 |
|
|
by Wendy C. Posted Wed April 25, 2012 @ 1:02 PM
|
|
|
I coupon and I've discovered that Wal-Mart will pull products when the consumer will get them for free.
When I read the title I immediately figured it was Wal-Mart.
Reply
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
by PepperElf Posted Mon April 23, 2012 @ 7:19 AM
|
|
|
i still see no proof other than conspiracy theories that a sale was why they pulled it.
After all if that was the case then there would never ever be sales.
O_o
Reply
|
|
|
by Arkaneinc Posted Wed April 25, 2012 @ 3:46 AM
|
|
|
I'm not forgetting that. I know that they get reimbursed. Issue has been resolved. The official response was basically "this should have never happened. It did. There was no reason for the product to be pulled. It will be investigated and dealt with."
I did make an assumption that it was pulled to coincide with the sale. This was based off the day it was pulled it was on sale with a great coupon. In both instances. This shortly happened after the Hanford,CA. See story here: http://www.hanfordsentinel.com/news/local/full-story-employees-arreste d-in-plot-to-defraud-local-walmart/article_d082a170-6e30-11e1-afbf-001 9bb2963f4.html
I suspected the answer I would get would be that it shouldn't have happened. Which is the answer I received from the company. My only intention was to get the information to the company. One of the managers even thanked me for this complaint making it's way to the corporate offices because until they contacted him the information was never relayed. Hopefully this response clears everything up. Since both managers have "no idea" why the product was pulled I couldn't give any evidence one way or the other.
Reply
|
|
 |
|
|
by Batman Posted Tue April 17, 2012 @ 1:32 AM
|
|
|
Coincidence.
Im not a conspiracy theorist; therefore I do believe this is more coincidental than anything.
For every couponer, there are many more who pay full retail price. For a retailer to pull items, just so they dont lose the pennies on coupons/ad matches, etc. just would not pay. Consider even at minimum wage how much they are paying to have one or more employee pull stock, just to not allow some customers to use a coupon and price match items.
If they did, their stores would be empty on many items, and they would not sell a whole lot.
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|
|
by tali Posted Sun April 15, 2012 @ 9:49 PM
|
|
|
I think appearances speak a lot here. I googled recalls for Allegra and Farmer John Hot Dogs. Neither showed a recall or the possibility of one. I work for a grocery store and while we sell Allegra, but not the hot dogs, there was no indication of a recall on the Allegra. And since that is my department, I would have been aware of it. Whether or not WalMart is pulling product with the purpose of with holding sales due to price matching/coupons, it does look fishy.
Reply
|
|
 |
|

|
by PepperElf Posted Sat April 14, 2012 @ 12:58 PM
|
|
|
Your entire premise is that walmart went out of the way to fake a recall just to deny customers the chance to use a coupon or to price match.
Believe me I'm sure the stores would have preferred selling you the product.
The problem is, if there IS a recall in the air, they have to cover their assets. Which means pulling a product if there's a potential health risk.
And simply because it's cheaper to piss off one or two customers when they say "no we can't sell it" ... vs paying out big bucks on lawsuits if the recall proves to be true.
Besides... if something is possibly being recalled, why would you want to put it in your body anyway? Sure it might be on sale but if it turns out to be harmful or deadly... just how much do you really save if you end up sick or dead from using it?
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
why would you go to 3 different WalMarts, looking or one that woould match the Food4Less price? Why not just go to Food4Less? Wouldn't you spend more in time and gas?
Please don't misunderstand, I don't think your complaint is invalid. If they are doing what you think, I agree that it could back fire and create question about the quality of a product when one doesn't really exist. I'm sure the manufactures would not be happy. Plus, it's pretty tricky.
Reply
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|
|
by Retail Veteran Posted Sat April 14, 2012 @ 12:39 AM
|
|
|
Walmart's price match policy does state that an ad from their competitor is required and that some restrictions apply. It also says some restrictions apply fro coupons as well. I take that to mean that a coupon cannot be redeem for more than the value of the item. The policy states to see stores for details. I don't think it is right for anyone to receive money back from a coupon which, if you wish to redeem the full value of a $1 coupon for an item that is $.79, that is what you are attempting to do.
Reply
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
One more thing:
"if there is any coupons that would make the item trigger overage the product gets pulled"
If their computer/tracking system is this good, then Walmart has no excuse for not having prices ring up correctly!
Reply
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
I think you should take this complaint to the appropriate agency in your state that deals with this. A call to the consumer affairs division of your state's attorney general's office should be a good place to start.
Reply
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|
|