 |
|

|
by PepperElf Posted Sat February 2, 2008 @ 7:11 AM
|
|
|
I'm kinda wondering what you want them to do then?
She made her choice and the network simply said they're going to respect it.
Did you perhaps want them to FORCE her?
If you want to blame anyone, blame HER and her boyfriend. Just because they're minors does not mean they don't know how babies are created. They officially teach it in grade school, unless your parents/guardians request you not learn it.
Really... there's not much the network can do, other than keep filming or not keep filming.
But if you're that upset... just turn the TV off. Or use it as an example for your own kids on "This is what happens when you mess around." Then teach them abstinance or (if that offends you) teach them safe sex.
Personally... I just think you're too worried about the TV set. In my own opinion people forget they have a CHOICE on whether or not the TV tells their families what to do and think. It's called the "Off Button Show."
Reply
|
|
 |
|
|
|
What Nickelodeon meant by respecting her decision to take responsibility for the situation was they respect that she chose to not only jeopardize her career by keeping the baby, but not to get an abortion. You know, the EASY way out of a situation like this. I feel that Nickelodeon is being more responsible by creating awareness around the situation by adding content to their shows that enlightens its viewers about situations like this. I am sorry that you feel this is unacceptable, but this sort of thing happens a lot more than I am sure you are willing to consider. Having a national TV network take the torch in this matter is awesome, and I am happy that they are doing it.
Besides, if you have been out of the loop (which it seems like you are), the average age for children to begin having sex is 12. I don't like it or respect it, but these are the statistics, and you need to be able to educate your children at as young an age possible.
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
nick actually has some morality claus or an 'acceptable behavior" type claus in their contracts if i remember correctly. so actually i can see their lawyers gearing up behind the scenes with this one. if you look at the ratio between disney and nick, most of the child stars on nick end up as well rounded individuals, most of the kids on disney don't.
Reply
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
still II don't think she is as messed up as her sister!
Reply
|
|
 |
|
|

|
I can't
by April Smith Tue January 15, 2008 @ 1:16 PM
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
If Darth Vader is the baby's father, we're all in for a world of hurt.
Reply
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|
|
by Mike Holly Posted Wed January 2, 2008 @ 7:38 AM
|
|
|
I was shocked when I learn Ms. Spears got pregnant but this is not Nick's fault. You should keep a close eye on your teenage daughter and talk to her about sex.
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
by Jugi Posted Tue January 1, 2008 @ 5:42 PM
|
|
|
Your giant paragraph hurts my eyes.
Seriously, whas was Nickelodeon supposed to do, put a chastity belt on her?
Kids should be taught to know the difference between actors and the characters they play.
Reply
|
|
 |
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
|
|
by Melissa Montoya71503@yahoo.com Posted Thu December 27, 2007 @ 10:37 PM
|
|
|
Turn off the TV!!! As parents it is up to you to decide what you feel is appropriate for your child to watch. I can't see how this is in anyway Nicks fault, she is a human 16 year old girl. This is reality not TV.
Reply
|
|
 |
|
|
by Janet Armentani Posted Thu December 27, 2007 @ 10:04 PM
|
|
|
Not surprised, given how well the older one was brough up. Where is Dad in all of this anyway? No wonder people in other countries think we're all screwed up- just look at what they see in the news!
Reply
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|
|
by Final Score: Boys-3, Girls-1 Posted Thu December 27, 2007 @ 9:22 AM
|
|
|
Well, sounds like they're writing her off the show, or ending the show altogether.
I was watching "iCarly" with my kids, and during the commercial break they advertised an episode of "Zoey 101" called "Goodbye Zoey", where she is apparently transfering to a British boarding school.
On a side note, I hope Miranda Cosgrove never gets pregnant. My kids love her shows ("Drake and Josh" and "iCarly"), and I like her too. Maybe you could direct your daughter to these shows instead.
Reply
|
|
 |
|
|
by mammoth Posted Wed December 26, 2007 @ 3:35 AM
|
|
|
i am not a parent but a am 16 and i know what goes on in most teenagers heads. we like to think that we a so grown up and know everything. even though alot of the time we have no clue. i am not trying to make excuses for her but being a actress will most likly force you to grow up faster than a normal kid. in that line of work you will be exposed to things that not all teens are exposed to. her boyfriend was 18 and it most likly made her feel good to be with him. plus her older sister is really messed up and her mom was writing a parenting book and when the news about her daughter being pragnet came out she changed it into a memoir of her life and how she raised her children if thats not disfunctional then i dont know what is
Reply
|
|
 |
|
|
by Angelic Princess:) Posted Mon December 24, 2007 @ 9:58 AM
|
|
|
I know I'm not helping this go away by replying.. but can we get this stupid letter OUT of the top 25? Or at LEAST out of the #1???
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|
by lucky esc Posted Mon December 24, 2007 @ 12:46 AM
|
|
|
What would you like them to do? Fire her? Would that be an ethical decision on their part? Women get pregnant, girls get pregnant. It happens everyday. On that note, how is this Nickelodeons fault? This is a simple situation of a young woman and young man making a mistake. Period. While I'm sure you didn't want to have this conversation with your children, you can't control other peoples lives and you can't stop the media. You have every right to be upset, but why blame the network?
Reply
|
|
|
|
 |
|

