|
|
Target Customer Service Let Me Down
Posted Wed May 14, 2008 12:00 pm, by Karl P.
Went to the Kohler, Wisconsin Target during my lunch break today (May 14, 2008) to pick up a few things we needed at the house. It's a trip I make often - Target is close by and I prefer it to Wal-Mart any day of the week. That is except Wednesday evidently, because today they really let me down from a customer service perspective.
What happened is this. I had one last item to purchase -- some powdered Clorox 2, but while I was grabbing this product off the shelf I noticed a new product -- a Clorox chlorine bleach product for whites that claimed to be gentler on fabrics. Sounded like a good concept, so I grabbed a bottle. Only problem was that the bottle I grabbed had a large hole in the spout so when I handled the product, the gel-like bleach product spilled all over my relatively new pair of Banana Republic jeans, my socks and my shoes.
Now, accidents happen, and I know this was nothing but a mere mishap. However, it is how the store handled it that is such a disappointment. When I took the bottle up to Customer Service, the male employee who greeted me was nice enough. He told me that he would get a manager and that most likely they would need to photograph my jeans, assuring me that Target would buy me a new pair of jeans. And while this was what I wanted to hear, I was a little surprised that it wasn't preceded or followed by an apology. After all, this was an unpleasant inconvenience. And a bit uncomfortable, too, as the bleach was now burning my leg.
After a few minutes, a store supervisor arrived and the male employee explained what had happened. The female supervisor seemed nice enough, but clearly didn't know just how to handle the situation, and quickly left -- to consult a manager with higher authority I assumed.
When she returned she told me that I could pick out any pair of jeans I wanted on the house. This is when I really became frustrated. They had now wasted a good deal of my lunch break, and it appeared as though they weren't attempting to lowball me with by trying to replace my Banana Republic jeans with their lunch-counter, slaughterhouse dungarees. Unh-unh!
I told her that this was unacceptable (and please note I have still not received any kind of apology from anyone). At this point she is once again flustered and visibly not sure what to do next. She is clearly either not comfortable making tough managerial decisions or she has not been empowered to do so. She leaves, and shortly returns with someone who I surmised was on more of a senior level.
She approaches and the supervisor introduces her. I tell her that their offer is unacceptable. She then eyeballs me from toe to head, and says, "Fine. We'll pay for a new pair of Banana Republic jeans. Just go and buy the jeans and bring in a receipt and we will reimburse you."
So, while they ultimately did the right thing in terms of replacing my jeans, I am really disappointed with how I was treated. I mean this was not some cunning plan I concocted, nor was I trying to get something for nothing, yet they treated me as if I had pulled a fast one. And now I have the pleasure of sitting in jeans that look like crap and reek like bleach for the rest of my workday. And I will need to drive to Banana Republic, which is not close, purchase a new pair of pants, and then bring that receipt back to Target.
And I think this speaks to an unfortunate epidemic in American retail -- the complete breakdown in customer service. No one at the Kohler Target store offered me an apology. And while they are going to replace my jeans, their manager made it clear to me that she wasn't happy about it.
Funny thing is that customer service is one of the reasons I choose to shop at Target over Wal-Mart, and while I will never happily go to Wal- Mart, I may consider going somewhere other than Target.
Reply
| Log In/Create an account | 98 comments |
|
|
| PlanetFeedback Comments are subject to strict terms and conditions. We reserve the right to deny site membership privileges to any individuals acting inappropriately. |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
by jaj j. Posted Mon June 9, 2008 @ 11:47 PM
|
|
|
I guess my question is...Why do you feel like it was the manager's responsibility to apologize for your neglegence? I mean, she didnt spill it on you. I personally travel to several Targets(job related) and other retail stores and I would honestly have to put Target's customer service on top and I dont even shop there. I think you should've have been satisfied that they offered you anything. If there really was a hole already in the bleach container, why couldnt you smell it? I mean, a leaking bleach container will give off a strong smell. I'm not convinced that the hole was already there, at least not since it was something such as bleach. The manager was probably irratated that you would approach her expecting a miracle although it was really your fault. I mean what did you expect, a check for the cost of your jeans?
Reply
|
|
 |
|

