 |
|
|
by Dissatisfied Cardholder Posted Thu February 7, 2008 @ 10:10 PM
|
|
|
Thanks.
Reply
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
by Gino Posted Mon January 14, 2008 @ 7:07 PM
|
|
|
http://www.planetfeedback.com/PlanetFeedback/The+opportunity+to+re-wri te/296353
Your own words, from your own mouth are the key, and I couldn't put it better myself:
"Commenters are, after all, a slice of the general population, just like the employees of the company that would receive my letter."
Amd "Commenters" includes those you show such disdain for and villify in your posts.
I find it peculiar you didn't respond in that thread, it leads me to believe you undertood completely what this site is about.
Reply
|
|
|

|
by Andrew 1 Posted Fri February 1, 2008 @ 1:01 PM
|
|
|
It is always helpful for an OP to hear points made from many different directions. And if those points are made respectfully and not in a personally insulting, degrading manner, then they really might get something out of it. Company employees, however, are forbidden from saying the kind of things I read here, at least from putting it in writing with the company logo on it.
I believe in the Planetfeedback mission statement, and also that the power of a site like this one to empower consumers depends upon the credibility it establishes. The personal insults do nothing to enhance that credibility, rather, they make a mockery of the intent of the site as defined by Pete and damage that credibility.
Certain individuals are not commenting in line with what the site's about. That's an opinion that we seem to share. And who might those be? It doesn't take much effort to see who they are. Just read the posts. The usual suspects. Over and over again.
I am here because I advocate consumer's rights, and believe that large corporations seeking only to obtain money while providing the bare minimum of service that the law allows, use their size to overpower the consumer. I think consumers need to be empowered. I support the mission statement, and will do what I can to contrast those who I believe are downing this site's credibility. I show disdain for these people because I believe they are working overtime to damage a good thing.
Gino, don't try to tell me there isn't anyone in the general population that you wouldn't try to villify if you felt it was neccesary to accomplish some greater good.
Reply
|
|

|
Hi Andrew 1
by blkwidow Sat February 2, 2008 @ 10:20 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
Profiles
by blkwidow Mon February 4, 2008 @ 11:46 PM
|
|
|

|
Yes
by William37 Tue February 5, 2008 @ 11:53 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
Pete & Greg, I've been getting e-mails from a gentleman who says you're having a problem with my posts regarding Motel 6, are deleting them and if I don't quit, I could get into serious trouble - do you know anything about this?
Thanks
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|

|
Question
by ♥Venice♥ Wed January 9, 2008 @ 4:47 PM
|
|
|

|
Answer
by Douglas McBride Wed January 9, 2008 @ 5:22 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|

|
Actually,
by ♥Venice♥ Wed January 9, 2008 @ 8:04 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|

|
Me either
by ♥Venice♥ Mon January 7, 2008 @ 1:01 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|

|
by ♥Venice♥ Posted Sat January 5, 2008 @ 4:13 PM
|
|
|
I completely agree with donno's post, and now realize that blkwidow not only doesn't understand the purpose of this site, but she doesn't know how to physically use it either. For someone so concerned with comments, you'd think she would have figured out how to post them by now. Her comments below are redundant and all over the place, making it look like her only purpose here is pursuing a mission that she somehow thinks is her responsibility. There's no point in having a discussion with a closed-minded person who just keeps repeating the same thing over and over. She may have a valid point in there somewhere, but if no one cares enough to listen anymore because she can't keep them interested, it's just a waste of time.
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|

|
Need more?
by ♥Venice♥ Sat January 5, 2008 @ 8:10 PM
|
|
|
|
|

|
Protocol?
by Douglas McBride Wed January 9, 2008 @ 7:06 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|

|
Exactly
by ♥Venice♥ Sun January 6, 2008 @ 2:00 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|

|
True
by Adam D Wed January 9, 2008 @ 4:03 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
Call 911
by checkmate Thu January 10, 2008 @ 12:27 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|

