 |
|
|
by Binkster Posted Sat July 25, 2009 @ 10:49 AM
|
|
|
I think this is a great idea, I am relatively new here, but this is a great site with great potential to help people and companies come together. Sometimes people just need a outlet to vent their flustration, and especially right now with corporate america running wild with our tax dollars, and our elected officials of both parties turning a deaf ear to our needs we desperately need grassroots organizations such as this. Thank you all providing this space with your time,talent, and participation. Nuff said.
Reply
|
|
|
|

|

|
Wait!
by Venice Sat July 25, 2009 @ 7:42 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|

|
Ouch!
by Venice Mon July 27, 2009 @ 5:13 PM
|
|
|
|
|

|
they don't
by Nicole F. Mon July 27, 2009 @ 12:38 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
I hope
by Nicole F. Wed July 29, 2009 @ 11:03 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
but, of course, I can't.
I have been trying to kinda just keep quiet and let this play out a bit, responding just when I thought I could clarify something, or answer a question. I have read every bit of feedback posted (at least all that I have found) and although I do not discount the validity of anyone's feelings, I really don't understand some of the reactions.
Honestly, what are people afraid of here? That a new idea or an expansion of an existing component of PFB might actually be discussed in an arena somewhat resembling a focus group? This is somehow bad?
More than one comment has been left stating that the objection is not to the people who were asked to participate (thank you by the way), so then what? Yes, perhaps some wording in the announcement could have been different- also the interpretation could have been different. In some cases it seems as though people were looking for a reason to be unhappy with this. Some members responded positively - they didn't read a different announcement.
In some cases references have been made insinuating that Greg would discount contributions from certain members. Certainly there have been some strained conversations - but not just on his part. I counter that in some cases it comes across as though any statement coming from him is subjected to an immediate attack.
We have had one "meeting". Clearly there have been no policy changes or new rules announced as a result. As I understand it, this is an effort to grow and improve the site. In my book, Kudos to PFB, or any business for that matter, that makes an effort to involve their consumer.
I don't think the 4 of us currently meeting with Greg are cookie cutter images of each other - hopefully that makes us a fairly reasonable representation of the collective members of the site.
So in closing, I would like to echo a statement made elsewhere by Brenda - should anyone wish to make their suggestions through me, I will be happy to pass them on. If you would like to remain anonymous, for whatever reason, let me know and I will present it that way and keep it that way until you tell me different. If you are feeling as though your input is discounted, this may be a great way to get your ideas across.
In the few years I have been a part of this community, I have seen several efforts to grow the site that involved contributions from specific members - Mommage and Shoppercast come to mind - I'm sure there were more.
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|

|
by Donno Posted Wed July 22, 2009 @ 2:55 PM
|
|
|
I'm out here in the family room watching the Burke's Law on TV Land. If anything interesting happens in the kitchen, or when dinner is ready, let me know.
Reply
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
My suggestion is to stop changing everything. I understand keeping up with the times, but I really dont see anything that needs any big changes.
I logged on this morning and saw that the font looked different, its things like that I see no reason in changing. Of course, now it is back to normal. Why?
I saw some comments to add this and add that, but most people dont know how to use alot of functions and prefer simplicity.
Look at how many people post their personal information and/or use the smiley face when they are obviously writing a negative letter.
It seems there is a big rush to "improve" to make people think their voice is being heard, and then they get retracted.
This is what happens when you have too many chiefs, or chief wanna be's
Good Day
Reply
|
|
 |
|
|
by Nicole F. Posted Fri July 17, 2009 @ 3:14 PM
|
|
|
Sounds like a good idea to me. I don't really care about "who was chosen" or any of that...I just like the fact that now users have representation and stuff like that.
This is just me being curious, but how do y'all meet? Face to face? Conference call? Live text chat?
Thanks.
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
by Scott A. Posted Fri July 17, 2009 @ 2:55 PM
|
|
|
I've been reading PFB for years now, and quite rarely comment on anything. But wow - the passionate response to the "Kitchen Table" is something else. An organization takes the initiative to review itself periodically, using its customers for input, and everything about the concept is drawn into question.
Do not mess with my school. Do not mess with my church. Do not mess with my job. Do not mess with my PFB. Unless, of course, I have a say into how you do it, which is, of course, my way of saying don't mess with any of it unless you do it my way.
I suggest PFB and the Kitchen Table begin by looking at why this site exists at all. If changes need to be made, then just do it. Forget all these backseat drivers and Monday-morning quarterbacks. The old adage rings true: Too many cooks....
Such a backlash. Wow. It's starting to smell low rent in here.
Reply
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
Why all the kvetching and wringing of hands? Sheesh. I don't see how this idea can hurt the site. If it does, it can get yanked.
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
Well, in case anyone doesn't know... I'm Brenda and I welcome anyone to shoot me an e-mail with anything they'd like discussed at our meetings. I'd love to hear all of your ideas!
Reply
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
|

|
by Just Jeffrey Posted Thu July 16, 2009 @ 6:52 AM
|
|
|
This seems like a good idea. However, I know several people were very upset about how discussions with members turned into policy. I believe Nate and Venice took hits because of just this sort of thing. In at least one case, we had someone make snarky comments about Nate in another thread (these comments were removed).
While the idea of getting member feedback is wonderful (of course, since this is PFB), it strikes me that after we had two rather significant events, it odd that this would be announced this way.
In other words, you already got feedback that some folks here don't appreciate other members holding policy positions.
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|

|
But Greg
by Venice Sun July 19, 2009 @ 12:57 AM
|
|
|
|
|

|

|
I suppose
by Donno Sun July 19, 2009 @ 1:36 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
that's why I use the RSS feed! New letters right at my fingertips! :-)
Reply
|
|
|

|
by Venice Posted Sun July 19, 2009 @ 8:14 PM
|
|
|
But unfortunately a lot of people do not use the feed even though it's the easiest way to see all the letters. I think most people rely on 15 Minutes of Fame to provide new letters, and once they click on one of those, they see the Top 25 and proceed to view the letters on that list.
Reply
|
|

|

|
Brenda
by Venice Sun July 19, 2009 @ 6:30 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|