HOME SHARED LETTERS RATINGS MY PLANET COMMUNITIES MISSION SIGN UP!
Shared Letters

Join and browse our exclusive open discussion forums and talk about whatever you like.

Channels
» The Suggestion Box
» Company Responses
» PFB Feedback Line
» Consumer Podcasts
» Mommy Talk & Daddy Dialogue ™
» Shared Letters


Newsletter

Sign up for PlanetFeedback's "Consumer Café" email newsletter!





Global Warming is Baloney.

Posted Sun June 7, 2009 1:40 pm, by Robert C. written to Burger King

Write a Letter to this Company  |  Rate this Company




I totally agree with your MIC franchisees on this one. See link below.

http://www.commondreams.org/headline/2009/06/06

I think I'm ready to give up my occasional whopper on this issue. Burger King sucks.

Burger King needs to stick to making fast food and stay out of the Global Warming debate. Management just doesn't understand the issue.


Reply



Log In/Create an account | 45 comments
     Add to your del.icio.us  del.icio.us    Digg this story  Digg this  
PlanetFeedback Comments are subject to strict terms and conditions. We reserve the right to deny site membership privileges to any individuals acting inappropriately.

by PepperElf Posted Thu June 18, 2009 @ 12:17 PM

I went downtown this morning to get a new SSN card ordered and on the
way back I was hungry.

I remembered this thread and headed over to Burger King specifically.

=)

It was tasty.

Reply

Sounds like you had a moment of "eco-clarity" elf by littleriver Thu June 18, 2009 @ 12:21 PM


eco-clarity? I went there because of the original sign. >:) i'm not an environmentalist n/t by PepperElf Mon June 22, 2009 @ 11:09 AM

by Nate! Posted Sun June 14, 2009 @ 10:55 AM

"Burger King needs to stick to making fast food and stay out of the
Global Warming debate."
I think that this is their intent. By making the franchisee take down
the sign simply puts them as neutral. They did not publish an opinion
either way.

Reply

Uhhh. Nate!! by littleriver Tue June 16, 2009 @ 11:23 PM

by dulynoted (aka duttycalls) Posted Sat June 13, 2009 @ 6:59 PM

Personally, my theory is that supposedly the earth changed millions of
years ago to what we have now. So, why could there not be another Ice
Age or even a "Warming Age" so to speak? What decides the path our
planet is on for changes? Certainly not "global warming" as the Al
Gore has decided.
You can turn anything to your point of view...its not that difficult.
You can tell people whatever you want and some will believe while
others will not.

Its all pre-destined anyway. We are just along for the ride.

Reply


by ALLEN G. Posted Sat June 13, 2009 @ 6:07 PM

The Sahara Desert was once rich farm land.There was no global warming
thousands of years ago!! Many scientists feel the earth changed its
axis.I am for clean air,windmill,solar,and nuclear powere.However,
global warming is a trick by left wing politicians to institue
draconian measures on every industry and raise everyone's taxes
accordingly.

Reply
by Alexandra1973 Posted Fri June 12, 2009 @ 8:28 PM

Global warming is baloney. CO2 is not a pollutant. Plants need it.

Furthermore, CO2 rises IN RESPONSE to any warming, it doesn't cause
it!

Reply

Right on by littleriver Tue June 16, 2009 @ 11:24 PM

by Chadg Posted Fri June 12, 2009 @ 8:19 AM

A franchisee is an independent business, much like a mom and pop
corner store. It is MIC's business, they have the right to put up any
sign they want. Corporations should not be allowed to silence
individuals. MIC pays for the rights to use
BK's name, how they use it is up to them.

1st Amendment

Reply

This has nothing to so with the first amendment by jeishere Fri June 12, 2009 @ 4:06 PM


by Sheldonrs Posted Tue June 9, 2009 @ 1:31 PM

What difference does it make? Why not just take the stance that, true
or not, gas powered cars and all other pollutants are bad and things
should be changed?


Reply


Because people want what they want...and those who believe by dulynoted (aka duttycalls) Sat June 13, 2009 @ 3:29 PM
by jeishere Posted Mon June 8, 2009 @ 5:31 PM

I don't understand your logic. Burger King needs to stay out of the
debate but MIC should not because you agree with them? Why shouldn't
both Burger King and MIC stay out of the debate? Why shouldn't MIC
just stick to making whoppers too?

