HOME SHARED LETTERS RATINGS MY PLANET COMMUNITIES MISSION SIGN UP!
Shared Letters

Join and browse our exclusive open discussion forums and talk about whatever you like.

Channels
» The Suggestion Box
» Company Responses
» PFB Feedback Line
» Consumer Podcasts
» Mommy Talk & Daddy Dialogue ™
» Shared Letters


Newsletter

Sign up for PlanetFeedback's "Consumer Café" email newsletter!





Refusing Service to Cyclists

Posted Sun July 3, 2011 1:29 am, by Joshua V. written to Wendy's International, Inc.

Write a Letter to this Company  |  Rate this Company


I was very disappointed this evening when I went up to the Wendy's drive thru (on Gardiner's and Bath in Kingston, Ontario, Canada) on my bicycle. I'm sure you get a lot of these complaints but here's another one. Not only was I refused service, but I was scoffed at, clearly for not being in a motorized vehicle. It's wrong to refuse service for such a reason, and borderline illegal; you're refusing to serve customers because they don't have a motorized vehicle. Whether this lack of vehicle ownership is due to age or income is irrelevant; it's still discrimination and it's still wrong.

Please install walk-thrus at your restaurants. Continuing to refuse service to a select portion of society is discrimination.


Reply



Log In/Create an account | 50 comments
     Add to your del.icio.us  del.icio.us    Digg this story  Digg this  
PlanetFeedback Comments are subject to strict terms and conditions. We reserve the right to deny site membership privileges to any individuals acting inappropriately.
by Matt M. Posted Sat July 30, 2011 @ 5:53 PM

I saw this post the other night and emailed a friend that owns a fast
food place, with a drive-thru, near a boardwalk and heavily used area
by people on bikes. I asked him if his place allowed people on bikes
to use the drive-thru. He said yes. He then immediately said,
without being asked, "but most won't because of the higher liability
insurance rates. He said the rates went up a good percentage (I don't
remember what he said, so I'm not going to post a guess) to allow walk
ups and not motorized vehciles to use the drive-thru. He also said he
had to pay a higher rate to allow people on skates/rollarblads inside
his place.

He said he would not have considered paying the higher rates, but the
number of people on bikes and skates made the price worth it, given
the area his place is located. I guess the Wendy's you went to does
not feel it was worth it for the higher rate. This is the same reason
why you don't see too many Sonic locations that have employees on
rollar skates like the commercials constantly show.

Reply

by McJohn Posted Wed July 20, 2011 @ 10:07 AM

I wasnt going to post here because I didnt really have an opinion on
this either way but now I do.

My wife and I had to stop at Checkers the other night for dinner. We
pulled up and ordered and then pulled up further only to see 2 bikes
parked in front of us and the riders were standing at the window.

I am normally a very cautious driver and I nearly ran into the bikes
because after taking the turn they were parked to the right and I
barely saw them through the bushes.

The thing that erked me was after they got their food it took them
over 5 minutes to figure out how to pack the food on the bikes without
dropping anything. One held the bags and drinks while the other one
packed them into the small bags on the side of the bike. Then they
tried to hold the drinks and bags and tried to take off, but that
didnt work so they had to reorganize everything. It was actually
slightly comical if not annoying.

The least they could have done was move the bikes to the side and
figured it out instead of holding up a line. And if your going to get
off the bikes and walk up the window anyway, just go inside.

Reply

It's even more ridiculous at Checkers... by dg132001 Thu July 21, 2011 @ 2:05 PM


My only Guess by McJohn Fri July 22, 2011 @ 8:06 AM
by Kelly P. Posted Mon July 11, 2011 @ 2:44 PM

It is not discrimination it is safety. Park your bike and walk in.

Reply

by DeeM Posted Sat July 9, 2011 @ 10:23 PM

It's ridiculous to say it's discrimination, that would only be true if
they refused to serve any cyclists who came in either by car or into
the store itself. Refusing to serve anything but cars in the drive
thru is a wise and prudent decision on the part of corporate decision
making.

Get off the bike, park it and go in and get your food. Cars only in
the drive thru is a rule that's been around for dozens of years. It's
not anything new.

