HOME SHARED LETTERS RATINGS MY PLANET COMMUNITIES MISSION SIGN UP!
Shared Letters

Join and browse our exclusive open discussion forums and talk about whatever you like.

Channels
» The Suggestion Box
» Company Responses
» PFB Feedback Line
» Consumer Podcasts
» Mommy Talk & Daddy Dialogue ™
» Shared Letters


Newsletter

Sign up for PlanetFeedback's "Consumer Café" email newsletter!





The Medium is the Message

Posted Tue February 5, 2008 5:14 pm, by Keith C. written to PlanetFeedback

Write a Letter to this Company  |  Rate this Company


As a Disney fan, and a member of the Disney online fan community for many years, I'm well aware that the Disney company regards fans (and in particular, those of us involved in online fan communities) with contempt. I always thought that it was because Disney fans can be a demanding lot, expecting the Company to hold to standards that Walt himself established, long before the rampant budget cuts of the 1980's and 90's. Then I read the following, on a popular Disney-related blog:

"When I used to work at Disney in Burbank, I was once at a meeting in which a rather senior executive responded to a comment about Disney fans by saying, 'They're freaks.' The room laughed. I was embarrassed."

That stung. But it also caused me to take a step back and think that, from their perspective, they're not too far off. For every heartfelt and compelling post about how Disney has touched someone's life, how early EPCOT Center attractions stirred a desire and motivation to help build a better future for mankind, how a simple moment of "Disney magic" created an indelible memory for child and parent alike--I have read thousands of posts containing pointless bickering and personal attacks. I've seen some of the kindest, brightest, and most creative people online among these communities. And at times I've seen even these people mired in some ugly discussions. So painful as it is, I must admit that to a casual observer--we're freaks. If that casual observer happens to be a business person, who sees Disney only as a business--not as something that can inspire and motivate and touch people--the assessment of "freak" is surely compounded.

I discovered PlanetFeedback some years ago, in its "first incarnation," before it took a long hiatus. I saw it not as an online community, but as a powerful and valuable tool for giving consumers a voice, both individually and collectively. Even then however, the seeds of an online community were planted, with the ability to reply to shared letters. Upon returning to PlanetFeedback, I found that what was once a handful of regular posters, had evolved and colonized around this piece of "online real estate," to form a more complete community. I've seen it expand beyond shared-letter responses, to blogs which often have nothing to do with PlanetFeedback or its mission.

Such a community has the power to share thoughts and ideas, to forge friendships, to shrink our world to a size where each of us can reach out to one another. But with that comes the sometimes volatile mix of personalities and agendas, the politics, and ultimately the in-fighting that plagues all communities--whether "real" or virtual. It also creates ritual, social hierarchies, and perspective that are unique to that community. Like all online communities, it takes on a life of its own, a life that ultimately is not entirely reflective of the world around it.

Despite my prior experience with PlanetFeedback, it's been so long, and it's changed so much (at least in terms of community), that I return with the perspective of an outsider. It's ironic that I read the Disney blog quote above at around the same time, as my recent experience with PlanetFeedback gave me the perspective to understand and appreciate it. And I couldn't, in all honesty, escape drawing the same conclusion about PlanetFeedback regulars.

I've seen regulars pick apart every shared letter that comes across, looking for a flaw (whether real or imagined) and exploiting it in earnest. The community supports this, not as "trolling", but as "constructive criticism". My own letter, in which I wrote of a serious security flaw in my bank's online system, was met with comment after comment telling me that I was wrong. Respondents concluded--without any specific knowledge of the Web page in question, without having seen the security message, without any knowledge of my experience with Internet security--that I was just wrong, that a big institution must be secured. What's more, a "mob mentality" prevailed, where the number of responses somehow validated this belief. Step back for a moment, and try to imagine this scenario playing out in another context, in another community, and you'll see that it's relatively unique to the ritual and community of PlanetFeedback.

This type of behavior is apparently not considered "trolling", even by PlanetFeedback management. It's more subtle than an outright "flame," but every bit as debilitating to the nature and purpose of PlanetFeedback. It has undoubtedly caused countless letter writers to either not share their letters, or to not write at all. Of even more concern to me, is the perspective of companies who receive letters through PlanetFeedback. If they see PlanetFeedback users as "freaks"--and if I were them, I'd be hard-pressed not to--then PlanetFeedback has failed its mission, and we've lost a very valuable tool.

