 |
|
by ronnieg Posted Sun April 20, 2008 @ 9:12 PM
|
|
|
I bought a 2004 ford Explorer from Advantage Ford in Stuart Florida in Dec. of 2003, $31,000.00. I took it back for transmission problems at 14000 miles took it back again for transmission problems at 40000 miles, the second time Advantage ford charged me $300.00, Now I am haveing more transmission problems at 80000 miles and they chaged me $100.00 to diagnose the problem and want to charge me $1,400.00 to fix the problem. My ABS light is coming on. My check engine light is coming on. My tire sensor sounder is coming on. I only have 80000 miles on this car. My first Ford and my last. No wonder Americans are buying Japanese and German cars. NO QUALITY IN FORD!!!!!!!!!!!!
Ronnie
Fort Pierce Florida
Reply
|
|
 |
|
|
by MartiniDreams Posted Sat February 9, 2008 @ 12:51 AM
|
|
|
Your letter makes no sense.
Reply
|
|
 |
|

|
by lj Posted Fri February 8, 2008 @ 4:07 AM
|
|
|
Man, this is really messed up. I don't even get it. So, your not buying a ford again, so be it. Move on and buy your GM. Some people.
Reply
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|
by Len Posted Thu February 7, 2008 @ 11:43 AM
|
|
|
I too am in the market for a new vehicle. I was considering the Ford Escape hybrid version, but after the experience a friend had with his new 500, I'll stick with Honda. He's had the car less than 2 years and just as it went over the 36K mark, he's had massive engine trouble and been in the repair shop almost monthly. And the tires on the car had to be replaced before 15K. Another friend bought a Ford minivan and had nothing but problems. Now I've had great experiences with Ford vehicles in the 70's and 80's, but I've heard nothing good about Ford in the following decades. I've had my current Honda for almost 10 years, and my previous Honda for 8. I've only had one major repair in that time. I'd like to buy from an American automaker, but these companies are behind the times. If Sync is the best innovation Ford can come up with, as opposed to Honda's hydrogen engine, I'll stick with Honda.
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
by Steve-Oh Posted Mon February 4, 2008 @ 4:03 PM
|
|
|
Ford announced a recall of 225,000 vehicles to fix a cruise control switch problem. I am disgusted! You people at Ford want to boost car sales but you are telling the public about faults? Your statement takes dollars off the worth of my Ford. You should have kept your BIG MOUTH shut. As far as I am concerned there is no FORD MOTOR COMPANY.
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
I once got cut off and practically hit by the same 500.
Now as a joke my friends and call it five hundreding when someone cuts you off.
Reply
|
|
 |
|
by Adam W Posted Sun February 3, 2008 @ 11:38 AM
|
|
|
I had to read your letter 3 times just to understand what you were talking about. My EX was one of the crazy Ford Taurus nuts. I'm sure he is equally as upset as you.
Personally, I don't see what the big deal is.
Reply
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|

|
by Gino Posted Sat February 2, 2008 @ 11:00 PM
|
|
|
I understand where your anger is coming from, we all buy cars and the companies change names of a model we buy, and it makes us think our purchase was not appreciated, our choice is being made fun of. But you state it's an excellent vehicle, you've proudly owned it for three years.
You say "we buy cars out of want, not need", and it may be the case for you, but most people buy cars to meet their transportation needs. I want to drive a Ferrarri, but I neither need one nor can afford it.
When purchasing any big ticket item, it's best not to rely on impulse, especially when cars are concerned.
Reply
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
|
|
by p d Posted Sat February 2, 2008 @ 6:57 PM
|
|
|
What a nut.
Reply
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|
|
by Giggle pie Posted Sat February 2, 2008 @ 12:20 PM
|
|
|
Uh... I have no clue what you are talking about. Can someone help me out who actually understands?
Reply
|
|
 |
|