|
by ♥Venice♥ Posted Sun December 23, 2007 @ 4:26 PM
|
|
|
Something else... I don't think this would be getting half the attention if Jamie Lynn was not the sister of Britney. That's what's making it a hot topic, even more than the issue of teen pregnancy.
Reply
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
|
|
|

|
by Adam D Posted Sun December 23, 2007 @ 11:27 AM
|
|
|
n/t
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
by lovescats Posted Sun December 23, 2007 @ 2:23 AM
|
|
|
Wow, Mrs. B, how does it feel to be so self-righteous? People make mistakes, this for a girl so young is very sad but it is her mistake and not yours. Who are you to judge? What if one of your kids came home pregnant? How would you feel? I bet the first thing you would do would be to blame Nickelodeon and Jamie Lynn. It couldn't be your fault and the fact that you never discussed this with your kids in a rational manner.
Women are not supposed to lose their jobs because of pregnancy and JL shouldn't have to lose hers. Teenage females shouldn't be penalized and lose their jobs because of pregnancy. Young women in soaps and other series keep filming during their pregnancies hiding them if it isn't part of the storyline.
If you don't like her, don't watch her show but don't advocate her losing her job. Women like you put women back decades where women did lose their jobs if they became pregnant.
You had better tell your kids that this is an actress playing a role. Her personal conduct is none of their or your business. Teach your kids compassion and sympathy. That is a lot prettier than the ugly indignation you are showing them.
Reply
|
|
|
|
 |
|