I don't see an easy answer here--but one thing is clear to me: the medium has become the message, and the message is unfocused and easily dismissed. If PlanetFeedback retains an emphasis on community as much or more than its use as tool, then it will never reach its potential. Any community, even a well-behaved one (which PlanetFeedback is surely not), is easy for outsiders to dismiss as being a microcosm that its not reflective of the world outside it. Disney has wholly discarded a wealth of knowledge, insight, and creativity that it could tap for free to better position itself in the market. So too, other companies will discard the potential benefit of PlanetFeedback.


Reply



Log In/Create an account | 74 comments
     Add to your del.icio.us  del.icio.us    Digg this story  Digg this  
PlanetFeedback Comments are subject to strict terms and conditions. We reserve the right to deny site membership privileges to any individuals acting inappropriately.
by blkwidow Posted Fri February 8, 2008 @ 12:21 AM

I applaud you and totally agree with you. Thank you so much for
sharing this letter. I suggest this site to many people, but lately I
tell them to NOT share the letter. For the many reasons you've
stated.

Reply

You know if it is by T. C. Fri February 8, 2008 @ 12:37 AM


If you don't recommend the site by donno Sat February 9, 2008 @ 8:18 PM


Where does it say... by Andrew 1 Mon February 11, 2008 @ 8:00 AM

by dulynoted Posted Thu February 7, 2008 @ 6:42 PM

Letters are picked apart, disected and in some cases yes even the
sender is trashed. But you are going on the assumption that all
complaints are legitimate.
And while we all know there are some, there seem to be more and more
with the emphasis on ME, ME and ME again. I want this, I want that...I
think I should be comped for this service or that even though I did
not like your service to begin with, or I did not like your food, but
did not say anything at the time it was served or when I was sitting
in your restaurant because I am just not a complainer. But get them
online and WOW...they sure open up and most start demanding
satisfaction and want it yesterday!

I too am a true PFB member of long ago and have just returned. But the
letters and comments are just about the same as they were before. The
essence is the same.
You have those who slam and berate the writer all the time and then
you have those who do sometimes and then again those who never do and
take all letters as being truthful.
No that I or anyone else should be the judge and jury mind you, but we
are a people of varied opinions and are able to share these on PFB
with the letter writer.

So whether they take our compliment or our disagreeing with personally
or not is fine.
But PFB has and always will be an avenue for people to write letters
of complaint, compliment or inquiries.
But its still PFB no matter how you look at it...its a consumer
website.

Reply


Duly noted,... by Andrew 1 Fri February 8, 2008 @ 8:50 PM

I don't know if it's insults by Steve-Oh Fri February 8, 2008 @ 9:42 PM

Passionate the new buzz word by blkwidow Fri February 8, 2008 @ 10:53 PM


Letters should be limited... by dulynoted Sat February 9, 2008 @ 3:45 PM


I'm for that... by Andrew 1 Mon February 11, 2008 @ 7:52 PM

Who judges the letters? by Steve-Oh Tue February 12, 2008 @ 12:25 AM


Steve-Oh... by Andrew 1 Thu February 14, 2008 @ 3:46 AM
by T. C. Posted Thu February 7, 2008 @ 1:13 AM

I was with PFB way back when also and came back after years out. I
can see some of what you are saying. The fact that some of these
letters and letter writers getting slammed is just a fact of everyone
trying to improve things. These letters are meant to be sent to the
company in question but if the letter is inane then how will that
company or others take it or us seriously. Ill written letters or
just outright crazy ones, 911 over the drive thru, will ultimately
cause PFBs' mission to fail. Some on here try to stur the mix in the
wrong way but you get that with every site and medium in the world.
There is no way to stop them and that is the greatness of America that
they are free to their opinion as you and I are free to ours.

Reply


Here I go again... by Jeffrey Thu February 7, 2008 @ 10:49 AM

Google-Proofing by Keith C Thu February 7, 2008 @ 2:05 PM


Good point. by Jeffrey Thu February 7, 2008 @ 4:48 PM

Exactly. by Keith C Thu February 7, 2008 @ 5:04 PM


The voting method by Andrew 1 Fri February 8, 2008 @ 12:09 AM

by hussyinterrupted Posted Wed February 6, 2008 @ 9:47 AM

anyone else thinks this guy has wayyy too much time on his hands? No
seriously... I liked this letter but I have to wonder why it is you
feel so compelled to care? Obviously your a smart guy. Maybe focus
your energy on something more productive than worrying what the
commenters on planetfeedback thought of your letter or following in
the disney cult. Its life man. People arent always gonna see things
the same way as you. Dont let it get to you so much. I would hate to
see you drop dead of high blood pressure over something so trivial.

