HOME SHARED LETTERS RATINGS MY PLANET COMMUNITIES MISSION SIGN UP!
Shared Letters

Join and browse our exclusive open discussion forums and talk about whatever you like.

Channels
» The Suggestion Box
» Company Responses
» PFB Feedback Line
» Consumer Podcasts
» Mommy Talk & Daddy Dialogue ™
» Shared Letters


Newsletter

Sign up for PlanetFeedback's "Consumer Café" email newsletter!





Charge Off

Posted Thu August 19, 2010 6:51 am, by Byron J. written to Verizon Wireless (Cell Phones)

Write a Letter to this Company  |  Rate this Company


I am in the process of getting a home mortgage to purchase my first home when I have discovered that on my credit report, Verizon has listed a Charge Off on my report which is now preventing me from obtaining my mortgage. The account was paid in full in going in 3 years now as soon as I was aware that it was in behind status.

As Verizon has been paid for going on 3 years the full amount that was owed, there is no more incentive to continue reporting the Charge Off on my records and I am asking that Verizon remove the charge off as this is not in violation of the FCRA.


Reply



Log In/Create an account | 45 comments
     Add to your del.icio.us  del.icio.us    Digg this story  Digg this  
PlanetFeedback Comments are subject to strict terms and conditions. We reserve the right to deny site membership privileges to any individuals acting inappropriately.

by Casmly Posted Thu August 19, 2010 @ 11:13 PM

Does anyone know if this would really prevent someone from obtaining a
mortgage IF they don't have any other blemishes on their credit? I've
been reading about how those that short sell should be able to borrow
after 2 years, and those that foreclose will need to wait 5. So, it
seems to me that in light of that, a charge off on an acct. 3 years
ago shouldn't weigh so heavy that it costs someone a mortgage. I'm
genuinely curious about this, so does anyone have any experience with
this?


Reply


I have no experience but Ive read that by RowdyRetailer Fri August 20, 2010 @ 12:28 AM

Well by fishbjc Fri August 20, 2010 @ 10:30 AM


re by RowdyRetailer Fri August 20, 2010 @ 11:25 AM


prevent someone from obtaining a mortgage by Bill R. Fri August 20, 2010 @ 9:55 AM

YES IT DOES by fishbjc Fri August 20, 2010 @ 10:16 AM


If the rest of your record is clean by Donno Fri August 20, 2010 @ 11:20 AM


Acts of Gord? by PepperElf Sun August 22, 2010 @ 1:48 PM

by PepperElf Posted Thu August 19, 2010 @ 11:04 PM

it doesn't matter if it's been paid off.

if the charge off was valid, it stays for 7 years



credit reports exist to show a person's true credit history

Reply

WRONG... by fishbjc Fri August 20, 2010 @ 10:24 AM


WRONG... by Donno Fri August 20, 2010 @ 11:18 AM


This was the research I used by Donno Fri August 20, 2010 @ 11:24 AM
by Lisa H. Posted Thu August 19, 2010 @ 4:57 PM

"As Verizon has been paid for going on 3 years the full amount that
was owed, there is no more incentive to continue reporting the Charge
Off on my records "

But there is. It's part of your credit history and is being reported
acurately from what you say. The whole point of a credit history is
that it shows just that, your history. If we could have everything
bad removed once we paid it, there would be no point in having credit
scores.