|
by BellaSera Posted Sun May 18, 2008 @ 9:44 PM
|
|
|
I just read something in Redhead's blog about remembering that everyone has things that bother them that don't necessarily bother other people. I know there has been a lot of discussion about apologies, and I've revised my original though process somewhat.
At first I thought that the lack of an apology wasn't really a big deal here. But since Redhead's latest blog posting, I think an apology is one of those things that really bothers the OP, and could make or break his customer service experience. And...that's fine. To me, this isn't a "total breakdown in customer service", but to the OP it is. And we shouldn't fault him for that.
There are many reasons why an apology may not have been forthcoming. Maybe it WAS an admission of guilt to the employees. Perhaps they just didn't feel they had anything to apologize for. (It was an accident after all.) Or maybe they were so flustered, because they've never had to deal with something like this before, and were so busy dealing with the situation that they didn't think to apologize for it. I know I've been in customer service situations where I didn't apologize, even though I probably should have, because I was focusing all my energy on dealing with the situation.
We never get the full story in these letters, and we'll never really know what was going on from Target's end. I do think that Target handled the basics fine. They didn't know how much the OP paid for his jeans, and they were right to offer him a pair of their own. And the OP was right to ask them to replace the full value. And if the lack of an apology is really what bothers him...then...okay.
I have other thoughts about this letter which I won't share here. But I think Target should've just apologized and been done with it.
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|

|
by chilin stone cold Posted Sun May 18, 2008 @ 6:28 PM
|
|
|
Soooo Kari have you gotten your new pants yet and did they reimburse you without any further issue???
Reply
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|
|
by Buddy Posted Sun May 18, 2008 @ 5:35 PM
|
|
|
At least you're doing Target the favor of not returning. That a huge plus for them.
Reply
|
|
 |
|
|
by Disgruntled Retail Employee Posted Sun May 18, 2008 @ 1:53 AM
|
|
|
Was the more senior manager rude because "She then eyeballs me from toe to head..."? She was probably assessing the damage done to your clothing. I am not familiar with the product that ruined your clothes (I thought gels weren't as harsh as liquids), but did you mention that it was burning you?
Unfortunately, in this sue-happy country, retailers have to be extremely careful about apologies in such instances. Not that one wasn't due, but I would think it would be Clorox, the manufacturer, to apologize for a faulty product rather than Target.
One thing I'm curious about - what are lunch-counter, slaughterhouse dungarees?
Reply
|
|
 |
|

|
by ♪♪Venice♪♪ Posted Sun May 18, 2008 @ 12:35 AM
|
|
|
Question for Karl:
While I was in Target tonight, I looked at the container of bleach you had the problem with, and I can't understand how it spilled. The spout is not only underneath the cap, but it's recessed and surrounded by a moat specifically designed to prevent spillage and direct the flow back into the container. Also, the bottle is not filled all the way to the top. Even with a hole in the spout, unless you turned the bottle almost upside down, I don't see how the gel could spill out. Was the cap on the bottle when you grabbed it off the shelf?
This has nothing to do with the treatment you received, but I was just curious how this happened.
Reply
|
|

|
Answer
by Karl P. Mon May 19, 2008 @ 11:19 AM
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|
by babyboat Posted Sat May 17, 2008 @ 4:07 PM
|
|
|
Target's return policy stinks also. They will not give you a gift card or use the returned items value towards any purchase if you don't have a receipt. I had purchased a baby item and losr my receipt. I was told I could only purchase an item in the specific baby item section of equal value or greater. I could not get diapers, or children toys or shoes b/c that was a different dept, that is where WalMart has a much better and forgiving return policy, plus Taregt only allows 2 returns w/o receipts a year.
Reply
|
|
|
|
 |
|

|
by olie Posted Sat May 17, 2008 @ 12:53 AM
|
|
|
On Clorox 2 bottles, the entire spout is enclosed inside the cap/measuring cup. At least in the half-gallon size. Did you happen to unscrew the cap so you could smell the product? And that's when it spilled?
And here: Your own words--"assuring me that Target would buy me a new pair of jeans. And while this was what I wanted to hear..." You wanted them to provide a new pair of jeans. They just didn't offer the jeans you wanted. You admit that you wanted Target to offer replacement jeans. It's only when they offer you Target jeans instead of Banana Republic jeans that you have a problem.
It's not Target's fault that you wore jeans to work and shopped there on your lunch period. They DID offer a solution. It's just not the solution you wanted.
Reply
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
by cissy Posted Fri May 16, 2008 @ 7:39 PM
|
|
|
I am dismayed not one employee offered first aid or to summon medical assistence. Since it was burning your leg the first reponse should have been to your discomfort. This would be my complaint to the Head Office,then the clothes. Good luck.
Reply
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|