Reply

Re: Refusing Service to Cyclists by Horsetuna Fri July 8, 2011 @ 4:58 PM


But... by RedheadwGlasses Tue July 12, 2011 @ 1:18 PM
by Horsetuna Posted Thu August 4, 2011 @ 6:09 AM

I am not sure how sensitive those things are, although they have no
problem in Canada in -40 below weather, iced and snowed over, heh.

Could put a little buzzer on the callbox perhaps for if it doesnt
trip? Just an idear. Or like how sometimes people just pull up right
to the window.

Reply
by VoiceOfReason Posted Thu July 7, 2011 @ 12:31 PM

With all due respect, why would you not just park your bike and go
inside? I don't understand why you are even raising this issue. If
Wendy's policy bothers you that much, then go somewhere else. That
policy is in place for a reason. And no, it's NOT discrimination.

Reply

Agree by Mnemosyne Thu July 7, 2011 @ 12:55 PM

After Hours by Melanie J. Sat July 9, 2011 @ 11:37 AM


by MA Cunningham Posted Thu July 7, 2011 @ 8:17 AM

It's called a lobby.

If you can't figure out why a 200 lb man on a 50 lb bike vs. a 3000 lb
car is a bad idea, (and further to suggest its discriminatory) then I
really don't know what to tell you.

Reply
by Jared C. Posted Tue July 5, 2011 @ 10:52 AM

They have every right to refuse service to whomever they wish,
including you and every other cyclist out there.

They have to ensure your safety while you are on their premises. By
going through the drive-thru with a bike, you could be putting Wendy's
in legal danger if another customer were to hit you with their car.

Reply
by tali Posted Mon July 4, 2011 @ 8:57 PM

Back in the mid '70's, we rode our horses everywhere. The McDonald's
finally put up several hitching posts to tie the horses to where they
could be seen and watched through the windows. They would not allow
them through the drive through. We did try. And of course we could not
bring them in. Worked out very nicely for all. Perhaps Wendy's needs
to install a bike rack.

Reply


The walmart here has hitching posts too by PepperElf Tue July 5, 2011 @ 11:31 AM


by hardball>softball Posted Mon July 4, 2011 @ 1:46 PM


I'm going to throw a few comments out there, Joshua. Please don't
think I am attacking you in a ny way:

1. My home city has an ordinance stating that motor vehicles only are
allowed in the drive-thru. That may have been the case, Joshua. The
ordinance may include scoffing after enforcing said policy. You might
want to check on that.

2. It is not discrimination, that is, unless prior to ordering the #3
with a diet coke (biggie-sized, of course), you filled out a
questionnaire indicating income and assets. If you did and they denied
you service specifically for those reasons, then yes, that would be
discrimination.

3. They do have a walk thru, complete with sit-in area. As an added
bonus you can actually see them putting your order together.

Reply


Actually, that would legally be okay by RedheadwGlasses Tue July 5, 2011 @ 12:40 PM


Yep. I've some apartments that have a minimum income requirement by PepperElf Wed July 6, 2011 @ 12:17 AM


Just to make sure we are on the same page…. by hardball>softball Wed July 6, 2011 @ 11:25 AM


Disregard my reply PepperElf by hardball>softball Wed July 6, 2011 @ 8:48 PM


It isn't if all he wanted was a cheeseburger... by hardball>softball Wed July 6, 2011 @ 11:05 AM


Well by hardball>softball Wed July 6, 2011 @ 8:44 PM
by billt Posted Mon July 4, 2011 @ 2:51 AM

I dont get it this is a drive thru, not a walk up or a ride through
I have seen local burger kings and and others service MOTORCYCLISTS,
but not bicyclists.

Reply


That's because motorcycles are motor vehicles while bikes are categorized as pedestrian vehicles by PepperElf Tue July 5, 2011 @ 8:35 AM


We rarely take the motorcycles.. by Harleycat Thu July 7, 2011 @ 4:05 PM

by PepperElf Posted Mon July 4, 2011 @ 12:42 AM

However, if you were injured by a vehicle in the drive through ...
would they be liable for the damages?

That may be something else to consider. YOU may not personally
consider pressing charges but others may.


