HOME SHARED LETTERS RATINGS MY PLANET COMMUNITIES MISSION SIGN UP!
Shared Letters

Join and browse our exclusive open discussion forums and talk about whatever you like.

Channels
» The Suggestion Box
» Company Responses
» PFB Feedback Line
» Consumer Podcasts
» Mommy Talk & Daddy Dialogue ™
» Shared Letters


Newsletter

Sign up for PlanetFeedback's "Consumer Café" email newsletter!





Nabisco Honey Grahams are now inferior

Posted Fri August 13, 2010 12:00 pm, by Bill B. written to Nabisco, Inc.

Write a Letter to this Company  |  Rate this Company


I would like to register my complaint about your (NEW recipe) for Nabisco Honey Graham Crackers. I have been eating them as most people for years but in the last year there has been a change to the recipe, size and taste.

There are now two distinctly different recipes being packaged (not in the same box) but the box design is the same. The original, the one that has been sold for years, is the good one. The second one is a smaller, bad tasting receipe. It taste like a pale, tastless paste - very bad!

The original ones are larger and wraped in a clear cellophane wrap. The bad ones are much smaller and wraped in a wax like wrapping. The last batch I looked at that were the bad ones had the date code 27DEC10BD2874.

I got stuck with the bad ones several times so I began opening the boxes at the store to see which ones I was getting. I am sure that this is annoying the store manager.

I have two questions why have you changed the recipe? I am sure that anyone in quality control who tasted this will know it is not good. I am sure the latest crop of MBA's has convinced management that Nabisco could save money this way.

Nabisco is still producting both the good and the bad ones but the good ones are getting harder to find. Are your intentions to switch to the "cheaper" ones and stop making the good ones or has some Nabisco plant gone rouge and is trying to show the most profit?

Please stop making the bad ones as described above. If reducing the cost of the product is the intention here then think of this. If people like me switch to another brand (even the store brand taste better) then your sales will go down and so will the profit. So what have you gained?


Reply



Log In/Create an account | 17 comments
     Add to your del.icio.us  del.icio.us    Digg this story  Digg this  
PlanetFeedback Comments are subject to strict terms and conditions. We reserve the right to deny site membership privileges to any individuals acting inappropriately.
by Adrienne A. Posted Wed March 9, 2011 @ 12:31 PM

I am so glad to see that I'm not going crazy!!! I've also noticed the
change in the packaging and and the recipe. I open a number of boxes
at the grocery store before I find the clear wrapping. I've
complained to the store manager when I return the bad ones wrapped in
the wax paper. I think that this is a bad idea and Nabisco needs to
realize that this change is going to damage their reputation by
supplying the consumer with the worst tasting cracker in the world
that was once the greatest tasting cracker in the world!!. Please
stop destroying this recipe!! I'm old school...I like the old
recipe!!

AEA
Maryland

Reply
by |Ev1L| Posted Sat August 14, 2010 @ 11:00 PM

It is very rare that I agree with a consumer, but this one has so much
merit, it boggles the mind.

I also wanted to quote donno's excellent response, but he hit the nail
right on the head and I think everyone needs to read that.

Who cares if eating more (pick one thing) is better for you? Consumers
enjoy brands because they like them. Eating healthy will work itself
out as they grab a few crackers while hitting a healthy meal at the
table. If everyone in this world subsisted on crackers, they would
have a valid point. They are a snack. Leave the rest of the healthy
living part of the equation to the foods we consume often and
regularly please.

Reply


Thanks by Donno Sun August 15, 2010 @ 12:29 AM


Great post! by RedheadwGlasses Mon August 16, 2010 @ 1:36 PM
by t n. Posted Sat August 14, 2010 @ 8:52 PM

Buy another brand. Stop opening them in he store because the store is
paying for those as damaged items.

Reply


that's a good point. n/t by PepperElf Sun August 15, 2010 @ 11:43 PM


i agree, more damaged goods=higher prices=another complaint. by Chadg Mon August 16, 2010 @ 1:22 PM


Here is a very interesting article on the change of recipe: by Donno Sat August 14, 2010 @ 1:32 AM

denser and grittier by donna f. Sat August 14, 2010 @ 11:19 AM

by Donno Posted Sat August 14, 2010 @ 12:07 PM

I see that you honed in on the pertinent details. Who the heck wants
denser and grittier.

The world has gone completely nutty. Sadly it is driven by people who
read about how blah blah blah is healthy for you, and blah blah blah
isn't. So companies have to change or the product is only bought by
those of us who care more about enjoying our food than the fear it
will kill us.

I considered for a second going out and buying a box of these, just to
see how shockingly different they are than my childhood memory, and
discarding the rest of the box. Then I realized I can probably just
find a few boxes opened by people looking for the tasty ones.
Besides, through these complaints I KNOW that they must suck so badly
that they aren't worth eating.

Reply

by olie Posted Fri August 13, 2010 @ 10:29 PM

You might be able to check for recipe by looking at the "expiration
date"(or whatever it's called) on the box.

Or the ingredient list, or the nutrition facts. Even if it's not the
sodium, as I suggested in a different post, *something* has changed.
Compare serving size, calories, fat, sodium, whatever.

And really, try the store brand. It's cheaper, and I personally don't
notice a difference between store and name brand. At least in this
item.

Reply

by olie Posted Fri August 13, 2010 @ 10:20 PM

First, you might want to try store brand graham crackers.

Second, there is a movement to reduce sodium in every single item that
we humans ingest. Unfortunately, it seems that salt is important in
every step, from how the dough/batter holds together to the final
taste. Even in something like graham crackers, and even in ways that
don't affect taste but affect texture.

The New York Times had an article:
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/05/30/health/30salt.html

They took a basic cracker, and tried to reduce the sodium content in
every single step of production. It's absolutely amazing how such a
simple ingredient makes such a huge, HUGE impact.

Blame the food nannies, who want to take salt, sugar, and fat out of
every single thing we buy.

Reply


by Donno Posted Fri August 13, 2010 @ 10:09 AM

I don't understand why the "good ones" would continue to be made. The
recipe changed half a year ago it seems. Maybe the shelf life is that
long?

There have been numerous complaints about Honey Grahams. I have
complained about recent changes in some of the products I have used
for many years. The companies don't seem to care, and point to better
nutritional value for the panel on the package. Oh! for the days of
whole milk, butter, leaded gas and asbestos.

If I were the store manager, I would forbid you to enter the store
again. That is willful destruction of a saleable product.

Reply

replyl by Bill B. Fri August 13, 2010 @ 11:02 AM


which is it? by Bill R. Fri August 13, 2010 @ 11:56 AM


Well then by Donno Fri August 13, 2010 @ 12:01 PM


The Last Day by Donno Fri August 13, 2010 @ 12:32 PM




Home | Shared Letters | Ratings | Login | Communities | Categories | RSS | Contact Us | Terms & Conditions | Privacy Policy | FAQ
Copyright 2013 © All Rights Reserved PlanetFeedback.com | Web by Cicada