 |
|
by sleves Posted Mon February 25, 2013 @ 8:54 PM
|
|
|
Dear Douglas, I have had difficulty dealing with Citizens as well. Below is a copy of my blog and facebook post
Citizens Bank are just paid thieves
February 25, 2013
Dear Sirs,
On February 1, 2013 I wrote a letter to you stating:
I have a checking account with you (xxxxxxxxxx) and in 1 year alone you've charged me over 1500.00 in overdraft charges and sustained overdraft fees. I demand you refund all my fees within 72 hours, not 2 months like last time. As you know Citizens Bank has a class action suit against you for exorbitant fee charges. Please respond immediately. I can be reached at xxx-xxx-xxxx
end of letter from 2/1/13
You chose to do nothing and leave me to be responsible for the charges which is UNACCEPTABLE. I opted out of overdraft coverage MANY TIMES, the most recent being JULY 2013 and Nick Desena said he would monitor my account to make sure I didn't opt into overdraft coverage which I NEVER did and Nick did not monitor the account as he said he would. Since July 2012, Citizens has charged me over 1500.00 in overdraft fees, what's the point in opting out if you're going to charge me anyway. One time, recently, Citizens charged me over 100.00 (overdraft and sustained overdraft) for a 1.29 charge to iTunes which put my account in the red be less than .75 cents.
After my last letter of 2/1/13 I finally got a callback 2/7/13 and was told the only solution is put limits on my account. Why should I be penalized for your mistakes. I'm on disability so one overdraft charge of 37.00 is like 137.00 to me. Just because I'm disabled physically doesn't mean I'm disabled mentally. I'm smarter than most people give me credit for, in fact when I graduated college, it was in nusing with High Honors. Not only am I smart but I'm very persistent, particularly when I'm being messed with, like now. I have tried to deal with just Citizens but now I'm going to send this to the media, and put it in my blog. I'm also going to seek a lawyer regarding this, just because you are a big company with a lot of money doesn't mean you can screw the little guy without ramifications, as the recent class action suit against you proved. Of which you settled to pay 137.5 millions small potatoes when you stole billions from customers. If you think "stole" is too strong of a word think of it like this, if someone came in your bank demanding money, wielding guns and wearing a ski mask,that would be considered stealing, your bank is essentially doing the same thing minus the guns and ski mask.
Sheila A. Levesque,
Reply
|
|
 |
|
|
by not_in_this_life Posted Wed February 15, 2012 @ 8:14 PM
|
|
|
I doubt the bank will have sympathy for your plight considering that you are writing on behalf of the account holder. Yes, I think it is wrong the way banks reorder transactions, but like others have said, if you do not keep track of your account, you cannot rely on a piece of paper or machine telling you that you have money in your account. Those are never accurate, they only specify your account in real time. Sure she probably did have the funds there when she made the withdrawal, and once other things processed after she didn't. Yes, the reordering sucks, but if the money was there, you (or should I say, she) doesn't need to worry about it. I would consider this a lesson.
Reply
|
|
 |
|
|
by William E. Posted Sat January 14, 2012 @ 12:59 AM
|
|
|
While it may not be "theft" or "fraud," it is definitely a legal issue. Bank of America is currently in a class action lawsuit because of the way they were ordering the transactions to maximize overdraft fees.
I have ten years' worth of banking experience, and I have seen first hand how the bank does this. I feel that, while we as customers should do our due diligence to ensure money is in our account, many banks' core processing systems need additional tweaking to ensure that they are not attempting to maximize their profits.
Many of the posters have said, "well, it's the customers fault for not keeping track of their own accounts; it's not the bank's responsibility." I argue that it IS the bank's responsibility to post transactions in a timely manner. The Check 21 Act has allowed many checks to be posted as soon as that night. ATM and POS transactions, in many instances, INSTANTLY post to the customer's account. It is the bank's who have the resources to make this possible for their customers.
Yes, customers make mistakes on their account may not constitute an emergency on part of the bank. However, shady practices by banks to maximize their overdraft fees IS an emergency.
You can read more about the B of A lawsuit by going to www.bofaoverdraftsettlement.com
Reply
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
You can change this immediately so you do not get overdraft charges, when you log in you can change your settings to NOT ALLOW overdraft protection. When you do this you will not be able to use your card if you have insufficient funds. *if* it does still go through and you do go overdraft it will still pay out the funds; only when you deposit enough to cover it. I have selected this option for my son's account because he was constantly overdrafting and it was ruining his credit and costing him a fortune. Contact the bank as well, they do offer a one time only overdraft fee reduction (usually 50%). I know it seems like you were robbed, and I sympathize with your plight. Try what I mentioned, it should work for you. (One caveat, there is a fee, it is about $5, which is much better than $37) Good Luck!
Reply
|
|
 |
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|