|
by All About the Branding Posted Fri May 16, 2008 @ 4:58 PM
|
|
|
Several years ago, I purchased some rice from Target. It was Target brand (they teamed with a popular Asian celebri-chef).
I followed the cooking directions.
A few minutes later, my neighbor rang the doorbell asking why smoke was pouring from my kitchen.
Sure enough, the amount of water they said to put in the pan wasn't enough and the rice was not burning.
My pot was ruined.
So, I wrote to Target. Not to demand millions of dollars because, gasp, my house could have burned down. But to let them know that the directions weren't correct. And, if they could replace my pot (since they sell pots), that'd be great.
A week or so later, I got a call from Target's insurance company. "All you want is for us to replace your pot?" she asked. I said "yes." She asked how much these pots were. "Well, you don't sell this particular one, but I can buy it on Amazon for $40. I'd be happy to take an XYZ pot, that Target sells also for $40."
She said, "I'm sending you a check for $100. Buy the pot whereever you want."
I got the check. On the back, where you endorse it, was the statement that said something like "By depositing/cashing this check, I agree to hold the Target Corporation blameless for the matter that I reported. I agree that I will seek no further compensation for this matter and I will not pursue this matter any further... yadda yadda yadda."
I doubt the woman ever said "sorry the directions were wrong." She was working for an insurance company and wanted to ensure that she paid me off so that I didn't sue them or whatever.
I bought the new pot and had plenty of money left over for something else.
Reply
|
|
 |
|
by Peregrina Posted Thu May 15, 2008 @ 4:33 PM
|
|
|
After reading letters like this, I remember why I disliked retail so much. Nothing they said would have pleased you, nothing they did would have been enough and even if they had bent over backward with gift cards and apologies, you still would have found something to complain about.
I've always wondered about the mind-set of people who want 'apologies' for accidents. After a customer bit my head off for apologizing and told me that I 'should be ashamed' of myself, I never apologized to customers unless it really was my fault. (If I left something in their way or bumped into them, for instance, I apologized, but if they pulled something down on their heads, I would ask if they were all right, but I wouldn't apologize.)
You are getting reimbursed for you jeans, I'm not sure what else you expect Target to do, except maybe post a sign over the bleach bottles telling people to check before they go yanking it off the shelves.
Also, and this is just me being morbidly curious, how did you stand wearing jeans all day that smelled of bleach? I can only be around the stuff for a few minutes before I get a screaming migraine from the fumes.
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by T. C. Posted Thu May 15, 2008 @ 8:00 PM
|
|
|
And no I will not name the company but suffice it to say a store manager with them is a stockboy with keys.
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
It must take you forever to shop since you check every bottle you pick up for any kind of defect that might occur.
A company that gives a stock boy keys and calls him a store manager is not on the same level as Target. Every retail store that I have worked at gave the managers the power to make things right. Even when I was just a supervisor I could make my own decisions to a certain point. A $78.00 pair of pants is not worth losing a customer over.
Reply
|
|
|
|

|

|
tamper
by SuzieCat Thu May 15, 2008 @ 11:24 PM
|
|
|

|

|
lids
by SuzieCat Thu May 15, 2008 @ 9:02 PM
|
|
|

|

|
Some of
by ~Fiƒi-la-ƒlea~ Thu May 15, 2008 @ 9:11 PM
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|
by Zan Posted Thu May 15, 2008 @ 1:47 PM
|
|
|
You were as much to blame as Target. They didn't put the hole in the bleach bottle. And you didn't watch what you were doing when you "grabbed" (your own word) it. I actually think they were being more than generous in offering you a new pair of "their lunch-counter, slaughterhouse dungarees" (that insult to Target is completely uncalled for and doesn't belong in a business letter, BTW) - let alone giving into your demand for a pair that would meet your standards. Of course the manager wasn't happy about it, and if you were as condescending to her in person as you are in your letter, she's probably even more unhappy.
"And I will need to drive to Banana Republic, which is not close, purchase a new pair of pants, and then bring that receipt back to Target."
Okay, THAT is just ridiculous! You're the one that demanded they spring for the Banana Republic jeans. Did you want them go out shopping for you too? You'd probably find something to complain about the ones they bought if they did anyway.
I'm sorry this happened to you, Karl.
Feel better now?
Reply
|
|

