 |
|
|
|
|
|

|
by Venice Posted Tue October 13, 2009 @ 12:35 AM
|
|
|
I guess I should have said that sooner.
I don't understand how the moderation policy can be enforced fairly if all comments aren't read, and I also don't understand why all comments are not read considering there are now so few. I would feel obligated to at least look at the comments posted on the most recent 25 letters, Top 25 Letters and 15 Minutes of Fame.
What I would really like to know is the method used in choosing which comments to read if it's not a matter of certain people being flagged. Is it the luck (or unluck) of the draw?
Reply
|
|
|

|
by PepperElf Posted Tue October 13, 2009 @ 6:16 PM
|
|
|
i was wondering about people getting flagged...
well maybe not so much as being flagged but... perhaps by human nature getting "noticed" a little more.
obviously each comment that gets deleted has to be read by a human to determine if that comment is or is not a violation.
so, because of human nature, it can be very possible for a specific user to gain an unofficial reputation for being a troublemaker or for breaking TOS more often than others.
so that person's posts might get read more often... then perhaps a user with a good reputation who slips in a violation statement once in a while.
Reply
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
I guess I haven't noticed some comments getting pulled but other rule-breaking comments getting to stay. I rarely see any comment that I think crosses the TOS line.
This site was much more fun when we could get away with murder. It also could be very mean and inhospitable.
While the site isn't as fun (for me) as it used to be, it is more professional. If I think an OP is being a complete tool, I have to be an adult and find a respectful way to disagree, or I leave the letter alone (usually the latter, since I don't like to edit myself).
But I don't think this site's responsibility includes providing me and others with endless hours of entertainment. In fact, if someone were to want to "buy" the site, I can see that if a buyer were to look a sample of letters and responses at certains in this site's history, they may not be interested once they saw some of the content (including from me).
Reply
|
|

|

|
I know
by Donno Mon October 12, 2009 @ 3:17 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
by Scott A. Posted Sat October 10, 2009 @ 8:30 PM
|
|
|
So, this question has been posted on this site for nine days now, and PlantFeedback hasn't responded yet. Maybe they did so behind the scenes, but considering the posting is in a public venue about the very site it's on, a response here is appropriate.
This is not meant to be an insult in any way: I have never seen worse Customer Service from any other organization. PlantFeedback is clearly telling the people who bother to come to their site that they don't care.
At least the average companies that do not care about Customer Service send a canned reply.
Low rent.
Reply
|
|

|

|
Scott
by Donno Sat October 10, 2009 @ 10:09 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|

|
Michelle
by Venice Sun October 11, 2009 @ 9:23 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|

|
Yes
by Venice Tue October 13, 2009 @ 8:00 AM
|
|
|

|

|
Pete...
by Just Jeffrey Tue October 13, 2009 @ 12:55 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|

|
Is it?
by Just Jeffrey Wed October 14, 2009 @ 7:09 AM
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|

|
by PepperElf Posted Sat October 10, 2009 @ 8:20 AM
|
|
|
i have noticed that some comments I thought would be pulled haven't yet been touched. (i.e. related to grammar or pointing out where a letter-writer may have broken the law)
but on the flip side i have seen comments that contain direct attacks and name calling have been pulled.
maybe they've finally relaxed a little with how things are being handled.
i think it has something to do with the way things got heated up very quickly over the blog-moderation notice.
Reply
|
|
 |
|
|
by Retail Veteran Posted Fri October 9, 2009 @ 10:05 PM
|
|
|
I have had comments deleted in the past. Usually they are ones where I have politely suggested that the original poster rewrite the letter to make it more readable. Simple things like punctuation, spelling, etc.
It was my understanding that when a comment is deleted that the poster of the comment was supposed to be sent an email explaining why it was deleted. I never received an explanation of why the comments were deleted.
I agree with you Venice that lately it seems like comments of those type and worse are being allowed. I have no problem with some of my comments being deleted but all such similar comments should be deleted as well. It should be fair and equal.
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|

|

|
donno...
by PepperElf Sat October 10, 2009 @ 6:36 PM
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
by Knight Posted Fri October 9, 2009 @ 5:19 PM
|
|
|
Oh Venice, here you go again.......
Reply
|
|

|

|
That's me
by Venice Fri October 9, 2009 @ 6:37 PM
|
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|
|
by S W. Posted Thu October 8, 2009 @ 6:39 PM
|
|
|
As one of the folks that recently posted a comment about rewriting a letter that included calling the employees things like "idiots", I apologize if I've offended anyone.
I am a casual poster here,(obviously, since I am just now seeing this letter) and thought that constructive criticism was allowed. Apparently, I am wrong. Although I fail to see how trying to help someone realize that a well written letter will forward their complaint more than a really bad letter can be construed as offensive. If I failed to see this rule in the TOS then it is my fault.
I do have to offer my completely unsolicted opinion on another matter. This site now has so many posting rules that a score card is needed, and it's just not worth it.
Combine the interesting posting rules with the ever present tension and sniping among members, this site has become hard to take seriously. What a shame!
Somewhere along the line the inmates have taken over the asylum and it's just not working. If I were Planetfeedback I'd close the whole thing down, re-vamp things, and start over in rebuilding the site's creditbility.
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|

|
by Venice Posted Thu October 8, 2009 @ 7:37 AM
|
|
|
I know that I've been told that there have been no changes to the moderation policy, but I'm still not sure if that includes suggesting that a letter be rewritten or made clearer. I have seen several comments to that effect lately that were not removed. Are suggestions on how to improve a letter now permitted?
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
michelle
by jeishere Thu October 8, 2009 @ 5:49 PM
|
|
|
 |
|

|
by mary jo Posted Thu October 8, 2009 @ 1:03 AM
|
|
|
Never fear Venice, the censor police at PFB are still out and still working overtime.
My guess is...its just certain people who are being censored.
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|

|

|
"Guess"
by Donno Thu October 8, 2009 @ 9:04 AM
|
|
|

|
venice
by b d. Sat October 10, 2009 @ 8:23 PM
|
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
Venice, if there is a comment that you feel is inappropriate, why wouldn't you simply shoot an email to Greg to delete it? What could you possibly hope to accomplish by posting this letter? Really. I don't for one minute believe that you honestly think that "comments now allowed that include but are not limited to speculation, name-calling, insults, letter critiquing, etc.?"
This letter really comes across as an attempt to stir the pot so to speak. Have things been too calm? I have noticed a bunch of new names lately - maybe they need to be sucked into the drama filled whirlpool that was the TOS debate.
Hopefully Greg will respond so that everyone who participates in commenting can have things be ever so much more clear than the TOS makes them.
wow.
Reply
|
|

|

|
Actually
by Donno Sat October 3, 2009 @ 8:48 AM
|
|
|
|
|