 |
|
by Brian R. Posted Wed January 5, 2011 @ 4:37 PM
|
|
|
I Back you up
Reply
|
|
 |
|
by Zan Posted Tue November 17, 2009 @ 9:32 AM
|
|
|
Several, in fact, but this particular man is usually working when I shop. About a year ago, I was checking out and he was bagging my groceries. I was making small talk with him when he suddenly said to me "What happened to your coat? You need a new one!" (I was wearing an old leather jacket with whitish cracks in the leather). Okay, that could definitely be considered rude. If this had been a non-disabled person I probably would have been upset. Instead, this is what I did:
1. Laughed and said "Yeah, I guess you're right!"
2. Smiled at the cashier who said "Eddie, that's not nice!" and assured her "it's no problem."
3. Let it go. And thought how nice it was of the store to give a job to this perfectly decent man who yes, doesn't have the social awareness that most people do and didn't realize he was being rude. Because really, he didn't do me any harm by pointing out what I already knew - that my coat WAS getting pretty ratty. No more so than if he'd whistled and pointed to the exit. If he'd done that, I would have reacted in much the same way. I certainly wouldn't have insisted he lose his job. Because where else could they assign him in a grocery store or fast food place where he wouldn't come into contact with customers?
Luckily for Eddie, most of the shoppers at this store seem to feel the same way and cut him some slack when he doesn't quite meet the standards we set. He still works there. And I truly hope that this McDonald's employee still works at that location as well.
Reply
|
|
 |
|
|
|
If what the manager said was true and that the disability causes him to be discourteous and rude then she needs to have him working another position away from customer contact.
It's not against any law to re-assign any employee. Each employee should be in a job best suited for him or her.
Reply
|
|

|
I agree
by Underdog Tue November 17, 2009 @ 7:35 PM
|
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|
by squeels007 Posted Thu October 29, 2009 @ 7:39 PM
|
|
|
instead of making excuses for the employee they hired, the manager should've made sure the employee was repremanded for his actions. disabled or not, the customer is always right. and if a business offers lousy customer service, its on them not you.
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
WOW
by b d. Sun November 1, 2009 @ 1:11 AM
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
by Kalphoenix Posted Tue October 27, 2009 @ 4:20 PM
|
|
|
Since this keeps coming up, I've mentioned this before, but McDonalds (and most fast food places of a similar vein) work with a minimum of people staffed (which is why it is cheap) and do NOT have designated stockers/cookers/cleaners. The same person who rings you up at the counter also cleans the bathrooms/dining area, same with the food prep people who might also be cleaning or stocking or ringing people up. The window person is really the only one who stays in one area, usually doing fries/bagging food if the window isn't busy.
Sure, they could "make-up" something for him to do, but unless McDonalds is getting some kind of kick-back for working him, I doubt they are going to put him in a position where it then requires them to staff an additional person to fill in for the work he then isn't doing. Although I suppose they could make him a manager, since they spend the most time out of the public eye, checking in stock, doing interviews (Turnover is fast), and doing the schedule.
It's quite possible there is NOWHERE else to "put" him.
I avoid them for completely different reasons, but I'm sure they don't miss my business either. Pretty sure they are the largest, most widespread fast food service in the world.
They're known for fast, cheap food, not great service. I doubt this will ever change in a low-price/low pay/low staffed work environment, and I don't think it's something they will bother to work on unless it's a hygiene issue or something that will give them nationwide bad press, like a hate crime. If the right person got ahold of it, I'm guessing they'd loose more customers over firing this individual than they'll loose from keeping him.
My guess is that the other 99% of the customers at this location either don't notice or don't care.
Reply
|
|
 |
|

|
by Giselle Posted Sun October 25, 2009 @ 3:49 PM
|
|
|
That's great they hire people with disabilities, but why put someone in front of the customer who might be be rude and offensive. So I guess everytime someone complaints, the manager will explain the situation and people will say "oh, ok, well I'm not upsest anymore" and then leave. What about all the people who DON'T complain, but just vow never to go there again? I say, take the guy off drive-thru and have him cooking/prepping/stocking and/or cleaning the dining area.
Reply
|
|
 |
|
|
by b d. Posted Sun October 25, 2009 @ 1:37 AM
|
|
|
not be offended if i knew the employee had a disability.
i mean, i just wonder...what would you think if a company said they didn't hire people with disabilities? that would be wrong wouldn't it? i would appreciate that the company is willing to take the risk, and with situations like this, it is a risk.
i was a waitress long ago, and the lady who assisted me (clearing off tables, making drinks, etc.) had a handicap. she had the mind of a 10 year old. one time she brought me a gift which was head bands and hair clips that a 5 or 6 year old would wear. you know what? she was a better worker than most employees that had no handicaps.
yeah, there might be times when they do things that are considered "inappropriate". i remember one time the lady i worked with was at the salad bar trying to clean it up when she heard someone say that they needed more ranch. she replied, "i would get some if i could get to the damn thing."
nobody ever complained on her. had they complained on her, what would the company say? should they have fired her for that?
i think you just have to remember that these employees are lucky to be working, and the company should be applauded for employeeing them. it's not really THAT big of a deal then is it?
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|

