|
|
The Medium is the Message
Posted Tue February 5, 2008 5:14 pm, by Keith C. written to PlanetFeedback
Write a Letter to this Company | Rate this Company
As a Disney fan, and a member of the Disney online fan community for many years, I'm well aware that the Disney company regards fans (and in particular, those of us involved in online fan communities) with contempt. I always thought that it was because Disney fans can be a demanding lot, expecting the Company to hold to standards that Walt himself established, long before the rampant budget cuts of the 1980's and 90's. Then I read the following, on a popular Disney-related blog:
"When I used to work at Disney in Burbank, I was once at a meeting in which a rather senior executive responded to a comment about Disney fans by saying, 'They're freaks.' The room laughed. I was embarrassed."
That stung. But it also caused me to take a step back and think that, from their perspective, they're not too far off. For every heartfelt and compelling post about how Disney has touched someone's life, how early EPCOT Center attractions stirred a desire and motivation to help build a better future for mankind, how a simple moment of "Disney magic" created an indelible memory for child and parent alike--I have read thousands of posts containing pointless bickering and personal attacks. I've seen some of the kindest, brightest, and most creative people online among these communities. And at times I've seen even these people mired in some ugly discussions. So painful as it is, I must admit that to a casual observer--we're freaks. If that casual observer happens to be a business person, who sees Disney only as a business--not as something that can inspire and motivate and touch people--the assessment of "freak" is surely compounded.
I discovered PlanetFeedback some years ago, in its "first incarnation," before it took a long hiatus. I saw it not as an online community, but as a powerful and valuable tool for giving consumers a voice, both individually and collectively. Even then however, the seeds of an online community were planted, with the ability to reply to shared letters. Upon returning to PlanetFeedback, I found that what was once a handful of regular posters, had evolved and colonized around this piece of "online real estate," to form a more complete community. I've seen it expand beyond shared-letter responses, to blogs which often have nothing to do with PlanetFeedback or its mission.
Such a community has the power to share thoughts and ideas, to forge friendships, to shrink our world to a size where each of us can reach out to one another. But with that comes the sometimes volatile mix of personalities and agendas, the politics, and ultimately the in-fighting that plagues all communities--whether "real" or virtual. It also creates ritual, social hierarchies, and perspective that are unique to that community. Like all online communities, it takes on a life of its own, a life that ultimately is not entirely reflective of the world around it.
Despite my prior experience with PlanetFeedback, it's been so long, and it's changed so much (at least in terms of community), that I return with the perspective of an outsider. It's ironic that I read the Disney blog quote above at around the same time, as my recent experience with PlanetFeedback gave me the perspective to understand and appreciate it. And I couldn't, in all honesty, escape drawing the same conclusion about PlanetFeedback regulars.
I've seen regulars pick apart every shared letter that comes across, looking for a flaw (whether real or imagined) and exploiting it in earnest. The community supports this, not as "trolling", but as "constructive criticism". My own letter, in which I wrote of a serious security flaw in my bank's online system, was met with comment after comment telling me that I was wrong. Respondents concluded--without any specific knowledge of the Web page in question, without having seen the security message, without any knowledge of my experience with Internet security--that I was just wrong, that a big institution must be secured. What's more, a "mob mentality" prevailed, where the number of responses somehow validated this belief. Step back for a moment, and try to imagine this scenario playing out in another context, in another community, and you'll see that it's relatively unique to the ritual and community of PlanetFeedback.
This type of behavior is apparently not considered "trolling", even by PlanetFeedback management. It's more subtle than an outright "flame," but every bit as debilitating to the nature and purpose of PlanetFeedback. It has undoubtedly caused countless letter writers to either not share their letters, or to not write at all. Of even more concern to me, is the perspective of companies who receive letters through PlanetFeedback. If they see PlanetFeedback users as "freaks"--and if I were them, I'd be hard-pressed not to--then PlanetFeedback has failed its mission, and we've lost a very valuable tool.
I don't see an easy answer here--but one thing is clear to me: the medium has become the message, and the message is unfocused and easily dismissed. If PlanetFeedback retains an emphasis on community as much or more than its use as tool, then it will never reach its potential. Any community, even a well-behaved one (which PlanetFeedback is surely not), is easy for outsiders to dismiss as being a microcosm that its not reflective of the world outside it. Disney has wholly discarded a wealth of knowledge, insight, and creativity that it could tap for free to better position itself in the market. So too, other companies will discard the potential benefit of PlanetFeedback.
Reply
| Log In/Create an account | 74 comments |
|
|
| PlanetFeedback Comments are subject to strict terms and conditions. We reserve the right to deny site membership privileges to any individuals acting inappropriately. |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
by blkwidow Posted Fri February 8, 2008 @ 12:21 AM
|
|
|
I applaud you and totally agree with you. Thank you so much for sharing this letter. I suggest this site to many people, but lately I tell them to NOT share the letter. For the many reasons you've stated.
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
by T. C. Posted Thu February 7, 2008 @ 1:13 AM
|
|
|
I was with PFB way back when also and came back after years out. I can see some of what you are saying. The fact that some of these letters and letter writers getting slammed is just a fact of everyone trying to improve things. These letters are meant to be sent to the company in question but if the letter is inane then how will that company or others take it or us seriously. Ill written letters or just outright crazy ones, 911 over the drive thru, will ultimately cause PFBs' mission to fail. Some on here try to stur the mix in the wrong way but you get that with every site and medium in the world. There is no way to stop them and that is the greatness of America that they are free to their opinion as you and I are free to ours.
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
Exactly.
by Keith C Thu February 7, 2008 @ 5:04 PM
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|
|
by hussyinterrupted Posted Wed February 6, 2008 @ 9:47 AM
|
|
|
anyone else thinks this guy has wayyy too much time on his hands? No seriously... I liked this letter but I have to wonder why it is you feel so compelled to care? Obviously your a smart guy. Maybe focus your energy on something more productive than worrying what the commenters on planetfeedback thought of your letter or following in the disney cult. Its life man. People arent always gonna see things the same way as you. Dont let it get to you so much. I would hate to see you drop dead of high blood pressure over something so trivial.
Reply
|
|