|
by ♥Venice♥ Posted Sat December 22, 2007 @ 5:25 PM
|
|
|
I had no intention of commenting on this letter, and I apologize for not having read all of the responses, but the first thing that came to mind when I heard the news about Ms. Spears was that maybe it was her choice to be pregnant. It's not uncommon for teens to intentionally become pregnant and for reasons that make perfect sense to them.
I have never seen Zoey 101, but I asked my 16 year old son if he was familiar with the show. He said he doesn't watch it but knows who Jamie Lynn Spears is. So I'm one of the parents who did take the opportunity to have a discussion about teen pregnancy. I was relieved and surprised to find out that he had already been thinking about it and actually agreed with my advice. It's no insurance policy, but it's certainly a step in the right direction.
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
"that you are not at all concerned about your young viewers and how they are going to mentally process this situation of a young TV star getting herself pregnant."
And how, I wonder, did she manage to do that? Is it another immaculate conception? Should I get the frankincense and mryhh ready? I'm not sure if you got the memo on this Mrs. B, but it usually takes two to make a baby. (I should know; I just had a baby myself.)
"If Ms. Spears was responsible in the first place, then she would not be in this "very difficult time"."
And again, why is it just **her** responsibility? She had a partner, no? Where's the focus on him? Oh, that's right. Boys will boys...
(It just bugs me when people make statements that put the sole blame of pregnancy on the female while letting the male off the hook.)
Rant over.
To be honest, I do sort of agree with you. Though I've never seen this show, and up until a few hours ago wasn't aware of who JLS was (thanks Venice, for clueing me in), I can see where you are coming from. However, it is your responsibility as a parent to instill the values you want them to have. You have made it clear, both in your letter and in your responses, that you wish not to have this conversation with your children and that you no longer consider this show viable family entertainment. That's your decision as a parent, and though I wouldn't go the same route, I respect your decision.
But there **are** parents aren't there that don't feel as you do. There are parents that would like to use this opportunity as a talking point for their children. They have just as much right to watch the show as you do to turn it off. As others have said, blaming the network is not the answer.
As Adam D said below, you have done your part as a parent. Now you need to let it go.
Reply
|
|
 |
|
|
by Anonymous A Posted Sat December 22, 2007 @ 5:04 AM
|
|
|
Im quite tired of seeing debates over Jamie-Lynn...This comment is directed towards the general cons of this topic,not necessarily to the letter writer: yes teenage pregnancy is quite irresponsible, but you cant expect her employer to intervene and tell every single one of their viewers that she is "bad" and guilty for having a child because she plays on Zoey, last time i checked, she IS human..yes she is young, but giving birth is part of life , and she is not the first 16 year old to be pregnant, im sure there are millions of others. I personally do not think 16 is a horrific age to give birth, its not like shes 13, and when she has the baby she will probably be 17 already, is it such an age to get worked up about? And in a particular state in the US, people are allowed to be married at 16, without consent.. so again, why be so worked up about her age? What people do in their private lives is their own business, its parents' responsibilities to tell their children right and wrong, not the responsibility from what they watch on tv...what's done is done, shes going to have a baby and there is nothing anyone can do about it, so give it up already and get back to your lives, people are criticizing her just because she is related to her controversial sister, people really need lives.
Reply
|
|
 |
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|
|
by tess4572 Posted Sat December 22, 2007 @ 12:23 AM
|
|
|
what i can't believe is that this child was not on birth control
Reply
|
|
|
|
 |
|

|
by donno Posted Fri December 21, 2007 @ 12:21 PM
|
|
|
When males and females get "together", pregnancy and babies result. Another newsflash - young people don't always make the best choices.
Having children is a private thing, and I don't see why it needs to be intertwined with what a person does in their public life.
I initially got a bit miffed when I found out what Bill was doing in the oval office. Then I figured out it didn't impact on his job, and I decided it was none of my business.
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|

|
Very True
by Adam D Sat December 22, 2007 @ 12:56 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|
|
by The little Pie is almost done cooking! Posted Fri December 21, 2007 @ 8:42 AM
|
|
|
Jaime Lynn Spears got pregnant, and I'm pretty sure the folks at Nickelodeon aren't too happy about it either. But it's not their fault that she got pregnant, and there's not much they can do about it. It's not like they wrote a storyline where the show's character got pregnant.
As a parent, you are doing the right thing by directing your child away from this show and teaching her about how teenage pregnancy can change a girl's life. You can teach her that Jaime Lynn's acting career could be ended by this, etc, etc.
Nickelodeon, is doing all they can do. They don't own her, nor are they her parent. All they can do is give her leave from the show so that she can do the right thing and try to be a parent to this child. They might even have to take her back, if there is a contract involved.
Reply
|
|
 |
|
|
by Ms. Me Posted Fri December 21, 2007 @ 8:37 AM
|
|
|
They should never air High School Musical again because of Vanessa Hudgens' leaked nude pics. And they should stop giving publicity to the Cheetah Girls because of the one who was on Dancing with the Stars; her dancing was quite suggestive. And don't even get me started on Hannah Montana. I saw her wearing a tight-fitting dress that exposed some of her cleavage. Unacceptable.
Really, aren't there other issues in the world more deserving of people's outrage?
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|

|
by Gino Posted Fri December 21, 2007 @ 1:05 AM
|
|
|
I sincerely hope you're over your shock, but the world is a different place for kids today. It's not Nick TV's fault this minor child is, shall we say, "knocked up" by her "long time boyfriend".(Define "long time" to a fifteen year old)
Where is the consternation and judgement in regards to him? Her egg didn't fertilize itself. By supporting her, they are in no way condoneing other children doing the same thing, they're simply showing compassion and concern for someone.
As far as being "vigilant" with what a child is exposed to on television, there's no way to block everything out. Even commercials for medicines mention "erections" and "strong gambling and sexual urges" as potential side effects. How does one explain those terms to their minor children? Even with the parental vchip in place, these words still get broadcast.
As far as condom commercials and Planned Parenthood commercials, if respectfully and responsibly done, I'd rather have kids learn the truth from their parents, and these real life examples are an excellent springboard for opening a meaningful, age appropriate dialogue.
Reply
|
|

