|
|
Auto Gratuity Policy at Joe's Crab Shack is Not Clear
Posted Wed May 20, 2009 12:00 pm, by Teresa B. written to Joe's Crab Shack
Write a Letter to this Company
This took place at the Destin, Fl location on Mother's Day.
My friends and I went to the Joe's Crab Shack for a Mothers Day dinner. We have all loved Joe's and Eat at Joe's as often as possible. We were a group of 11 however we all were paying seperate. One person paid for 5 people, one for 4 people and then one paid for herself and then I paid for myself. But it did get somewhat complicated. My best friend wanted to share the Steam Pot for 2 and since her son was paying for her, I gave him the money for me. However, I had already ordered a Cat 6 Hurricane so I had already created a check.
I want to say that the service was outstanding. The food was the best. However, the problem came when we paid. We did not find it out until a few days later when we were all talking. I got the bill for my ONE drink and it was $12.99 which is about $3.00 more then what it should have been, I noticed that I was being charged a auto gratuity. So I didnt care, but I put $15.00 in the book and excused myself to the restroom telling my friends to get my change.
A few days later, I remembered that I had not gotten my change back from my friend and asked her about it. She said that the server never brought it back. So basicly I paid $15.00 for ONE drink. I was alittle put out buy this. I paid a 50% gratuity. The friend who was paying for 4 told me that she also was charged for a auto gratuity and then the friend who paid for my meal and the other 5 was also charged the auto gratutiy of 18%.
From what I understand, this was not suppose to happen. Since we split the bill, it did not quailify as the large group auto 18% gratuity. According to Joe's menu a auto gratuity will apply to parties of 8 or more. I realize that we had 11 but since we split the check, I and others thought that we would pay what we deemed appropriate.
I just want to understand for future reference how the auto gratutiy works. Does it apply for any party of 8 or more that is seated together regaurdless of how the check is split?
I have no other complaints. This is one of the best locations in the chain and highly recommend it.
Reply
| Log In/Create an account | 48 comments |
|
|
| PlanetFeedback Comments are subject to strict terms and conditions. We reserve the right to deny site membership privileges to any individuals acting inappropriately. |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
by Palsgraf Posted Wed December 30, 2009 @ 8:45 AM
|
|
|
First, I didn't know Joe's Crab Shack was still around!
Second: The gratuity is a 'suggested' gratuity. You can speak with a manager to have it removed (though, if I had a problem warranting that, I'd probably just pay the bill but never return).
Third. As stated before, you should have addressed the price discrepancy immediately with someone.
Best Wishes.
Reply
|
|
 |
|
|
|
when i worked at holiday inn we added gratuity to groups of six or more. some people in these groups would try to get around that by paying separately. this is not a loophole. if you are sitting together and obviously together, separate tickets or not, the auto gratuity applies. the server is waiting on a large group no matter how the total gets split. it takes more time and is harder and she is missing out on other tables, that quite frankly would probably be more lucrative while waiting on you.
Reply
|
|
 |
|

|
by MayDay Posted Sat May 23, 2009 @ 11:22 AM
|
|
|
While in Orlando last spring we went to a place that added 18% on just 3 people. 2 adults and 1 kid. It was called Carving Station and not only was it ridiculously overpriced, the food was just average and dried out.
So the waitress received a near 12 dollar tip for bringing lemonades and clearing plates. So I guess the restaurant can put into place whatever auto-grat policy they want. Apparently this place automatically adds it on to every check no matter what the size the of the group is.
Going out to eat is really complicated anymore. Servers and customers alike always expect the worst from each other it seems.
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|
|
by Anonymous A. Posted Fri May 22, 2009 @ 5:58 AM
|
|
|
Auto gratuity is put in effect with tables of 8 or more regardless of how many split the check. It's the whole issue of serving so many people at once, even though you see yourself as an individual. You are still indeed part of that big group. All 11 of you can pay for your own bill, but you will still be charged 18%; however, most places automatically put the gratuity in the bill amount so they won't get stiffed. As far as the mystery to your change, either the waitress assumed that she could keep the change(since you went to the bathroom) or forgot to bring back the change, or someone at your table kept your change and didn't admit to it. Hope this helps.
Reply
|
|
 |
|
by Sarah J. Posted Thu May 21, 2009 @ 9:58 AM
|
|
|
When I did waitressing it was over 8 people that we got to add the 18% tip. Why because you are all sitting at the same table whether you ask for seperate checks or not you are a party of 11 people.
That is just how it works. I was lucky that I got $7 an hour but it was because no one wanted to get up at 5 Am to do the breakfast and brunch shifts but that wage made up for it on slow days.
I do think that they should raise the wage some more for servers.Especially if they have to pool their tips like some places like Applebees, when I worked there I would be excited I made $230 a night but then realized after tipping the bartenders and also the hosts and bussers there was not as much to be so excited about.
Reply
|
|
 |
|
|

|

|
better yet
by PepperElf Wed May 20, 2009 @ 10:20 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|

|
by PepperElf Posted Wed May 20, 2009 @ 6:58 PM
|
|
|
However if you feel your tip was too much, I suppose you could ask for the server for your change, less the standard tip, or more if you so choose.
However... even though you split the bill, it still qualifies for the mandatory tip.
Why? Because splitting the bill does not split the work the waiters have to do to service such a large group.
Reply
|
|
 |
|