|
by PepperElf Posted Tue December 6, 2011 @ 9:25 AM
|
|
|
i think the "they weren't" meant that the OP found out after the fact that the funds weren't available.
however that still doesn't mean much.
some banks let you view a "quick peek" on your funds but you have to open the link to see all the pending transactions.
plus just because your funds show available doesn't mean all of your transactions have posted to the bank yet
1) Automatic / recurring charges - it won't post to the account right away if it's not the date for it to be processed.
2) credit / paper charges - those have to be sent in manually so they may not post immediately either.
this is why it's best to keep track yourself instead of relying on the bank.
This why you don't run up a bunch of small expenses .... only to have the bigger one hit and then turn the little ones into overdrafts.
More importantly.... Reordering will NOT make you overdraft. No matter HOW you reorder it, if you have enough money to cover ALL OF YOUR CHARGES then you won't overdraft no matter how they are ordered.
Spending more than what you have causes overdrafts.
Reordering ONLY affects how many overdrafts you have when you spend outside your means and fail to plan.
Remember... lack of planning on your part does not constitute an emergency on other people's part.
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|

|
by Irving Patrick Freleigh Posted Mon December 5, 2011 @ 2:45 PM
|
|
|
"I checked online to be sure the funds were available before making a withdrawal from the ATM. They weren't."
And just like that, the problem comes sharply into focus.
Reply
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|

|
by PepperElf Posted Sun December 4, 2011 @ 6:56 PM
|
|
|
show me where it's illegal.
not understanding how your bank works on your part does not create "theft" on the bank's part
Reply
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
by JohnG Posted Sat December 3, 2011 @ 7:41 PM
|
|
|
Or by online you already meant at the ATM?
Reply
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
|
|
|
Sorry, but this is no scam or rip off, nor is it theft or fraud. You should never rely on the balance that you get from the website or the ATM, there not real time balances. I keep a checking register and the only thing I use the website for is to see what has come in in order to check it off in my register. I'm with BOA and they reorder transactions from largest to smallest in that day. I don't care in what order they redo it in because I have enough in there to cover. I've been with BOA for 20+ years and haven't had a overdraft with them in over 10 years.
I'm not saying that I agree with the reordering or with the way the banks conduct there business, it's just that the majority of the problems that banking customer have can be avoided with the use of a checking register whether it be online or paper. I would highly recommend that you, or your girlfriend, try using one (accurately).
Reply
|
|
 |
|
|
by Retail Veteran Posted Fri December 2, 2011 @ 10:58 PM
|
|
|
Did you make the withdrawal from the ATM or did your girlfriend? If it is your girlfriend's account, she needs to contact the bank via phone or in person. Writing a letter on her behalf will not accomplish anything. It is her responsibility to keep track of how much money she has in her account and what transactions are outstanding that will take money out of her account. They make software you can use to track your spending and manage your bank account better.I have had a checking account since the late 70's and NEVER had INSF fee. I know how much money is in my account and what transactions are outstanding. I never rely on the balance online or on the ATM receipt.
Reply
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
Hey bud,
by Jay S. Fri December 9, 2011 @ 1:44 PM
|
|
|
|
|

|
Well,
by Jay S. Sat December 10, 2011 @ 10:35 AM
|
|
|
|
|

|
re:
by Jay S. Sat December 10, 2011 @ 5:41 PM
|
|
|
|
by douggieboy Posted Sat December 10, 2011 @ 9:59 PM
|
|
|
... on this account. I don't have it on my other account either, so if funds haven't cleared a few days after making a deposit, and that money isn't available, no ATM will process a cash withdrawal.
The first problem is incorrect telling us that the funds have cleared, when they haven't. The second problem is loaning $26 at 170,000% interest, and then staggering subsequent small charges, to maximize how many more excuses they can create to continue stealing from the account, at $37 a whack.
If you think that's right, ask your neighborhood loan sharks what kind of interest they'll charge you for an overnight loan of $26, then ask yourself whether or not what the thieves at CItizens are doing should be legal.... on larger sums, most are happy with an aggregate annualized return of 120%, up to about 180%.
CItizens might still come clean on this~~ I'm offering them every chance.
Reply
|
|
|
|
by Jay S. Posted Sun December 11, 2011 @ 6:56 PM
|
|
|
So to answer my question: No, you didn't.
K thanks.
Just get a new bank.
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
Really?
by fishbjc Sun January 1, 2012 @ 8:57 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
Question:
by Ben G. Tue January 24, 2012 @ 8:51 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|