|
Great point
by Srgntpeppr Fri December 21, 2007 @ 9:07 AM
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|
by Adam W Posted Thu December 20, 2007 @ 11:25 PM
|
|
|
I thought it was nice that network is supporting her. She needs support now more than ever.
I also understand that she is setting a very bad example for children. One part of me wants Nick to remove Zoey 101 and all things Spears related from their channel. However, I also understand that the show is popular among children and why should they be denied one of their favorite shows.
I'm a mixed bag on this one.
The only thing I do know is that Lynne Spears should be ashamed of herself. She has raised not one but two daughters who have become the laughing stock of the country. She should hold her head in shame when she walks down the street.
Reply
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
it takes 2 people to become pregnant. Don't you DARE lay this on the feet of a 16 yr old girl alone!
and to lay blame on a TV show for the actions of 2 kids... is shameful! How man MILLION teenagers become pregnant each year?
You should APPLAUD her for not aborting silently, as most do in her situation..
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|
by Nikki37 Posted Thu December 20, 2007 @ 7:40 PM
|
|
|
Chill out... Zoey 101 is done filming... it isn't Nick's fault that she doesn't have a strong moral family base. I can see your point, but the bottom line is if a parent is doing his/her job, actions of actors will have minimal if any effect.
Reply
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
|

|
by Wolf Posted Thu December 20, 2007 @ 2:01 PM
|
|
|
I think a lot of the problems now a days is that there are no "real" Heroes/role models anymore. Kids now can't look up to Celebrities, too much drugs/drinking and general bad attitudes. The Rap stars are the LAST people I would let my son imitate. Most singers are just as bad too. Notice, I said MOST. I happen to listen to Country, so there is a bit more "Good" people there. And don't even get me started on "athletes".
When I was little, I worshiped "The Fonz". He was so cool, I named my teddy bear "Fonzi". As I got older, I wanted to play baseball like Nolan Ryan. I wanted to entertain people like NKOTB. In high school, I wanted to solve cases with Fox Mulder BUT, I knew they were "untouchable". Meaning, they were in the spot light and there are problems with that.
They weren't my Heroes/role models. My Heroes/role models growing up (and still are) were Cops, Firefighters, Marines, and the kind, old man that lived across the street. All growing up, I wanted to be a Marine. Unfortunally, a shoulder Defect kept me from joining up. If I could, I would have joined 10 years ago, right out of high school.
Kids need to be taught to look up to "real" people. Not actors, not Athletes, not singers. Not charters on TV. I like 'Fox Mulder", but every interview I have seen of David Duchovny, he strikes me as a jerk. Now, he might not be. I don't know him. But he is not like Mulder.
Your daughter is 10. Take this time to teach her the difference between a Charter on TV and the real person. You never know, in doing that, YOU might become her Hero/role model!
Reply
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|

|
by StoicGrrl Posted Thu December 20, 2007 @ 11:40 AM
|
|
|
What would you have them do? Make a statement that this poor girl is a dirty whore? That they have absolutely no interest in her well-being and hope she dies? Help to totally destroy her life, right as it's become extremely difficult? And all for what? So you don't have to explain to your children that sometimes there are consequences to making a bad decision? How about this. How about Jamie Lynn Spears and her family take responsibility for her, Nickelodeon takes responsibility for it's employees, and you take responsibility for your kids.
It seems to me that if Jamie Lynn Spears had had more access to condoms and Planned Parenthood, your letter would never have needed to be written. If you are teaching your children abstinence, that is your business, and I sincerely hope that your children are able to maintain the values you instill in them in spite of what they see happening on TV, in society, and among their peers. That is kind of the point of parenting, isn't it? Eventually they're going to be outside of your direct influence, faced with a real world decision about sexuality, and if you think they'll be swayed by what they see some celebrity doing on TV you have more to worry about than what Jamie Lynn's doing.
Reply
|
|
|
|

