 |
|
|
by t n. Posted Thu October 27, 2011 @ 8:48 PM
|
|
|
When you sign up for the job they tell you that you're not allowed to take ANYTHING from the store. This is true for just about every retailer. Outdated stuff MUST be thrown away. Don't get me wrong, it totally sucks what happened, but it's Circle K. Get another job and move on.
Reply
|
|
 |
|
|
|
by sarahsmile Posted Fri October 21, 2011 @ 10:26 AM
|
|
|
most are willing to work for any company that offers a steady paycheck.
Reply
|
|
|
by texasgurl Posted Sun October 23, 2011 @ 6:27 PM
|
|
|
I hate my job and one of my coworkers tries to get me in trouble on a regular bases but the people in charge won't do anything about it. Plus I got wrote up for something I didn't even do and something that everyone does but only I was punished for. I still work there though because I need the paycheck. If I got fired for something I didn't do or something that everyone did but only I got fired for I would threaten to take it do the newspaper. Of course that might not work for the letter writer. It all depends on how willing the newspaper is to make a big deal out of it and how scared the company is of bad press.
Reply
|
|
 |
|
by Jared C. Posted Thu October 13, 2011 @ 10:02 AM
|
|
|
I've worked at several retailers and convenience stores and this is typical of all the ones I've worked at - out-of-date magazines or newspapers can be taken home by staff once the UPC's are cut out.
I agree with the letter writer - her daughter was wrongfully terminated. The regional manager Clint is in the wrong here.
Reply
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|

|
by PepperElf Posted Thu October 13, 2011 @ 9:36 AM
|
|
|
You know I'm also reminded of my first job, slinging pizzas.
We asked if we could eat the mistakes because they were going to be thrown away anyway.
The manager told us "no" because it would encourage us to screw up more.
That's probably why they don't want employees scarfing home unsold mags... it could encourage some to keep a few back, hidden, just to take them home when they went out of date.
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
This probably went down one of two ways:
1. The employees were warned/told they couldn't take the unsold magazines, but decided to do it anyway ("what's the harm? they're just going to get thrown away"). I feel for them, b/c i hate waste, but stupid rules are still rules when it comes to your job. Your daughter and the other two ignored the new manager and tried to get away with it.
or
2. This new manager is such a jerk, he didn't even give the employees a chance to comply with the rule -- no warning or anything. If that's the case, does your daughter really want to work for someone who's like that?
Reply
|
|
 |
|
|
by EricMV Posted Thu October 13, 2011 @ 1:08 AM
|
|
|
From my experience in publishing, I may be able to shed some light on the practice that the OP references. Publishers often don't want physical returns of unsold books or magazines. So they process it as a return but the retailer simply agrees to render it unsaleable and discard it. For paperback books, this usually means tearing off the front cover. For magazines, I gather it can mean cutting away the UPC so it cannot be sold legitimately.
It is highly plausible that a manager allowed employees to take and read magazines that had been rendered unsaleable and treated as if returned to the publisher. I don't know if it violates the agreement between the publisher and the retailer, but it's not stealing in any economic or legal sense, as far as I know, so long as the employee is not selling the magazines.
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|

|

|
Actually....
by Irving Patrick Freleigh Thu October 13, 2011 @ 9:16 PM
|
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|

|
by Irving Patrick Freleigh Posted Wed October 12, 2011 @ 11:26 PM
|
|
|
"My daughter Ashley was terminated from the Circle K in Crooksville, Ohio for what they called theft. She was GIVEN permission by her manager to take old out-dated magazines because she said that once they removed the UPC's the magazines they would be thrown away. "
If your daughter's boss told her it was okay for her to rob banks, would she do it?
People need to get used to the fact that taking things they didn't pay for at work is a Bad Idea. Just because those magazines are outdated doesn't mean they no longer have value to the company. Most likely they were going to be returned to the circulation company for credit.
Reply
|
|
 |
|

|
by PepperElf Posted Wed October 12, 2011 @ 10:01 PM
|
|
|
1) "Old manager" you say? Is that manager even working with the company anymore?
If the manager is gone then claiming he "gave permission" doesn't really amount to having official permission to take unused product. ... especially since stores get money back by turning unused product in to the publisher.
2) Unemployment - straight from Ohio's own official site:
http://jfs.ohio.gov/unemp_comp_faq/faq_elig_reason.stm#discharge
An applicant's unemployment must not be his/her fault. If discharged from a job, the applicant may be considered not eligible for benefits -- if the employer shows why the discharge was for "just cause."
3) The manager's personal information.
Unless you are the legal guardian of your daughter (ie a minor or an adult that requires guardianship), you will not be entitled to ANY information regarding her employment, save what she herself gives you.
If your daughter wishes to obtain this information it is something she herself will have to do.
Reply
|
|
 |
|
|
by Steve OH (IO) Posted Wed October 12, 2011 @ 3:32 PM
|
|
|
fire you, he fired your daughter. Why didn't she call? He might have been willing to provide it to her. She doesn't seem to care enough to do the small amount of work a phone call takes. This could mean that she's lazy, doesn't think she really has a case,or that you are operating without her knowledge. I'm not sure what was said, but it had to be a little heated for him to ask three times if you were threatening him.
I'm not sure why you think it's a witch-hunt. He didn't just fire your daughter, he fired two other people. When times are tough and people are getting cut, only the best keep their jobs.
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
Unemployment? If she was fired for theft, that means she was fired for cause and is not entitled to unemployment benefits.
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|