|

|
I'll bite
by Donno Fri May 16, 2008 @ 5:01 PM
|
|
|

|

|
And I do too
by chilin stone cold Sun May 18, 2008 @ 11:57 AM
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
As I posted below, I think the OP deserves to get full compensation for his ruined clothing. But then I was wondering... if he had come from work or a job interview in an expensive suit, should Target have to compensate him for the suit? Where is the line drawn?
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|

|
by All About the Branding Posted Thu May 15, 2008 @ 11:49 AM
|
|
|
What I don't understand is what's the answer you were looking for?
Were you looking for them to open the register and had you some cash? Were you looking for them to volunteer to have someone run out to the mall and buy you a replacement right then-and-there?
The lack of an apology, is disappointing. But I'm not sure that the situation, as you laid it out here, is really an example of the death of customer service. In fact, the way I read it, they did better than many businesses: they offered you a quick replacement with something in the store, they offered you reimbursement.
Could they have had their act together better? Maybe. But the fact is that they got someone who did her best. And, gosh, with the attitude you're throwing around here, I somehow suspect that part of your complaint is... excuse me... imagined. But, hey, maybe I'm wrong. If I am, then take this advice: if you want people to believe you, don't come across as you did in this letter.
In any case, I very much sympathize that you had to stand around covered with bleach. If this were me, I'd clean up before complaining because, well, bleach is hazardous (even if it's gentler on fabrics). Why, oh why, didn't you have the common sense to get yourself safe before you launched into your quest for "customer service"?
Reply
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
I work in retail setting just like Target except its pure grocery. To not offer an apology is totally rude. The fact that you are compensating the customer is admittance enough.
I would replace the ladies clothes with something from our stock so she could return to work We would keep her damaged clothes, and she would look for receipts. If she did not have them we would come together on a dollar amount. Then of course have her sign a release from liability form. Apologize again, and be done with it.
Good Day
Reply
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
Here's the problem with your logic:
Target very quickly and efficiently worked to remedy the situation WITHOUT EVER ADMITTING ANY FAULT OR BLAME! They aren't going to apologize to you because that would indicate that they did something wrong and could open them up to all kinds of litigious fanatics.
For all they know, the bottle of bleached was shipped to them from the manufacturer in that condition or the damage happened to the container in transit. Why should they apologize for that? That's another reason they aren't about to admit any wrongdoing.
They're replacing your precious "Banana Republic" jeans. Let it go and move on.
Reply
|
|
 |
|

|
by BellaSera Posted Thu May 15, 2008 @ 8:57 AM
|
|
|
Despite the arrogant tone of the letter, I am kind of on your side because a similar thing happened to me at Target a couple of years ago. I picked up a bottle of bleach cleanser, the top wasn't on tightly enough, and some of the cleanser leaked on my t-shirt. Although not Banana Republic, the t-shirt was still relatively new enough to make the situation irritating. I didn't ask to get the t-shirt replaced, though.
While Target employees didn't hold you down and pour bleach on your pants, the merchandise WAS defective and that means they're at fault. And like Redhead said, Banana Republic jeans are expensive (for me at least). Why would I want to replace them with a pair of Target jeans which are much less expensive and not of the same quality?
But I don't see where this translates into a "complete breakdown of customer service." You were offered a resolution that was not acceptable. Fine. They then gave you a resolution that WAS acceptable, albeit without an apology. Is that really what's eating at you though?
"And I will need to drive to Banana Republic, which is not close, purchase a new pair of pants, and then bring that receipt back to Target."
Which is exactly what you wanted to do.
Reply
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
You really are full of yourself, aren't you. All this because no one rolled out the red carpet of apologies.
It seems to me that they handled this pretty well. Someone got right on the issue and then escalated it immediately when you were not happy with their first offer. Of course their first offer is going to be an item from their store. I would actually expect that. When that was not accepted, they offered you exactly what you wanted. Oh wait, you actually have to go buy them. What did you expect? That they would send an employee to do that?
Reply
|
|
 |
|