|

|
Mrs Tyler
by Adam D Thu December 20, 2007 @ 12:18 PM
|
|
|

|
zoey 101
by mrs Tyler Thu December 20, 2007 @ 12:36 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|

|
Ok, and
by Adam D Thu December 20, 2007 @ 3:40 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
LISTEN...
by Angelic Princess:) Thu December 20, 2007 @ 10:28 PM
|
|
|
 |
|
|
by Alexandra Posted Thu December 20, 2007 @ 10:36 AM
|
|
|
Now's a good time to teach your children about abstinence.
And it's also time they learned that just about anything coming out of Hollywood is trash.
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|

|
by mary jo Posted Thu December 20, 2007 @ 9:58 AM
|
|
|
I dont think I have ever said this to someone here but honey, YOU ARE NUTS!!!
No tv station or show is responsible for the sex lives of their actors.
You make it sound like they tied her down and impregnanted her on purpose and are now flaunting it for everyone. It seems like the only thing that will make you happy is if they drag her through town and stone her!
Frankly, her sex life is none of your business. She didnt do it on tv, your child didnt witness it, she is 12 weeks along and she isnt waddling around as a teenager on her show.
You know, it would have been very simple to just explain to your child that people make mistakes. However, I loath to lable any child as a mistake. But what you tell your child IS your responsibility. Not what anyone else's child does. Regardless of if that child is in the public eye or not. Thank GOD my son rarely watches tv and when he does he doesnt look to anyone on it as a role model!
So, the girl is pregnant. Nothing YOU can do about, nothing the network can do about, nothing even her own mother can do about it now. I think her taking responsibility for her actions is being mature. Again, its not your business.
LOL! You seriously make it sound like this was part of their plan and they turned it into a show. "Zoey gets pregnant by her 19 year old boyfriend!"
You need to take responsibility for your own children and maybe not depend on cable television to give them morals.
I think the statement put out by the network is very nice. What CAN they say?! They are the ones with the most to loose here.
You cant say she wasnt responsible. Maybe she WAS being responsbile. Gazillion children are born to responsible parents all the time!
WOW! There is just so much here that is wrong and just crazy. I cant comment on it all. It makes my head hurt. LOL!
Basically, turn the tv off.
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|

|
Hmmmm
by mary jo Thu December 20, 2007 @ 1:14 PM
|
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
Nickelodeon is in no way responsible for the actions of Ms. Spears.
It is also with great taste they chose not to denounce her. It is not their place to judge. Nickelodeon is her employer, not her mother.
If you don't like it, change the channel.
Reply
|
|
 |
|
by Peregrina Posted Wed December 19, 2007 @ 11:11 PM
|
|
|
While I personally think it's a travesty that a 16 year old is having a baby, in the end it's really none of your business, despite what the tabloids, news and gossip rags tell you. If you don't like the show, turn off the TV. If you don't like the example being set by 'celebrities' like Spears and others, find your daughter other (better) role models. They are out there, you just have to work a bit harder to find them and bring them to the attention of your child. You are the parent, not Nick.
PS - Am I the only one who would have no problems for commercials about condoms and PP? I've seen commercials for Viagra and other erectile dysfunction medis, but never any about birth control, safe sex or options other than marriage and/or kids.
Reply
|
|
|
|

|

|
I've seen
by PaintedLady Wed December 19, 2007 @ 11:45 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|

|
HA HA!!!
by HeatherRae Thu December 20, 2007 @ 2:36 AM
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|
|
by Mike Holly Posted Wed December 19, 2007 @ 8:48 PM
|
|
|
I agree. JLS's boyfriend should have his ugly *ss put in jail and prosecuted for statutory rape for getting her pregnant since she's only 16. However, Nickeledeon has no control over JLS's personal life. Her parents do. They are spoiling her just like they corrupted her big sister.
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|

|
by Jeffrey Posted Wed December 19, 2007 @ 7:41 PM
|
|
|
Your child, at 10, is allowed to watch news programs?
Seems to me like she shouldn't be. If my kids are around, I don't turn on the news. What with the war, kidnapping, murder, and teen pregnancy...
Point is, Nick isn't corrupting your kid. It's whoever is allowing her to watch programs where they tell her about these nasty things.
By the way... I suspect that this letter may have been written a bit in jest. It's written by someone that registered, as their real name, as "Mrs. B."
Reply
|
|
|
|

