 |
|
|
by Dissatisfied Cardholder Posted Thu February 7, 2008 @ 10:10 PM
|
|
|
Thanks.
Reply
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
Hi Andrew 1
by blkwidow Sat February 2, 2008 @ 10:20 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
Profiles
by blkwidow Mon February 4, 2008 @ 11:46 PM
|
|
|

|
Yes
by William37 Tue February 5, 2008 @ 11:53 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
Pete & Greg, I've been getting e-mails from a gentleman who says you're having a problem with my posts regarding Motel 6, are deleting them and if I don't quit, I could get into serious trouble - do you know anything about this?
Thanks
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|

|
Question
by ♥Venice♥ Wed January 9, 2008 @ 4:47 PM
|
|
|

|
Answer
by Douglas McBride Wed January 9, 2008 @ 5:22 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|

|
Actually,
by ♥Venice♥ Wed January 9, 2008 @ 8:04 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|

|
Me either
by ♥Venice♥ Mon January 7, 2008 @ 1:01 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|

|
by ♥Venice♥ Posted Sat January 5, 2008 @ 4:13 PM
|
|
|
I completely agree with donno's post, and now realize that blkwidow not only doesn't understand the purpose of this site, but she doesn't know how to physically use it either. For someone so concerned with comments, you'd think she would have figured out how to post them by now. Her comments below are redundant and all over the place, making it look like her only purpose here is pursuing a mission that she somehow thinks is her responsibility. There's no point in having a discussion with a closed-minded person who just keeps repeating the same thing over and over. She may have a valid point in there somewhere, but if no one cares enough to listen anymore because she can't keep them interested, it's just a waste of time.
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|

|
Need more?
by ♥Venice♥ Sat January 5, 2008 @ 8:10 PM
|
|
|
|
|

|
Protocol?
by Douglas McBride Wed January 9, 2008 @ 7:06 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|

|
Exactly
by ♥Venice♥ Sun January 6, 2008 @ 2:00 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|

|
True
by Adam D Wed January 9, 2008 @ 4:03 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
Call 911
by checkmate Thu January 10, 2008 @ 12:27 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|

|
by donno Posted Sat January 5, 2008 @ 3:31 PM
|
|
|
It appears that this site is being used inappropriately.
Recently a poster with the handle blkwidow has been posting accusations about the regular users of this site. blkwidow has also been making statements that letters that have been widely regarded as without merit are in fact valid. However, blkwidow fails to give any evidence to support his/her opinion. Instead, blkwidow resorts to attacks on the people commenting on said letters (aka "the regulars"), calling them "morons" and "idiots".
In addition, blkwidow fails to understand how the site works. Even though blkwidow uses the term "regulars", blkwidow doesn't seem to know the term means these people are indeed regular members who offer feedback. Witness the complaint blkwidow has made that the regulars are consistently found to give feedback, as if it is an inapproprite use of the site (!).
Finally, blkwidow has chosen inappropriate venues for posting his/her complaints. While blkwidow should have opened their own profile and created a blog (or posted a complaint to PFB), blkwidow hijacked this thread to make an attack on the regular members of the site. Such opportunistic behavior should not go unnoticed.
While a site such as Planet Feedback must be open and public by design, I implore all regular members to be on the lookout for rogue character assassins of blkwidow's ilk.
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by blkwidow Posted Fri January 4, 2008 @ 9:45 PM
|
|
|
Calling writers names isn't helping any. A lot of the negative feedback is just plain mean and doesn't really help the writer with an effective plan. There is a whole lot of difference between positive reinforcement to help a writer get his complaint across and get a response and just bashing the writer's letter with mean name calling. Like calling the writer whiny, or a 10 year old, or "Her Majesty" or any other adjectives they use. Does this really help? If they are going to critique a letter and pick it apart, then be more business like about it. Don't start calling the writer names like you're back in grade school. If their parenting skills are anything like their bullying or criticizing skills on this site, then I feel sorry for the teachers or police. Because I'm sure they are getting calls from the school and police station to come pick up Johnny or Jane. No wonder we have shootings on the school and University campuses.
Reply
|
|
|

|
by donno Posted Sat January 5, 2008 @ 4:22 PM
|
|
|
"Whiny" isn't a noun, so it isn't a name. We do get whiny people here periodically, and they can in fact be referred to that way. That has been going on a long time, so I doubt you will see a change. But even if someone thinks the whiny person is an idiot, they don't say so.
Name calling and foul language is not done here. However, in the blogs a different protocol is in effect. Anything goes over there. However, in the letter writing area it isn't done.
If you stay long enough, you will see how it works. However, if you can't stomach a clearly unreasonable letter being criticized, you won't be happy lurking here. You have questioned what "invalid" or "clearly unreasonable" means, and obviously we differ on that. This isn't a cozy "pat everyone on the back" place. It wasn't designed to be and it isn't.
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
My mistake
by blkwidow Fri January 4, 2008 @ 9:38 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
Thank you.
by blkwidow Sat January 5, 2008 @ 7:45 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|

|
PFB 101
by donno Wed January 9, 2008 @ 2:10 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
Cry Baby
by blkwidow Fri January 4, 2008 @ 9:31 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
Duly taken
by blkwidow Sat January 5, 2008 @ 3:53 PM
|
|
|

|

|
Why is it
by donno Sat January 5, 2008 @ 7:23 PM
|
|
|

|
This is why.
by Douglas McBride Wed January 9, 2008 @ 4:06 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|

|
Good idea
by ♥Venice♥ Sun January 6, 2008 @ 12:34 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
by U B Posted Wed January 2, 2008 @ 9:48 PM
|
|
|
How come no one posted a 6 paragraph letter of complaint about the site being down, asking for compensation?
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
by T. C. Posted Wed January 2, 2008 @ 8:25 PM
|
|
|
also it was kicking me over to a complimentary gift card post for the gift card scam post. thought a hacker got to the system lol
Reply
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|
by T. C. Posted Wed January 2, 2008 @ 8:22 PM
|
|
|
thank you it is working fine now, though I thought I screwed up my computer. whooo!
Reply
|
|
 |
|

|
by Tom S. Posted Wed January 2, 2008 @ 5:59 PM
|
|
|
And that now I was being cut off. I am relieved it was not just me, but am sorry the whole site is having problems.
Thanks, guys, fur all your work.
Reply
|
|
 |
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|

|
by Blackrack Posted Wed January 2, 2008 @ 10:46 AM
|
|
|
I'm just glad it's not my computer. I was about ready to throw the harddrive out the window.
Reply
|
|
 |
|

|
by calm Posted Wed January 2, 2008 @ 9:31 AM
|
|
|
Thanks for letting us know the problem isn't at our end.
Reply
|
|
 |
|
|
by Big Tom Posted Tue January 1, 2008 @ 11:47 PM
|
|
|
Thanks...when yahoo has a problem they blame our computers
Reply
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
Nothing is coming through on RSS feeds, or is it that there is no one complaining lately?
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|

|
by StoicGrrl Posted Tue January 1, 2008 @ 5:57 PM
|
|
|
Seems to be working nicely from here. Thanks for all that feverish work - it is greatly appreciated. :)
Reply
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|
|
by oupiglet Posted Tue January 1, 2008 @ 4:22 PM
|
|
|
Thanks for the update! Makes me realize just how much I love and miss this site when it's down!!!!
Reply
|
|
 |
|
|