|
by ♪♪Venice♪♪ Posted Thu May 15, 2008 @ 2:04 AM
|
|
|
If your attitude with the Target employees was anything like it is in this letter, I'm surprised they were as nice to you as they were. There's no doubt in my mind that even if someone apologized, you still would have written the letter.
Of course they weren't happy having to pay for your pants due to something that was beyond their control, and if the only reason you wrote this letter is because a smiling employee didn't roll out the red carpet and apologize, it only makes you look ungrateful for what they did do. The fact that they were willing to accommodate you is an apology in itself.
I think you wanted them to wave a magic wand and somehow turn back time so you didn't ruin your clothes, didn't smell like bleach, didn't have to drive to Banana Republic and didn't have to experience one bit of inconvenience for something that in your own words was a "mere mishap". Being told that you could pick out any pair of jeans on the house was an immediate solution to "sitting in jeans that look like crap and reek like bleach for the rest of my workday". You chose to wear the jeans instead of making the best of an unfortunate situation.
I must be behind the times. If this happened to me, I wouldn't have expected the store to replace my jeans. If the bottle didn't leak until you got home, would you have complained to Target or to Clorox?
Reply
|
|
 |
|
|
|
I think it was more than generous for them to offer to give you a pair of jeans right then, and even more so when you turned them down and they agreed to pay for you to pick out a new pair from Banana Republic.
Although this wasn't a pleasant experience, they have made it as easy as they could. The reality here is that you have damaged property - damage that happened in their store. What they could have done (and were probably supposed to do, but I don't know their policy)is take all of your information and file a claim with their insurance company - much like a claim is filed if someone slips and falls - it is just called in as property damage. Then you could have waited for someone to call you and get your story, you could have continued to wait while they decided if they were going to replace your used jeans and then you could have waited for funds.
Nothing about your situation represents an erosion of customer service. Sure the bottle shouldn't have leaked, but geez, nobody did it on purpose. As for an apology - I am sure they are sorry - sorry about the bleach, sorry about your jeans, sorry they had to deal with you at all.
Reply
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|

|
by Donno Posted Thu May 15, 2008 @ 12:43 AM
|
|
|
You know, some customers will do just about anything to make a claim like this. That is why they may have treated you with some suspicion. Look at it from their point of view instead of being insulted. They agreed to replace your jeans. So you run to the internet and complain.
You sound completely full of yourself. You refer to their jeans as "lunch-counter slaughterhouse dungarees." So why shop there if it is so beneath your standards?
They offered to pay for full replacement of your fancy dancy jeans. But you didn't get your apology. Geesh. "I'm sorry you spilled bleach on yourself because of a manufacturer's defect." (it really isn't Target's fault) Is that good enough for you? You complain you had to go about your day looking like crap because you spilled this stuff on yourself. What did you expect them to do, drive to Banana republic while you waited and buy them for you? You refused their "slaughterhouse" replacements, so what other option is there?
I think you got exactly what you wanted except an apology. Why that rates an internet complaint I'm not sure. I'd be more concerned about my cafe jeans than an apology from a lunch-counter customer service representative.
Maybe you should shop at the stores located in the same place as Banana Republic. They will stretch your wallet further, but you'll get the customer service and all the apologies you demand.
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
I agree with the OP in that he should be reimbursed for his clothing. Target doesn't make a pair of jeans that I can or would wear (Target generally doesn't carry short chick stuff), and if bleach spilled on my $60 Gap jeans, I'd be pretty insistent that they get replaced. Why would I want $20 jeans from Target that don't fit me?
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|

|
I remember
by ~Fiƒi-la-ƒlea~ Fri May 16, 2008 @ 10:23 AM
|
|
|
 |
|
|
by gb Posted Wed May 14, 2008 @ 8:49 PM
|
|
|
You are going to be reimbursed for your pants and you are still not happy. I guess there are people that will always find something to complain about!
Reply
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|
|
by Evil N Posted Wed May 14, 2008 @ 7:01 PM
|
|
|
Yeah, really. You spilled the bleach. Target didn't. It was an accident. Why should Target have to apologize for your accident?
Reply
|
|
 |
|
|
|
I have to agree with SusanB.
I'm not sure why they would need to apologize since you spilled the bleach on yourself.
The best you might hope for is an "I'm so sorry that happened to you", but really, how much is that worth? It qualifies as a courtesy at best, but it's certainly not required.
Get your new pants and be happy, I say. Life's too short.
Reply
|
|
 |
|
by SusanB Posted Wed May 14, 2008 @ 6:47 PM
|
|
|
I guess I'm pretty "low maintenance" because I honestly don't undertand the value in an apology. It wasn't Target's fault there was apparently a hole in the bottle and I think their offer to replace your Banana Republic jeans was actually quite generous considering the circumstances.
Reply
|
|
|
 |
|
|