|

|
I think...
by PaintedLady Wed December 19, 2007 @ 11:47 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
Condoms? Planned Parenthood? You do realize those two things PREVENT teen pregnancy, right? Teaching abstinence DOES NOT.
* * *
It is the job of every parent to do everything in their power to keep their minor children from having sex. Jamie Lynn's mother LET THE GIRL'S BOYFRIEND MOVE IN WITH THEM.
I am appalled that any parent allows their child to have sex under their roof.
By the way, if your children's minds can be corrupted by poorly raised and poorly behaved celebrities, then you haven't done your job.
Reply
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|
|

|

|
AMEN! n/t
by PaintedLady Wed December 19, 2007 @ 9:30 PM
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
by SusanB Posted Wed December 19, 2007 @ 6:18 PM
|
|
|
Nickelodeon is Jamie Lynn Spear's employer and their goal is not to corrupt the minds of children - - like it or not, they are in the business of making money.
If you want to rant at someone why not go after her mother, Lynne Spears? Shs is ultimately responsible for teaching this 16 year old girl right from wrong and obviously didn't do a very good job of it and this was her second chance - - Brittney isn't doing a very good job of setting an example for young people either.
So to show your disgust over this situation, you are no longer allowing your 10 year old daughter to watch Zoey 101, huh? You and your children do realize that Ms. Spears is an actress and is only playing a character on the show - - right?
Reply
|
|
 |
|
|
by NICHOLAI Posted Wed December 19, 2007 @ 5:57 PM
|
|
|
Had Jamie Lynn been using protection and having sex and had not gotten pregnant, people would not think she was a slut. But now, since she has gotten pregnant people are going crazy and referring to her as a slut and not letting their children watch her show. News flash!!!!!!!!! TONS of "kids" that are 16 are having sex whether you like it or not. It would be naive to think she wasn't having sex at all and was a virgin. I don't think there are that many 16 year old virgins around anymore, and even if you think your kid is, you might be wrong. They hide it well.
Reply
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|

|
by (i hate more than you) vc Posted Wed December 19, 2007 @ 5:52 PM
|
|
|
Yeah!!!
"We know this is a very difficult time for her and her family, and our primary concern right now is for Jamie Lynn's well being."
And the best thing they can do for her at this time is fire her knocked up ass. That way your children will stay pure and virginal until they day they wed. You tell 'em sister.
No way in hell your daughter ain't wearin' white on her wedding day because some floozy on TV got her freak on. I suggest you have Fonzie raise your kids instead. He may act the tough guy, but deep down he's a pussy cat. And probably the coolest man ever.
AAAAAAAAYYYYYYYYY
Reply
|
|

|

|
Thanks, VC!
by PaintedLady Wed December 19, 2007 @ 8:59 PM
|
|
|

|

|
Don't blame me.
by (i hate more than you) vc Thu December 20, 2007 @ 6:55 AM
|
|
|

|

|
*cheers*
by StoicGrrl Thu December 20, 2007 @ 11:33 AM
|
|
|
 |
|

|
by MA Loper Posted Wed December 19, 2007 @ 4:42 PM
|
|
|
I am gonna go out on a limb here that you are all parents and that is great, but just because you were cautious enough (or lucky enough) to not become pregnant until you wanted to doesn't make the reality any less pointed.
If you want to point the finger of blame, look at Lynn and Jamie Spears and the influence of their eldest daughter. Clearly there is little parental supervision in that family. I mean, she screams it on the front page of a tabloid magazine instead of keeping it as the private, personal issue it is. How much more class-less can it get than that?
But to expect Nickelodeon to pull the plug on the show and put Jamie-Lynn out of a job because she made a mistake and you don't like it is irresposible and short-sighted. How is that going to help anyone? It's not going to take back the fact that this 16 year old girl is pregnant, but it will end her career and her livlihood and NO ONE has the right to demand someone else lose their job because YOU don't share their opinions and beliefs.
And ultimately, just as the responsibility for Jamie-Lynn's actions falls at her parents feet, the responsibility for YOUR kids actions falls at yours. The only true role models your child should ever need is YOU! To rely on or expect anyone else to do that for you is foolish and shortchanges your child!
Again, if you want to be incensed, direct your anger where it belongs, Jamie-Lynn and her boyfriend's lax parents, not at Nickelodeon.
Reply
|
|
 |
|
|
by Angelic Princess:) Posted Wed December 19, 2007 @ 4:39 PM
|
|
|
Ok, I admit I hardly read this letter... but I hope your not trying to say that this is going to encourage your daughter to get pregnant. She PLAYS someone on Tv.... YOUR the parent. NOT her.
Reply
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|