|
by donno Posted Sat January 5, 2008 @ 3:31 PM
|
|
|
It appears that this site is being used inappropriately.
Recently a poster with the handle blkwidow has been posting accusations about the regular users of this site. blkwidow has also been making statements that letters that have been widely regarded as without merit are in fact valid. However, blkwidow fails to give any evidence to support his/her opinion. Instead, blkwidow resorts to attacks on the people commenting on said letters (aka "the regulars"), calling them "morons" and "idiots".
In addition, blkwidow fails to understand how the site works. Even though blkwidow uses the term "regulars", blkwidow doesn't seem to know the term means these people are indeed regular members who offer feedback. Witness the complaint blkwidow has made that the regulars are consistently found to give feedback, as if it is an inapproprite use of the site (!).
Finally, blkwidow has chosen inappropriate venues for posting his/her complaints. While blkwidow should have opened their own profile and created a blog (or posted a complaint to PFB), blkwidow hijacked this thread to make an attack on the regular members of the site. Such opportunistic behavior should not go unnoticed.
While a site such as Planet Feedback must be open and public by design, I implore all regular members to be on the lookout for rogue character assassins of blkwidow's ilk.
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|
|
by blkwidow Posted Thu January 3, 2008 @ 12:15 AM
|
|
|
It appears that the Planet Feedback site is being used inappropriately. The motto at the top of the home page says "Helping Consumers Express Their Voice, Helping Companies Prime Their Ears". However it seems that visitors have changed the motto to "Let's Critique the Shared Letters and Bully the Writers so the Letters Are Not Shared Anymore". These are the same visitors to this site over and over again. If you look at the shared letters, you'll see some of the same names on every one of them repeatedly. A few of them are Redheadwglasses, donno, harleycat, Adam D, Chris O, Michelle O, Cor H, Srgntpeppr, Bill R etc. It gets quite personal and mean.
These same bullies are bitter, jealous, resentful, insecure, lonely, idiots with nothing better to do than to sit in front of their computers slamming and critiquing well meaning people that write and share letters on the Planet Feedback site. Who is going to continue to post and share letters any longer if they are going to be verbally abused? I thought Planet Feedback was a site intended to write, post and share letters for others to read about companies that we have valid complaints about? Not a site for morons to abuse and take personal jabs at shared letters and hide behind their silly handles. I've posted my last shared letter. What's the point? So it can be fodder for these idiots? Is this their only enjoyment in life? Because they have no other life and don't get out like the rest of us? It's so easy for them to criticize our letters because they probably aren't doing anything themselves.
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
My mistake
by blkwidow Fri January 4, 2008 @ 9:38 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
Thank you.
by blkwidow Sat January 5, 2008 @ 7:45 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|

|
PFB 101
by donno Wed January 9, 2008 @ 2:10 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
Cry Baby
by blkwidow Fri January 4, 2008 @ 9:31 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
Duly taken
by blkwidow Sat January 5, 2008 @ 3:53 PM
|
|
|

|

|
Why is it
by donno Sat January 5, 2008 @ 7:23 PM
|
|
|

|
This is why.
by Douglas McBride Wed January 9, 2008 @ 4:06 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|

|
Good idea
by ♥Venice♥ Sun January 6, 2008 @ 12:34 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
by U B Posted Wed January 2, 2008 @ 9:48 PM
|
|
|
How come no one posted a 6 paragraph letter of complaint about the site being down, asking for compensation?
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
by T. C. Posted Wed January 2, 2008 @ 8:25 PM
|
|
|
also it was kicking me over to a complimentary gift card post for the gift card scam post. thought a hacker got to the system lol
Reply
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|
by T. C. Posted Wed January 2, 2008 @ 8:22 PM
|
|
|
thank you it is working fine now, though I thought I screwed up my computer. whooo!
Reply
|
|
 |
|

|
by Tom S. Posted Wed January 2, 2008 @ 5:59 PM
|
|
|
And that now I was being cut off. I am relieved it was not just me, but am sorry the whole site is having problems.
Thanks, guys, fur all your work.
Reply
|
|
 |
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|

|
by Blackrack Posted Wed January 2, 2008 @ 10:46 AM
|
|
|
I'm just glad it's not my computer. I was about ready to throw the harddrive out the window.
Reply
|
|
 |
|

|
by calm Posted Wed January 2, 2008 @ 9:31 AM
|
|
|
Thanks for letting us know the problem isn't at our end.
Reply
|
|
 |
|
|
by Big Tom Posted Tue January 1, 2008 @ 11:47 PM
|
|
|
Thanks...when yahoo has a problem they blame our computers
Reply
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
Nothing is coming through on RSS feeds, or is it that there is no one complaining lately?
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|

|
by StoicGrrl Posted Tue January 1, 2008 @ 5:57 PM
|
|
|
Seems to be working nicely from here. Thanks for all that feverish work - it is greatly appreciated. :)
Reply
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|
|
by oupiglet Posted Tue January 1, 2008 @ 4:22 PM
|
|
|
Thanks for the update! Makes me realize just how much I love and miss this site when it's down!!!!
Reply
|
|
 |
|
|