Reply


I think... by Jeffrey Wed February 6, 2008 @ 10:13 AM


Jeffrey, calling for better behavior... by Andrew 1 Wed February 6, 2008 @ 9:53 PM


You are corrrect... by Jeffrey Thu February 7, 2008 @ 6:41 AM

I care because... by Keith C Wed February 6, 2008 @ 2:12 PM

by Adam D Posted Wed February 6, 2008 @ 1:43 AM

I read your letter, and at first really did not feel like responding,
but something inside myself pushed me to do so. Your letter was
written with a lot of thought and was well written. However, I don't
think that you have REALLY looked into this "community" on
PFB. Yes, there are certain regulars that have slammed some O.Ps for
certain letters. I myself have a tendency to do so from time to time.
Maybe some people deserve it, maybe some don't (you called 911 over a
cheeseburger??) However, if you REALLY look close, there are many
people here again, myself included, who when faced w/ a good letter,
or a great suggestion, feel compelled to let the author know about it.
Believe me, I would MUCH rather spend my time on PFB reading good
happy letters, but frankly, people are drawn to drama, and that is
part of what makes PFB great. We are in fact a community as you say,
and I have gotten to know some of these people really well, and if I
knew any of them outside of this community I would see fit to spend
time in with them! There are some GREAT people on here, and some NOT
so great people on here. But, we all chose to come here and one time
or another. Thats what makes this site great. I for one am THRILLED
that I have found a site, where I can in fact express my opinions, to
not only other companies, but to other people, and I get to do it all
for free! In todays world, It's seldom you see anything get done for
free, and I for one, am willing to put up with some of the bad aspects
of PFB just for this reason. I like this site, and will continue to
use it on a regular basis. Thats what makes it so great, we are all
free to do as we chose! Enjoy!

Reply

First impressions by Keith C Wed February 6, 2008 @ 2:39 AM

by (i hate more than you) vc Posted Wed February 6, 2008 @ 1:01 AM

Your comments, however well written, accomplish that with which you
rail against.

Freaks? Really?

Please explain how, in the vast expanse of the point you were trying
to make, how a comment like this is acceptable. I fail to see how
throwing around invectives and an array of platitudes does anything
but further the discourse.


Reply

Acceptable? by Keith C Wed February 6, 2008 @ 2:31 AM


Re: The Medium is the Message by Andrew 1 Tue February 5, 2008 @ 10:57 PM


Yes, raise the bar... by Pete Tue February 5, 2008 @ 11:08 PM
by blkwidow Posted Thu February 7, 2008 @ 12:07 AM

I totally agree. Not every shared letter needs a comment or a
response. If it's an invalid complaint or rediculous, then why even
bother with a comment? Just ignore it and move on. Why waste our
time?

Reply

by SiouxFan Posted Thu February 7, 2008 @ 12:29 AM

Do you look at every letter that comes through PFB? Not every letter
does get a comment. It's just the letters that are unreasonable that
make the majority of the Top 25.

I still have yet to see a constructive comment to a letter from you.
All you seem to be doing is running around pointing out that
commenters are mean. The very thing you are suggesting for everyone to
do is the very same thing you could do for "abusive"
comments.

If it's a invalid or ridiculous comment, why bother responding? You
are only calling more attention to it. Just ignore it and move on. Why
waste your time?

Reply

Lane Bryant by blkwidow Fri February 8, 2008 @ 12:05 AM


Right, but by SiouxFan Fri February 8, 2008 @ 9:07 PM

by RedheadwGlasses Posted Thu February 7, 2008 @ 7:12 PM

If reading critical comments is a waste of your time, then don't read
the responses. I don't mind reading them. I don't need you speaking
up on my behalf, and neither does anyone else. YOU are free to ignore
a ridiculous letter. Don't dictate to everyone else what they should
and shouldn't do.

Reply

by RedheadwGlasses Posted Tue February 5, 2008 @ 10:24 PM

"Respondents concluded--without any specific knowledge of the Web
page in question, without having seen the security message, without
any knowledge of my experience with Internet security--that I was just
wrong, that a big institution must be secured. What's more, a
"mob mentality" prevailed, where the number of responses
somehow validated this belief."

That's not my perception of the responses to your letter. In fact, I
find the above statements to be greatly exaggerated to the point of
being meaningless.

And I agreed with you on your letter.