Reply

by cissy Posted Sun July 3, 2011 @ 5:41 PM

My concern would be breathing the exhaust fumes while awaiting the
order. But saying that, it's not bordering illegal, but understand and
sympathize with your plight.All the best.

Reply

by Chadg Posted Sun July 3, 2011 @ 3:56 PM

Joshua- I agree with you 100 percent. I do not have a vehicle, i
cannot afford one. I believe that there should be a law in place
making it illegal to refuse service based on these grounds.

I do not buy their "safety" argument. I have a headlight and
taillight, and use them at night. If a driver behind you cant see you
from ten feet during broad daylight, they have no business behind the
wheel.

You have my support, i too am tired of being discriminated against and
treated like a second class citizen because i only make $14,000 a year
and cant afford a car.

Please, don't put all the blame on the person behind the counter, you
have no idea what they may have dealt with during their shift, they
are also simply following orders.

The rich owners class needs to listen up and stop crapping all over
their customers, no matter how poor we are.

Reply


to add... bicyclists are required to follow all rules and laws of the road, and can be ticketed for violations. We should also be able to enjoy the same privileges. by Chadg Sun July 3, 2011 @ 4:00 PM


"ALL rules and laws of the road?" REALLY?? by olie Sun July 3, 2011 @ 8:21 PM


re by RowdyRetailer Mon July 4, 2011 @ 8:37 AM


It is true by Nate. Mon July 4, 2011 @ 9:56 AM


Weight is a factor as well..n/t by Harleycat Fri July 8, 2011 @ 12:39 PM


About the law thing..... by RowdyRetailer Mon July 4, 2011 @ 1:50 AM

bikes are not as big as a car by texasgurl Sun July 10, 2011 @ 1:01 AM

by RedheadwGlasses Posted Sun July 3, 2011 @ 2:56 PM

Sigh. "illegal"? You go find the statute and quote it. yeah, I
thought so.

They have the right to enforce this rule. IT'S NOT DISCRIMINATION.
Geez I hate that word getting thrown around. Knock it iff.

Reply


"Discriminate" to make a difference in treatment or favor on a basis other than individual merit ....from websters dictionary by Chadg Sun July 3, 2011 @ 4:09 PM

While we're looking at Webster's: Drive-through definition, see drive-up. by Steve OH (IO) Sun July 3, 2011 @ 4:29 PM


The LW meant the "racism/sexism" type of discrimination by RedheadwGlasses Tue July 5, 2011 @ 12:39 PM


by olie Posted Sun July 3, 2011 @ 2:52 PM

This is a safety issue--for the customer's safety.

They also will not allow walk-ups, or pushing-in-grocery-store-carts
customer.

When I'm in a drive-thru, I expect that the customer in front of me is
using a motorized vehicle, with brake lights. I'm not expecting a kid
on a bike or a parent pushing a double stroller.

Also--most DT ordering areas respond to weight on the sensor. How
were you, on a bike, able to trigger the sensor?

Reply


i dont buy that... by Chadg Sun July 3, 2011 @ 3:59 PM


Chad, I respect your comments. by olie Sun July 3, 2011 @ 8:12 PM

by Harleycat Posted Sun July 3, 2011 @ 9:57 AM

It is not borderline illegal and most likely an insurance regulation.
It's a drive thru, not a ride thru. I'm sure if you were there on
your bike and a car came around and hit you you'd be first in line to
sue.

Reply

by RowdyRetailer Posted Sun July 3, 2011 @ 9:03 AM

Borderline illegal???

They have the right to refuse service.

The walk through is called the lobby


good day

Reply


not when the lobby closes hours before the DT. by Chadg Sun July 3, 2011 @ 3:57 PM

Lobby closed by Retail Veteran Sun July 3, 2011 @ 9:19 PM


some of us work late hours. i also have a reflective vest and headlight and taillight....... by Chadg Mon July 4, 2011 @ 8:11 AM




Home | Shared Letters | Ratings | Login | Communities | Categories | RSS | Contact Us | Terms & Conditions | Privacy Policy | FAQ
Copyright 2013 © All Rights Reserved PlanetFeedback.com | Web by Cicada