|
|
Deplorable Customer Service from Frederick's of Hollywood
Posted Thu March 5, 2009 12:00 pm, by Heather W. written to Frederick's of Hollywood
I purchased a pair of $60.00 boots in September 2008. I wore them approximately 10 times, when one of the heels on the boots completely snapped off while I was wearing them. I contacted the company via email in February 2009, requesting a full refund for the boots, due to the extremely poor quality. I would expect to have a pair of shoes for much longer than 5 months before they become damaged.
I offered to send the boots back as proof that they were in fact damaged. The company responded that because it was past the 90 day timeframe for returns, they would not honor my refund request. I told them to forward my email to a manager because I would not accept no for an answer.
The company did not respond for almost a week, so I emailed them again, asking if they were planning on ignoring my complaint. They then wrote back and said they would be "willing" (!) to offer me a store credit reflective of 50% the purchase price of the boots - in essence, a $27.00 credit towards my next purchase.
I responded that I would in no way be shopping with them in the future, as I did not see this as a solution to my problem. I also said that it is deplorable that they do not stand behind the quality of their products. The company did not respond.
I would like a full refund to my credit card for the cost of the boots. This is the only resolution with which I will be satisfied. I am happy to send them back to the company, as long as the company provides a prepaid return label or arranges for a package pickup.
Reply
| Log In/Create an account | 40 comments |
|
|
| PlanetFeedback Comments are subject to strict terms and conditions. We reserve the right to deny site membership privileges to any individuals acting inappropriately. |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
by Shrew2u Posted Sun March 15, 2009 @ 6:43 PM
|
|
|
Well, at least now you are fully aware of what their return policy is. Your feet are far too important to screw up with poorly-made shoes - invest in a quality shoe and use a cobbler to re-sole/repair them, it'll be the best money you've ever spent.
In the meantime, I would have taken the offer of the $27.00 credit to buy something non-shoe, and shopped for replacement boots elsewhere. Clarks was an excellent suggestion - they have some very cute boots (not as high a heel as Freddie's tends to have) that are actually built to last.
Reply
|
|
 |
|
|
|
you didn't try to return a thong!
Reply
|
|
 |
|
|
by Buddy Posted Sun March 8, 2009 @ 7:31 PM
|
|
|
I think they were being very generous with the offer that they made to you. Since you were past the 90 day return window, they did not have to offer you a thing.
Reply
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|
|
by Buddy Posted Sun March 8, 2009 @ 7:29 PM
|
|
|
$60 for a pair of boots? Well, you know what they say, you get what you pay for!
Reply
|
|
 |
|
by Marty5223 Posted Sun March 8, 2009 @ 10:35 AM
|
|
|
Was the boots 54 dollars/ Asking because 50% is 30.00 dollars not 27.00.
I would take the 27 dollars and buy something besides boots.
The reason I say this is you could not rent boots for 3.00 dollars or $2.70 cents for each of the 10 times you used them. You did get some use of the product.
Heals can break for all kinds of reasons. Were you running, stepped in a grate or crack in sidewalk, dancing, jumping. Also I don't know this but if your plus size it might be to much stress. Not saying your overweight I have no way of knowing this...just throwing that out.
Anyway 27.00 dollars is better than nothing. I doubt that you could get the boot repaired for that amount.
If I was the store I would not give you a full refund either. I might and this is only MIGHT exchange them if I knew if others had similar problems.
Reply
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
by cissy Posted Fri March 6, 2009 @ 2:49 PM
|
|
|
You have learned a valuable lesson (as I did) with boots. Keep the receipt but ultimately ask for information regarding a warranty/guarentee. I hope you receive some sort of compensation. Good luck.
Reply
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
You wrote requesting a refund for your boots, which the heel broke off, but you did not say exactly when your heel broke off, only that you informed them in Feb 2009.
I would listen to a few of the other posters in here...find someone that repairs footwear and have it repaired.
And I would also take the other boot with you to have them look at it to see if there are any other loose or weak areas regarding the heels.
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|