|

|
I think...
by Jeffrey Wed February 6, 2008 @ 10:13 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|

|
by Adam D Posted Wed February 6, 2008 @ 1:43 AM
|
|
|
I read your letter, and at first really did not feel like responding, but something inside myself pushed me to do so. Your letter was written with a lot of thought and was well written. However, I don't think that you have REALLY looked into this "community" on PFB. Yes, there are certain regulars that have slammed some O.Ps for certain letters. I myself have a tendency to do so from time to time. Maybe some people deserve it, maybe some don't (you called 911 over a cheeseburger??) However, if you REALLY look close, there are many people here again, myself included, who when faced w/ a good letter, or a great suggestion, feel compelled to let the author know about it. Believe me, I would MUCH rather spend my time on PFB reading good happy letters, but frankly, people are drawn to drama, and that is part of what makes PFB great. We are in fact a community as you say, and I have gotten to know some of these people really well, and if I knew any of them outside of this community I would see fit to spend time in with them! There are some GREAT people on here, and some NOT so great people on here. But, we all chose to come here and one time or another. Thats what makes this site great. I for one am THRILLED that I have found a site, where I can in fact express my opinions, to not only other companies, but to other people, and I get to do it all for free! In todays world, It's seldom you see anything get done for free, and I for one, am willing to put up with some of the bad aspects of PFB just for this reason. I like this site, and will continue to use it on a regular basis. Thats what makes it so great, we are all free to do as we chose! Enjoy!
Reply
|
|
|
|
 |
|

|
by (i hate more than you) vc Posted Wed February 6, 2008 @ 1:01 AM
|
|
|
Your comments, however well written, accomplish that with which you rail against.
Freaks? Really?
Please explain how, in the vast expanse of the point you were trying to make, how a comment like this is acceptable. I fail to see how throwing around invectives and an array of platitudes does anything but further the discourse.
Reply
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|