|
by PepperElf Posted Sat February 2, 2008 @ 9:00 AM
|
|
|
*shrug*
resale is a tricky issue. I belive you can go online to calculate your car's resale value.
I think that's what you were talking about...
Reply
|
|
 |
|
by Marty5223 Posted Sat February 2, 2008 @ 7:54 AM
|
|
|
Here is what this person is talking about. I decided to do a search and came up with this CNN story. Link for those that would like to read and a little bit of the story.
http://money.cnn.com/2008/01/29/autos/bc.ford.homersimpson.ap/index.ht m?postversion=2008012916
Ford exec: Taurus like Homer Simpson
Ford executives takes shots at one of their own, vow to make next Taurus more like Superman.
EMAIL | PRINT | DIGG | RSS Subscribe to Top Stories
feed://rss.cnn.com/rss/money_topstories.rss
Paste this link into your favorite RSS desktop reader
See all CNNMoney.com RSS FEEDS (close) January 29 2008: 4:40 PM EST
Homer Simpson (left) and a 2008 Ford Taurus
DETROIT (AP) -- "D'oh!" What was Ford thinking?
Belittling your product probably isn't a great marketing tool, but two top Ford Motor Co. executives recently criticized the looks of the new Taurus sedan, with one comparing it to doofus cartoon character Homer Simpson.
While speaking in Detroit this month, CEO Alan Mulally and Derrick Kuzak, head of global product development, took shots at the current Taurus, with Kuzak likening its looks to the portly, balding, doughnut-devouring Simpson.
During a speech to industry insiders, Mulally hinted that a new, nicer-looking Taurus is coming in the next year or so, adding a crack about the current car.
"The new Taurus that you're going
Reply
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
|

|
by Lia Posted Fri February 1, 2008 @ 2:29 PM
|
|
|
Wow, what a way to cut your nose off to spite your face. All over a little comment.
Good luck with your GM. I'd rather push a push my Ford than drive a GM anyday.
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|

|
by (i hate more than you) vc Posted Fri February 1, 2008 @ 1:22 PM
|
|
|
The ONLY person that should be upset about this is Homer J. Simpson. (or Matt Groening)
And Homer should be peeved that (1) Ford compared him to a Ford, and (2) Lynette is a Flanders lover who thinks Homer isn't worthy of Ford.
Stupid Flanders.
Reply
|
|
 |
|
|
|
but I didnt get this letter AT ALL, Lynette.
So basically, Ford poked fun at their OWN CREATION and you are going to swear them off for life over that??
Just as an FYI, if you love your car, thats all that matters. Ford calling the 500 a Homer Simpson car is not going to cost you dearly in resale value. Driving it off the dealer's lot already did that for you.
And there has ALWAYS been the "Homer" car in Ford's lineup. The Contour, the Tempo, the Granada, the Maverick. Every generation has had its inexpensive, reliable, albeit ugly car.
But that is CERTAINLY no reason for this rant.
In the grand scheme of things, instead of shooting off your own big mouth over something this trivial, why dont you try being grateful that your 500 runs and by your own admission has been relatively problem free?
I know plenty of people with Chryslers and GM products that would trade you for that running Five Hundred ANY DAY OF THE WEEK!
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|

|
by donno Posted Fri February 1, 2008 @ 12:12 PM
|
|
|
They renamed the car a year ago from 500 to Taurus in a effort to invigorate poor sales. Perhaps they thought that using the name of a successful model from the past would work. It didn't.
When I think of a Ford Taurus, and imagine the driver, Homer Simpson fits right into the picture. After all, he is a beloved father figure.
Reply
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|
|
by Steve-Oh Posted Fri February 1, 2008 @ 11:38 AM
|
|
|
Now I see why so many people on here react the way they do to letters. I am tempted to go over to the Dark Side myself.
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
Nope.
by Steve-Oh Fri February 1, 2008 @ 1:48 PM
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
This letter made me giggle.
"As far as I am concerned there is no FORD MOTOR COMPANY."
Thats it, they are OFF THE FAMILY TREE!! They are DEAD in your eyes!
Don't buy GM though, if you value your sanity. (I'm a "proud" owner of a crapalier... save yourself the headache, please)
Anyway, back to the point, I don't even really understand the quote. What is "the homer simpson of cars" supposed to mean anyway???
"We have never had problems with the 500 and it was classified as one of the safest cars on the road. We have owned this car for 3 plus years and we always like the looks and comfort it has. QUALITY also."
So a stupid comment negates all of this? You decide that a car that you LOVE, that is comfortable and is up to your standards as far as quality goes, is complete crap because of a stupid comment that ford made?
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
I think its kind of funny myself. They made a mistake with the car and are poking fun at themselves.
Your letter cracked me up! Thanks
Reply
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by Leslie S Posted Mon February 4, 2008 @ 2:09 AM
|
|
|
There's nothing like a little Star Wars to brighten one's day :)
Reply
|
|
 |
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|

|
by Jeffrey Posted Thu January 31, 2008 @ 7:04 PM
|
|
|
Huh? Are you writing this letter because someone at Ford made a comment about the "500/Taurus" being "the Homer Simpson of cars"?
Why in the world would you be so upset that Ford (their CEO and head of development) would make a job about THEIR OWN cars?
Is it because you're now ashamed to own this car?
I simply don't understand why an adult person would be so upset about this.
Can you explain it to me?
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
I'll send the "head honchos" at Ford a box of Kleenex to dry their their tears.
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|