|
by Donno Posted Wed May 20, 2009 @ 6:53 PM
|
|
|
is not the best idea. I am in the camp of the server didn't see you again, and thought that whatever was in the book was for the bill and a tip. Now if your *friend* handed the server the book, it would be reasonable the server return it to her.
If your one drink should have been $9.99, then 18% would be around $1.80, so I am confused as to how it went up $3.00. I would have asked about this on the spot, and the 18% if it concerned you. It should be 18%, as others have pointed out.
Reply
|
|
|
|

|
not tax
by Nicole F. Thu May 21, 2009 @ 10:09 PM
|
|
|
 |
|
|
by Lisa H. Posted Wed May 20, 2009 @ 5:10 PM
|
|
|
Many people have addressed the "party" vs "checks" issue very well, so I'll leave that.
It seems like your other complaint was that you didn't get your change back? I suppose the waitress didn't see you at the table when she returned and assumed you had left and the change was for her? Even so, I agree she should have checked with someone at the table.
My other thought is that maybe your change ended up with someone else else by mistake? It sounds like there was confusion at the end of the meal.
Reply
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
by Final Score: Boys-3, Girls-1 Posted Wed May 20, 2009 @ 1:17 PM
|
|
|
Even if each individual paid for themself, and there were 11 checks, you were still there together, making you a PARTY OF 11.
Is that clear?
People try to split checks in large parties thinking they've found a loophole in the auto-gratuity system. Not everyone does it for that reason, but many do. Either way, it's not fair for the server to lose out on the auto-grat because the check was split (for whatever reason), because splitting checks is actually more work.
Reply
|
|
|
|

|
In our system
by Final Score: Boys-3, Girls-1 Wed May 20, 2009 @ 2:06 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
You're wrong on one thing: You WERE a large party regardless of how you split the checks. To expect otherwise is rather naive.
However, to not bring you your change back? You paid over what the bill stated, and since the bill included gratuity, every penny over that amount should have been returned to you.
I think you all should get together, figure this out, and speak with the manager.
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|

|
by Just Jeffrey Posted Wed May 20, 2009 @ 10:53 AM
|
|
|
Everyone else is hitting on the "just because you split the check, we're no longer a group of 11" thing.
So, I'll tackle two other things.
First, some say that any form of auto-gratuity is wrong. They say tipping should always be at the discretion of the customer. On the other hand, people who work in restaurants will tell you that they don't get paid well, that tips are how they make a living, and it's a hard job.
You're not complaining about this, but I anticipate this will turn into a debate over mandatory tipping vs. not.
So, I'll turn to the other thing: how was the check marked. I'm used to seeing "18% gratuity" as an explicit line item on a check, in these cases. Whether or not mandatory tipping is right or not, and whether or not you were a group of 1 or 11, the fact remains that the check should call this out.
Which you said it did.
So, I'm wondering: what is your complaint? It seems like you have a legit beef in that the server did you return change on your $15 ($2.01, to be specific). The server had no reason or right to assume that the entire amount was a bonus tip.
But you don't seem to be complaining about that. You seem to be complaining about how you were a party of 1, not 11. And, I guess, this is why you'll get a number of people telling you that you were a party of 11. In fact, you were worse than a party of 11. Because 11 checks had to be made. Otherwise, isn't it identical?
Reply
|
|
|
|
by Ben G. Posted Wed May 20, 2009 @ 12:44 PM
|
|
|
And I wish I could remember how it was written on the menu word for word. But it says at the bottom something along the lines of:
"We do not add automatic gratuity for large parties. We feel it should be your decision to reward your server based on your experience"
Something along those lines. Sometimes it burns the server, but most times we have noticed an actual increase in the tip percentage. We used to grat 18%. My servers most times are receiving 20 or above.
As for the overpayment, being that he left the restaurant it would be hard to prove, but I agree the server had no right to assume it was for him/her.
Reply
|
|
 |
|
|
by jeishere Posted Wed May 20, 2009 @ 9:20 AM
|
|
|
The policy is quite clear, It says "party of 8 or more", not "checks of 8 or more". You had a party of 11, this has nothing to do with how you split up the bill.
Reply
|
|
 |
|
|
|
Splitting the bill never gets you out of auto gratuity, if that were the case, alot of people would do it.
You seem to be happy with the service you received, if you are put of by the price, next time cook a meal at home.
Good Day
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
Sorry, I have to go with Joe's on this. It doesn't matter that you were splitting the checks, you were still a party of 11 and required the attention and space that a party of 11 does. Even more so with splitting the checks like that.
Reply
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
|
|
by Michelle L. Posted Wed May 20, 2009 @ 5:47 AM
|
|
|
I have never worked at Joes, but being a bartender and server for 15 years I can say that it does not matter if the table has separate checks or not. The number of people at the table is what qualifies the gratuity. Even if everybody at the table would have paid individually, the grat would have been added to each check.
Menus normally read "Gratuity will be added to parties of 8 or more"
Not "Gratuity will be added to checks of 8 or more"
Reply
|
|
|
 |
|
|