Reply

It was my perception by Keith C Tue February 5, 2008 @ 10:43 PM


Of course... by Jeffrey Wed February 6, 2008 @ 10:20 AM

It was irrelevant by Keith C Wed February 6, 2008 @ 2:46 PM


Speaking of "not very flattering, let alone accurate" first impressions .... by calm Thu February 7, 2008 @ 2:34 PM

Alice shows more control over the "Fists of Death". by Keith C Thu February 7, 2008 @ 5:02 PM


"many people seem to feel that HAVE to say something" by RedheadwGlasses Thu February 7, 2008 @ 7:22 PM

YOU'RE in charge of your time. by Keith C Thu February 7, 2008 @ 7:34 PM


Don't put words in my mouth by RedheadwGlasses Thu February 7, 2008 @ 7:54 PM

My mistake by Keith C Thu February 7, 2008 @ 8:18 PM

You have my vote by blkwidow Fri February 8, 2008 @ 12:27 AM

I have a question. by T. C. Fri February 8, 2008 @ 12:52 AM

R-E-A-D by Keith C Fri February 8, 2008 @ 1:23 AM

I think by T. C. Sat February 9, 2008 @ 1:03 AM

How condescending by Steve-Oh Sat February 9, 2008 @ 1:07 AM

Taking responsibility by Keith C Sat February 9, 2008 @ 2:55 AM

You have two unrelated letters on here. by Steve-Oh Sat February 9, 2008 @ 7:12 AM

Look and you shall find by Keith C Sat February 9, 2008 @ 9:34 PM

Thanks Steve by T. C. Sat February 9, 2008 @ 11:36 PM
by cissy Posted Tue February 5, 2008 @ 9:45 PM

I loved your letter, but please credit the author of "the medium
is the message". The story of this is quite insightful and
interesting.

Reply


Marshall McLuhan (n/t) by Jeffrey Tue February 5, 2008 @ 10:02 PM

Thanks for catching that. by Keith C Tue February 5, 2008 @ 10:46 PM


by Beeracuda Posted Tue February 5, 2008 @ 9:33 PM

I have to say, after spending the last few years on PFB, that the
community on here is an invaluable tool for this site. Not because
companies know that letters are made public, but mostly because letter
writers tend to think they're right in the given situation, and in
some cases, they 100% know that they're right. In some cases, they
very well may be. However, most of the letters written here are
flawed. There can be several reasons for this.

Often, when someone has a complaint, they write letters out of anger.
When done so, logic is often lost by the anger. The users on here try
to point that out to the author. Unfortunately, this is sometimes met
with more venom from the letter writer. The onus should be on the
letter writer to be open to others' opinions, or else not make their
letter public.

Another thing that happens is that someone writes a complaint and
leaves out certain important details. Many of us have done this in
life when trying to explain our side of a debate. We try to put
ourselves in the best light possible in order to gain sympathy from
others. I have to say, PFB is certainly not the place to gain
sympathy from others. It's a place to file a legitimate complaint in
order to seek some kind of restitution from a company, or to allow the
company to learn of certain practices which may be harmful to the
consumer and/or company.

Finally, there are those letter writers who are simply trying to get
something for nothing. If you've ever worked in retail, you'd realize
that there are plenty of people like that in the world. It's pretty
easy to detect those types on PFB, as it is in the real world. Those
that do such things deserve all the criticism they receive in the
comments. It's these types who dilute the power of a consumer
complaint site such as this and others. It's sickening to see and
hurts consumers as a whole.

Those of us here at PFB have seen all types. While the vast majority
of us try to offer constructive criticism to those who might fail to
see the flaws in their complaint, it's also very difficult to not slam
those who are blatantly looking for freebies. While these types of
people may provide a form of entertainment for some of us, if our
comments either make the letter writer see the err of his/her ways, or
if it scares them off the site, in my opinion the derogatory comments
are well worth it.

I don't think any of us on here are "pro-business" at all.
We are all consumers, and none of us want to see people getting the
short end of the stick. However, if constructive criticism is able to
elevate the writer, or future writers, to a higher standard in regards
to weighing their complaints, as well as composing decent
business-like letters, then everyone wins.

Reply


IF... by Andrew 1 Tue February 5, 2008 @ 10:46 PM

by The PlanetFeedback Team Posted Tue February 5, 2008 @ 8:25 PM

Actually, your description of the diverse PFB community is remarkably
similar to any other online community even though you claim it's not.

What makes PFB unique is that there are actually two constituencies
involved...the letter writers and the commenters. Although there is
some cross pollination, these are two very distinct groups. What is
even more unique about this situation is the fact that, on most online
boards or forums, the members post thoughts/opinion/etc. FOR THE
BENEFIT (or lack thereof) of the board. Except for rare cases, that
is not the case on PFB.

On PFB, members write letters to entities that are not the board
itself but BEYOND the board. These letters form the basis for
conversation on PFB however that's NOT the primary purpose of the
letter writers. The primary purpose of folks who send letters through
PFB is to provide feedback to companies and others about their
interaction with those companies etc.

