|
|
Undertrained and unprofessional at Circle K
Posted Wed October 12, 2011 12:00 pm, by Roger M. written to Circle K Food Mart
Write a Letter to this Company
My daughter Ashley was terminated from the Circle K in Crooksville, Ohio for what they called theft. She was GIVEN permission by her manager to take old out-dated magazines because she said that once they removed the UPC's the magazines they would be thrown away. My daughter Ashley explained this to the under-trained regional manager Clint. He stated that what an old manager told her made no difference. She had been there for over two years and should't there have been a meeting with the new manager to go over and explain what was acceptable and NOT acceptable. I also called to find out Clint's last name for unemployment purposes and he is a very rude person when dealing with the public. He kept asking if I was threating him? I told him three times that no I wasn't...I simply needed his last name because unemployment asks who terminated you? Ashley said EVERYONE takes the magazines so shouldn't EVERYONE has been terminated? Jim the manager also knew this was going on but he was not even repremanded. I understand the store was having shotage problems and I believe Clint was simply on a witch hunt and picked three people to fire.
I believe my daughter should get at the worse a warning and be given her job back because as I stated she asks about the magazines and was given the okay to take them.
Reply
| Log In/Create an account | 23 comments |
|
|
| PlanetFeedback Comments are subject to strict terms and conditions. We reserve the right to deny site membership privileges to any individuals acting inappropriately. |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
by t n. Posted Thu October 27, 2011 @ 8:48 PM
|
|
|
When you sign up for the job they tell you that you're not allowed to take ANYTHING from the store. This is true for just about every retailer. Outdated stuff MUST be thrown away. Don't get me wrong, it totally sucks what happened, but it's Circle K. Get another job and move on.
Reply
|
|
 |
|
|
|
is that if there is new management within the store and the old manager that permitted this is gone, there must be a reason.
Secondly, does your daughter really WANT to work for a company that makes scapegoats out of their employees?
She should take it as a lesson learned and move on to a better employer.
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
by Jared C. Posted Thu October 13, 2011 @ 10:02 AM
|
|
|
I've worked at several retailers and convenience stores and this is typical of all the ones I've worked at - out-of-date magazines or newspapers can be taken home by staff once the UPC's are cut out.
I agree with the letter writer - her daughter was wrongfully terminated. The regional manager Clint is in the wrong here.
Reply
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
This probably went down one of two ways:
1. The employees were warned/told they couldn't take the unsold magazines, but decided to do it anyway ("what's the harm? they're just going to get thrown away"). I feel for them, b/c i hate waste, but stupid rules are still rules when it comes to your job. Your daughter and the other two ignored the new manager and tried to get away with it.
or
2. This new manager is such a jerk, he didn't even give the employees a chance to comply with the rule -- no warning or anything. If that's the case, does your daughter really want to work for someone who's like that?
Reply
|
|
 |
|
|
by EricMV Posted Thu October 13, 2011 @ 1:08 AM
|
|
|
From my experience in publishing, I may be able to shed some light on the practice that the OP references. Publishers often don't want physical returns of unsold books or magazines. So they process it as a return but the retailer simply agrees to render it unsaleable and discard it. For paperback books, this usually means tearing off the front cover. For magazines, I gather it can mean cutting away the UPC so it cannot be sold legitimately.
It is highly plausible that a manager allowed employees to take and read magazines that had been rendered unsaleable and treated as if returned to the publisher. I don't know if it violates the agreement between the publisher and the retailer, but it's not stealing in any economic or legal sense, as far as I know, so long as the employee is not selling the magazines.
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|

|

|
Actually....
by Irving Patrick Freleigh Thu October 13, 2011 @ 9:16 PM
|
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|

|
by Irving Patrick Freleigh Posted Wed October 12, 2011 @ 11:26 PM
|
|
|
"My daughter Ashley was terminated from the Circle K in Crooksville, Ohio for what they called theft. She was GIVEN permission by her manager to take old out-dated magazines because she said that once they removed the UPC's the magazines they would be thrown away. "
If your daughter's boss told her it was okay for her to rob banks, would she do it?
People need to get used to the fact that taking things they didn't pay for at work is a Bad Idea. Just because those magazines are outdated doesn't mean they no longer have value to the company. Most likely they were going to be returned to the circulation company for credit.
Reply
|
|
 |
|

|
by PepperElf Posted Wed October 12, 2011 @ 10:01 PM
|
|
|
1) "Old manager" you say? Is that manager even working with the company anymore?
If the manager is gone then claiming he "gave permission" doesn't really amount to having official permission to take unused product. ... especially since stores get money back by turning unused product in to the publisher.
2) Unemployment - straight from Ohio's own official site:
http://jfs.ohio.gov/unemp_comp_faq/faq_elig_reason.stm#discharge
An applicant's unemployment must not be his/her fault. If discharged from a job, the applicant may be considered not eligible for benefits -- if the employer shows why the discharge was for "just cause."
3) The manager's personal information.
Unless you are the legal guardian of your daughter (ie a minor or an adult that requires guardianship), you will not be entitled to ANY information regarding her employment, save what she herself gives you.
If your daughter wishes to obtain this information it is something she herself will have to do.
Reply
|
|
 |
|
|
by Steve OH (IO) Posted Wed October 12, 2011 @ 3:32 PM
|
|
|
fire you, he fired your daughter. Why didn't she call? He might have been willing to provide it to her. She doesn't seem to care enough to do the small amount of work a phone call takes. This could mean that she's lazy, doesn't think she really has a case,or that you are operating without her knowledge. I'm not sure what was said, but it had to be a little heated for him to ask three times if you were threatening him.
I'm not sure why you think it's a witch-hunt. He didn't just fire your daughter, he fired two other people. When times are tough and people are getting cut, only the best keep their jobs.
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
Unemployment? If she was fired for theft, that means she was fired for cause and is not entitled to unemployment benefits.
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|