|
by PaintedLady Posted Wed December 19, 2007 @ 4:08 PM
|
|
|
I'm curious as to what you wanted them to do; make a huge media circus out of firing her and announcing to their viewers "That's what happens when you make a mistake around here, missy!"? Say she disgusts them and beg their viewers not to turn out the same? How do you suggest they show concern for "how they are going to mentally process this situation of a young TV star getting herself pregnant"?
That is a parents' job to sit them down and explain that the actor and the charactor are not one and the same and that the actor did things that your family believes are not proper. And great time to explain that actors are normal people too, and that your children shouldn't EVER model themselves after someone just because they're on TV, that true heroes should be looked up to because of how they act in real life.
Reply
|
|

|

|
And
by ~Fiƒi-la-ƒlea~ Wed December 19, 2007 @ 8:16 PM
|
|
|
 |
|
by SusanB Posted Wed December 19, 2007 @ 4:00 PM
|
|
|
Jamie-Lynn Spears plays a fictional character on Zoey 101 and Nickelodeon doesn't have any control over what she does on her own time. They had to make a statement of some sort - - what would you have preferred they said?
I'm not saying that a pregnant 16 year old is OK and I think that the boyfriend should be arrested and prosecuted like anyone else would be for doing the same thing. Depending on where the act took place and their precise age at the time, this guy can possibly be charged with a felony.
Nickelodeon's goal is not "to corrupt the minds of children". Unfortunately they are dealing with a situation that is beyond their control and there's really very little they can do about it.
Reply
|
|
 |
|
|
by Rhet Canter Posted Wed December 19, 2007 @ 3:56 PM
|
|
|
Nicolodean television is not responsible for raising your daughter and the type of messages she receives through the media. YOU ARE! I believe that's what they call "heart to heart" chats about life in general. And Nicolodean is not responsible for what Ms. Spears does in her personal time. And look who she's influenced by. Her sister. Like that's something to proud of. So I guess she's emulating and her Mother did a crappy job of talking to her, just like you're starting to do with you.
Why don't you wake up and take responsibility for your family and not blame the outside world for your issues. All your issues are yours. No one elses.
Got it Mrs. B???????????
Peace!
Reply
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|

|
by Blackrack Posted Wed December 19, 2007 @ 3:50 PM
|
|
|
You do realize that the people you see on TV are actual people and not the characters they play, don't you? They have needs, wants, and free will. They screw up sometimes because, like our own lives, they don't follow a script once the cameras are rolling.
No TV station can control everything their actors do. I wouldn't want them to because that's called slavery.
If your daughter can't process, at ten years old, how someone became pregnant, then I think it is you who dropped the ball and not Nick TV.
P.S. I don't think many girls get themselves pregnant. They usually have a little help.
Reply
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
|

|
by Adam D Posted Wed December 19, 2007 @ 3:04 PM
|
|
|
Despite the fact that Jamie Spears is pregnant and her boyfriend is facing possible prison time, I think it is their business, and not yours. If you don't like what is on your TV, then TURN IT OFF.
Reply
|
|

|

|
And to add
by Adam D Wed December 19, 2007 @ 6:23 PM
|
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
I'm not going to tell you how to parent your children, but if I had a child that watched zoey 101, i would definitely take this oppurtunity to discuss with my child the consequenses of having unprotected sex (or any sex for that matter, depending on the age of my child) Your children may be too young for this kind of discussion though.
I think the reasoning behind nickolodeons comment on "taking responsibility" comes from owning up to her mistakes.
I doubt her contract will be re-newed.
Reply
|
|
 |
|
|
by Cass Posted Wed December 19, 2007 @ 2:55 PM
|
|
|
It's not Nickelodeon's fault that she's pregnant. It's also none of their business (nor mine nor yours), and I think that's what they're trying to say in their PR statement - which really doesn't say much, and I think that's to their credit.
This is an unfortunate situation for Jamie Lynn and made more difficult that she's going to be dealing with it in the public eye, subject to holier than thou types who think they have a right to judge her.
Reply
|
|
 |
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|

