, mostly negative. Had I known what I know now, I would have just written a letter and dropped it in the mail.
This site provides a good service and an easy way to contact companies, but it has probably migrated into a statistic gathering device instead of the "voice it was intended to be.
I admit I got wrapped up in the game as well; I couldn't wait to "hammer" a letter writer or comment on a post. My level of one-upmanship grew to an embarrassing level.
I started writing letters with good content, but crafted them in such a way that they were sure to cause controversy, and it worked for a while. Not only was it fun, but it was a bit therapeutic.
Suddenly, I am banished and no one wants to post to my letters, this only gives me cause to post to other letters, and I post some doozies.
I have been referred to as a slack jaw, a yokel, a bumpkin, an idiot, an a-hole, etc.... Most of this was directed at the name I created, but a lot was probably personal attacks. I am amazed at the level of hatred generated by simple letters.
I have one suggestion. When a OP is creating a letter, he/she should be queried about their interaction with the manager. I can't start to count the number of responses that begin with "did you speak to a manager?"
I find that I am spending way to much time on this site; I am not leaving, but I am no longer going to fill this site with my writings, it just isn't worth it any longer.
I do wish you all well and urge you to examine your personal post over the past month or so and ask yourself "am I being helpful or spiteful?"
For the record, I posted on 57% complaints, 35% compliments, and 8% questions; 23 letters with only 2 responses. One from Dominoes and one from Target; I recommend you patronize these stores.
For all of you that think I am an uneducated hick; I have a college degree, as does my wife, I have made life/death decisions throughout my career, in 2005 & 2006 I made 36 platelet donations to a blood donation center, look up platelet donation on google to see what a huge commitment this was. I honestly feel as though my platelets saved lives. I don't let my kids kill anything they aren't prepared to eat, I believe every living creature has a right to live until it is ready to enter the food chain. Yes, I catch bugs in my house, but I always take them outside and let them go.
I have one more letter to write, then I am going to make cameo appearances, not the daily barrage I am known for.
Clete
Reply
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
I hate when grown people order off the kids menu. It's so tacky. They have side items. Or share a regular meal.
Reply
|
|
 |
|
|
|
I agree the waitress should have said something when you ordered from the kids menu. But there are other ways of eating less food -- my bf and I frequently split meals. One would order an entree, the other would order an appetizer or salad, and we'd split it.
The key is, if you had been told about the $1/person upcharge, would you have gone ahead and ordered off the kids menu? If so, you need to drop your complaint about the $2 and move on to something better.
Reply
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
You and your husband are obviously over the age of 12, the kids menu is only for 12 and under. If you are only going to eat a little, then order one meal and share. I have seen it done many times and there are no problem. Maybe the manager is having trouble with grown adults buying off the kids menu. I could go and ask my manager of the IHOP around here and ask if he needs to get the approval of the head office before adding on any extra charge.
Reply
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|

|
by ~Fiƒi-la-ƒlea~ Posted Thu November 1, 2007 @ 7:24 AM
|
|
|
Like others suggested, I would have expressed my disapproval right when I saw the bill. They may have tacked it on as a service fee for making the exception with you not being children and eating off the children't menu which states that it is only for children.
Reply
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
by S. Brown Posted Wed October 31, 2007 @ 7:52 PM
|
|
|
How old are you and your wife? The IHOP menu clearly states that the Just for Kids menu items are for "12 and under". You are owed nothing.
Reply
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|

|
by "Clete" Posted Wed October 31, 2007 @ 7:44 PM
|
|
|
Just do what I do when I get overcharged at a restaurant, take it out of the server's tip. You end up with a correct amount and the server learns to serve better.
Clete
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|