 |
|
|
by Knight Posted Thu February 11, 2010 @ 12:14 AM
|
|
|
Any updates John?
Reply
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
by Knight Posted Wed January 27, 2010 @ 9:44 AM
|
|
|
Why not bring another class action lawsuit against Microsoft demanding that they extend the expiration date of the vouchers? It's brilliant!!!
Reply
|
|

|

|
Really?
by Donno Wed January 27, 2010 @ 10:40 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|

|
lol
by NathanG Thu January 28, 2010 @ 1:57 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
by Kalphoenix Posted Fri January 22, 2010 @ 2:09 PM
|
|
|
I, like many of the posters here, feel that OP has their answer: Microsoft is not interested in either speaking with, or accommodating OP outside what they are legally bound to do via the vouchers.
But, my final thoughts and suggestions below:
1.) Contact the MS sales department. If anyone has any desire or ability to help OP, it might be them. Customer service will not be able to do anything for OP other than (maybe) a non-assumed responsibility apology.
2.) I don't know if this would even be allowed (The vouchers may only be good for physical software), but since the vouchers will expire before the program OP wants comes out, OP should see if they can use the vouchers for Microsoft's "Tech connect" subscription service. TC gives you licenses and downloads (and betas) of Microsoft software. Might be only way to get the specific program when it comes out after the voucher expiration. It's pricey though, something like 200-300$ yearly, and the licenses are specific, not unlimited. OP still might get bit if MS delays the program again and the service expires before the release.
3.) Microsoft is not going to offer OP anything outside of what they are obligated to per the legal agreement and to the letter of it. First, they may not feel it's worth any further effort, and second, if others find out Microsoft made one exception, the rest may have a case to demand the same treatment.
4.) Give it a little more time. There may be only one specific person who can deal with this matter and you may not be near the top of the list.
5.) Being on the loosing end of the deal, Microsoft is not going to give OP any ideas about what they can do. It's going to be OP's responsibility to think within the rules but outside the box. It is not Microsoft's obligation to come up with a solution.
6.) Note that I'm not saying that it is or isn't poor customer service on MS's part, but OP needs to consider how badly they would like to use Microsoft products in the future. It may very well be that Microsoft has no intention of doing business with OP or similar litigants in the future outside of the legal arrangements already made, and that, in essence, Microsoft has "fired" the customer, or intends to do so at the conclusion of these vouchers.
7.) If all else fails (and it looks like it will), find something else to spend the vouchers on, because when they are gone, they are gone, claimed or not.
After all, they have billions of customers, it's being made fairly clear by their actions that Microsoft doesn't particularly feel that it needs you or any of the others in this particular situation.
Peace.
Reply
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|
|
by macdave2 Posted Wed January 20, 2010 @ 7:36 PM
|
|
|
Have you called the claims administrator at 1-800-960-5660. They are the ones the deal with the vouchers not microsoft.
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|

|
lol
by NathanG Thu January 21, 2010 @ 8:58 PM
|
|
|
|
|

|

|
hmm
by NathanG Fri January 22, 2010 @ 2:30 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
by NathanG Posted Sat January 23, 2010 @ 1:55 PM
|
|
|
I don't smoke so lets sue the car manufacturers for putting in a Cigarette lighter.
I don't use the Nascar feature on my phone so lets sue Palm for pre-installing one.
I don't use the second bathroom in my house so lets sue whoever built it.
I don't use the scanner ability on my printer so lets sue lexmark
I don't use a comforter so lets sue the bed in a bad manufacturer who included it with the sheets and everything.
I don't use ketchup so lets so every fast food joint who includes it.
I don't use checks anymore lets sue my bank for sending them to me free with my checking account.
I don't use the bikes at the Gym lets sue my gym for putting them there.
I don't use the nature walk trails in my town, lets sue the town.
Where does it stop? And as funny as my examples are they are just as nuts as the lawsuit you won.
Reply
|
|
 |
|
|
|
Oh my god, let it GO already. They aren't going to accommodate you on this, you had plenty of time to spend the voucher. So buy something already. You're not guaranteed to get your way on everything throughout life.
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
I don't think that they can legally respond to you. You mentioned you were part of a class action lawsuit against them, any questions you have might need to go through the legal department. I would try contacting the firm that handled the case for you, tell them you have a question about the vouchers and ask them the best way to go about getting an answer.
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
by Knight Posted Tue January 19, 2010 @ 6:27 PM
|
|
|
You won a lawsuit against them. They are not going to do anything more then what they were required to do by law.
Good Day
Reply
|
|
 |
|
|
by Kelshir Posted Tue January 19, 2010 @ 5:35 PM
|
|
|
Maybe they cannot legally respond. It is the result of a lawsuit so ANY response would have to be looked over by lawyers on their side and it could be that the terms of the settlement forbids them from contacting you over this issue.
Reply
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|

|
by Donno Posted Mon January 18, 2010 @ 9:01 AM
|
|
|
There is no problem with asking for consideration, but couldn't not getting a reply be one form of an answer? I believe so.
There is an expiration date on the voucher. What you asking is similar to asking for a coupon's expiration date to be extended.
The terms of the compensation are very clear.
Reply
|
|
|
|
 |
|

|
by NathanG Posted Mon January 18, 2010 @ 8:43 AM
|
|
|
I really dont think after being sued Microsoft is going to be accomidating to those in benefit of the suit.
Also you say you pooled your vouchers together and want to buy Office with it. You do realize that under the license agreement only 1 person can use that copy of Office, unless you also plan on buying a corporate license which allows you to install on a certain number of PCs (though last I checked it was well over $1,000).
So I wouldnt go around advertising to microsoft that you plan on buying one copy to share among 10 people, unless of course you want to be on the other side of a lawsuit.
Reply
|
|
|
|

|

|
So
by NathanG Tue January 19, 2010 @ 10:58 AM
|
|
|
|
|

|

|
So
by NathanG Tue January 19, 2010 @ 3:24 PM
|
|
|
|
|

|
RE: So
by Knight Tue January 19, 2010 @ 6:31 PM
|
|
|

|

|
Exactly
by Donno Tue January 19, 2010 @ 7:20 PM
|
|
|
|
|