|
by calm Posted Wed December 19, 2007 @ 2:22 PM
|
|
|
I haven't been following this story at all so most of what I know I learned from this letter, but I've got to say that if I had a 16-year-old kid who was out there working full-time, and that kid made a huge mistake, I would be pretty upset if her employer decided that she was the last priority on their list. A more common situation appears to be that a pregnant teenager faces some kind of exclusion from activities she'd otherwise be in so that the other teenagers who participate don't get the slightest hint that pregnancy is okay, and even there, where the adults have a much greater responsibility for the kids who are watching, I think it's wrong to sacrifice one kid for pedagogical purposes.
But even if I didn't, I think that trying to hide this sort of thing from other kids backfires. Life is hard and messy and complicated, and unless things have gotten a lot simpler since I was a kid it's been at least intermittently hard and messy and complicated for a lot of the 10-year-old fans of "Zoey 101" for awhile now. What they need from adults is guidance in coping with a hard, messy, and complicated life, not the message that their parents can't handle even the thought that they have problems.
There are all kinds of ways you can explain pregnancy to a kid without condoning it but without conveying that a girl who gets pregnant at 16 forfeits all right to being treated well by the adults in her life. I hope you'll consider picking one of those ways for your daughter, because it is entirely possible that 6 years from now she's going to be asking herself whether she has done something so awful that you won't love her any more. I hope that doesn't happen, but if it does, I hope you'll have laid the groundwork for a faith that you will always love her no matter what.
And I hope that this kid, who not only has to deal with the fact that life is hard and messay and complicated but who has to do it in front of an enormous audience many of whose members somehow think that they have the right to direct her life because their kids have seen her on TV, has a bunch of adults in her life who are able to communicate to her that they will always love her no matter what. At the very least, how about if those of us who are adults and are not in her life try not to go out of our way to make things any harder for her?
Reply
|
|
 |
|
|
by PD Marshall Posted Wed December 19, 2007 @ 2:01 PM
|
|
|
Who brought up an abortion????? Of course they can't control another person, however, they can control who they hire and who they allow to represent their product. This is a great opportunity as a parent to discuss teenage sex. HOWEVER, it is also the network's responsibility to ensure that the people they put in front of millions of children be a positive role model. If they choose not to do so, then as a parent AND a consumer, I have the choice not to watch their shows and not to purchase their products. It has nothing to do with shielding children from every little thing wrong in the world, it has to do with being responsible and having consequences for your actions!
Reply
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|
|
by PD Marshall Posted Wed December 19, 2007 @ 12:26 PM
|
|
|
I am in complete agreement and couldn't have put my thoughts into words better than you have. I have contacted Nickelodeon and left a voice message echoing the same sentiments. I have also begun contacting advertisers on their network that I will no longer be purchasing their products. Needless to say, we will no longer allow Nickelodeon to be watched in our home. Please tell me, WHAT WE CAN DO TO MAKE SURE THAT Ms. SPEARS IS NO LONGER PART OF THE NICK LINE UP!!!!
Thank you.
Mrs. M
Reply
|
|
 |
|
|
by Deborah H Posted Wed December 19, 2007 @ 11:46 AM
|
|
|
I agree with you. Networks only care about ratings and advertising dollars. They don't really care about their viewers. I'm sure there are other shows your daughter can watch - or maybe - she will read a good book instead! The Spears family has never been seen in a good light in my opinion. They have never been the type for young people to emulate. Have your daughter watch age appropriate movies starring Natalie Portman. There's a young actress with intelligence, talent and good character. Good for you for speaking up on behalf of your daughter and young people!
Mrs. H.
Reply
|
|
|
|

|
The Professional
by The little Pie is almost done cooking! Fri December 21, 2007 @ 8:44 AM
|
|
|