 |
|
|
by Pete M. Posted Sat April 23, 2011 @ 12:08 PM
|
|
|
I have Cigna and was diagnosed with ovarian cancer in 2009. I was given excellent care and cigna even assigned me a home health worker to see if I needed anything and that i was doing good after my surgery.
Cigna has been great for oour family and I am highly pleased with them
Reply
|
|
 |
|
|
by enough already Posted Tue December 14, 2010 @ 6:35 PM
|
|
|
I am so sorry to hear about your struggle with Cigna. My uncle had Cigna when he was diagnosed with cancer. He had Cigna for decades before he got ill.
My uncle ended up selling all of his possessions, then his livestock (pets) and finally his ranch to pay for his care. His friends donated and 'loaned' tens of thousands to keep up his treatments. He died penniless in an old camper trailer. His elderly wife still lives there, unable to work due to age and without a retirement since it was spent on medical bills for her husband.
It took less than 1 year to lose everything-to erase a well earned life. Cigna should be shut down for sure.
The former CEO of Cigna is now on a crusade to stop the abuses. Maybe you could look him up in Google-Wendell Potter. Not sure what he can do, but maybe he will listen and add your complaints to his files.
Good luck in your fight.
Reply
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|
|
by s c. Posted Sun April 25, 2010 @ 12:05 AM
|
|
|
My family had Cigna coverage for about 4 years. As long as you don't use it you never realize it doesn't work. We just stupidity let the company take bi-weekly payments out of husbands checks. The time I really need to use it I was denied. Fought with them for a year. Had to hire an insurance letter writer/advisor. She was a former insurance employee who claimed she needed to redeem herself. She put together a 15 page letter with probably another 30 pages of old doctor records and told me to be patient. She was correct, they finally paid. Interesting enough my son had a estimate for his wisdom teeth removal. The doctor's office showed me what I would pay and what Cigna would pay. My portion was around $500.00. This was with a policy that a portion was supposedly paid by the company and we paid approx $400 a month. THEN...we were laid off, and I signed kids up on a low-income state policy that cost only $15.00 a month per kid. Wisdom teeth were removed by same doctor, same total cost, but I ONLY paid $40.00. I still had to fight with the insurance company to get approval for out of network doctor (closest network doctor was 500 miles away). I had to insist that my kid was entitled to treatment for pain since insurance company wanted to take so long to approve. This insurance is Blue Cross.
Reply
|
|
 |
|
|
by jay s. Posted Fri December 18, 2009 @ 12:44 PM
|
|
|
Watch "Sicko" and "Sick Around America". You will find out disgusting stuff about the healthcare system and insurance companies here.
Insurance companies actually provide bonuses etc. to their employees who deny operations. The more important the operation is, the more expensive it will be. The more major operations they deny, the more money they save.
Reply
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
by lovescats Posted Sun December 6, 2009 @ 11:21 PM
|
|
|
"Cigna," he replied, "Can you not afford better coverage than Cigna? They're notorious."
You realize your doctor was way out of line making this statement. So maybe he felt he wouldn't be able to charge you an exorbitant fee because Cigna wouldn't pay it while other insurance companies would. I don't know if your insurance policy is through your employer or it is a private party but each policy pays differently. He really had no way of knowing what they would pay ahead of time. And what they pay is based upon what fee codes he uses.
Also, insurance companies can't cancel your surgery only you or the doctor can. Apparently your doctor didn't think enough of you as a patient to try and work something out. I hope your operation wasn't life-saving.If it were me, I would be looking for a new doctor.
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|

