|
|
Walmart Gouging on "Economy" Sized Products
Posted Tue February 24, 2009 12:00 pm, by Robert M. written to Walmart
Write a Letter to this Company | Rate this Company
Over the past few months, while shopping at the Glen Ellyn, IL, Walmart on 59, I've noticed that items available in "value" sized packaging, such as larger packages of dishwasher detergent (70oz = $3.25, 140oz = $6.65, 15 more), deodorant twin pack (single = $2.99, twin = $6.33, 35 more), and even family sized snack crackers (8oz = $2.01, 12oz = $3.23, 24 more) are priced higher per ounce than the smaller packaging.
So when we attempt to be environmentally aware and frugal, we're being ripped off by paying more per ounce on the larger sizes of identical products.
With the urge to reduce waste because of environemtnal concerns and the need to save in this current economy, it's shocking that Walmart is gouging their "guests" by overcharging on products that they themselves paid the manufacturer less for.
I want Walmart to be honest and fair in it's pricing. Stop jacking up the prices of larger sized packaging simply because that's what people gravitate towards when their trying to save money! That's like a slap the face of your guests when they trust Walmart to be the best place to go to save money.
I recently saved $3 just by buying two smaller sized packages instead of the available "value" sized on several basic items.
Do you think an investigative show like 20/20 be interested at looking into the pricing policies of a behemoth like Walmart? I'm sure most readers are thinking it's only as few cents, but with Walmart's volume that easily equals millions every month in dishonest profit.
Reply
| Log In/Create an account | 35 comments |
|
|
| PlanetFeedback Comments are subject to strict terms and conditions. We reserve the right to deny site membership privileges to any individuals acting inappropriately. |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
by X Jiffy Lube Posted Sun March 1, 2009 @ 6:26 PM
|
|
|
I really don't think there is any dishonesty here. The prices are there for everyone to see, including those who don't know how to add or subtract. Good for you for recognizing that you could save a few bucks buying the smaller sizes items but really there is nothing more to read into.
Reply
|
|
 |
|
|
|
Walmart not matter what anyone thinks is in this business to make a profit (huge as it is already).
Like you I am a smart shopper and do not take anything for granted just because its in a "double" pack. I too check prices and make sure I am getting the most I can for my money.
However, sad to say there are many people out there who will never look at a price because they need that item or they just do not care what it costs and just toss it in the cart.
Its not illegal to make a profit and whether its Walmart or any other store they do appreciate those customers who never check the prices or compare.
Reply
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|
|
by Tiffy611 Posted Wed February 25, 2009 @ 7:59 PM
|
|
|
If you look closely at the price stickers on the shelf at Wal-Mart, you'll notice a yellow cornor on the upper left with the price per unit. It is very simple to compare those and buy the better bargain. They did the math and provide you with the info, it is up to you to use it!
Before anyone says it: I read the price tages, have double checked random labels, and found the math to be accurate, and can buy accordingly.
Reply
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
by S W. Posted Wed February 25, 2009 @ 1:01 PM
|
|
|
I don't ever recall being told that the economy size products always offer the best deal. It's always been that the economy size COULD offer a better deal.
The consumer needs to pay attention to the unit pricing and take care of themselves. That's why unit pricing was put in place...to enable you to do that. If it's not displayed, use a calculator.
WalMart isn't ripping people off, at least on in this case. This is marketing as it has long been done.
No business is going to hold your hand and make sure you get the best deal by always packaging the best deal a certain way. You need to take care of yourself and pay attention when you shop.
Reply
|
|

|
DITTO!
by Kim M. Wed February 25, 2009 @ 7:55 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
by Mike Z. Posted Wed February 25, 2009 @ 10:29 AM
|
|
|
Im your next door neighbor in Lombard. If you really want to help the local economy, don't shop at Wal-Mart!! There are a number of smaller businesses in the area where you could buy these items that would appreciate your business very much. The more business you throw Wal-Mart's way, the more you are hurting Glen Ellyn businesses. Food for thought.
Reply
|
|
|
|
by Steve-OH Posted Thu February 26, 2009 @ 8:36 PM
|
|
|
Reply
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|
|
by jeishere Posted Wed February 25, 2009 @ 9:35 AM
|
|
|
I think this might be a good thing. As more and more people are affected by the economy and living paycheck to paycheck, this gives them the option to buy the smaller size at a cheaper price and maybe have a little money left over.
Reply
|
|
 |
|
|
|
You have to do your own unit pricing. 10+ years ago, I was shopping at Sam's Club and things like ketchup and tuna were more expensive in bulk than they were at the grocery store. Not every "economy" size product is worth buying.
Reply
|
|
|
|
 |
|

|
by Donno Posted Tue February 24, 2009 @ 8:08 PM
|
|
|
This has been going on at stores for decades. As always, it is buyer beware. This is the power of the unit price tags for those unwilling to do the math in their heads, which I used to do in the dark ages before unit pricing.
WalMart could care less about the environment, and frankly I doubt most stores would consider pricing larger items lower per unit volume/weight based on environmental impact. Stores are in business to make money, and playing games with different sized product and prices is one way they do that. Larger is not always cheaper.
Reply
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
For the longest time, retailers priced the larger version of products less on a per ounce basis than the smaller versions. It used to be that the small version was a "bad buy" and getting the large version saved you some money AND it was a good thing for the retailer because they managed to pry some extra cash from your wallet without having to spend much more in extra packaging costs. Even with a built in discount, the profit margin usually was better on a larger item simply because the packaging costs were less.
Lately, that trend has been shifting, for unknown reasons.
Reply
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
I've seen this at other retailers as well. I always check the "price per unit" pricing before I decide to buy the bigger item.
Reply
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|