|
by olie Posted Thu March 5, 2009 @ 11:28 PM
|
|
|
Before malls carried the soft-core porn that is Victoria's Secret, a select few carried Frederick's of Hollywood. Think more feathery trim, more lace; fewer undergarments that actual women would wear on a daily basis. Basically, a lingerie store for women who would never ever dare to venture into the back section of a video store or into an adult toy store.
I would guess that OP's boots were not intended for outdoor use. Or even repeated indoor use. I'd guess that they were more for, um, "dress-up". How high were the heels? How solid or spiky?
Most retailers won't offer a refund of any kind after 5 months. You don't offer much "proof" that the boots were made poorly, only your word that the heel came off. I could probably yank a heel off a high heel. My dogs would certainly be able to chew one off. What caused the heel to "snap off" while you were wearing the boots? Dog? Saw? Knife? Playing tug-of-war in an effort to get $60 back for something that doesn't appeal to you any more?
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
by MayDay Posted Sat March 7, 2009 @ 6:06 PM
|
|
|
We have a cobbler in one of our smaller towns and he has been in business ever since I can remember, the man is like 80 years old. He fixes broken shoes, straps on purses, you name it..he can do it! He is a real sweet guy from Italy and he doesn't charge that much at all..I tend to give him a little more than he asks for!
I'm a true believer in buying good quality shoes, I hate that vinyl leather stuff that they make sneakers out of. I look forever for decent shoes for my son, they all make the fake leather ones which last like a week, with what 5 year olds put them thru.
The best shoes I have ever owned were Clarks and Aerosoles, the style wears out before the shoe does!
Reply
|
|
|
|
by Final Score: Boys-3, Girls-1 Posted Mon March 9, 2009 @ 2:02 PM
|
|
|
and got close to the employees in the process. One of the girls in their marketing department gave me a pair of shoes as a gift once, and they are one of the most comfortable pairs of shoes I own. I've had them for eight years and they are still in great shape!
Reply
|
|
 |
|

|
by Wolf Posted Thu March 5, 2009 @ 6:04 PM
|
|
|
They don't know what you were doing while wearing them. They don't know how long you were wearing them for. Or if you caught the heel on something.
I too wear boots (Not from there though). The boots that I wear are normally $65. (I happen to get them on sale for $25.) When I was working, I wore them to work. You stated that you wore them around 10 times. For me to wear them just 10 times that would have me ON them (not just riding in the car) for just over 100 HOURS. That was on concrete walking/standing for all that time. That is JUST at work. Not counting if I went anywhere AFTER work. That is a LOT of wear for just 10 times.
I would suggest that you see if a Shoe repair place can put the heel back on. I don't think they charge too much.
Reply
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
You only paid $60.00 for boots? Those sound like a very cheap pair of boots. Were they on sale (deep discount) or something? I just bought my 13 yr old son tennis shoes that cost $75.00
Reply
|
|

|

|
Where
by Wolf Thu March 5, 2009 @ 6:08 PM
|
|
|
|
|

|

|
He
by Wolf Thu March 5, 2009 @ 6:53 PM
|
|
|
|
|

|

|
I am
by Wolf Thu March 5, 2009 @ 8:23 PM
|
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
|
|
|
I agree that a company should stand behind its products, but $60 for boots is *awfully* cheap. I don't think I'd count on boots that cost anything under $100.
NOt saying they shouldn't refund your money -- just saying that some products shouldn't be made and sold AT ALL without reaching some sort of minimum expectation of performance.
Reply
|
|
|
|

|

|
and
by ♫Venice♫ Thu March 5, 2009 @ 5:45 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|

|
by Donno Posted Thu March 5, 2009 @ 11:38 AM
|
|
|
There seems to be some question as to whether the company's proposed solution is an offer.
I think it is. You used the boots for 5 months, past the returns period. You have no warranty, and the company has no idea the manner in which you wore the boots.
I can understand that you would be suspicious of buying their product again, and I wouldn't blame you if you didn't. But I think the company's offer is fair.
Reply
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
You are probably past the time frame of returns with a receipt.
If you want a good pair of boots, there are alot better places out there for them. Justin makes a good line of boots.
I think their offer was very appropriate.
Good Day
Reply
|
|
|
 |
|
|