Reply

You're Wrong! by fishbjc Fri August 20, 2010 @ 10:18 AM


"You're Wrong! If"..... Huh? by Donno Fri August 20, 2010 @ 11:14 AM


The OP never said by MA Cunningham Fri August 20, 2010 @ 4:00 PM

There was nothing in the letter by Lisa H. Sun August 22, 2010 @ 11:52 AM


alternative viewpoint by RowdyRetailer Thu August 19, 2010 @ 2:56 PM


The OP's problem by Donno Thu August 19, 2010 @ 6:35 PM


re by RowdyRetailer Fri August 20, 2010 @ 12:15 AM

I'm so sick of your flaunting by t n. Thu August 19, 2010 @ 8:56 PM


Flaunting by Eclipse Thu August 19, 2010 @ 10:10 PM


Thank You by RowdyRetailer Fri August 20, 2010 @ 12:21 AM


Its crazy by Eclipse Fri August 20, 2010 @ 11:22 AM


T.N, by RowdyRetailer Fri August 20, 2010 @ 12:09 AM

you paid $40,000????? by franese Sat August 21, 2010 @ 9:50 AM


re by RowdyRetailer Sat August 21, 2010 @ 9:59 AM


"I can only reflect my views, they are all I have." by Donno Sat August 21, 2010 @ 11:13 AM


Well said, Donno by LadyMac Sat August 21, 2010 @ 8:22 PM


re by RowdyRetailer Sat August 21, 2010 @ 11:49 PM

True but... by franese Sun August 22, 2010 @ 10:10 AM


I live in an area by LadyMac Sun August 22, 2010 @ 3:01 PM


I am so glad by MA Cunningham Mon August 23, 2010 @ 3:25 PM
by BigShot Posted Wed August 25, 2010 @ 3:37 PM

with MA Cunningham. Rowdy, I don't know you, won't know you, and have
no animosity towards you. I assume that your posts are geared towards
helping people enjoy life and stay out of debt. I gather in your
posts that you're a Christian (me too) and I think you genuinely are
trying to help people. However, canned responses to any complaint
involving credit cards that they should "just use cash" aren't helpful
to them in their current situation nor do they help you get your point
across. Not everyone was as fortunate as you and I to have the values
of financial discipline instilled in us, most people in debt are
mimicking what their parents did. Perhaps if you gave more of an
explanation as to why you feel cash is better, other than one or two
sentence replies, it might sound better. I'm no Pulitzer winner, but
I do have a Journalism degree so I have an idea about the impact that
words and how they're used have on people.

By the way, kudos to you and your wife for being foster parents. In
this culture, there is a desperate need for orphaned or at-risk kids
to have good role models and influences. God bless! :-)

Reply

by ST Posted Thu August 19, 2010 @ 2:09 PM

If it's reporting as a 3 year old paid charge off, that in itself
shouldn't be enough to prevent you from getting a mortgage. I had
some screwups earlier with my credit, but did not have any problems
getting my mortgage just last year. There have to be some other
entries on there that are more likely causes of any denials you're
getting. A 3-year old chargeoff shouldn't carry enough weight to
cause a denial by itself.

Reply

That was LAST YEAR, this is THIS YEAR... by fishbjc Fri August 20, 2010 @ 10:22 AM


Neither by ST Fri August 20, 2010 @ 11:47 AM

by RedheadwGlasses Posted Thu August 19, 2010 @ 1:37 PM

But it's accurate, so it should stay.

Reply


by Donno Posted Thu August 19, 2010 @ 9:07 AM

I think you will find "going on 3 years now" means you have over 4
years to wait for it to be removed.

A chargeoff is a serious matter, along the lines of bankruptcy.
Notations of these just don't go missing.

It isn't a matter of "incentive". The purpose of it on your report is
to let potential creditors (eg a mortgage lender) know that you may be
a credit risk. I have never had a single negative mark on my credit
report. Shouldn't I have an advantage over someone who has?

Reply

Really? by fishbjc Fri August 20, 2010 @ 10:26 AM

by Bill R. Posted Thu August 19, 2010 @ 8:23 AM

Byron J.,

The issue is was this debt turned over to collections and paid off by
you after it was due in full. If that is the case you can and should
expect that entry to remain on your creditr report for up to 7 years.
If you can prove that the debt was paid in full prior to it being
turned over to collections you might stand a chance of having it
removed as an error.

BillR.

Reply




Home | Shared Letters | Ratings | Login | Communities | Categories | RSS | Contact Us | Terms & Conditions | Privacy Policy | FAQ
Copyright 2013 © All Rights Reserved PlanetFeedback.com | Web by Cicada