|
by Andrew 1 Posted Tue February 5, 2008 @ 10:57 PM
|
|
|
Marshall McLuhan opened the door to a part of the arts that I never liked much. By saying that the television itself was the message, not the programming it broadcast, he confined it's essence to only one small part of everything that it was.
The Planetfeedback community as a medium, without regard for the quality of what it spouts forth, will be missing the very element that can make it, or not make it, a powerful tool for consumers. If companies perceive it as a meeting place for freaks, then they won't listen, or listen only to be amused, not to consider changing the way they do business.
I believe that it's vital that both the quality of the letters is high, and the comments they attract are, too. The only way this can happen is if we as members make a concerted effort to stop sending ridiculous letters to the number one spot, just so we can entertain ourselves by haw-hawing and condemning. And follow that by raising the level of the commentary.
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
Lane Bryant
by blkwidow Fri February 8, 2008 @ 12:05 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
"Respondents concluded--without any specific knowledge of the Web page in question, without having seen the security message, without any knowledge of my experience with Internet security--that I was just wrong, that a big institution must be secured. What's more, a "mob mentality" prevailed, where the number of responses somehow validated this belief."
That's not my perception of the responses to your letter. In fact, I find the above statements to be greatly exaggerated to the point of being meaningless.
And I agreed with you on your letter.
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
My mistake
by Keith C Thu February 7, 2008 @ 8:18 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
R-E-A-D
by Keith C Fri February 8, 2008 @ 1:23 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
by cissy Posted Tue February 5, 2008 @ 9:45 PM
|
|
|
I loved your letter, but please credit the author of "the medium is the message". The story of this is quite insightful and interesting.
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|

|
by Beeracuda Posted Tue February 5, 2008 @ 9:33 PM
|
|
|
I have to say, after spending the last few years on PFB, that the community on here is an invaluable tool for this site. Not because companies know that letters are made public, but mostly because letter writers tend to think they're right in the given situation, and in some cases, they 100% know that they're right. In some cases, they very well may be. However, most of the letters written here are flawed. There can be several reasons for this.
Often, when someone has a complaint, they write letters out of anger. When done so, logic is often lost by the anger. The users on here try to point that out to the author. Unfortunately, this is sometimes met with more venom from the letter writer. The onus should be on the letter writer to be open to others' opinions, or else not make their letter public.
Another thing that happens is that someone writes a complaint and leaves out certain important details. Many of us have done this in life when trying to explain our side of a debate. We try to put ourselves in the best light possible in order to gain sympathy from others. I have to say, PFB is certainly not the place to gain sympathy from others. It's a place to file a legitimate complaint in order to seek some kind of restitution from a company, or to allow the company to learn of certain practices which may be harmful to the consumer and/or company.
Finally, there are those letter writers who are simply trying to get something for nothing. If you've ever worked in retail, you'd realize that there are plenty of people like that in the world. It's pretty easy to detect those types on PFB, as it is in the real world. Those that do such things deserve all the criticism they receive in the comments. It's these types who dilute the power of a consumer complaint site such as this and others. It's sickening to see and hurts consumers as a whole.
Those of us here at PFB have seen all types. While the vast majority of us try to offer constructive criticism to those who might fail to see the flaws in their complaint, it's also very difficult to not slam those who are blatantly looking for freebies. While these types of people may provide a form of entertainment for some of us, if our comments either make the letter writer see the err of his/her ways, or if it scares them off the site, in my opinion the derogatory comments are well worth it.
I don't think any of us on here are "pro-business" at all. We are all consumers, and none of us want to see people getting the short end of the stick. However, if constructive criticism is able to elevate the writer, or future writers, to a higher standard in regards to weighing their complaints, as well as composing decent business-like letters, then everyone wins.
Reply
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
by Keith C Posted Tue February 5, 2008 @ 8:50 PM
|
|
|
That's very well said--but I think that either missed my point, I misunderstood yours.
As I said to Jeffery, if the real purpose and value of PlanetFeedback is a "database" and forum, then the letter-writing element becomes irrelevant. If the letter-writing element is indeed relevant, and companies are expected to take these letters seriously, the level of discourse surrounding them is going to have a significant impact. The only way it would not, is if the companies see PlanetFeedback and its various audiences as you described. Perhaps some do, but I doubt that all (or perhaps even most) do.
I don't expect anyone to agree with me. Some of the most interesting and rewarding discussions I've had online, have been with people who disagreed with me, but were able to present reasoned arguments. In a best case, we both learn something. What I take exception to is the bullying and trolling that occur here. That kind of things sullies any reasoned arguments that may have been made, and reduces the credibility of all involved--including PlanetFeedback itself.
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
The purpose of PlanetFeedback is simple...we give consumers an easy way to provide feedback to companies and other entities and we back it up with the power of a public forum. Hence our slogan...The Voice Of One/The Power Of Many.
The letter writing component is absolutely relevant to our existence. In fact, without the letters, there would be nothing for anyone to talk about. Therefore we share your concern for the letter writer's experience when they use PlanetFeedback.
I'm sure you'll agree, however, that the process of shaping the commentary surrounding the letters is a sticky one. It simply isnt possible to control every sentence which appears nor do we want to. It may seem easy to pick out that which is harmful however the simple fact is almost everything can be interpreted as trolling and bullying if one were inclined to see it that way. We strive to give our commenters the widest possible latitude while maintaining order and mutual respect.
Companies dont see the commentary which takes place around the letters unless they come to the site to take a look. We trust their ability to interpret and absorb the interaction which takes place on our site. We are not afraid that they are going to take us less seriously because of that interaction.
The concern, if any, that companies may have about us is that we allow consumers to take what was a very private transaction and make it public for the whole world to see. This drives many of the responses members get after using our service. It also forms the basis for why some companies wont respond to letters sent through us - they dont want to legitimize our presence. We appreciate the former and think the latter engage in very short sighted thinking.
In the end, feedback is feedback, no matter where it comes from or in what form. The company that discards or ignores that feedback does so at their own peril.
Reply
|
|
|
|
by blkwidow Posted Fri February 8, 2008 @ 12:33 AM
|
|
|
Who wants their shared letter criticized for poor grammar or spelling errors? Sometimes I make a typo too. It happens. No need for bullying. I agree with you. Keep up the good work.
Reply
|
|
|
|
by blkwidow Posted Fri February 8, 2008 @ 12:35 AM
|
|
|
Now I'll probably be told to go away again! Oh well. Don't they get tired of telling me that?
Reply
|
|
|
|
 |
|