I surely hope there is something in the franchisees agreement about
what can be posted on franchise property since it will carry the
Burger King name will ultimately represent the corporation.


Reply

what came first, the chicken or the egg. by littleriver Tue June 9, 2009 @ 12:19 AM

You better re-read the article by jeishere Tue June 9, 2009 @ 9:31 AM
by Ben G. Posted Mon June 8, 2009 @ 5:26 PM

I agree with the OP. They need to not polarize themselves.

My thoughts? How can we be absolutely sure global warming is true or
false when we have only been recording weather patterns for how long
now? 150, 200 years? How are we absolutely sure this is a man-made
issue?

How do we know this isn't just a cycle?




Reply


Re: by Kemp Mon June 8, 2009 @ 8:11 PM

How are they polarizing? by jeishere Tue June 9, 2009 @ 9:40 AM


It kinda makes me wonder by MA Cunningham Mon June 8, 2009 @ 3:09 PM
by littleriver Posted Sun June 14, 2009 @ 12:42 AM

cows and large animals are "NOT" eroding the ozone layer MA.

That is just more hyperventilated nonsense from the far left.

The Ozone layer is just fine thank you.

Get back to worrying about that fungus growing on your tulips. It is a
much more pressing issue.

Reply
by hussyinterrupted Posted Mon June 8, 2009 @ 12:57 PM

What I find amusing about this debate is the rate at which people
become so infuriated about it. I admit, I am a skeptic on climate
change. I do beleive it's happening, and I do believe that man most
probably has something to do with it. But I don't believe that it's
really worth getting up in arms about.

The science of climate change is a relatively new science. It's only
been around for, what, 50 years-ish? No way is any one going to
convince me that scientists have this thing nailed. The earth has
been going through warming and cooling periods for billions of years
and all of a sudden we notice a pattern in the last 50 years and think
we know exactly what's going on? Bull.

Being a bit of a scientific thinker myself, I can safely say that all
new sciences are severely flawed. That's why once upon a time people
believed that the sun revolved around the earth, or that blood-letting
would cure any disease. Being a free-thinker, I know not to buy into
the hype because if logic and science has taught us anything, it's
that human interpretation and understanding of science is limited and
greatly flawed.

Reply

Good points by littleriver Mon June 8, 2009 @ 3:44 PM

by RedheadwGlasses Posted Sun June 7, 2009 @ 5:58 PM

It's not much a debate when the overwhelming majority of scientists in
the world agree: Human behavior is contributing to global climate
change.

To believe otherwise is to say that dinosaurs never walked the earth.

Reply


not all scientists agree with that by PepperElf Mon June 8, 2009 @ 11:37 AM


I said "overwhelming majority," not "all" by RedheadwGlasses Mon June 8, 2009 @ 12:32 PM

on what?? by littleriver Mon June 8, 2009 @ 3:51 PM

Koolaid isn't science by littleriver Mon June 8, 2009 @ 11:49 AM


you know that's a good point. at one point most of the world's scientists also believed the world was flat n/t by PepperElf Mon June 8, 2009 @ 12:16 PM


Flat Earth by Beeracuda Mon June 8, 2009 @ 12:24 PM

fortunately by littleriver Mon June 8, 2009 @ 4:18 PM


Wait by Brendalala Mon June 8, 2009 @ 12:24 PM


Koolaid Drinker.. by Harleycat Mon June 8, 2009 @ 1:17 PM


Oh... by Brendalala Mon June 8, 2009 @ 1:46 PM

I agree.. by littleriver Mon June 8, 2009 @ 3:52 PM


You're the one who's been brainwashed by RedheadwGlasses Mon June 8, 2009 @ 12:32 PM

There's only one kind of koolaid in america today. by littleriver Mon June 8, 2009 @ 3:49 PM


I'll take the koolaid, Red by snarly Mon June 8, 2009 @ 4:58 PM


ironically i just heard a talk given by a former think tank employee ... by PepperElf Mon June 8, 2009 @ 7:01 PM

excellent point by littleriver Tue June 9, 2009 @ 12:22 AM


O_o *giggle* o_O by PepperElf Wed June 10, 2009 @ 8:58 PM




Home | Shared Letters | Ratings | Login | Communities | Categories | RSS | Contact Us | Terms & Conditions | Privacy Policy | FAQ
Copyright 2013 © All Rights Reserved PlanetFeedback.com | Web by Cicada