|
by Christine M. Posted Mon November 30, 2009 @ 2:35 PM
|
|
|
I'm sorry this happened to you, but I'm not surprised. Cigna is the absolute WORST insurance company we have ever had the displeasure of dealing with.
We were stuck with them for several years, through my husband's employer. It was the only insurance option that was offered. They go out of their way to get out of paying for pretty much anything. One of the few things they didn't try to get out of paying for was my annual mammogram, but that was only because Massachusetts state law requires that insurance cover one per year for women 40+.
Just one of many examples of Cigna's cheapitude that we've endured - my husband's doctor ordered a colonoscopy. He'd had his appendix removed and they found cancer in it. So of course, they wanted to check to see if it had spread anywhere else.
Cigna covered the colonoscopy itself, but decided not to pay for the anesthesiologist. We got a bill for $900. I guess he was supposed to have something stuck up into his nether region, poking around up there, while wide awake. We fought and fought with Cigna, until they finally settled and paid a paltry $125 on that $900 bill. No wonder health care practitioners hate them so much!
We weren't the only ones who've had such issues with Cigna. The HR department at hubby's work got so many complaints, that they finally got rid of Cigna and switched everyone back to Blue Cross/Blue Shield, who we've NEVER had a problem with. The switch to Cigna was to save the company money, but, in this case, you get what you pay for. I am so glad we're no longer stuck with them.
Good luck to you in getting any kind of response from Cigna. They exist simply to take people's money, and give them nothing in return. They deserve to go out of business!
Reply
|
|

|
cigna
by tali Tue December 1, 2009 @ 9:14 AM
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
Opt Out
by tali Tue December 1, 2009 @ 9:17 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
opt out
by tali Wed December 2, 2009 @ 9:19 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|

|
Ben...
by Just Jeffrey Tue December 1, 2009 @ 3:59 PM
|
|
|

|
Okay,,,
by Ben G. Wed December 2, 2009 @ 12:48 AM
|
|
|

|

|
Answers
by Just Jeffrey Wed December 2, 2009 @ 9:37 AM
|
|
|
|
|

|

|
Whoa!
by Just Jeffrey Tue December 1, 2009 @ 4:03 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|

|
Huh?
by Just Jeffrey Mon November 30, 2009 @ 3:03 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
by olie Posted Mon November 30, 2009 @ 8:56 PM
|
|
|
I know I do. I don't know exactly what Congress gets, but I'm really, really happy with the coverage my employer negotiates. And the fact that my employer pays all but 6% or so of the premium.
I'm not trying to pick a fight with you, Angela. But until both Houses can agree to a two-page condensation of coverages, like my insurer can, I'm against it.
Mental health
Chiropractic
3-tier prescription--5/10/25
Mail-order prescriptions--3 months for price of 2
100 individual/200 family deductible in network
200/500 out of network
$100 copay for ER, waived if admitted to hospital
There are some pre-authorizations required, but these are spelled out on less than 1 page, if you count meds.
We also have dental, which pays for 2 cleanings per calendar year(not just "every 6 months", which depends on the actual calendar). X-rays are on some schedule, but those have never been a problem. My son had 4 wisdom teeth removed two weeks ago; medical and dental will coordinate, and I'll probably
end up paying ZERO. Oh yeah, ortho is limited to those under 18, and only 50% of that up to around 4000. I'm officially safe there.
I have had NO problems, in 14 years, with any calls to my insurer. While there are a few cases where I'd have preferred to have them pay a bit more, their replies have always been prompt and based on the clear condensation of benefits, and the *not Congress-length* policy.
Our out-of-pocket is limited to minimal deductible/copay; eye exams and corrective lenses; OTC meds; and prescription copays. All of which are covered with a payroll deduction(on my part) for a Flexible Spending Plan.
Why would I want the government to take this over?
(And before you criticize Congress, didn't you Golden Gophers elect Al Franken?)
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
LOL yes they did!
Good Day!
Reply
|
|
|

|
by Just Jeffrey Posted Tue December 1, 2009 @ 9:28 AM
|
|
|
...you have a job. And, based on this, I'd say a reasonably good one. With an employer that's not looking to cut health care expenses as a way fighting the recession.
But there are plenty of people that don't have jobs. Or have low paying jobs, where even that 6% is more than they can possibly afford. Or have jobs, but with employers that have cut health care benefits. Or with employers that don't offer the package you have.
What do we do about those people? So far, I've yet to see the insurance companies offering deep discounts to people that are unemployed or "under"-employed.
If the insurance companies are worried, then they are welcome to propose a plan where THEY ensure that everyone gets quality medical care at a cost that each family can afford. But insurance companies are businesses, so they don't need to work that way.
You don't want the government to take over. But for everyone that's not so-lucky, what are they to do?
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
Ditto
by N L W. Mon February 22, 2010 @ 7:22 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|

|
Oddly...
by Just Jeffrey Tue December 1, 2009 @ 9:22 AM
|
|
|
|
|