If they share their letters, it's generally to inform others about
their experiences.

We allow comments on these letters for the sole purpose of creating a
discussion around the issues raised in the letters. It is our belief
that such a discussion can be invaluable for future readers who come
to PFB as part of a search for information about companies and other
entities. When done properly, each letter becomes a
"mini-knowledge base" that exists to educate fellow
consumers. For instance, even though you're not particularly pleased
with some of the commentary placed on your letter, there is no doubt
that the issues you raised have been nicely fleshed out. This
benefits others who might come across your letter.

It may come as a shock to some that the single biggest source (by far)
of our traffic is not people who leave comments or people who write
letters...its people who come here via Google searches to see what
people have to say about specific companies. Once here, they may well
participate by writing a letter or leaving a comment however the
primary use of PFB is as a resource for research.

This was the impetus for implementation of our new ratings feature.
Now folks can come here and access our giant database of information
for the purpose of making decisions about what companies they may
patronize and what they can expect if they do so.

We have been taking steps of late to "elevate" the
conversation surrounding letters and we always strive for the highest
quality commentary possible. We will not, however, force anyone to
agree with the letter writers.

We firmly believe this position fully supports our mission statement
which is to empower consumers and increase their control.

Reply

PlanetFeedback's mission and placement by Keith C Tue February 5, 2008 @ 8:50 PM


Hi Keith by The PlanetFeedback Team Tue February 5, 2008 @ 10:29 PM

Well said by blkwidow Fri February 8, 2008 @ 12:33 AM

I agree with you. by blkwidow Fri February 8, 2008 @ 12:35 AM

I am not by T. C. Fri February 8, 2008 @ 12:57 AM

by Jeffrey Posted Tue February 5, 2008 @ 7:45 PM

The thing is, the strength of PlanetFeedback is that it's a community.
If this was merely a tool for forwarding letters to companies, would
it have the same power?

Personally, I feel that PlanetFeedback being a community is a strength
for reasons other than it's the mission statement.

I believe that many companies, especially the "big" ones,
have little incentive to do better. Particularly when it comes to
customer service. I'm cynical, but I simply do not believe that sites
like PlanetFeedback convert "bad" companies into good ones.

What I do believe is that we can be better consumers. Learn the
tricks. Understand how businesses operate so that we can work within
their rules.

It's naive to think that you'll get anywhere by trying to get a
corporation to change to YOUR rules. But if you're a smarter and
better consumer, you can try to avoid the problems. And when problems
arise, you know how to deal with them.

Therefore, the commentary from members is valuable. We're sharing our
experiences, our opinions, and our insights. Sure, some of us take on
a nasty tone. Heck, from reading how YOU dealt with some people, I'd
say that you missed an opportunity to be nice and got a bit nasty
yourself.

In the end, if what you want is a tool, then you can use
PlanetFeedback for that purpose. Send a letter without sharing it and
no one will comment on it. Or you can just write a letter directly.

I don't agree that companies are shaking in their boots because a
letter was posted on PlanetFeedback. Sure, some do care. A little.
But these are companies that are likely doing a better job anyway.

Oh, and by the way, I'm a Disney freak as well. And Disney has
publicly stated that they do listen to their fans (e.g., web sites and
podcasts). What some jerk executive said was... gasp... his opinion.
Given how out of context this quote is, it's hard to say how this
matters. If a Disney accountant calls me a freak, I'm less likely to
care than if this same quote was made by Bob Iger on national
television.

Say, Keith, did you apply to be the CMO?

Reply

Good points, but can you have it both ways? by Keith C Tue February 5, 2008 @ 8:16 PM


You don't know what a CMO is? by Jeffrey Tue February 5, 2008 @ 8:52 PM

Perhaps not by Keith C Tue February 5, 2008 @ 8:58 PM


Just giving you a (good natured) hard time. by Jeffrey Tue February 5, 2008 @ 9:05 PM


You might... by Jeffrey Tue February 5, 2008 @ 9:10 PM

Disney by Keith C Tue February 5, 2008 @ 8:20 PM


Not my experience... by Jeffrey Tue February 5, 2008 @ 9:02 PM

Disney War: you should read it by dottiejean28 Wed February 6, 2008 @ 11:14 AM

Thank God! by T. C. Fri February 8, 2008 @ 12:59 AM




Home | Shared Letters | Ratings | Login | Communities | Categories | RSS | Contact Us | Terms & Conditions | Privacy Policy | FAQ
Copyright 2013 © All Rights Reserved PlanetFeedback.com | Web by Cicada