|
by Jeffrey Posted Tue February 5, 2008 @ 7:45 PM
|
|
|
The thing is, the strength of PlanetFeedback is that it's a community. If this was merely a tool for forwarding letters to companies, would it have the same power?
Personally, I feel that PlanetFeedback being a community is a strength for reasons other than it's the mission statement.
I believe that many companies, especially the "big" ones, have little incentive to do better. Particularly when it comes to customer service. I'm cynical, but I simply do not believe that sites like PlanetFeedback convert "bad" companies into good ones.
What I do believe is that we can be better consumers. Learn the tricks. Understand how businesses operate so that we can work within their rules.
It's naive to think that you'll get anywhere by trying to get a corporation to change to YOUR rules. But if you're a smarter and better consumer, you can try to avoid the problems. And when problems arise, you know how to deal with them.
Therefore, the commentary from members is valuable. We're sharing our experiences, our opinions, and our insights. Sure, some of us take on a nasty tone. Heck, from reading how YOU dealt with some people, I'd say that you missed an opportunity to be nice and got a bit nasty yourself.
In the end, if what you want is a tool, then you can use PlanetFeedback for that purpose. Send a letter without sharing it and no one will comment on it. Or you can just write a letter directly.
I don't agree that companies are shaking in their boots because a letter was posted on PlanetFeedback. Sure, some do care. A little. But these are companies that are likely doing a better job anyway.
Oh, and by the way, I'm a Disney freak as well. And Disney has publicly stated that they do listen to their fans (e.g., web sites and podcasts). What some jerk executive said was... gasp... his opinion. Given how out of context this quote is, it's hard to say how this matters. If a Disney accountant calls me a freak, I'm less likely to care than if this same quote was made by Bob Iger on national television.
Say, Keith, did you apply to be the CMO?
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
Disney
by Keith C Tue February 5, 2008 @ 8:20 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|