|
by Chadg Posted Fri October 23, 2009 @ 7:30 PM
|
|
|
I once had a disabled cashier at dunkin donuts get angry at me for not wanting 50 munchkins! I asked for a box of 25. he told me he was supposed to "upsell" me 50. i told him i only wanted 25, he then told me he had to tell the manager why he didnt upsell. the manager came out and explained to him that it was ok, not everyone wants 50 munchkins, he then apologized to me for the cashiers behavior and told me he has a special need.
I saw no reason to get upset with him, he was just trying to apply what he had been taught, i know plenty of people who would have tweaked on this guy. Perhaps the front counter at 7am was not the best placement for him, at least he was willing to try.
As to my earlier comment on this thread, yes the customer should expect top level service every time, i do not see this situation as poor service, but rather, an attempt to provide the best possible.
Reply
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
When I'm annoyed by the behavior of a special needs person, I try to remind myself, "She is someone's sister. She is someone's daughter. She is an aunt." And that I should show that person the kindness and patience and some understanding, the same as I'd want someone to do for someone *I* care about who needed a little more wiggle room while out in the world.
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
by KGBags Posted Fri October 23, 2009 @ 2:57 AM
|
|
|
Its too bad you only received excuses from management. A more proactive response was required such as "I apologize for ___'s rudeness. He has a handicap and sometimes gets caught up in his job duties. Neverless it is clearly inappropriate behavior for a drive through employee to whistle at cars and I will address this with him immediately, taking steps to ensure that he knows that this is not acceptable".
I think we can all appreciate that those with mental handicaps may not always perform with the skill and precision that we expect, but hey, I don't perform with skill and precision every day either, and all it takes is a reminder from my employer that I slipped up. There is no reason the manager cannot address her employee as well. He should be held to the same standards as all other employees with regard to customer service, and there should be no difficulty in addressing this with him, regardless of his job duty.
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|
|
by gimme_some_truth Posted Fri October 23, 2009 @ 12:31 AM
|
|
|
OK, so you went to the drive through, received your order and left? What else could you possibly want? It was explained to you that this guy has a disability... Perhaps you should try to be more understanding of the poor guy while he tried to earn a living and work around people when he has a bit of trouble communicating with them.
You indicate that you wanted this man to be more courteous... Perhaps he was as courteous as he possibly could be considering his disability? It may be very hard for him to even talk to other people...
I recommend opening your mind, and allowing the disabled to earn a living....
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|

|
by Venice Posted Thu October 22, 2009 @ 6:29 PM
|
|
|
The consensus on this site seems to be that fast-foot employees are rude, lazy, stupid, etc., but I just don't see it that way. I can't think of one fast-food employee that was ever rude to me or appeared to be lazy or stupid. They always seem to be on the ball and go out of their way to do a good job.
Either I'm lucky, low-maintenance, an infrequent fast-food eater, or what? I don't know. I just know that I never have any of the problems that so many other people seem to have at fast-food restaurants. I can't figure it out.
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|

|
Nate
by Venice Fri October 23, 2009 @ 12:17 AM
|
|
|
|
|

|

|
Kalphoenix
by Venice Thu October 22, 2009 @ 9:01 PM
|
|
|

|

|
You know
by Donno Thu October 22, 2009 @ 8:36 PM
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
So the employee comes off as rude, but it isn't his intention to be rude -- I can accept that. But the kicker is, I can accept that more easily than I can accept the OVERT RUDENESS of fast food employees who don't have intellectual disabilities.
Reply
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|
|
by Scott A. Posted Thu October 22, 2009 @ 1:22 PM
|
|
|
You went to a restaurant, ordered food, received your order, then went on your way. What else did you want? Oh, wait! They also had to smile and say "yes, sir!" and "no, sir!" If they don't coddle you to your standard, you're gonna make a call!
You were there to get food as quickly as possible. You say the food was "shoved" at you (subjective term) and the guy whistled - so now you want him reassigned. Unfair.
Reply
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
Maybe the employee has a autism spectrum disorder, and that causes them to not smile...seriously. that maybe the whistling is tourettes. I'm using my sociological imagination here...my professor would be proud.
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
Really? I understand that this wasn't the model of great customer service, but did he really do anything so bad? He gave you your food quickly and tried to send you on your way. Maybe he rushes to meet time requirements and simply doesn't comprehend time well? Once you understood there was no ill intent, was it really such a bad experience?
I say good for this manager and McDonald's for working with this gentleman.
Reply
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|

|

|
Many
by Nate. Thu October 22, 2009 @ 10:45 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|

|
Actually...
by Just Jeffrey Thu October 22, 2009 @ 6:58 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|

|
by PepperElf Posted Wed October 21, 2009 @ 8:50 PM
|
|
|
if the manager were to punish the employee over this, it may be a violation of the ADA.
as other's have said - and i agree - the man is doing a job despite the difficulties his body has given him.
he might not have perfect social skills... but in my opinion it is wrong to punish him for this
there's nothing wrong with a little bit of tolerance and patience for those who have physical and mental difficulties in life. in fact... doing so makes you a better person.
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
by Venice Posted Wed October 21, 2009 @ 5:35 PM
|
|
|
I could see how this whole thing seemed funny, especially the whistling!
Laughing does not always equal disrespect.
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|

|
Actually...
by Just Jeffrey Thu October 22, 2009 @ 3:01 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
Wow
by Nicole F. Wed October 21, 2009 @ 10:57 PM
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|

|

|
Good point!
by Just Jeffrey Wed October 21, 2009 @ 12:43 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
Ive got several special needs employees.
You have to treat them same as other employees.
They rarely make it past bagging groceries, but many of them are hard working and appreciate the opportunity to work. Many of them are very friendly too.
On the other hand, I have had complaints about them. And I do have to mention they are special needs.
Most customers know it. I have to be careful what I say, because some customers feel I should not discipline them, only letting me know what happened.
That does nothing but keep the problem going. Some get upset that I would think of discipling the issue.
Ive explained on the phone, that I treat everyone the same, and that they know the expectations. Then they turn on me saying that this is their only job, etc etc. Almost to the point to where I am the bad guy.
So I can understand the hesistation. I dont know this guy, so its hard to say, but I feel the manager involved.
Good Day
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|