HOME SHARED LETTERS RATINGS MY PLANET COMMUNITIES MISSION SIGN UP!
Shared Letters

Join and browse our exclusive open discussion forums and talk about whatever you like.

Channels
» The Suggestion Box
» Company Responses
» PFB Feedback Line
» Consumer Podcasts
» Mommy Talk & Daddy Dialogue ™
» Shared Letters


Newsletter

Sign up for PlanetFeedback's "Consumer Café" email newsletter!





Amazon Deletes Negative Reviews

Posted Sat March 8, 2008 12:00 pm, by James C. written to Amazon.com, Inc.

Write a Letter to this Company  |  Rate this Company


I've noticed that Amazon.com has been deleting negative reviews for L. Ron Hubbard's book "Dianetics." It would appear that only reviews of 4 stars and above allowed. I'll admit, there were one star reviews posted without substance; but there were some well thought out reviews that gave a critical view as to why the reviewer did not like the book.

What the review deleters at Amazon.com don't seem to realize here is that you're eliminating what made Amazon an interesting place to research a product. There was usually some form of balance that allowed a reader to look at the reviews, see the good and bad, and make a decision. What's happening here is akin to false advertising. By taking out all the negative reviews, you're giving readers the impression that ALL reviews ever posted for this book have been positive.

I've seen it mentioned that Amazon does this because one-star books do not sell; that it's bad for business. Well, what good is Amazon.com if every product review is a 4 or 5 star review? I look for that note of caution when buying a product. If there are 100 five star reviews and 1 one star review, I still read the one star review (if it's well written) to see why that person had a bad experience. That one review may be the one that saves me the same time and trouble. Who knows, maybe those 100 five star reviews are all from people with a vested interest in the product -- maybe the author or manufacturer themselves.

Why would I come here any more for reviews if only 4 and 5 star reviews are allowed? Everyone has an opinion -- if you don't provide both sides, you're doing a major disservice to your customers who think they're seeing the whole picture.

As far as reviews go, Amazon.com has soured my opinion on the process. Without balance, there's no point in posting reviews, let alone reading them.

Go back, read the critical reviews that your customers posted for L. Ron Hubbard's "Dianetics," and post them back on the site.


Reply



Log In/Create an account | 14 comments
     Add to your del.icio.us  del.icio.us    Digg this story  Digg this  
PlanetFeedback Comments are subject to strict terms and conditions. We reserve the right to deny site membership privileges to any individuals acting inappropriately.
by Laura B. Posted Sun April 27, 2008 @ 5:11 PM

Amazon has repeatedly deleted my negative 1-star review of a
Sedona-area guidebook that I returned for a refund, because it was an
advertising-filled piece of junk, NOT a true guidebook by any
definition. It's been deleted over and over, despite me re-posting it.
Interestingly, there remain FIVE five-star, positively RAVING reviews
of this piece of garbage, EACH ONE by an author that has only reviewed
this book, and NEVER reviewed anything else on Amazon.com. I don't
trust Amazon as far as I can spit! What a crooked organization. Anyone
who thinks their review system is truly open and unbiased is horribly
mistaken! They manipulate their review system to their liking, and
they'll delete any review they damn well please if that's what they
feel like doing. What a bunch of Nazis!

Reply
by Nicole F. Posted Mon March 10, 2008 @ 12:40 AM

It seems weird that Amazon would do that. I love Amazon. It's my
favorite "store." I do read the reviews and trust the opinions. I've
bought many things from amazon and read countless reviews...I've never
suspected "tweaking" of reviews. Usually I can find just as many bad
reviews as good.

I have, however, come across reviews which just seem to be something
like an author's friend beefing up the review list and whatnot.
Sometimes it can be pretty easy to spot the fakes.

I hope Amazon responds to you...I would like to hear their response.

Also, perhaps they had a glitch or some server problems? Maybe
technology is to blame, since you said a large number of reviews have
vanished?

One more thing...have you tried e-mailing customer service with your
questions? I find that it's the best way to get something handled.
That's another thing I love about Amazon: awesome customer service.

Good luck!

Reply

Lousy Customer Service by E S. Thu December 10, 2009 @ 11:32 PM

by Chris M Posted Sun March 9, 2008 @ 10:43 PM

I'm too tired to go try and check, lol. I would hate to think that
Amazon would selectively delete negative items though, if they were
not against some TOS.

Reply


Why didn't they delete this review of the book you mentioned? by Knuckles Sun March 9, 2008 @ 1:41 PM

by Knuckles Posted Sun March 9, 2008 @ 1:47 PM

This feature would seem to attempt to filter shill comments, and to
some extent it does. However, I don't pay much attention to it,
because I have found it far askew of common sense in some cases.

As an avid ebayer, I read a lot of user feedbacks in an attempt to
judge the honesty and "user friendliness" of buyers and sellers. I
find I have to use these same thought processes when reading reviews
on the web.

Reply

Amazon's Reviews by James C. Sun March 9, 2008 @ 2:53 PM

So true!! by abby436251 Wed March 19, 2008 @ 5:50 PM
by Zan Posted Sun March 9, 2008 @ 10:25 AM

Amazon's review system lost my respect ages ago. Why? Check out the
"top reviewer" list and look at the number one reviewer. I won't
mention the name here, but this "woman" has been posting upwards of
20-30 reviews A DAY for years - every one of them 4 and 5 stars. In
her profile she claims she's a "speed reader" and reads 2-3 books a
day. Her reviews are simply atrocious. They're long, but they're
filled with glaring errors about the content of the books, as well as
numerous grammar and spelling errors. There are many people who
suspect that this "woman" is actually a large group hired to review
books, either by the authors or Amazon.

Reply

Interesting... by James C. Sun March 9, 2008 @ 11:32 AM

by Knuckles Posted Sat March 8, 2008 @ 11:02 PM

As soon as you click on User Reviews, they show two reviews (one good,
one bad) next to each other. For whatever reason there are only a few
bad reviews right now, but they are there to see. So the one negative
review you desire is right there to see.

I notice Hubbard's latest book has only 3 reviews, a 1 star, a 4 star
and a 5 star.

I haven't been monitoring Amazon's editing of reviews of anything, as
I don't have the time for that type of activity. However, I use the
reviews. If they were censoring negatives, why not get rid of all of
them?

Reply


by ams1001 Posted Sat March 8, 2008 @ 9:35 PM

Look it up on Barnes & Noble (www.bn.com). They have 32 reviews, and
granted, the majority are positive, but there are a handful of
negative reviews, and they are mostly well-written and reasonable. :o)

Reply

by SuzieCat Posted Sat March 8, 2008 @ 7:20 PM

It makes no ense for them to delete negative reviews. Now, because of
the nature of that specific book, I can see folks writing inflamoatry
negative reviews. controversial material tends to bring that out in
folks.

Howeverm, if teh reviews are factual, negative or not, they should
stay!

Reply

by RedheadwGlasses Posted Sat March 8, 2008 @ 12:19 PM

Great letter, and I agree completely.

Reply




Home | Shared Letters | Ratings | Login | Communities | Categories | RSS | Contact Us | Terms & Conditions | Privacy Policy | FAQ
Copyright 2013 © All Rights Reserved PlanetFeedback.com | Web by Cicada