 |
|
|
by blondie615 Posted Mon May 12, 2008 @ 12:53 AM
|
|
|
burger king can barely cook the regular burgers right, much less a thick burger. also you have teens whao are not trained or care about food safety...
Reply
|
|
 |
|
|
|
I had diarreha for a few days. I know it was the burger, because lunch and dinner were my only two meals that day...half burger for lunch and half for dinner....then 3 days of agony. did'nt write a letter just because I know better than to eat from there now or eat that burger.
Reply
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
Sigh, I'm kind of tired of hearing over and over again YOU HAVE NO PROOF! NO SOUP FOR YOU!
That's not for you to decide, it's for Burger King to decide. A good company will listen to it's customer and try to resolve their issue.
I think they deserve a refund for the simple fact that these burgers are DISGUSTING! I got one for lunch at work, took one bite and tossed it. I bet if I had ate the whole thing I would have become very ill too!
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|

|

|
Apparently
by ♪♪Venice♪♪ Thu May 1, 2008 @ 5:37 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
My hubby and I each had one for lunch today. It was delicious and din;t make me or him ill
Reply
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|

|
by SuzieCat Posted Thu May 1, 2008 @ 2:25 PM
|
|
|
I ordered one of these a couple weeks ago. although the concept sounds yummy, I was not impressed. the meat itself tasted off to me, ruining the flavors of the A! sauce and crunchy onions.
I do agree with the others, though. You would have done well to at least include the date and location.
Reply
|
|
 |
|
|
|
Have you been to a doctor?
Do you have any solid evidence that the food made you ill?
It is quite possible that you both contracted a stomach virus or something similar that had absolutely nothing to do with anything you ate.
Most folks eat three meals a day plus snacks, so how easy is it to think that any sudden illness might be food-related?
Leaves the door wide open for coincidence.
You might want to make sure you have a case before you start throwing out accusations of food poisoning and start making demands.
Reply
|
|
 |
|
|
by Steve-OH Posted Thu May 1, 2008 @ 11:07 AM
|
|
|
Corporate is not going to be able to do anything but look at this as a scam because it's a vague, unverifiable complaint (and you are asking for money).
BTW, your bodies may just have been rejecting the huges amounts of grease you subjected them to.
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate has a number of options with regards to this letter and only one of them involves considering it to be a scam. Other options include:
1. Ignore it entirely
2. Give the customer what she's asking for
3. Give the customer something but not exactly what she's asking for.
4. Contact the customer using the contact information which is provided with every letter sent through PFB and get further information about the incident and then use that information to make a better informed decision.
Just because you may think corporate is going to look at this a certain way doesn't mean they will at all.
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by T. C. Posted Thu May 1, 2008 @ 11:02 PM
|
|
|
Most times on here people are all about info. If they are going to let a vague letter through they should not disregard comments so easily about it. Yes the letter will get back down to the manager eventually, but if it was that important to get the info across, why the vague letter and the attmpted call? No answer she should've went to see the manager.
Reply
|
|