HOME SHARED LETTERS RATINGS MY PLANET COMMUNITIES MISSION SIGN UP!
Shared Letters

Join and browse our exclusive open discussion forums and talk about whatever you like.

Channels
» The Suggestion Box
» Company Responses
» PFB Feedback Line
» Consumer Podcasts
» Mommy Talk & Daddy Dialogue ™
» Shared Letters


Newsletter

Sign up for PlanetFeedback's "Consumer Café" email newsletter!





Police should practice what they preach

Posted Tue June 30, 2009 8:54 pm, by Nate E. written to City of Kalamazoo Department of Public Safety


To Whom It May Concern -
While driving upon South Westnedge Ave. Northbound near Whites Rd., there is a large billboard depicting two officers of your department on bicycles, along with two children on bicycles, all parties wearing helmets. Along with this is the message "Helmets are the new cool!"
Below the message, there are the logos of your department, Kohls, Bronson, and SafeKids Kalamazoo.

I think that it is an excellent idea that you have teamed with these local organizations to provide safety messages to area residents along with the recent helmet fitting and give out event.

The reason I am complaining is that this evening, Tuesday June 30, 2009, I witnessed an officer on bicycle patrolling the Kalamazoo Pedestrian mall near KVCC. The officer in question was not wearing a helmet, and was interacting with families with children.

I find it completely ironic that you preach a safety message that you do not personally practice. Additionally, it is shocking that you would send officers out on bicycle without this common piece of equipment generally regarded as essential to safety in the event of an accident.

I would like the Department of Public Safety to properly equip officers with safety equipment while patrolling on bicycles, especially since you have large images promoting such practices bearing your name and logo along with community sponsors.


Reply



Log In/Create an account | 22 comments
     Add to your del.icio.us  del.icio.us    Digg this story  Digg this  
PlanetFeedback Comments are subject to strict terms and conditions. We reserve the right to deny site membership privileges to any individuals acting inappropriately.

by Chadg Posted Thu July 2, 2009 @ 4:49 PM

as someone who relies on a bicycle and/or public transit to get
around, i think wearing a helmet should be up to the individual, the
government has been encroaching on our personal freedoms too long,
next thing you know, youll need a permit to open a can of paint.

If i realize the risks of riding sans helmet and am willing to take
that risk, its my own problem if i get hurt! same goes for seat belts
in cars, your choice, your problem!

Reply


I totally agree by Nate! Thu July 2, 2009 @ 10:04 PM


Seat belts in cars by Donno Fri July 3, 2009 @ 1:11 PM


i dont bother unless the driver asks me to, or im riding with mom nt by Chadg Fri July 3, 2009 @ 6:59 PM

It's your own problem if you get hurt until... by jeishere Thu July 9, 2009 @ 3:44 PM

by RedheadwGlasses Posted Wed July 1, 2009 @ 11:26 PM

I complained about the St. Paul police turning on their sirens/lights
to zip through stop lights ... only to turn them off and resume normal
speed on the city streets. THey don't feel like they should sit and
wait at a light like the rest of us. Drives me nuts.

Reply


Annoying by Nate! Thu July 2, 2009 @ 9:53 AM

Are you sure that's what they were doing? by emt_c Thu July 2, 2009 @ 5:37 PM


There's also the possibility ... by ams1001 Thu July 2, 2009 @ 9:48 PM


ABsolutely this is what they are doing by RedheadwGlasses Thu July 2, 2009 @ 11:25 PM

In that case, by emt_c Fri July 3, 2009 @ 12:25 AM

Not necessarily true..... by Jennifer S Fri July 3, 2009 @ 5:24 PM

by PepperElf Posted Wed July 1, 2009 @ 11:09 PM

and contact the police dept too


i don't know about the cops
but i know back when i was in the military... if i was riding my bike
without a helmet and got in an accident, the navy would NOT pay for my
treatment since wearing a helmet was an official base policy. (we even
had to sign our names to it)

same for seatbelts etc...


not to mention it's a bad example for them to ride around like that

Reply


This is the police by Nate! Thu July 2, 2009 @ 9:51 AM


Safety first by Donno Fri July 3, 2009 @ 1:16 PM


daytime running lights also lower your insurance =) n/t by PepperElf Fri July 3, 2009 @ 4:55 PM


Personally I think the whole helmet thing is bogus (for bikes) by Donno Tue June 30, 2009 @ 11:56 PM


Not only PA.. by Harleycat Wed July 1, 2009 @ 8:17 AM

People can get hurt on bikes too! by Jo23 Wed July 1, 2009 @ 4:31 PM


You are lucky by Nate! Thu July 2, 2009 @ 9:58 AM


by MayDay Posted Thu July 2, 2009 @ 10:44 AM

...I'm in PA too and I know a bunch of bikers. Some of the bikers in
my area always used to whine and complain that they were "forced" to
wear helmets when riding. So when PA passes this law about wear a
helmet only if you want they were all doing a jig in the streets.

So...why do car drivers have to wear seatbelts for safety when bike
riders can go without any belts or helmets? I always wear my seatbelt
and I'm terrified of riding a motorcycle, but if I did I would wear a
helmet.

I remember the days of riding in my parents' Range Rover in the back
without any seats in it. We would sit on pillows and play board games
while going somewhere. No seats, no seatbelts, never had an accident.
Of course, back then there were no cell phones, iPods and all the
other distractions that people must do while driving. There is not
enough time in a day for me to complain about people multitasking
while driving....

Reply

I disagree by Nicole F. Fri July 3, 2009 @ 12:28 AM




Home | Shared Letters | Ratings | Login | Communities | Categories | RSS | Contact Us | Terms & Conditions | Privacy Policy | FAQ
Copyright 2013 © All Rights Reserved PlanetFeedback.com | Web by Cicada